Resolution-PC 94-69RESOL~ITI~N NQ. PC94 9
A RESOI.UTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIC1h
AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF
VARIANCE NO 2fi76
WHEREAS, on March 3, 1975 the Pianning Commission granted Variance No. 267a undor
Resolution No. f'C7o-51 wafving permitted usAS and minimum numbor nf parking spacos an property located
ori tho east side of Anaheim 6oulevard Approximately 337 feet souch of the centerline of North Street, and
turtfier doscribod as 734 North Ar+ahelm Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, ~ald Resolution No. PC75•51 includes the tollowing conditlon af approval:
"4, 1'h~t a palnt booth shall not be utilized at tha subJect Iocatlon, as stipulated to by
the petiti~ner."
V`lHEI~EAS, safd Resolutlon also contalned tho following finding of fact:
"4. That tho petitioner stipufatad that tho proposed use wlll not have ~ paint both."
WFiEREAB, the petitioner has requested doletion of said condition of approval and sald tinding
of tact portaining to prohit,itiun of a pafnt spray bootl~ in conjunction with a previously-approved automotive
re~.~air and body shop.
WHEREAS, th9 City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Clvic Center In
the City ot Anahelm on Juno ~I, 1994, at 1;30 p.m., notice of sald pubiic hoarfng havfng been duly givon
as roquired by law and in accordance with the provislons ot the Anahelm Municipal Code, Ch~ept~r 10.03,
to hear and consider evidenco far and agalnst said pmposed amendment and to Investigate ~nd mako
findings and recommendations in connection therewfth; and
WNEREAS, sald Comm(sslon, after due inspection, Investigation and study made by itself
and In its behalf, and after due cunsideration of a11 ovidence and reports oifered at said hearing, does iind
and determine the follawing facts:
1. That tlie Planninc~ Commission is authorized ta considor modification of any variance at a
publfc hearing ~~pon the grounds that such modiffcation, includfng tho imposition of any addftianal
conditions theroto, is ~easonabiy nec~ssary to permit reason2ble operatfon unde~' the varlance as nranted.
2. The fnsteliatlon and use of a paint spray booth, when authorized by the issuance of a
building permit, will not be detrimenta! to the peace, hoalth, sa(ety or wolfare of the surrounding
communlty.
3. That the requosted modification of :ho previously-apProved variance is nocossary to permit
re~sanable operatfon of the existing automotive repair and body shop.
4. That no one indicated th~ir presence at said public hearing in opposition; and tl~at no
correspondence was roceived in opposition to the subject potition.
A IF ylA .NVIRONM~NTAL~A~ I A FIN~ING: The Planninq Dlrector or his
authorized representatfve has determfned that the proposed proJect fatls withln the dnfinition of Categorical
Examptions, Class 3, as defined in the St~tu EIR Guidellnos and Is, therefore, categorica~ly exempt trom
tha requirement to prepare an ~IR.
.1 _ PC94-68
CR2104M~.wp
NOW, THERGFUFlE, BE IT RESG~LVED :h~t ihe Anaheim City Planning Commisslon daos
heroby delote Finding No. 4 and Conditlon No. 4 of Resolution No. PC75•51 thereby allowing ~~aint spray
booth in connection with the eulsting sutomotiva repair and body shop.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOh was ado~.ited at the Planni~Commission meetiny of
Juno 1, 19J4. :~
i
C A1 M , AN EI CITY P NI G CU'MMISSION
A'('TEST:
-L'
~/7~;~c~u7. <~r:X.,~~'`~.,
SEC "TARY, AN,4H~(M CITY PLANNING COMMIStiION
~~
i
S7ATE OF CALIFONNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
!, Janei L. Jensen, Secretary of the Anaheim Cfty Planning Commissinn, do hereby certify
that the foregoing re5olutlon was passod and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Plannfng
Commission held on June 1, 1994, by the followinfl vote of the membArs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 60YDSTUN, CALDWELL, MESSE, PERAZA, TAIT
NOE~: COMMISSI4NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HENNINGER, MAYER
IN WlTNESS WI-IEREOF, i have horeunto set my hand this ~_ day of i~ _
1 ~94. ~
; -~,t~ ;~ ~.~ . .
3 REfARY, ANR IM CITY PLANNlNG COMMISSION
i
l/ '
_2_ PC94~G9