Resolution-PC 94-141RE L 1TION N0. PC94-141
A RFSOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CI7Y PLANNItJG C~JMMISSION
AMENDING THE EXHIBf'i'S AND CEHTAIN CONUITIANS OF APPROVAL OF
CONDITIpNAL USE PERMIT N0. 3538
WHEREAS, on Septembor 9, 1392 the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved
Conditional Use Permft No. 353A undor Resolution No. PC92-110 pormitting a private educ~tional iacility (etl~
grado through 12th grade) in conJunction with an ex(sting church and prescFiool on property tocated on the
south side of La Palma Avenue, approximately 665 feet oast of the ~enterlfne of Magnolia Avenue, and
further described ~s 2530 West La Palma Avenue (Grace Baptist Church); and
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. PC92-110 includes tho followin~ c~ndition of approval:
"1. That sub;ect facility shall be Iirnited to a maximum onrollment of one hundrod (120)
studants.
That suhject property shall be devoloped substAntlally in accordanc9 with plans and
specffications submitted to the City of Anafieim by the petitloner and wlilch plans are
on file with the Planniny Departmont marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3, includinq
refurbishment oi tfie Iandscapinfl."
WHEf~EAS, the petitfoner requests amendment to the conditlans ot approval pertt~ining to the
approved Exhibits and to the maximum permftced student enrollment (150 instead of 120) and wafver of
minimum number oF parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiss(on did ho~d a public hoaring at the Clvfc Center in
1he Cfty of Anahoim ~n October 17, 1994, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hoarfng having boen duly
glven as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of tho Anahefm Municlpal Cade, Chapter
t8.03, to hear and conslder evidonce for And r~gainst said proposed amendment And to invostlgate and
make findings and recommendations In connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, safd Commission, aiter du9 inspection, Invostigation and study made by itselt
and fn its behalf, and aftar due consideration of all evldence and reports ofiored at said hearing, doe~ find
and determine the following facts:
1. That tlie petitioner requests (a) amendmont to the cundit(ons ~~f approval pertalning to the
approved exhibits and to the maximum permitted student enrollrnent (150 instead of 120) and (b) approvai
of the following waiver, fn connection with a oreviously approved private Qducatlonal facility (grados 8
throuyh 12) located at 2530 West La Palma Avenue:
Section 1. 6.050.0266 - Mlnimum number of parkinq sp~ces•
18.06,g~.Q,g~7 224 rAquired; 11 proposed and rocommended
18.06,050.0268 by the Traffic and 7ransportation Mana~er)
QQ6.080
~nd 18.21~~Q4
2. That the parking walver is hereby den(ad on th~ basis that it was withdrawn fol~owin~ public
notification.
CR2222MS.WP -1 • PC94-141
3, That use of the parking facllities will be controlled by parking pormits that are issued tn
students.
4. That the incroaso In !he num~er of students from 120 to 150 wlll not be a slgnific~nt Increaso
in the overall operltiori af the church and school complex.
5. Triat the existing classrooms and play areas are located approximately 180 feet from the
single-family rosidences to the south.
6, That the existinfl school with an enrollment of 117 students has not had a detrimental effecx
on tho surrounding area.
7. 7hat no one indicated their presence at said public iiearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was roceivod in oppasition to the subject pntitlon.
~A;.IFORNIA ENVIR9NMENTAL QUALITY AC'T FINUIN :?h2t the Anaheim City Planning
Commisslon has revlewed tha proposal to amend the condittons of approval and the exliiblts of a
previously approvad pr(vato educationai ~acility and does heroby find that the Negativo Declaration
previously approved in connection with Conditinnal Use Fermit No. 3538 is adequate to serv4 ~s the
required environmentai documentation in connection with thls request upon finding th~t the declaration
reflects the independent ~udgoment oF the leaci agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaratton
together with any commants rACeived during tlie public review process and further findin~ on the basis
of the init(ai study and any commants rece(ved that there is no substantiai evidence that the proJect wiil
have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, 6E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
her9by amend Condition Nos. 1 and 4 of Resoluilon No. PC92-110 tu read as follaw3:
"1. 1'hat subJect facility shall be Iimited to a maximurn enrollment of one hundrRd fi(ty (150) students.
4. That sub(ect proporty shall be doveloped substantially in accordanco witli plans and spocificatlons
submitted to the C(ty of Anaheim by tho petitioner and which plans ~re on ffle with the Planning
Department marked Revislon No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. t and 2 and Er,hibit Nn. 3."
and, further, that the Plannfng Commissipn adds the follo~~ing new condition:
8. That prior to the increase in student enroltment, a fee in the amount ~f four hundred thirty three
dollars and thirteen cents ($433.13) shall bo paid to the City oF Anahc~im for sewer capacit~~ mitigation
purposes.
THE FOREGUING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Plannfnfl Commission moeting of
October 17, 1994. ~~ ~~~ ~ G~~~
~ Ah ANAHtIM CI'tY PLA NING COMMISSION
CMAIRWO ,
ATi'ES7: ' ~ /
d~l
~=~-~---~-~ ~"
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CIN PLANNING COMMISSION
.2_ PC94-1at
STA'1'E OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ~s.
CITY OF ANF+MEIM )
I, Edith L. Marr(s, Socretary of tho Anaheim City Planning Commisslon, do horeby certify that
the torogoing resolutfon was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anal~eirn City Planning Commissl~n
field on October 17, 1994, by the follo~vinp voto of the mernbers thereof:
AYFS: COMMISSIQiVENS: BOYQSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNIiVGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIQNERS: NONE
ABSENT: C4MMISSIONERS: NONE
r
IN WI i NESS WHEREOF, I have he;ounto sot my hand th.; ,_ ,. ~, day of _ l~r~r~ ~-~ ,
.e.l c
1994. ______ /, . ~ / .
~D (~ -' ~
SECRETAaY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON
_3_ PC94- I 41