Resolution-PC 94-37RESOLUTION NO. PC.94-37
A RES~LUTIOf~ OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION
'i HAT PL-'TI710N FOR RECIASSIFiCATION N0. 93-94-07 BC GRAN'1'ED, UNCONDII'IONALI.Y
WH~REAS, the Anaheim Clty Planning Commission did recefve a veriiled petftlon for
Reclassiflcation for rer~! property sltuatod in the Ciry of Anaholm, County of Ora~ge, State af Californla,
dascribeci as follows:
TH4T POFlTION OF TFiE EAST HALF OF 7HE SOUTIiEAST C~UAR7FR OF TI-IE
SOUTHEASI' QUARTER OF SECTION 7, IN TOWNSNIP 4 SOl1TH, RANGE 10 WES7,
SAN BERNARDINO F3ASE AND MERIDIAN, D~SCRIEiED AS FALLOWS:
BEGINNItJG AT THE SOUTHEA5T CORNER OF SAID SECTIt~N 7 AND RUNNIMG
THENCE SOUTIi B9 DEG. 34' 20" WEST 531 FEET TO THE l".ENTER LINE OF
KATFiRYN DRIVE AS SHOWN ON TRACT 1633 AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 47,
PAGE SO OF MISCELIANEOJS MAPS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0 DEG.
16' 10" WEST ALONG SAID ~ENTER llt~[ 325.50 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF
THE CENTERLINE OF THE 50 FOOT S7FiEET, SHbWN AS R.ANCHI7U STREEf UPON
THE MAP OF SAtD TRACI'; THENCE NORTH 09 D[G. 36' 20" EAST ALONG TH~
CEN7ER LINE OF SAID RANCHITO STREET .^_58 FEET; 7HENCE NORTH 78 UEG. 45'
25" FAST 50.00 FEET TO 7HE NOST ~OUTHERLY CORNEFi OF LOT 44 OF SAID
TRACT 1633; 7HENCE NORTH 78 DEG. 45' 25' EAST 81.79 FEET ALONG TFiE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID 1.Q7 44 TO THE SOUTHWEST COFINER OF LOT 45 OF
TRACT 1fi33; THENCE NORTH R9 DEG. 41' 30" EAST 1AA.00 FEET ALONCi THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 45 AND THF EASTFRLY EXTENSION THEREOF 70 TH~
EAST LINE OF SAIO SEGTION 7; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG.18' d0' WEST ALONG SAID
EAST LINE TU THE POiNT OF BEGINVING.
EXCEPTING THEREFRUM TNE EA3T 190 FEE7 OF TH~ SOUTH 190 FEET,
MEASURED ALONG THE ~OUTIi LINE 7HEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 40 FEET THEREOF AS DEEDcD TO
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 22, 1956 IN F100K 3558
PAGE 160 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFFiOM TH~ WEST f 50 FEET' OF SAID IAND AS DESCRIBED
IN THE t~EED TO CiTIZENS NATIONAL BANK IN TH~ DEED RECOROED JANUARY
2S, 1962 IN B001< 5987 PAGE 404 OF AFFICIAL RECOADS.
11~'HEREAS, the Cfty Ptennin~, Commfsslon dId hold a public hearing at the CNi: Genter in
tha Cfty of Anahaim on March 7, 19~J~1 at i:30 p.m., notice ut said public hearing i~aving been du!y given as
required by lav~ And In accordanco with the provisions of the Anahr,lm Munlcipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to
hoar and cons(der evidenco for and agafnst said proposeci reclassificatian and to investigate and make
iinciinns and r~commondations in conrection therewith; ard
WHEREAS, said ~•ommissf~n, ahgr duA inspection, imiestiflatfon entl study made by itselt
nnd in Its b~tialf, and after due constderntlon of ull ovldence and reports uHereci at aaid hearinq, does find
and deterrn+ne the foliowing tacts:
1. Th: thv pQtitioner proposes r~classiticai~nn of subject propeity (rom the CH (Commerciat,
I~eavy! Zone to tho CL (Cummercial, Limitsd) Zone.
CR2Q41 MS.WP -1- PC94-37
2. That ttie subject property is iocat~d in tli~ Redeveloprr~ont Agency's 8rooklwrst Commercial
C~rridor Rodevelopment Are~.
3. Thet lhe req~tested reclassification Is consistont with the Planning Commis~lon's dlrective
to rezuno alt CG and CH proportles to the CL Zone.
4. That the proposed roclassificatlon of subJect property Is r7ecessary and/or desirable for the
ordoriy and propor develaprnont of the communfty.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properl,y relate to the zories and
thelr permittecl usos lacally established In close proximity to subjec: property and ta the zones ancf their
permitted uses flenoraily estoblishod ttiroughuut'he communfty.
6. That ttio properry is designatec; for several commerclal land uses by the Anaheim uenoral
PIAn.
7. That one parson indicated his presence at said public hearing (n favor; and that no
correspondence wAS received In opposition to subt~ct petftion.
~ALIFOFINIA EiVVIRONMFNTA~UALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Ciry PlAnning
Commiss(on has reviewecl the propos~l to reclassify ~ubject property from the CH (Commerctal, I~eavy)
Zono to the CL (Commercial, l.imited) Zone to pormlt An a~tomobilo lubo/oli chAnfle facility (2,652 square
foet) on Parcel #1 AdJacent Brookhurst Street ar~J a full-service hand car wash with a related retail sale~
Area (2,224 square teet) and a selt-servo automatod exterior car wash (1,656 sGuare teet) on Parcul #2
ad~acent Lincotn Avenue ~nd Brookhurst Stroet, with waivers of minimum landscaped setbt~ck adJacent
residentfal zones, maximum number of freestanding signs, rhinimum distance betwoen signs, permitted
Iocatiar~ of ireastanding signs and pbrmittod encrcwchr,ionts on nn irregularlyahaped parcel of iand
cunsisting of approximately 1.6 acres located north and wes~ oi tha northwest comer of Llnculn Avenue and
Brookhurst Streat ~~vith Percel #~ having a fronta~o of a~proxi~nately 90 ieot on the west sids oi Brookl~urst
Street and parcet ~2 having a irortaae of 190 fest on the nort;~ side of Lincc' ~ Avenue end 65 feet on the
west side of Brookhurst StrRet and furthor descrlbeci as 125 Norti~ Brookhurst Street and 2217 Weat Lincoln
Avonue; and doos hereby approve tho Nec~ative Declaration u~o.i iinding that the daclaratfon reifects the
indepondent Judgoment of the lead ~gency and that it hAS considerf d the Negative Declaratlon together with
any comments recefveci durinfl the publ(c review process and furthE r tinding on the basis oi the Initial study
and any comments received that there is r-o substantial evidunce that the proJect will have a siCnH(c:ant effact
on lho envfronment.
NOW, THEREFORE, F3E IT FiESOLVED that tho Analieim City Plsnning Commfssfon does
hereby approve the subJect Patitiun for Reclassffication to suthorize an amendmRnt to the Zoning Ma~~ of
the Anaheim Municipal Code to oxclude the abnva-describeci property from the CH (Comm~rcial, Heavy)
Zone and to incorporate said described property Into the CL (Commerciat, Umited) Zone, unconditlonally.
dE IY FURTHER RESOWED that approval of th(s a~plicatior. ~onstitutes approval ~f the
proposed request only to the extont that ft complies wfth the Anaheim Municipal Zonlnfl Code and any other
applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not Inciuda any action or findinc~s as to
com~liance or 2pproval ot the r8quest regarding any othor ~pplicabie ordinance, regulation or requiroment.
BE IT FURTHEF RcSOLVED, that thls resotution shall not constitutr3 a rezonin~ of, ~r a
commitmont by the Ciry to rezone, ti~e subJect prop~rty; any such rozoninp shall r!aquire an orcJ(nance of
the City Councfl which shall be a legis~atfve act which may be approved or denfeci by the City Councll at
its sole discrotion.
,2_ PC94-37
. ...... ..~....l~~ . .:~..i ... 'i:M1Wlh!~i~.ni~•n~ ' ...
~~~~~~
~
~
THE FOREGOI~IG RE50LUTION wps adoptsd at the Planning Cornndssion moetinp of
March 7, 199b.
~
CHAIRMAN, NA EIM CITfi LANNING COMMISSION t
ATfEST: /
`° - =--~~~ =-
SECRETARY, ANAHEINI CITY PIANNIPIG COMMISSION '
STAT~ OF CAI.IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edfth L. Harrfs, Secretary of the Anahelrn City Planning Commisglon, do hereby certliy that the ;
foragoing resotuttan was passed and adopted at a mae!ing of the Anah~im City Planning Commfsslon held
on March 7, 1994, by the followlnfl vote of tho mer~bers theroof:
AYES: COMMI.~,SIAN~RS: 80YpSTUN, CALDWELL, MAYER, ME3SE, PERAZA !
NOES: COMMlSSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NT: CQMMISSIpNERS: HENNING~R, TAIT
IN WITNESS WHEREVF, I t~ave hereunro set my hand this ct ~day of `~ ~,
~ ssa. . i
' ~ CL1~:~
SECRETaRY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
,
-3• P~94-37