Resolution-PC 93-89~ ~.
, ,
g~,^~OLUTION NO.~ 3•89
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FQR CONDITIONAL U5E PERMIT NO. 3622 BE GRAPITED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commisalon did recefve a verlflRd Petitlon for
Conditional Uso Permi: ior certain real property altuated in the Cfty of Anaheim, County of nrange, SWte
of Californla, described as:
PARCEI. i, IN THE CITY OF ANAWElM, COUNTY OF ORAN~E, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOQK 2, PAGE 1 OF PARCEL
MAPS, IN 7HE OFFICE UF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHERF.AS, the Cfry Pianning Commission did hold a public hesring at the Civlc Center
in the City of Anaheim on July 26, 1993 at 1:30 p.m., notice of sald publfc hearfnp havfng been duly gbon
as required by law and In accordance with the provisiona oi tha Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and c~~nsider ovidence for and agalnst said proposed aonditional use permit and to Invastigate end
meke ffndings and rocommendations fn connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, sald Commisslon, after due inspoction, investigatlon and study mado by ftself
and In fts behalf, and after due conaideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does ifnd
and determine the following facts:
t. Thet the proposed use is properly one tor which a conditional uae permit is authorizod by
Anahelm Munic(pal Code Sections 18.81.050.050 and t8.61.050.070 io permit retnil sales and repair of
boats, marine equlpment, accessories and supplies, with waiver of:
~actions 18. _~Q50.02 2- ,~i~jp,sila.,r~mber of ~arkfna s~aceg.
t8.08.050.022 (~,~~, requlrecl; ~ existing)
,~.Q6,050.0222
18•Og•050.0223
18,0 .050,,Q,~
~,8•06•OBO
~pd 18.81.088.05Q
2. That the parking variance will not cause an Increase In traHic congestion in the fmmediste
vicin(ty nor adversely aHect any adJoining land uses because a parking demand study tor the specHic
proposed a~ctivitfes wa. submitted by the petltloner and approved by the Cl:y TraHic And Trnnsportation
Manager; and
3. That the granting of the parking veriance under tha conditions fmposed will not be
detrimental ta the peace, he~ith, satety or genoral weltere of the citizens of the Ciry of Anahelm;
4. That the proposed use, inotud(ng an indoor ahawroom and outdoor disptay, i.s one for
which a condhfonal use permit Is suthor(znd by the "Loning Code;
5. That tl~e proposed uso wilt nat edversely aHect the adjoinfng tand uses and the growth and
developmant of the area in which It is proposed to be located;
8. That thp siz9 and shape of the site (or the proposed use Is adequate to a11ow the full
devetopment ot the proposod use in e manner not d^!~imental to the part~cular arna nor to the peace,
health, satety and general welfare;
CR185E3MS.wp -1- PC93-89
~
i
~"~.~,
~
l
~
~ ~
,~
4
i~
:r
'~
a "r
~-. t~..
7. That the traHic generated by the proposed uae wili not Impose an undue burden on the
streeta and highways deslgned and improved to carry the traffic In the area;
8. 7hat the granting ~f the condftional use permit under the conditlons imposed will not be
detrimental to the peace, heaith, sa(ety ancl flenerel welFara of the citizens of the Gity of Anahoim; and
~. That no ono indiceted their presence at sald public hearing fn opposltlon; and that no
correspandenca ~vas recefved in oppositlon tn the subject petitlon.
~,ALIFQF~yIA ENVIRONMENTA~, ~UALITY ACT FINDINC3: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commfasion has reviewed the proposai to permit retail sales and repeir of boats, marine equipment,
accessorles and supplies, with waivor of minimum number of parkinp spaces on a rectangularlyshaped
parcel of Iand cons(stir!g of approxfmatoly 1.38 acres located at the northeast corner of Liberty Avenue
and Lomon S4reet, having approximate irontages of 217 feet on the noKh side of Llberty Avenue and 240
feet on the east side of Lemon 5treet and further descrlbed as 1904 North Lemon Stroet; and does hereby
approve the Nogative Der,laration upon flnding that the declaration reflects the inclependent judgament of
the iead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaretion together with any comments recelved
during the public review proceas and turthor tinding on the basls of the Initial study and any comments
received that there is no substantlAl evidonce that the proJect wlll have a signlilcant effeat on the
envlronment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV~D that the Anaheim City Planninp Commisslon does ~
heroby grant subject Petiti~n for Conditlonal Use Permit, upon the fiollowing conditions whi:h are hereby
found to b¢ a necessary prerequfsite to the propoaed use of tho subject property In order to preserve the
safety ~nd general weiiare of the Citizens ot the Ciry of Anaheim:
1. That the outdoor dlaplay of boats shall be Ilmited to the three (3) spaae display area shown on
Exhibk No. t.
2. That there shall be no outdoor storage, ropair or display of bogts permitted wfthin any designated
Automoblle parking area.
3. That no 9ags, balioons, placards or othor advertising dev(ces or signage shall be placed on the boats
be(ng displryed outdoors.
4. That a traffic signal assessment tee equalfng the dfHerence between the Industrlal e~id commercial
assessmont fees ahall be ~id to the City of Anaheim in an amount as estabilshed by City Counci!
Resolution.
8. That plans shall be submitted to the Ciry Traffic and Transportation Menaper fur hla reviaw and
approvAl shawing confotmance wfth the tateat revislons of Enginoering Stendard Pian Nos. 43a Rnd
602 pertaining to pnrking standards and drNeway locationa. Subject property shali thereupon be
d~veloped and mAlntafned in contormance with eald plans.
6. That subJect properry shall be developed substantfally ,n accordance with plans and specNfcations
submittod to the City of Anaholm by tha petitioner and wh(ch plans are an Itle with the Plannfng
Department marked Exhlbit No. 1.
7, That Condition Nos. 4, 5 and 6, above-mentioned, ehall be compteted wfthfn a perlod of thirty (30)
days irom the date of this resoiutfon.
` ~,
}
'~ ~~rr.
-2- PC93-89
f~"'`
Q"'''~
8. That approval of this appl„ation constitutos approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anahelm Municfpal Zoning Cade And any otfier applicabl~ City, S!ate and Federal
regulatfons. Approval does not include any action or ilndings as to compllance or a~pr~val af the
requost regardfng an,y other appllcable ordinanae, regulatlan or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon does hereby find
and deiermine that adoptlon of thls Resolutlon is exprossly predicated upon applicant's compliance with
each and all of the conditlons harelnabove set forth. Should any such conditlon, or any pan thereof, be
declarod Invalid or unenforceable by 4he final Judgment of any c rt of corripetent Juriedictlots, thon thls
Resolutian, and any approvals herein contalned, ahall be dee null and vold.
THE FOREGOfNG RESOLUTION was adc,~ed~thp~ Pla~ig Commisslon meeting of
July 26, 1993.
.
ANAHEIM CITY PI~4NNING~OMMISSIQN
ATTE5T: /
CRETARY, ANAbf_ ~;ITY PLANNINCi COMMISSION
~~
STATE OF CALIFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L. Jensen, Secretary of the Anahefm Ciry Plannirg Commisslon, do hereby certKy
that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meetin~ of the Anahelm City Planning
Commisslon held on July 26, 1993, by the tollowing vote of the membars thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:I~ONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NANE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sot my hand this ~y~(i day Af
/~r~~~_, 1993.
l_~. ~
ECRETARY,~ CITY Pl~1NNING COMMISSION
,:,
'`%i
~~.
i
~
.3. PC93-89
,