Resolution-PC 94-109RE OL~ITION N0. PC9~1••i09
A RESOLUTION AF THE ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMI~510N
TMAT PE"71TION FOR RECLASSIFICATIQN N0. 94-95-02 BE GRANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY
WHEREAS, the Anaheirn City Pianning Commission did rocelve a verified petition for
Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Courty of Orango, State of Calitorn(a,
described as iollows:
I.OT 2 OF TRACT N0. 230, JEWETT SUBDIVISION, AS PER MAP THEREOF,
RECORUEQ iN ',OOV< 13, PAGE ?.5, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID
ORANGE COUNTY.
WNtFlEAS, the City Plannfnfl Comm(ssion did hold a public hearing ~t the Civic Cantor in
tho City of Anahoim on August 8, 1J9h at t:30 p.m., notice of sai~ pubtic ho~ring havfng been duly given
as requi~ed by law and in accardance wilh the prov(slons af the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chaptor 18.03,
to h~ar end consider svidencA for and against said proposed reclas.sificotion snd to investfgate and make
findin~s and recommendations in connection there~vith; and
WHEFiFAS, ~aid Comrnission, aftar duo inspoctfon, invostigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and sfter due consideration of all evldenco and reports offered ~t said heArinp, does finc;
anc! dotermine tho follawinfl facts:
t. That the petitEoner proposes reclassificAtlon of subject property from tho RM-1?.00
(Hesidential, Mialti-Family) Zono to th~e CL (Commercial Limited) Zone.
2. That the Anahelrn General Plan designates subject property for Commercia~ Gane~al land
uses.
3. That tho proposed reclassific;ation ot subJect property is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly and proper develupment of the community.
4. '~hat thu proposed r~clzesffication of subJect property dons properly relate to the zones nnd
thefr permftted uses locally establ(shed in close proximity to subJect pruparty and to the zunes and thefr
permittod uses generally establishecl throughout the communi!y.
5. That no one In~icated their presenco at safd public h~aring in opposition; and that no
~orrespondence was received fn opposition to subject petitlon.
CAI.IF RNIA ENVI NM~N ~A~Q~.A.~~TY.A T F ~: 7hat tha Anahafm City Pl~nning
Commission has revfewod ttie proposal to reclassify subject property from the RM-1?.00 (Resldential, Multi-
Family) Z~no to th~ CL (Commerclal Limited) Zono to permft a cQnstructicm company offEce heodquerters
withln an existfng t,t3~1-squaro foot residentlal structure and detached garage with wafver oF required site
screening on a rectangularlyshaped parcel of land consisting of approximataly 0.16 acre, havfnfl tt frontage
of 50 foet on the east sida of Anaheim Boulevard, having a m~ix(mum depth of approximateiy 742 teet, being
located approximately 2G5 feet soutt~ of tho canterlino of Valenr,:a Avenuo and fu~thQr describod as 874
South Anaheim [ioulevard; and dues hereby approve tho Negative Declaration upon finding that tho
declaration reflects the independen! ~udc~ement of the lead agoncy and that it has considered tfie P~QgatEve
Ueclarat(on togother wlth any c~mments receiveci during tho publio review process anci fuKlier linding on
the basis of th~ initial study ancl any comments recoiveci ttiat there is na substantial evidonce that the pro~ect
will have a signilica~t eifect on the environment.
CRZ 167MS.V~'P -1- PC94-i 09
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HESOLVED that tfie Anaheim City Piannfng Cnmmisslon doos
~iereby approve the subJect Pet(tion for Rociassifioation to authorize an amendment to the Zonln~ Map of
the Anaheim Mun(cipal Code to exclude tho ~bove-described property from the RM-1200 (Residentfal, Multi-
Family) Zone and to incorporate said described property into the CL (~ommercial Limited) Zone,
unconditlonally,
8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this .ppiication constitutes approval of the
propos~d request or~ly to the extent that it complies with tha Anahalm Munfcipal Zoning Code and any o;her
applicable City, State and Fedoral regulatlons. Approval does not include any actlan or flndin~s as to
complianco or approval of the request reperdiny any otho~ appllcable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
Bfc IT FURTHER RFSOLVED, that this reso~utfon shall nat const(tute a rezonln~ of, or a
commitment by the CEty to rezone, the subJe~t property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of
the City Council which shall be a legisldtive act which may be approved or deniod by the Cfty Council at
its sole discretion.
TH~ FOREGOING RESOLUTION wps adoptod at the Plann(ng Commission meeting oF
August 8, 1994.
_ ~~ ' ~ ~~-
C AIRWO AN, ANAHEIM Ci rY NNING COMMISSIOiV
ATTEST:
n oie..y,~
~ SE RETARY, ANAHEIM , Y PLANNING COIVIMISSION
l ~
STATE OF C~LIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI1Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, Janet L. Jensen, Secretary of tha Rnahefrn Cfty Pianning Commission, do hereby certify
that tho foregoing resolution was passed r~nd adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Plannln~
Commission he-d on August e, 199A, by the followfn~ vote of th~ members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIUNERS: BOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, PEFtAZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIONFRS: NONE
ABSENT: COMb11SSI0NERS: MESSE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havo hereunto set my hand th(s~ day of ~~~ee~~,p~
1994. V
~o~~, ~
/ CRE ARY, ANAHEIIy}~ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
L
-2- PC94• 10~