Resolution-PC 94-13~SOLUTION Nn~ PC94-13
A RESOI.UTION O~ THE ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION
AMENQING CERTAIN CONDI710NS OF APPROVAL OF
CGNUlTIONAL USF F'ERMIT NO. 3566
WFIEREAS, Conditional Uso Permit No. 3568 to nermft the phased construr,tion o( a regional
sho~pin~ center uuith indoor entertainment facilit(es, an automolNe repafr and parts installatton facllity In
con~unctton with e major retail tenant, sem~-enclosed restaurants (oucdoor dining/food court), and an
auditorium; commun(ry meoting room, and with watvens of (o) minimum structurai sotback abutttng an ar:erial
highway, (b) landscaping of requfred yards, (c) permitted encroachment into roqutred yard arc~as, (d)
roqu(recl parkin{~ lot IandscapinQ, (e) maximum sign area, (~ n~auimum number oi freestnnding signa, (g)
maximum Hroa of ir8estending signa, (h) minim~m dists~nce betwoen ireestandtng and/or •oof signs, (J)
maximum he(ght of tresstanding signs, Q) mFUCimum number o( roof signs, (k) maxtmum area of roof sipns,
(I) maxfmum height ot roof signs, and (m) maximurr~ height oi Illuminatod root signs) was approved by tho
City Council on July 27, 199~ under Rusoiution Nu. 93R-ifi~, lollawinc~ approva~ by the Planninfl
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said Resolutlon No. 9aR-162 includas the following conditfon ot opproval:
'3. That the autnmotive services bay area shall bo oriented to the south away trom
Loara Streat anct Euclid Street and nearby residential uses, and sx(d sarvicd bay
area shall be screened trom publlc vlew from ali rights-of-way Inaludtng tho Santa
Ana~;.~torstate 5 Freeway by a six (6) toot high block wall, landscaped bonn ar
combinatlon thereof. Trees shall be planted adJacent to the autom~tive sorvic~ bay
area ta ensure adequato screening and to reduce noise intrusion tnto nearby
residential prouertlos."
WHEREAS, the petitionar has requesteri t~ amenci said conditlon ot approval pertaining to the
orientati~n of t~utomothre servics bays; end
WHFRFJIS, the Chy ~lanning Commission did hold a puWic hearing at the Civfc Center in
the City ot Anaheim on February 7, 1994, at 1:30 p.m., notfco oi said public hearing havinp boen d~~ly
9'rvon ea requtred by law and In accordanco wNh the provistons ot tho linahaim Municf~at Code, Cha!~ter
t8.03, to hear nnd consider evidence for ar~d again~~ sakl proposecl ameixlment and to irrvestigate and
make tindings nnd recommondations In connc-ctfon ti:erewflh; anct
WHEREAS, said Commissfun, afler di~e inspectlan, Imeattgatfon and study mado by ftsalf
and In ita behalf, end a(ter due conaidoraUon e: all Jvidence end reports Mlerad at said haaring, does find
and determino thu fdlowing lacts:
1. 1'hat tho proposed projoc:t rematns in compliance whh tho Anaholm Ciar~eral Plan;
2. Tl~at, besed on thA ovidonce presented, th!s propos.a) reorientati~n of thH automotiva aervica
bays logether wfth tho Inntallatlon ol a t2•toot high aottnci wall will nol adversoiy impacc r-qarby and
ad~acent land uses nor ba det~trt~ntal to the peace, health, safety or general waitare of the surrourxlfng
community;
CH2O04MS.WP •t- PC94•S3
3. That there have been no Cocio Arriendments or new City Councii policies en~cted sinr,e this
use p~rmR was appraveci, which amendments would adversely aHect this use permit.
4. That no one indicatod their presenco at said public hoaring In opposition; and that no
correspondence was recelved in oppusition to the subJect potition.
~IFORtJIA NVIRONMENTAL ~UAI.I'fY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Cf~y Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to amond Condition No. 3 of Rasolutlon Mo. 93R-16~ pertafrdng
to the orientatiun of automative service bays fn con~unction with a prevlously-approved maJor regiona!
shopping center and do9a hereby tlnd that Ffnal ~nvironmenta~ Impact Rep~n (E~R) No. 31B prevl~usly
caRified in connectton with Condftional Use Pormit No. 3566 Is adequete to sarve as the roqulred
environmental documer~tatlon In connection wlth this re~uost upoR findlnd that the doclaration reAects tho
inaependent ~ud~ement of the lead agoncy and th~t it has cunsldero9 th~, propasa~ together with any
comments receiv~d during the public rovlew period and there Is no substtintla~ evidence that the proposed
site plan revis(on will have any addftior~l algnHicpnt Impacts beyond those analyzed and mkipated under
Final EIR No. 316.
NOV1l, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cfty Planning Commiss~on doas
haraby amend Conditlon No. 3 of Rosotution No. 9SR-162 to r9ad as ioilows:
"3. The drive-through automative sorvice bay area shP!I bo acousticelly screaned by a minirtwm twelva
It2) toot high suund barrfer wall to be located approximately torty-tivo (45) teet east ot the service
bay e:cit and parallel with Loara Street. Tho ssrvlce bay ~rea shall be screenod irom public view from
all rlflhts•of-way, ~~~cludfng ths San4u Ana Freaway (Interstate 5) by a sfx (e) foot high bluck wall,
landscaped berm or combtnatlon thereof. 7rees shall be ~lanted ad~acent to the Qutomotive service
bay area to ensu~e adequate scrt-ening and to (uRher reduce nolse Imrusion Into nearby residentlai
proFertles. Fiubber mats shall be installed snd usad around tc~ol areas to lower nolse levols (rom
droppad tools. Hours o1 automotNe sorvice operetions shall be Iimfted to 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M.,
seven (~) daya e week. Furthermore, preciso ptans fllustrating the luil automotlve service area
(fncluding the aforementioned screentng methods) shall be submitted to tho Zonirg Divislon for
consideration by the Planning Commlasion as a Reports nnd Recommendfltions item. These plans
shall b~ r~viRwod and approvod by the Planning Comrnisslon prior to the tssuance oi a building
permit."
and, turthor, that tho Ptanning Commission adds the idlowinQ now conditton:
"38. Thnt a nofse study sha~l be corxiucted ninety (SO) drays after the commencoment of tho automotN~
sorvice operatlon. If aaid stu~y indicc~tes that tha ru~ise Qonerated exceeds permitted Iwals, the
potitionor shall take appropriato action to mitigate nofso tmpacts to an acceptable luvel."
THF FOREGOIN(a RESOLUI'IVN was adoptecf et the Planning Commission meeting of
February 7, t~J4.
e'1~'~ ` .t'~-~-"~----
CFIAIRMAN PRO-TEMPQ E
ANAHEIM CiTY PIANNIN COMMISSION
A'TTEST:
~• ~
~~ "?.n~ t c. ~~c, u~rr.t
SECR TAR , ANAHEfM CtTY f'IANNItJG COMMISSION
2. PC94•S 3
STATE QF CALIFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CIN OF ANAHEIM )
I, ~Aargarlta $olorio, Secretary of the Anaheim Clry Planning Commission, do hereby ceRify
that the forogoing resolutlon was passed an~ adopted at u meeting of the Anahelm C~ty F'lanning
Commission held on February 7, 199~1, b1~ tho foliowing vote of the membors therooi:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: CAI.I~WELL, F!ENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE
NOES: CCIMMISSiONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, PERAZA, YAIT
h~~
IN WI7NES5 WIiFR~OF, I have hereunto set my hand thls ~'?
199d.
day of ~~2u~,
~ r.~Q C~
S CRETA ANAHEIM ClTY F~LANNING COWIMISSION
3-
PC94- t 3