Resolution-PC 94-6RE L TI N NO. PC94-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIVN
TMAT PETITIQN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 3652 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did rece(va a veriilod Petition for
Condit{onal Use Permit far certafn real property s(tuated in tho City of Anaheim, County of Orange, &tate
of Califarnia, described as:
PARCELS 1 ANQ 2, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 35, PAGE 'i 1 OF F'AfiCEL
MAPS IN THE OFPICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OP SA'D COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a public hearing at tho Civlc Center
in the City of Anaheim on January 10, 1994 ai 1:30 p.m., notico of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law an~ in accordance with the provisions c~ the Anaheim Municfpal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evfdence fior and against said proposed condltionel use permit and to
invostigate and make findings and rocommbndations in connoction therewfth; and
WHEREAS, ~aid Commission, after due ins{~ection, investfgation and study mr~de by Rself
and in Its b~half, and aiter duo consfderatfon of all evidence and reports offAred at said hearing, does flnd
and determine the following facts:
t. That the proposed use is proporly one for whfch a conditlonal use permit is authorized by
Anahefm Municip3l Codo Section 18.69.050.606 to pormit a 3,700 sq.ft. baseball school (n an exfstln~
37,511 sq.ft. industrfa~ camplex wlth waiver of the following:
Sectlons 18.06.Q5g,0212 - Minlmum numbgr of~arking s ap ces.
18.OfL9~0.07.555 11 requlrod by Cade;
18.06.050.03t ~„4, recommended by parking demand study;
1 .0 . C~4 proposed)
and 18.61,066.050
2. That the parking waiver will not cause an increaso in traffic congestlon in tha immediete
vicfnity nor adversQly afiect any adjofning land uses because safd waiver has been substantfated by a
parking study preparod by an independ~nt engfnoer and that the City Trafiic and Transportat(an htts been
reviawed and apnruved the study with the condition that subJect pruperty shall malntain a minimum §~
parl<ing spaces and Iimit hours of operat(ons to 4 p.m. to 10 p.m., Monday through Friday, aiid 9 a.m. to
3 p.m., Saturday;
3. TF~at the grantin~ of the parking varlance under the cc,nditions Imposed will not be
detrimental te the peace, health, safety or qeneral woifaro of tho citizons of tho Ciry of Anahelm;
4. That th~ proposod use is properly o~e for wnich a conditfonal use permft ia auiharized by
the 7_oning Code;
5. 'fhat the proposed use will not advorsely aftoct the adjoining land uses and tha growth and
developmont of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
6. That the slze and shape ot the site for the proposecf use Is adequate to allow the iull
developmont of the proposed uso in a mannor not detrimental to the particular ~rea nur to the peace,
heal?h, safety, and generol welfare;
CR t J87MS.wp .1 _ PC94-6
7. That tho traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burdon upon the
str~ets and hl~hways dosigned and improved to carry the traffic in the area;
8. ThAt the grantinfl of the conditional use permit under the aond(tions imposed will not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and genAral welfare of the citizens of the City of Anohelm; and
9. That no one indlcated thoir presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposltion to tha sub~ect petition.
~ALIFORNIA ENVIR~NMENTAL (]UAI.I'TY ACj FINDIIJG: That the Anahelm City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal ta permit a 3,700 sq,ft. baseball schooi In an existing 37,511 sq.ft.
industrfal complex with walver af minimum number of parking spaces on an irregularly-shaped parcel of
land consisting of approximately 2.35 acres, havin~ a frontage of anpr~xfmately 650 feet on the north slde
af La Palma Avenue, having a maximum depth of approaimately 492 faet, being locatcui approximately 80
feet west of the centerline oi Van Buren Street, and turther described as 39G1 Gast La Palma Avenue; and
does he~eby approve the Negative Declaratfon upon !indfng that the declaratian reflects the indep~ndent
judgement of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negativo Declaratfon together w~;h any
comments received during tho public review prucess and further flnd(ng on the basis of the IrftlRl study
and Any comments rc~ceived that there is no substantial evide~ce that the projact wfll have e slgnHicant
effect on tho Anvironment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I? RFSOLVEn that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby grant subJect Petitlon for Cond(tfonal Use Permit, upon the followin~ conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subjoct property in order to preserve tho
safety and gonoral weifarQ oi the Citizsns of thA City of Anaheim:
1. That the appropriate trafffc signa! assessment fee shall be paid to the CIry of AnaFieim In an am~unt
as established by City Councll Resolutfon.
2. That plans sliall be submittod to the Cfty TraHlc and Transportatfon Manage~ for his review and
appruval showing conformance with the latest r9v(sions ot Engineerin~ Standard Plan Nos, ba6 and
602 pertaining to parking standarcfs and driveN~ay locations. Sub(ect property shall thereupon be
devel~ped and malntained in conformance with said plans.
3. That a minimum of sixty four (64) parking specos shall be provided for employees and custpmers.
4. That this use shall bo Ilmited to battin~, fielding and pltching instruction, and tha spectator area shatl
n~t be open to ihe c~erseral pubiic.
5. That the use oF this facility shall be by appolntment only.
6. That trash storage areas shall be pravided and maintained in a location acceptable to tha Department
of Maintenanco and In accordance with approved plans on file wlth said Department, Such
fnformatf~n shall be specifically shown on tfio ptans submitted for building permfts.
7. That a plan slieet for solfd waste storagQ and collection, and a pian !or recycling shall be suhmitted
to the Department of Maintena~ce for review and approval.
8. That sub(ect property shall bo developed substantial;y in accordance with pl~ns and spACifications
submitted to the City ot Anaheim by the petitioner and which pians are on file wfth the Plannlnfl
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
-2- PC94-6
9. 'I'hat tha hours of operatlon shall be Ifmfted to the foliowing:
Monday through Friday: 4{~,m. to 10 p.m.
Saturtlay: J a.m, ta 3 p.m.
5undey Ciosed
10. Th~t prior to commenceme~~~ of the activity authorized by this resolutlon or withln ra period of one
(1) yoar from the date of !his resolution, whichever occurs iirst, Conditi~n Nos, 1, 2, 3, G, 7 and 8,
above•mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to camplete sald conditions
may be granted in ~ccordance with Soctloii 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Munfolpal Code.
11. That approvsl af this application constftutes appraval of the proposed reqttest only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zonfng Coda and any other appficable Ciry, State and Federal
regulatfons, Approval does not include any actlon or f(ndings as to complianco or approva! of the
request rogardfng any other appiicable ordinance, regulation or requiremont,
BE IT FUR7HER RESOLVED that tho Anaheim City Planning Commiasfon does heroby find
and determine that adoption of this Resoiution fs expressly predicated upon applicant's complis~nce wlth
each and all of the conditfons hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditlon, or ony part thereaf, be
declared Invalid or unenforceahle by ihe f(nal Judgmant of any court of competent Jurlsdictlon, then thla
Resotutlon, and any approvals herein conta(ned, sl~all be deemed null and vold.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopteo At the Planning Commisslon meeting of
January 10, 1994. -
/~~ ~
~~ "!~:_ ,/ ,
ChIAIRMAN ANA EIM C! 11~NNING COMMI3SION
ATTEST:
~ n_._J
/ CRETARI', a A" IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY ~F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEiM )
I, Janet L. Jensen, Secrotary of tha Anaheim City Plannfng Cammission, do hareby cerrify
that the loregoinfl resolution was passed and adopted at a moetir.y oF the Anah~im Cfty Planninp
Commisalon hold on January 10, iJ94, by the foilowing vote of the mombers thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIQNERS: BOYDSTUfv, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABScNT; COMNIISSIQNERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hsve heraunto set my h2nd this ,Z~ dtty of
199ti.
~ ~~
RETARY, ANAHE ITY PLANNING CAti~MISSION
.3. PC94-6