Resolution-PC 94-136RESnLL171~N NO. PC9d-136
A RESOLUTION OF T HE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TF~AT PET-TION FOR CON~IITIONAL USE PER~iIT NQ. 3721 F3F GRANTED
WMEREAS, the Anaho!m City Pianning Commission did recoive a verified Petitlon +or
Conditional Use Permit for certain roal property situatad fn the City of Anahe(m, County of Orango, State
of California, described as:
PARCEL N0. 1 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 125, PAGES 1; AND 17
OF PARC~L MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF QRANGE
COUNTY, CAUFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dfd holci a public hearing at tho C:ivic Center
in the City of Anahelm on October 3, 1994 at 1:30 p.m., notice of sai~ public hoaring having been duly
given as raqulred by law and in accordAnce with the provisfons of the Anaheim Murlcipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hoar and consider evidence for and against said proposed condit(onal use permit and to
invost(~ate and mako ffndSngs and recommendat!ons in connection thorewitfi; and
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, efter due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and ait~r due cunsideratfon of all ovidanco and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determin~ the following facts:
1. Ttiat the proposed use is properly ane for which a conditional use permic Is authorized by
Anahaim Municipa~ Code Section 18.61.050.601 to permit an automotive repair and body shop with walver
of the following:
3ections 18Q~9~0•0222 - Minimum number of parking spaces.
18•06,08~ (~ spaces required;
,~nd 18.61.OFF.050 2~ proposed, as recommendQd by the
City's 7raffic and Transportation Manager)
2, That the petitioner's current 6,OOU sq.it. automotive rep~ir and body shop is located across
tho street and has operated without detriment to the surroundinc~ ar~a; and that the proposed facility will
be insicle a 12,000 sq.ft. building;
3. That the parking domand study, dated August 22, 1994 and prepared by TraHlc Safety
Enc~ineers, dotermined that a minimum of 25 spaces would be adequate for this speciffc use; ~nd that
the study was reviewed and approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manac~er;
4. That the parking variance will not cause an increase in traHic congestlon In the fmmediate
vicinfty nor adversely aHect any adJoininfl land uses;
5. That the c~ranting of tha parkinp va; iance under th~ conditions (mpused will not be
detrimental to tha peace, health, safoty or genoral welfarQ of the citizens cf the City of Anaheim;
6. That the proposed use is prope~ty one for which a cunditional use pormit is suihorizRd by
the Zoning Code;
7. 7hat the proposQd usa will not adversely aHect tl~e adJoining land uses and tho growth and
devolopment of the area in which it is praposad to be located;
CR2210M5.W P -1- PC94-136
8. That tho size and shape of the site for the proposed use ~s adeyuate to allow the full
d9velopmont nf the proposed uso in a mann~r not dotrimental to the particular area nor to the poace,
health, safety, ~nd general wolfare;
9. That the traffic genora4ed by the proposed use will not imposo ari ~ndue burdon upon the
streets and highways designgd and improved to carry the traffic in the araa;
10. That the grAnting of tho conditional uso permit under tha conditlons Imposed will not be
detrimentai to the peace, h~alth, safety and genoral welfare of the citizens of the City of Anahelin; and
11. That one (1) person indicated his presence at said Fublic hearing in favor; and that no
cc,rrespondence was received in opposition to the subject petltiori.
~ALIFORNIA ENVIRQNMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the pnaheim City Planning
Commission h~as reviewed the proposal to perm! an autumotive repafr and body shop with waiver of
rr~i~~irnum nurr~bor of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately
0.52 acre havfng a frontage of approxfmately 179 ieet on the north side oi Miralama Avenue, having a
maximum dopth of approximately 122 feet, being located approximately 355 feet east of the conterUno of
Tustin Avenue, and further described as 3627 East Miraloma Avenue; and does hereby approve the
Negative ~eclaration upon finding that the declaration re(lects the independent )udc~ement of the lead
ac~ency and that it has consldered the Negatfve Declaratfon together with any comments roceived during
the public review process and fwther finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments recelved
that there Is no substantlal evidence that the project wlll have a signfficant effect on the environmont.
NOW, THEREFORE, DE iT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plannfng Commission does
hereby grant subjoct Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the foliowing canditions which are I~ereby
found to be a noressary preroqufsite to the proposod use of the sub~ect property in order to preseNS the
safety and gonoral welfare of thA Citizens of ths City of Anahelm;
1. That no vehicles waiting for repa(r or customer pick-up shall be stored or parked outside the build(ng
overnight.
2, That any pruposed freestanding sign on subJect property shall be a monumont-type not exceading
oight =e) feet In height and ~hall be subJoct to the prlor review and approvai of the City Traffic and
Tr~nsportation Manager to deterrnine adequate Iines-of-sic~ht.
3. T{iat the total number of emplo~ees sha~l be limitod to a maximum of ten (10) and that a minlmurn
of twenty (25) parkin4 spaces shall be provided on sfte.
4. That plans shall be submitted to the City Tratfic and Transportatlun Mana~er for his revfew and
approval showing conformance with the latest revisions of Engineerinfl Standard Plan Nos. A36 and
602 pertafning to parking standards and drivaway locations. Subject property shall theroupon be
devetoped and maintained in conformance with said plans.
5. That trash storage areas shali be pruvided and maintafned In a location acceptable to the Department
of Maintenance and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Such
information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for buflding permits.
6. That a ~lan sheet for solid waste storage and collection and a plan for recycling shall be submitted
to the Departm9nt of Maintenance for review and approvat.
7. That subJect property shail be devoloped substantially in accordance with plan~ and speci(icatfons
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitloner and which plan is on file with the Planning
Department labeled Exhibit No. t.
_2_ PC94-136
8. That na outd~~~ ~~rac~e of, dlsplay of, or work on veh!cles or vohicular parts shall be permitted and
that all or.lsti~~~;~ uutdoor display and staraqe stiall be remavod and any existing outdoor worl<
terminated.
~J. Ttiat prior to commoncemont ~f tho activity authorized by th~s resolution, or prior to Issuance of a
buildin~ pormit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolutlon, wh(chever occurs
first, Condition Nos. 4, 5 and 6, above-mentloned, shall be complied with. Extensions far further time
to comptete said conditions may be granted in aacordai~oe with Section 1a.03.090 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
10. 7hat prior to final buildEng and zoning in5poctions, Condition No. 7, above-mentloned, shall be
complied with.
11. That ~pproval of this application constitutos approvai of the proposed reyuest only to the extent that
it complies with the Anahefm Municipal Zoning Code ar.d any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does nat include any actian or flndinfls as to campliance or approval of the
re~uest regarding any other applicable ord(nance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLVED that the Anahe(m Gity Planning Commissfon daes hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolutinn is Qxpressly predicAted upon applicant's comp~lance with
each and all of the conditlons herainabove set forth. Should any such cnndition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalld or unenforceable by the iinal Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals heroin contair.ed, shali be deemod null and void.
1'HE FOREGOING RESOLUT'IQN wss adopted at the Planning Commiss(on meot(ng of
October 3, 1894. ~ /J
~~'W a (i+G/~v''u~v'.>
C AIRWO AN ANAHEiM CITY NNING COMMISSION
AT*E~~
f~..~
l~.J-~'~ /
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSION
5TA7E OF CALIFQRNIA )
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, SecretAry of the Anaheim City Plannfnfl Commission, do heroby certify
that the foregoing resolutlon was pass~d and adopted at a meeting oi the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on Qciober 3, 1994, by the foliowing vote of the members theroof:
AYES: CONIMISSIONERS: BUYDSTUN, CAI_DWELL, MAYER, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEN7: COMMISSIONERS: HENNINGER, MESSE, TAlT
IN WITNESS WH[REOF, I have hereunto set my hand tliis ~~ day of
~~'~-'°G--' 1994.
~ ~"`
SECRETARY, ANAHtIM CITY P ~f ING COMMISSION
.g_ PC94-138