Resolution-PC 94-7RESOI~iTION NU. PC9a-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS{ON
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3654 BE GRANT~D
WFiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did roceive u vorHled Petftlo~ for
Conditional Usa Permft tor certai~ real property situated ~n the City of Anaheim, County of Ornngo, State
of Cali(ornia, described as:
ThJSE PORTIONS QF 7HE WEST NAi.F OF THE NORTFiWEST QUARTER OF
SE(;TION 4, TOWNSHIP 4 SOllTH, RANGE 9 YVEST $AN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN ACCORDING TU 7HE OFFICIAL PIAT OF SAID LANO FILED !N THF
DISTRICT IAIJD OFFICE, MARCH 23, 1875 DESCRIBEQ AS FOI.lO'JVS:
PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED iN BOOK 94, PAGE 18 OF PARCEI
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECQRDER OF ORA!VGE COUNTY,
GALIFORNIA.
WFiEREAS, tho City Plannin4 Comm{sslon dtd hdd a public hearing ctt the Clvlc CeMer
in the City of Anaheim on January 10, t9~4 at 1:30 p.m., nQtice oi said publlc hearing having beon duty
givon as reyu(red by law arni in accurdanca with the provisions ol the Analioim Municlaal Code, Chapier
18.p3, to hear and conskJer evidence tor and aga(nst saki pro{sasec! conditiorat uae permft and to
investigste and mako lindings and re~cemm~r~dations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due Inspoction, Investigation ar~d study made by Its~lf
and in its behalt, ond aNer due consideration of all evidence and reports otfered at sald hearing, doea Ond
and determino tho iMlovving facts:
1. That the proposed use is property one ta which a conditional use permk Is euthorl~ed by
Anaheim Munlcipal Code Section 10.61.050.fi0f to permit a t2,958 sq•ft• automolNe repair (acAlty in an
exis+ing tndustrial Iwilding whh waNer of thQ fdiowfn~:
.~i.~.C~~2..n~,18 06 0_ 5U•~222 • N~~~1.R~~~~IP.~~1S~±•
t~~6•Qap ~~, required by Codv;
~r ~t 18.Ei.~~.Q ;~Z dutermincYJ to be ede.~uate by the CNy 7raNic
pnd Transpcxt~tion Manager,
~ proposed)
2. That ih4 parking varfance will net causa en increase fn traNic Congestion in the immediate
vir,inity nor adversety aHect any acf~aining Iand usos because the min~mum number ot p0tkln~ spec9~ has
per.n revfewed by tho City Traffic and Tranaportatbn Manager ai~f he tirxls that the axlating pc~rkln9 supply
is adaquato Icr Ihe propnsed lac~ity duA to Iha large indoa work a-ea ancl parking area Irwide Ilu 12,858
sq.lt, buildfng;
3. Yhat the ~rantin4 of llw park~nfl variance under the coMMiona imp4sa! vWl not be
dc~rimental 1~ thQ pcace, hcsatlh, saletY or fle"ara~ wet~~rQ ~nf Ihe ratl2ena d tFnt Ciry o( Arrehelm;
4. That ihe propo:-ccl ~so is properly ono ~~ vrhkh a corrJitb~ral use ~mit Is euthorited by
the Zaning Codo;
5. That Iho p~opos~!d u3e w~l nM AcNersely allect tfw ac)jeinirQ land us~ orxl the prw+lh en~
dtr~ei~pmt±nt ot the area ih which N is propou~tl tA be focated:
Cq t~J88MS. W~ • 1- P094-7
6. 'That the slze and shape of the site tor the proposnd use is adoquate to allow the iuil
development of the proposed us~ in a mannar not detrimonta~ to tho particular area :~or to tho peace,
health, satety, and ~eneral welfar~;
7. That the traNic flenerated by tho proposed use wlll not impose an undue burden upon the
stroats and highways designed and improved to carry tho trafflc In the area;
p. That the ~ranting ot the canditional use permft under the conditions tmpo4ecf wfll not be
dotrimental to the poace, tiealth, safety And goneral welfare of the citizens of tho City of Anahelm;
9. That the Redevelopment Commission has r~viowed tho proposed requost and determined
that the repa(r (acility Is in conformance wfth the Redevelopment Plan for ProJect Area Alpha; and
10. That one person indicated hAr presence at said ~ubllc h~arfng In oppositlon; and th~t no
cor;espondence was recoNed In opposition to the sub~ect petrtion.
~A~ IF RNIA ENVIRONMEI~TAL ~UALITY A~ IN N: Tht-t the Anahelm City Plonnlnp
Commission has revlewed the proposal to permit a 12,358 sy.it. automothre repair iactliry in en existin~
inctustrial bulfding with wniver of mtnimurn ~umber oi parking spaces on n rectangulgrlyshaped par^el of
land consisting of approximately 0.6t3 acre, having a frontage of npproximately 140 fr~et on the north ofde
ot l.a Patma Avenue, having a maximum depth o! approxlmately 220 ieet, being locatod approximat~ly 470
I~et east ot the conterline of Tustin Avenue, and furthor describeci as ::831 Eost La I'alma A~~enue; and
does hereby approve the Nagatlve Daclaratton upon firxi(ng that the dec~.~ntinn reflects the independent
~udgement oi the lead agency s~nd thnt it has conskforeci ihe ~Vegativo Declaration tngeRher wlth any
comments received during the public review process and turther finding on the basis oi tha Inltial study
and any comments receNed that there is no substanttat evidenco that the pro~ect will have a slgnHlcent
effoct on the ernfronment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ant~helm City Planning Commlagion dooa
hereby grant sub~ect Petition (er Conditfonal Use Perm~t, upon the (dlowing conclRions whlch arA hereby
(ound to be a neces:~nry prerRqu(situ to tha proposed use nf tho sub~ect proporty In order to FrASecve ihe
safety ~nd flenoral weltare ot the Citizens of the Ciry ot Anaheim:
t. Tfiat the totat number ot empl~yees sholl be iimited t~ ~ maximum ot twelve (12) peatona.
2. That a1{ auto ropair activities and ovemiflht storage of vehicles shall taka place whdly InafdA thd
building.
3. That thd landscape p~antcrs shail ~ re~turbis+ ^d In accoreian~e wfth tho submitted landacapo plan.
d. 7hat erry proposecf lreestxr~iing ulgn on sub(ect property aholl be a monument•type not exc~ln~
aight (8) leet in hefght arxJ shall be 3ub(QCt to the revlaH ar-d approval o( the CRy T~aNic and
Tran~spoRation Man~Qer to detcrmirr~ adequato Ilnes-ot-sl~M.
5. Tt~at trash storage nro;~s st-alt be providud arxl matnlalned in a locatbn acceptable to 1ho DopartmAnt
ot Mointenanco and in accorciance with Hpproved ~stans on file with said DepartmRnt.
6. 71iat a plan sheett 1or solid wasto s~orafls nrxl tdlor,tbn, orxJ o~lan for r~cycling shall t~ submrita!
to the Department at Maii~onanco Icr raview and approval.
7. .~~at firn sprinklera ahatt be inst~ll~d ns requfrc~cf by the Fire Dopartment.
.~, PC94•7
8. That subJect property shall be developed substantially tn accordance witls plans a~id speclfications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petftioner and which plans are on tilo with the Planning
Oepartment marked Exhibit Nos. 1 thraugl~ 5.
9. That prior to commencement ot tho activlty autFiorized by this resolution or within a period of one
(t) ~~oar iro!n tht date ot this resoh~tion, whlchevQr occurs tirst, Condition Nos. 3, 5, 6, ~ and 8,
above-mentlonerJ, shall be complia: ~Nith. ~xtonsl~ns t~r turthor t(rr~o to complete sald conditlono
may be granted in accordanc~ with Soction 18.03.090 of tfie Anaheim Municiptal Coclo.
10. Thai app-oval of this application constitutas approval of the proposed requeat only to the extent that
it cornplies with the AnahAlm M~nicipAl Zoning Codv and any other applicc~ble City, State and Federal
rogulations. Approval does not include any actlon or findfngs as to compila:ice or aporovnl ~t tf~e
request regarding ~ny other opp~icabl~ orciinance, regula:lon or raqulrement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that tho Anahoirn Chy Pfanning Commlaslon does hereby flnd
and determine that adoptton ot this R~solution is expressly predtcatecf upon applicanYs compllence with
each and ail af the condfiions tioreinabove set (orth. Should any such conditlon, nr any paK thereof, be
declareci invalid or unonforceable by thr, final ~udgment ot any court ot campetc~nt Jurlsdlction, ther~ this
Hesolution, and any approvais herefn contafnod, shall be deemed null and vold.
7HE FOREGOING RESOLJTION was adopted at the Planning Commisslon meeting of
January 10, 1994. ~ ~ i~
~j y % / _r~ v
CHAIRfdAN ANAH IM CITY P. NING COMMISSIOiV
ATTEST:
,en~.oE..~
~~5 RETARY, ANAHEIf ITY PLANNING CUMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFCf~NIA )
COUNTY OF OR,~NGE ) s5.
CITY OF APJANE'`A )
~, Janet L Jensen, Sacrgtary oi the Anaheim Ciry Planning Carmlealon, d~ hereby certify
that the lorepoing resalution was Qasaed and ndopted at a meeting of the Anaho(m Cfty Planning
Commission held on January t0, t~4, by the f~llowing vote ol the n~embors thoreo(:
AYES: COhIMISSIONER$: BOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, I-1ENPIINdER, MAYER, MESSE, PERPZA, TAIT
NOES: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIOPiERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOr, I have hereun!o set my hand this Z~~1, day ot
C./' .l~4nL~dt~t _, t994. _
~~ . . ,
, CRETARY, AN~E1M CITY PIANNINCi COMMI3310N
a. PCe~a•7