Resolution-PC 94-165RESOI.UTION N0. PC94-1fi
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~N
AMENDING FiESOLUTION NO. 72R-322
ADOPTEQ IN CONNEC'TIQN WITH VARIANCE NO. 2375
WHEREAS, on August 1, 1972 the Anaheim City Council approved, in part, Variance No. 2375
undor Res~lution No. 72R-322 for waivers of minlmum front yard, minirnum !ot width, and minimum lot area
to establish en RS-5000(SC) "Residentfal, Single-Famlly" tract foliowing donlal by the Planninp Commfssion.
Subject proporty fs locatocl on the east side of Mohler Drive approximatet;~ 470 feet south of the centerline
of Ca{le Granada and further cJescribod as 180 N~rth Mohler Drfve; and
developer:
WHEREAS, said Rasoiution No. 72R-322 includos the tollowing stipulation made by the
'That sald varlance be granted, in part, subJect to the 4ollowing conditions and further subject
to the stipulltion by the peveloper that on the 6,000 to 6,500 square foot lo4s tf~ere would be
no two-story homes and theso homes woulci be I(mited to A rnaximum of 1,550 squnre (eet
of Ifvinc~ spacc~ and contefn no more than threo bedrooms."
WHEREAS, the petitioner requests arnen~ment to stitd term of approval to r~tain a dwelling
excoeding 1,550 square feet in size, consisting of 2 stories and containin~ 5 bedr~oms;
WHEREAS, tho City Planning Commission did hold a public heariny at the Givic Conter in
the ~ity of Anaheim on Decemuer 12, 199~t, ~t 1,30 p.m„ notica of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and fn accordanc~ with the provislons of tho Anaheim Munlcipal Codo, Chapter
t8.03, to he3r and cons(der evide~ce tor and aflainst said proposed amendment and to investigate and
make iindinfls and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aiter d~to Inspection, invesr~7ation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidenco and reports otiered at safd hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. 7hat Lot No. 52 of Tract No. 7730 (180 North Mohler Drive) i~ 6,000 sq, ft. in size;
2. 7hat thg dwelling at 180 Nortfi Mohler Drivo, which or(gfnally conslsted of 1-story, now
consists ot 2 stories (attic space which was converted to Iiving spaco);
3. That the dweliing, which was originally t,550 sq.ft. In size, now includes a secohd stnry
modif(cation {675 sq.it. Ilving space In the attfc) and an addition ('ta0 sq.it. built in 1981) for a tot~l floor
area of 2,405 sq.ft.;
4. That the dwelling, whlch orig(nally cont~ined three bedrooms, now conteins five bodrooms;
5. That the exfsting development of the property, a 2,4~5 sq.ft., 2-~tory house with five
bedrooms, comalies with the zoning and development standards of the underlying RS•7200 "Resident(al,
Single Family" Zone although It dces not comply with stiputations orfginally mado by the developer;
CR22Fi4MS.WP -1 • PC94•165
6. That the strlct application of the restrictlons imposed by Resolutlon No. 72R-322 c~aprivos
tl7e suaJect property of privileges enjoyed by other propertic-s in the same zoning classificatlan outside
Tract 7730, such as atlowing socond story additions, pormitting maximum lot coveraqe of 40°k, and putting
no Ilmit on the total number of bedroorns;
7. That the second story converslon and t~ie adciitlon have beon Integrated into the de~~Ign of
tho homA; and
8. That no one indicatod ti~elr presencu at said pubiic hearing fn opposition; that one int~rssted
person spoke; and that no correspondonce was recefved in opposition to the subject petition.
AL F RI~IA ENVIRONMEN7AL QUAI_I7Y AQ IND : i hat t~,, Anahalm City Plar.ming
Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby ffnd that the Neg~..ive neclaration previc~usly
approvod in connecNon with Vorianco No. 2375 is adeGuate to sorve as the roquired environm«ntal
documentation in connection with thfs roquest upon finding that the declaration reflects the indepen~ient
JudgPment of the lead agoncy and that it has considered the Negative Declaratlon together with any
comrrienes receivod during the public review process And furthor tlnding on the basis of the initial study
and an~r camment, recefvecl that there I~ no substantial evfdence that the proJect will have a sfgniffc:ant
effer,t ~n tho environmont.
NOW, THEREFORE, 9E IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plannfng Commisslon does
hieraby amend Resolution No. 72R-322, adopted in connect(an with Variance No. 2375, aa (ollows:
A. Amc~nd tho stipulation mado by tho developer and documented on pago 8 of sald rosolution, to reac!:
'That subJect var(ance be granted, In part, subJect to the fo(lowing cond(tlons ~nd furtF~er subJect to
the stipulatfon by the Developer that on the G,000 to 8,500 sq.ft. lots there would be r~o two•story
homes and these hornes would be limited to A maximum uf 1,550 sq.ft. of Ii~~ing space :~.nd contain
no more than thre~ bedrooms, with the except(on of 180 North Mohl~r Drive (Lot No. 52 of Tract No.
7730)."
B. Add the foltowing cond(tions:
3. That the owner of Lot No. 52 of Tr~ct No. 7730 (180 N. Mqhler Drive) shall obtain ell riecessary
bufiding permits needecl to legeli~e ~he att(c conversion.
4. That subject property shall be dQVeloped substantially In accordance with plans and s~secffications
submitted to the Cfty ~f Anahofm by the petitloner end which plans ar~ on filo with the Planning
Uepartm~nt marked Exhlbit Nos. 1 through 3.
5. That Conditlon No. 3, above-mentfoned, shall be completed withln a~erlocl of thirty (30) days
from tho date of this resolution.
6. That prior to tinal building and zoning Inspections, Condltion No. 4, abovo-mentioned, slzall be
complled with.
7. 7hat approvai of th(s applfcation constitutes approval of tho pmpused request only to the extant
that it complies with the AnAhelm Municipal Zonfng Code and any other appl(cable City, State and
Federal reflulations. Approval does not include any actlon ar ifndings as to compliance or
approval of the request regarding any othor appl(c~ble ord(nance, regulation or requirement.
.z_ PC94-165
~I
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adoptad at the Plann(ng Comm(sslon meeting of
December 12, 1994. ~
-~ , ~ ~~ ~
CfiAIRW MAN, ANAHEIM CIT PWNNING CO~AMISSION
ATf EST:
~ ` `~~~:
,.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C TY PIANNING COMMISSION ~
~
STA7E OF CAUFORNIA ) ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L, Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plann(ng Commission, d~ hereby aortlfy that
tha foregoing resoiution was passed and ac'opted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Cnrtimiss(on
held on December 12, 1994, by the followfr,g voto of the membors thereof:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BOYQSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA, TAIT
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABuEN7: CO~AMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITR~ESS WHEREOF, i ttave hereunto set my hand this `~,~ day of ~
1995. ,
~ ""`y i
~
SECRETA Y, ANAHtIM GITY PIANNING COMMISSION j
~
,
i
t
~
.3. PC94-165