Resolution-PC 94-62RES~LUTION NQ, PC94-62.
A RESOLUTIQN OF TME ANAHEIM CIl'Y PLANNING COMMI.~,SIQN
i NAT PkTITION FOR CONDITIONAL UuE PERMIT ~lO. 3679 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEFiEAS, the Anahe~m City F'lann!ng Commissfon did re~eive a verified Petftion for
Ccruli~annal Use Perrnit for certafn real property situated in the Cfty of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stet9
Af ~;,a{iforni7, ~escribeci as:
PARC~L 1; LOTS 8 AND J OF TRACT NA. 290~, IfV THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANuE, Sl'ATE OF CALIFnRNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECQRUED iN BOOK 99, PAGES 21 TO 23 INCLUSIVE GF MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE GOUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: THE EASTERLY 167.5G FEET OF 7HE SOUTHERLY 259.75 FEET
(MEASUI~EU TU THE CE~lT~R OF TH~ STRE~'fS ADJOINING) OF LOT 8 IfV
BLOCK f7 OF 1'I~iF SUF3UIVISION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTlON 21,
TOWNSHIP a SOUTH, RANGE 10 W~ST, SAN BERNAFlDINO MERIDIAN, f3FING
APAR7pF'FHE FAIRVIEW COI~ONYTRACT, AS SHOWN ONA MAP FiECQRDED
IN BOOK 1, PAGE 33 OF MISCELLANEQUS M,APS, RECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNT!, CALIFORNIA,
PARCEL 3: TI-IE EASTERI.Y 184.50 FEET OF 'THE SOUTFIERLY 259.75 FEET
(MEASUR[D TO TfiE CENTE~tLINE OF 7HE STREE7S ADJQINING) OF LOT 8 IN
dLOCK 17 AF THE SUBDIVISIQN OF TI-IE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 21,
TOWNSHIP d BQUTM, fiNNGE 10 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERI~l,4N, E3EING
P~ PART OF THE f'AIRVIEW COLONY TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORD~D
IN BOOK I, PAGE ~3 OF MISCE! lANEOUS MAPS, RECOR~S OF QRANGE
CUUNTY, CALIFqRNIA.
~XCEPTING TtiEaEF~OM THE EASTEHLY 167.50 FEEr,
WIaEREAS, the Gity Planning Cornmisslon did hold a public hearing at tho Clvlc ~enter
in iPie City of Anahelm on May 16, tg.~h at 1:30 p.m., notlce of said public hearing havin~ beon duly given
as rc~quired byllw and in accardance with tho pravisions of the Anahalm Municfpal Code, Ghapter 1&.~3,
to hear antl cansider evidenco for an~ against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate anc~
make findings ar',d recommendatians in connection therew!th; ~nd
WHEREAS, sF-(d Commission, after due lnspection, investigatlon ancl study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due canslcierat(on af all eviclence and reports oHored at said hoaring, do~s f(nd
and determine the following tacts:
1, That 2Fi~ pr~poseci use is properly ene ~or wnfch a conclilional uso permit is au[horized by
Anaheirn Munlcipal Code Sectlons 18.2l.050.110 and 1a.44.050.~30 to permlt a 2-story, 6,136 sq.ft., 12-
bodroorn dormftory in conjunc'tiun with an exist(ng 9,792 sq.ft. Buddhist Temple with wafvers of the
foilowing:
(a) serti~ns 18.Ofi.Q50.01P1 - Minimum n~mt~er of parking s~~.
~a.os;Q.Q.Q (Required: 12 cover~.i spaceswith total 15
1$.21.06~.Ot0 spacHS for dormitory;
and 1~4 S.OG6,Q~Q ~ropos~d: ,po cQVered s~aces witFi totai 16 open spacas)
CR2U95MS,Wp -1- pCn4-62
(b) ~~tiQns 18,04.042.020 - Minimum setback oi ln~titutiorai uses
]~}.21.063 ~diacont to a re i~~,tj~l zone boundarv.
44 (Required: 1. ~5 }oot wl~g structural and parkir~
and 18.44.06~Q40 setback rsqutred ed~acent to north (RS-7[00] and
east (RS-A-43,OOOJ property Iines, with minimum
6 trees required adj~cent easl property line;
Proposed: none to 42 iagt to north properry ffne and
ngne to Qast property Iine, with 1 tr~.g proposed adjacent
to east property Iine)
2. That waiver (a) is hereby approved permming 15 open pa!king spaces;
3. That the parking variAnco will not cause an Increase in traHic congsstlon In the fmrnediate
vicinity nor adversely aNoct any ad{otning lancJ uses b~.+cause open parking will enhance the proposed
landscaping and dormitory residents are expeclod t~ utilize vanpool transportation rather than individual
autorr:ob(les;
4. Th~at the granting ot tho parking variance under the condittons Imposecf wfll not be
detrimontal to ttie peace, hoalth, saloty or general welfare oi tho cltizons of the CRy oi Anahefm;
5. That walver (b) Is hereby approvecf, In part, Inr the east property Iine only tx~cause the
proposed parking area, as shown on submitted plans, can be movod southory to accommodate tho
minimum requirod t5•loot w(de satback alor.~ nurth property line which abuts single lamily residorttfal uses;
B. That t~iere are Rpeci~l circw~~siances appllcablo to the property such as shape, I~catton
arxl surroundings, whlcfi c:o not apply to other ldentlcally zoned propartfes In the vfclnlty becsuse wAlver
of the required setback and minlmum numbar of trees alonp tt~ ~st property Itn~ Is JustHlad by the
exlstfng rtonresidRntial use (Buddhist Templo) lo the oast;
7. That st~lct appllcation of tho Zoning Cocie de~:rive3 the property o~ prNileges en~oyod by
other propertles under idenNCal zoning clossilicalion in thn viclnNy;
8. That the proposed usb is properly one tor whlch a condi!lonal ~~e perrr~k Is n~Ahorized by
ihe Zonlnq Code;
9. 7hat the proposed use will not advers~iy aNect Iho adJoining land uses and ihe growth and
dwelopment of the araa In which R Is proposal to bA located becauso the d3slgn of fhQ proposed
dormit~ry wNl be comp~tibla with the exi~tin~ tempfo arxf ucceasory buNdings;
10. That thA sita and shape d tNe sHe for tha propo9ecl use I~ adequate to allow thr~ lull
clevelopment at the propoaed use in a mannor not detrimerdal to the particular area nar to the poaco.
health, ~atety, ard peneraf welfare;
t t. Thal the SraHic generatecf hy tho proposed c:se wNl not impose an undue burden upon th$
streots ond hig~rways das7gnecl and imprc~vod to carry the trt~Kic In the araa;
t2. That the granbnq M tha a~x~diltanal uae pRrm~ urxfor tlw conditions Imposed will not bo
dolrimental to the peace, health, ~afety and general wel(are of tho cMlzens al the City of Anaheim; and
t3. That no one Irbiptas th~ir pm.sunce at t~ld pubtic haarlny in oppo~itfon, ar+~+ ~hat no
corrasp~xscferx:a was receivod fn .~rp~slifon to tho aub(cct pelition.
.2. rc:~s aa
CALIFQ_RNIA ~NVIRQZIMEN?AL UQ ALI7Y ACT FINDIN~: That the Anahelm City Planninfl
Commission has rovieweci the propasat to pormit a 2•story, 5,136 Sa.n., 12•bfxiroom dormitory In
conJunct(on with an existing guddliist Templo with wzivors nf minimurn number of parking spaces and
minlmum setback of institutional uses ~djacent tu a rpsidentlal zone boundary on an {rregularly-shapod
parcel ot land cansisting ot approximateiy 0.98 acre locatad at the northwost curner oi Ninth Stroet and
Kalella Avenue, having (rontages uf approximately 240 teet on the north si~e oi Katella Avenue and 184
feet on the west side of Ninth Sireet, and lurther descrfbed as 1505 Wost Katella Avenue; and does hereby
, n~rovo tha NegatNe Ueclaratlon upon finding tfiat the declaratlon rRtlects the Independent ~udgement of
the I~ad agency and that it has conaldered the Negotfve Declaration togother with ~ny comments roceived
during the public review proces~ and further Iind(ng on the basis of the Initf~l stucJy and any commants
roceived that there is ro substantlal evidenco that the proJect wlll have a signiticant ef(ect on thc~
environment.
NOW, THEREFOR~, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheln~ City Pianning Commfssion dons
hereby grant sub~ect Peiftiun f~r Conditional Use Permft, in part, upon ttie iollowing r,onditions which are
hereby (ound to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use ot the subJect pruperty In arder to
preserve the safety and generai weltare al the Citlzens of the City of Anaheim:
t. That tho cccupanr,y nf tho dormRory shall be limftad to a maximum o! thirty (30) rESidents.
2. That a slx (6) foat high biock wnll (as measureci irom th~ I~ighest adJacent grade) shall be
constructed adj~cant to thu resident(al properties to ihe north.
3. That there shall bo na bus storafle permitted an the property.
4. That a sewer capacfty mitfgatiun (eo of ninety ono d~llars (591) per beciroom unft shall be paid to ihe
Ctry ot AnahAim.
5, 7hat ~r~ah stornqe areas shall be provtdal ar~d maintained fn a locatton acceptabfe to the Qep~rtmont
ut Mc ntenanco and in accordanre with approved plans on tile with soid Dopartmont. 5uch
inlormatlon shall be apec~cally xhown un the plan3 subrt~itted (or buflding pormits•
g, That a plan shee! for sdid wast~ storage erxi collect(on, and a plan tor recycf{ng shall be submitted
to tho Do~rtmont of Maintenanca tor review and approval.
7 e~semontpa ongrt ho east p o~perty li ot oft he p~ col on which'the dor nR ry wiUtbo~co siructed iifty
a D sione Inpaccordancre wHh Rules 5rA ancf 20to1 the tWater U~ility~Raco ,tHules a-xit Rogulat onsinA
~, That sub~eC prop~rty ahall t~e devolopecl substantlaliy in accordance wfth plans aivl speal4lcations
submitted to the City of Anahaim by tho petNioner ancf wtitch plann are on tilo witi~ the Plannin~
Dc~pactment marked Exhibit Nos. t through 6; pravided, howevar, that a m~nimum tNtoon (t5) loot
widA landscapsd area shall be provldecl arfj~corn to the north pro~erty Ilne thereby dtsptacing ehree
oNside t e gated ~ k~ng a ea towards iK~tot a A enuo osutt n'g fn a local o( tf oen (15) o~en parkin~
spa~4s.
10. That prfor to fa~uance of e bulding ~ermft or within A perfocl of one (t) year Irom tha date oi Ihis
re.adutbn, wlichover a:cura lirst, Corxlition Nos. A, 5, 6, 7 arxl 8, abave•~ ~ ~~ cordane
complied with. Extgnsions for lurther timo to r,om~leto aakf conditions may be q
with Sectfon 18.03.c19~J ot tne Anahelm Municipal Code.
PC4M•62
.~.
1 t. That prior to tinal build(ng and zaning inspectlons, Conditlon Nos. 2 and 9, above-mentionod, shall
be complfed wfth.
1:. 7hat ~pproval of this apptication constitutes approval oi the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with tho Anatielm Municipal Zoninp Cocle :,~d any other applicable City, State and Fedarai
reflulations. Approvel does not Include any actl~n or findings as to compliance or approvai of the
request re~ard(ng any other appflcable ordinance, regulation ar requiroment.
BE IT FURTHER R@SOLVED that the Anaheim Clry Plannfng Commisslon does hereby ff~d
and dutermine that ad~ption of this Rosolution Is expressly predicated upon applicant's complianco with
each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditlon, or ~ny part thereof, be
declared Invalid or uneniorcoable by tha tinAl ~udpmont of any court of competont Jur(sdlction, then this
Rosolut(on, and any approvals herein containad, shall bo deomed null and void.
THE FQREGOING RESOLU710N was adopted At the F'la~ning Cummission moetlnp of
May 16, 1994. ~ ,
Z
/ -'.1~ 'd- ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY~~~IN COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~% ..
~~. ~J ,
~~ L.~ ~._ ~ . / LC~~t..,
SECHEI'ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) st.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Horris, Secretary ot the Anaheim City Plenning Commiss(on, do horeby cortify
that the toregoing resdution was passecf and adoptcxf at a meetinfl o( the Anahefm City Planning
Commission held on May 18, 199A, by tho following vote of the mombArs ih4reo(:
AYES: COMMISSiOiVEAS: 60YDSTUN, CALDWELi, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERO.ZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISS~ONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CONiMISSiONERS: MAYER
r"• IN W~TNESS WHEREOF, ~ have herounto vet my hancf this ,1~ day oi
1 ., ~~-- 1934. ; ~ ~
..__.~ ; ~_, ~._ l'-t' %~ ,"~. !al.~ .~'-''_: -
SECREi ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PU1NNiNG COMMISSION
~, PC~J4-82