Resolution-PC 94-82,~ w'w~
RESOLI-TION NQ P~'r.$4-02
A RE50LUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TMAT FETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 4251 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEFIEAS, the Anahelm City Planning Commission did receivo e verified Petition for
Variance for certain real property situated in tho City of Anahelm, County u( Orange, State of Callfornia
described as:
F'ARCEL 3 OF PARCEl. AfAP N0. 87-416 IN THE CITY OF ANAIiEIM, COUN7Y OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FIELD IN BOOK 242 i~AGES 1
TO 4, INCLU&IVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CQUNTY
RECOFDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission did hold a pubiic hQaring at -h~~ Civlc Center In
ttie Clty of Anaheim on June 27, 19J4, at 1:30 p.m., notice of safd publlc hear(ng havin~ been duly given
as required by law and in accardan;.e with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ghapter 18.03,
to heer and conslder evidence for ~nd against said proposad variance and to tnvostigate and make findings
and recomrnendatlons in connectfon therewith; and
WHEREAS, safd Commissfon, atter duo inspection, investi~ation and study made by ItsQlf
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all ev(donce and roports offerod at safd hoaring, does ftnd
and determ(ne tlie (ollowfng facts:
1. That tho petit(oner proposes waivers of the followfng to construct one 35-foot high pylon
sign, ~ne 8-toot high shopping cenier (dentificat(on sign, and !ive wall signs:
(A) $ections 10.05,091.~ - ,p~rmitted tv~o an~i i~~h,1y'~ .eiPd centev
~$ 42•0~7 IdentHicetlon sfgn.
and 18.Q4.082.04U (one 20 sa.it. mon_~IIIgr~t si n permitted;
two ireFStandina clans proposad consist(ng of
one 35 iQot high, 4J3 sa,ft. pylon sfgn and
one 240 sa.tt. monument sign)
(B) ,~gction 18.05.090.020 - P rmft wall s(qns.
~q_2•067 (1 permitted; ,~ proposeci)
and 18.8a.062•04Q
(C) ,~@ t,~.~f n 18.05,090.O~.Q • Fr~@st n in ir ctlonal siap~gQ.
,18 42.067 (Qnq 3(pot h(gl~ iraostanding directional sign
n~18.84,062.040 pormittod per entrance driveway;
Qg~• t I F frePStandin~ ~ilrectior.al s(~n propos~d)
2, That tho Radc~velopn~Qnt Commissfon recummendoa that tho ~ylon sfgn be deieted trom
the roquest, that the two monument signs be appravect sub~ect to compliance with the desf~n guidelineg
bging davoloped by City ot ,4naheini and City of Yorba Linda staff And ttvat only three (3) wall sipns bd
permlttect {denying tho Mfct~nnfn ttre Ir.po, `auto sen~fae," and 'garden sh~p' signs);
3. That H•aiver (A) is hereby aranted, in part, permittinp tt rnaximum o( two monumont signs,
to bo in compliance with d~sipn yuicielfnes (or the SAVI Rar~ch comprehensive signfng and wayfind(ng
program beinp dovelo~ed by staH on tho basis that the larfle size oi the property n~cessftates adaltional
identNication end entry monumontntion in order to lacilitato a~:cess to tho site; an~ dsnying ti~e pylon sign
on the basis that the pylnn sign w~~ withdrawn by the applfcant at the publir, hearing;
CR2125MS.wp • 1- PC94•8~
~a,.~~;, tJ..K:
4. 7hat waiver (8) is t~ereby grartecl on tho basls that there are special circumstanc~s
applicable to the property consisting of Its topography, locatlon and surroundlnfls (a significant grade
differontial between subJect property and nearby ArFeriai h(gfiweys and freeways, and in~ilrect accass from
Welr Canyon Fl~aad, the only nearby arterial highway), which do not apply to other identically ~~sned
propercies in tho viciniy; and
5. Tliat walver (C) Is hereby granted on the basis that thore are special circumstancos
appllcable to tho property consisting of hs topography, Iocation and surround(ngs (a signifir,ant Qrade
diffe~'ential betweei7 sub~ect property and neArby arter(al highways and ireeways, and indirect accoss trom
Weir Canyon Road, the only nearby arterlal higt~way), which do not apply to other fdentically zoned
propertles in !ho vicinity;
6. That s' ict applfcetlon of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privil~ges onJoyed by
other properties under iden!ical zoning r,lassilicatien in tfie vic(nity; and
7. That no ono Indicated their prQSence at sa(d public hearing in oppositlon; and th~t no
correspondQnce was recefvod in opposition to subject pet(t(on.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALfTY ACT FIN~IN~: Tho Planning Director or his
authorized representative has determ(ned that the proposeci project locatod r~n an irreqularly-shaped parcel
of Iand consist(ng of approximately 18.69 acres at the southwest corner of Old Canal Road and Pullman
Street having ta frontaye of approxfmately 623 feot on the west side of Pullman Street with a maximum depth
of approx(mately 1,240 feet and turther described a~ 1095 Pullman Street, falls within the definitlon of
Catogorfcal Exemptlons, Class 5, as dei~ned In the State EIR Gufdelines and is, there(ora, catogorically
c~xempt from the requirement to prep~re an EIFl.
NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahefm C!ty Planning Commission does
tiereby grant subject PetitiUn ior Varianco, upon the following conditions wh(ch are hereby found to bo a
nocessary prerequisite to tho proposed use of the subJect property in order to preserve the satety and
general welfaro ot the Cftizens of the City o( knahelm:
1, That subJect property shall be developod substantialiy in eccord~nce with plans and specfifcations
submitted ta tlie City ot An~i~elm by the petitioner and whicl~ plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhi~i- Nos. i tfirough 3; providad, howc~v~r, that:
(a) Two (2) monument ~igns sha;l bo perm(tted In compliance with design quidelines tor the SAVI
P.anch comprehensiva signinQ and wayfinding program bein~ developcx~ by C~ty of Anahelm and
Cfty of Yorba Lin~a staH.
(b) The pylon slgn shall r~t be pern~itted.
(c) The watl siqns shall be permitteci consistent with tho revisod elovation plan submitted at the
June 27, 1994 public hearing with the addition of tho "Garden Shop" and "Auto Sorvice" slgns on
the Past elevat(on. The "Garden Shop' and "Auto Service" signs shall bo the same latter height
as the "Fresh Focxi" and "Pharmacy" sig~s currently ~hown on safd plen.
2. That w!ihin g~~eriod of oro (1) year from the date of this resolution, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned,
shall be compl(ed ~~+ith. Ext~nsiens tor furt~~er timr~ to complett~ said conditfoi~s rray bd grented in
accordanc9 with Sectfon 10.U3.090 of the Anahoim Municip~i Code.
3. 7hat ap~roval of this application constitutes approval of th.e proposed request only to tho extent that
it complies ~yfth the Anahefm Nunicipal Zoning Caie ancl any other appifcnbie City, Stato and Focferal
re~ulatfons. Approval does not include any ectfon or findfngs as to compllance or approval oi the
requrzst regard(ng any othor applfcable ordinanco, re~utation or requirement.
.2. PC~J4-82
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahoim Cify Planning Comrr~ission doos hereby find
and detormine tl~at adoption Uf thls ~tesolutlon (s expressly predicated upon applicant'~ compllanco with
each ~nd t-II of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Si~ould any such condition, or any part thoreot, be
dec;lared invaiid or uneniorc~abie by the final judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, thon this
Resolutlon, and any approvals herein contaired, shall bo deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOINC RESOLU7IQN was adopted at ttie Planning Comrniss(on mAeting of
Juno 27, t994,
~ fJ~~ d-~
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY P I G COMMISSION
ATl'EST:
(;l.l~ CoGofu.6
SECRETAR , A HEIM CITY PLANNING C0IAMISSION
STATE OF GALIFORNIA )
COUNN OF ORANGE ) ss.
~ITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Marg4rfta Solorio, Secretary of the Anahelm Gity Planning Commission, do hereby certlfy
that the forogoinQ resolutfon was passed ~nd adopted ~t a meetirig of the Anahelm City Plannfng
Commfsslon held on June 27, 1994 by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: F3qYDSTUN, CALDWEI.L, HFNNINGER, \AAYER, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIO~JFRS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 7AIT, MESSE
IN WITNE ;S WHEREOF, I have horeuntu set my hand thfs 1~'~' day af ~,
1994.
,
1 c~.n a~~; c . ~~.~
SECRETARY, A HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.3_ PC94-82