Resolution-PC 93-81: "~ ~ i
RFSOLUZION N0. PC93-81
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVA~ OF
RECLASSIFICATION N0. 87-88-57
WHEREAS, on Juno 2Q, 198a the Anahelm Ciry Planning Commission approved Reclassificatlon
No. 87-88•57 in conjunctlon with Conditional Use Permit No. 3006 to rezone subJoct property irom the RS-A-
43,000 (Residential/Agricuitural) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limltodj Zone) and to permft a 3-story, 1~6
unit motel and accessory uses wlth waiver of minimum number of parking spaces on properry located nn
the o~st sido ai Beach Boulevard approximateiy 900 teet south of the centerline of Llncoln Avenue and
further described as 212 South Baach Boulovard; and
WHEREAS, Resolutian No. PC88•154, adopted in conJunctlon wlth Reclasslticatlon No. 87-88-57,
includes a requirement that Conditio~~ Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4(porteining to co~structlon of a relief sewer,
inatallat~on of street Ilghting facilities, payment of the street tree fee, and payment of a fee in connection wkh
str~et tmprovements to reduce the level of service irom "F" to "E" at the Intersection of Beach Boulevard and
Llncoln Avenue) be completed prfor to the Introduction of an ordinance razon(n~ the subJact property or
within a period ot one year, which~ver occurs first; and
WH~REAS, Rosolutlon No. PC88-155, adopted in conJunction with Conditlonal Use Permft No.
30Q6, tnr,ludes a requlrement that certaln conditions of approvAl be comploted prior to issuar:;,e of a building
permit or within a period of one year, whlchever occurs first; and
WHEREAS, the petitloner hss requested that the above-mentloned conditions of approval of
Reclassirication No. 8T-88-57 be trancferred as conditions of approvel to Cond(tlonel Use Permit No. 300f,;
and
WMEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a publ(c hearfng at the Civic Center In tho
City of Anahaim on July 12, 1~J93, et 1:30 p.m., notfce oF sAid publlc hearing having been duly given as
reaulred by law and in accordAnce wlth the provisions af the Anaheim ~Jlunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to
hear and consider evicienco tor and against said proposed amendment and to irniestigate and make
findings and recommendationa in connection therewith; and
WI-IEREAS, said Commfssion, aftei~ duo inspectian, investigation and study made by ftaolf and
in its behalf, and aker due consideration of ell evidence and reports oHered at safd hearfng, does tind and
determ(ne the following facts:
1. That the posting of bonds and payment ofi cash related to tlie necessery publlo
Improvements can be required prior ta the fssuenc~ of a building permit ~or tho proJect assxlatgd wRh
Conditional Use Permit No. 300a;
2. Tl~at the Public Works Qiv(sio.i has reviewed subject request and doos not opposo ft;
3. That no one indicated their presence at sald public hearing In oppositlon, and that no
correspondence was rocefved in opposition to tho subject petttion; and
4. That transferring the conditions of epproval irom Rosolutlon No. PC88-154 t~ Resolutlon No.
PC88-15b results in the unconditional approval oi Reclassif(catlon No. 87-SB-57.
;;~~y~
'~h
,,.
CRt 839MS.wp .1. PC93-81
i^
GAI.IFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL C~UALITY ACT FINDING: That thA Anaheim City Pla~nfng
Commisslon haa reviewed the proposal to amend the conditions of approval by deleting certaln conditlons
from Reclasslifcation No. 87-88-57 and adding them to Condit(onal Use Permit No. 3006 and claes hareby
find thet the Negative Declaration previously approved fn connectlon with sald zonin~ petkions Is adoa~:ate
to serve as the requ~red environmontel documentation in connectlon with this request ~pon flnciing that
the declaration reflects the independent Judgement of the lead agency, and that !t has consldered tha
Negative Declaratlon together with any commAnts received during the publlc rovlew process, and further
finding on the basis of the initial study and eny comme~ts recaived th~t there Is no subatantlal evklence
that the projeat wfll have a signiflcant effect on the environment.
NOW, ThlEREFORE, BE IT RESOWED that tho Anaheim City Planning Commiasion does
hereby amend tho conditlons of approval of Resolutian No. PC88•154, adoptod In connection with
Heclassiflcation No. 87-8D•57, in their entirety to read as follows:
1. That approval of tlds application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the ex~end that
it complles with the Anaheim Municfpal Code and any other appllaable City regulatlons. Approvai
does not includo any actlon of tindings as to complience or epproval of the reques4 ~egarding eny
other applloabie ordinance, regulation or requlrement.
'THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIQN wa3 adopted at the Pianning Commisslon meating ~f
July 12, 1993. ^ ~
/ ~
CHAIRMAN PR •TEMP E
ANAHEIM LITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ A ~
CRETARY, A G~li CI'fY PLANNING COMMIS510N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet t~ Jensen, Secretary of the Analieim City °lenning Commisalon, do hereby cenHy
that the toregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meetfng of the Anahefm City Planning
Commissfon held on July 12, 1y93, by the tollowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDS7UN, CALDWELL, MAYER, MESS~, PERAZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HENNINGER
IN WITN'cSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7~day o1G~~i-~~ /,~~ 1993•
~
RETARY, ANAH ff CITY PLANNINCi COMMISSION
i
•2-
PC93-61 ~
i
~
~
,~
;u
,.~i~~.