Resolution-PC 92-73~,u~~d•.
RESOLUTION NO. PC92-73
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS510N
THAT PETITIUI~ FOR COPJDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3499 ~E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petitian for Conditianal Use Pprmit for certain real prop~rijr situated in tho Ciry of
Anahe3m, County of Orar~ge, State of Californfa, describod as:
LOT 9 AF TRACE N0. 3313, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CAUFORNIA, AS PER MAP REGORDED IN BOOK 107, PAf3E(S) 34
THIROUGH 37 INCLU5IVE, OF MISCEUANEOUS MAPS, IN THE dFFICE OF THE
GOUNTY RECORpER OF SAID COUN'TY.
EXCEPTING 7HEREFROM THA"' PORTION IYING NORTHEFlLY OF LIfVE
PAHALLEl. WITH AND DISTANT SOUTHERLY ?_20.OJ FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT
AIJGLES, FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOl' 9.
~EING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PAFlCELS 1 AND 2 AS SHOWN UN A MAP RECORUEn IN BOOK 145, PA~~S ?.2
ANO 23 OF PARCEL MAPS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the
Civic Center in the City of Anah~~m ~n June 15, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., notice Af said p~~blic
hoaring having been du{y given as required by law and in accardance with the provisions
of the Anahoim Mimicipal Cods, Chapter 18.03, to h~ar and consider evidence for and
against said proposed conditional use permit ~nd to investig~te ~nd make findings and
recommendations in connection therewitli; and
WH~RE~~S, said Commission, after due insp~ction, investigation and study
mad~ by itself and in its behalf, and after dus considaration oi ail evidon~e s~nd ropurts
offered at said hearin~, does find and determine tho following faats:
1. 7fiat the pro~osed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authoriz~d by Anah~im Municipal Code Sections 18.61.050.05Q, 18.61.05U.070
and 18.61.050.072 to permit an auto leasing facility with 6,000 sq.ft. 09 auta
inspoction/preparation area and an outdoor e~tomotive storage area ior a maximum of
144 vehicles.
2. That the petltioner stipulatad at ~he public hearing that the auto
inspvction/proparation area has been reduced to 4,9.33 square feet.
3. That the proposed use is aroperly one for which s conditional use
permit is authorized by the Zoning Code;
CR1519MS -1- PC92-73
4. That tho proposed use will ~rot adverse{y affect the adjoining land
uses ond the growth and development of 4he ~r~~ in which it is proposod to be located;
5. That the size and shape of ~he site fnr the propased use is adequata
to alic~w the full devolopment of the prc~posecl use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular ~roa ror to the peaca, health safery, and generai walfare;
6. That tho traffic g4nerated by the proposed use will nat impose an
undue burden upon the streets and h`ghways designed and improved to carry the traffic
in tho arsa;
7. That the granting af the c;onditiQnal us~ permit und~r tho conditions
imp~sod will not be detrimontal to the peace, hoalth, safetar and general welfare of the
citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim;
8, That #ho propnsod au!o leasing facility with an-site preparatian sn~
outdoor vehiclA storage is compatibl4 to the surrounding land uses and is not visible to
the ~eneral public;
9. Th~t the proposed use h~s more than adequate parking for the
operatir,n of the loasing facility and the outdoor vehicla starage; and
10. Tha: no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondenr,e was received in opposition to the aubJect
petition.
,~ALIFORNiA.ENVIRQN~IENTALOi~_A~TYACTFINDING: ThattheAnaheim
City Planning Commission has r~vie~-ed the proposal to permit an auto ledsinc~ faciliry with
4,933 sq.ft. of auto inspection/proparation are~ and ari outdonr automotive storage area
for a maximum of 144 v~hicles on ~an irre~ularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 4.69 acres, havinr~ a frontago of approximatoly 80 feet on the south side
of Palais Road, having a r~iaximum depth of ~55 ieet, being located approximately 710
feet east of the centerline of Anaheim Boulevard and furtlier described as 270 East Palais
Road; and does hereby approve the Negative Declarati~n upon flndin~ that th~
doclaration reflects tha independer: judgt~m~nt of the lead ag~ncy and that R has
considered tho Negative Declaratfon together with any comments recaived during th~
public review process and further finding on the basis of thc~ initial study ~nd any
commonts received that there is no substantial evidencv that the proJect will h3ve a
significani eHect cn tho ern~ironment.
_2. PC92-73
NOW, 'fHEREFOFI~, BE IT RESOLVED tha~t the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grar~t subject Petition f~r Condi~tional Use Permit, upon the
follc,wing conditions which are hereby foun+~ to be a necessary prerequisito to the
propased use of the subject pro~erty in orde{ ta preserve the safety and generai welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim;
ThA" ther~ shall be no au#omobile repair (including, but not limited to, tune-ups, oil
Changes, det~iling, et:.) pormitted on tF-e premises. Only veh(cle inspection and
preparation for leasing shall be allowed.
2. That a~fan Sheet for salid waste storago and collection, and a plan for recycling
sh~li be submit#ed to the C~~partment of Maintenance for ravipw and ~pproval.
3. That the separ~tinn wall ~etween the proposed automotiile uses and the existir,g
church shail be upgraded to the proper occupancy st~nc~ar~s, as required by the
Building Division.
4. That pricr to cornmencement of the activity authorized by this resolution, rr prior
to issuanae of a building permit, or within a periud of one (1) year fram the date
of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 2 and ~, ebove-mentioned,
shall be complied with. Extensions fo~ further time to complete s~id conditions
may be granted in accordt~nce with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Mun:cipal
Cod~.
5. TF~at subject property shall be devolopad substantially in accordanc~ with plans
and specific~tions submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitianar and which
plans aro on fiio with the Planning Department marked Revision No. 1 of Exhibit
Nos. ~ and 2.
6. That approv~l of this applicatior~ ccnstitutes approval of the proposed request only
to the extent that it complfes with the Anahoim Municipal Zoninc~ Code and any
other applicable City, St~te and Federal ~egulations. Approval does not include
any action or findings as to compliance or approval ofi the request rs~arding any
other applicable ardinance, regulation ar requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RE:SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby flnd and determine tliat adoption of this Resolution is ;xpr~ssiy predicatect
upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part therenf, be declared inv~lid or unenf~~rceeble by
the final judgment of any court of com~stont jurisdictian, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
.3_ PC92-73
THE FOREGOIh1G RESOLUTlON was arlopted at the Pl~nning Commission
meeting of June 15, 1992.
~
c i ~_
~2 r•-c 'L ~
CHAIRNiAN ANAHEiM CI'TY P ~ NlNP~~OM iSSION
ATTE~T:
~~~r~~~~~
S~CRET RY, . NaHEIM CIN ?LANNING COMMISSION
STATE O~ CALIFORNOA )
COUNTY OF AR4INGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAH~IM )
I, Mmrgarita S~olorio, Sec~etary of ths Anaheim City Planning Comr~iission,
da hereby certi~r that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission rield on June 15, 1992, by tho following vote of
the members thoreof:
AYES: COMMISSIaNERS: BOUAS, BRISTOL, HELLYER, HENNINGER, M~SSE,
ZEMEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: N0~lE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEFtS: PENAZA
IN dNITNESS WHEREOF, I have lierounto sat my h~nd this ~~'u' day of
_ C~ ~;yr`'. , 1992.
~ ~'~'_~~c,. ~ . ~ ~ale.w..o~
SECAETA Y, ~ A~IEIM CITY P~ANNIfVG COMMISSION
-4- PC92-73