Resolution-PC 94-4RESOLUTION NO, PQ94-4
A RESOLU71pN AF THE ANAMEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS510N
DEPJYINr, THE REQUEST TO AMEND CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL bF
CONDITIOMAL USE PERMIT N0. 3593
WHEREAS, on Marcti 22, 1J93 the Plznnin~ Commission approved Conditionai Use Permit
No. 3593 under Ro~olutlon No. PC93-32 to pormit on•premise consumptlon of alcoholic beverage3 In
con~unction with a restaurant/billiard center on property located on tho east side of Beach Boulevard
approximately 1050 teot north of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue and turther described as 314 North Beach
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, sald Rasolution No. PC93-32 Includec the tollowi~g conditio~ of approval:
"6. ?hat there shail be no cofn oporated tahles/amusRment dnvices, Iive entertalnmont,
and/or dancin~ on ~ubJoct property'
WHEREAS, the petftioner has requested to amend sald condition of approval by doleting iho
reterence to "Iive entert~inment"; and
WHEFiEAS, the City Plann(ng Commission did hold a public hoaring at the Civic Center in
tho City of Anahe(m on January 10, 1994, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sa(d publfc hearinQ hav~ng boen dufy
g(ven ~s requtred by law pnd in accordance with the provisions nf the Anaheim Munlcipal Codu, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evfdenco for and against said proposed amendmRnt and to Investigate erui
mako tindings and recommondations in connecti~n therewith; And
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investfgation and study made by nself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence end rsports oHerod at said hearing, dous tirxl
1nd d~termfne the tollnwinfl tacts:
t. That the proposed emondmont to the r,onditions of approv~l would aaversoly afte~K the
adjoining land uses and the growth end deva~opment ot the area in which it Is proposed to be located;
2. That appro~~al oi the proposed amendment would be dofrimental to the peace, health, safAty
and gen~ral w~liaro of the citizons of tlio City of Anaheim;
3. That, as testifiQd to by Palice Ue~rtmont ataH, the addition uf Ilve o7terta(r.mant to the
establishment would hav~ a cumulativo negat(ve ofiect and would chanAe the characteeistics oi the
establishrnane frorn restaurant/billfard hall to primarily a billiard hail/niBht club in canjunction wkh on-sale
of alcoholic baveragEls !horaby potentially rosult(ng in hlgher Incidents ot crime and calls for ~olice
servicos; ~nd
n. 7hat two (2) people Indicated their pr9se~ce at said public hearinp In tuvor of ~ubJec!
proposal; pnd that no carrospondence was receivacl in opposftion to the subJoct petftfon.
CAl1~RIVIA ENVIFlONMENTRL f~UALITY AGT F N I : That the Anahelm City Planning
Commission has r~rviewed tho p~oposal to dalete the referenco to "Iive entertab~ment" contalned In
Condition D1o. t3 of R~3solution No. PC J3•32 and ~o~s herahy tind that the NeqativR Dedaration prevlously
appr~ved in conner.ticn with Cond~tional Uso Permft No. 3593 is adoquate t~ serve as the requlred
envfronmc~n!ni documentat(on in connactlon wfth thfa request upon finding that the declar~t(on reflecta the
indepesident ~udgamr,nt c~ the lead agency and tFu+t it has cons(dered the NegatNo Decla~tlon tagother
v+ith ariy co~nments receivoci durin{~ the pubifc roview process end further finding on the basis of the InRial
study and any comments received that thon- is n~ sub~tant(al QvidencQ that tho pro(ect will have ~
si~nific~ant afiect on tho ernironmtnt.
PC94-4
CR19£35M8.WP '~"
r-
NOU1~, THER~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1~naheirn City Planninb Commis~;lon does
hereby determfne that Condition IVo. 6 of Resolution No. PC93-32 should remain In eNect, and that the
request is therefore denied.
THE FOREGOING RFSOLUTION was adcptod et the P~ nnl~ Comm!sslon meeting of
January 10, 1994. > > ~/
/l .~2l~"~ /~
CWA RMAN, AN HEIM CI PLANNING COMMISSION
ATl'EST:
~
,, ~' %~ RE1'ARY, ANAH,E M CITY PLANNING C~MMISSION
' !/
STATE OF CP,LIFORNIA )
COUNTY 4F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, ,1a~iet L. Jensen, Secretary of the Anaheim Cit~/ Plannin~ Commi~sfon, do hereby certffy
that tho foregoing reso~ution was passed and adoptod at a meeting of the Anaheim Cfty Planning
Commission held on January 1Q, 1994, by the followfng vote of the members th9reo4:
AYES: COMMISSIONFRS: CALDWELL, MENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZN, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIO~IFRS: BOYDSTUN
ABSEN7: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
!N WI1'NESS WHEREOF, I 17ave hereunto set my hand this ~~L day of ,,~r_° sa ~! ,t
-7~
1 ssa.
l ~~~~
3~ ETARY, ANAHEI CITY PI~INNIN(3 COMMISSIdN
2. PC9d~3