Resolution-PC 94-84RESOLUTION N0, PC94-~4
A RESOLUTION OF 7HE ANAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FAR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3691 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anahr~lm City Plannln{~ Commission did recnive a veriiled Petftion for
Conditionnl U~e permit for certa~n real property situated in the City of Anahafm, Cuunty ot Orango, Stato
of Calfiornia, describeci ~s:
THfiT t'QRTION OF Lf)T 4 OF SOU7H PLACENTIA TRACT N0. 2, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGE 42 OF MI3CELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE
OF 71~E COUNTY RECORDEFi OF SAID CJUNTY, DESCRIEI:D A~ FALi.UWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTNWEST CORNkR OF ",ID LOT 4; THENCE
KORTHERLY 598.25 FEET ALONG THE WEST LI~' JF 5AI~ LOT: THENC:E
EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH TFIE NORTh LINE UF SAII~ LOT TO A POINT
WHICH IS EASTERLY 340.00 FEET, MEASURED ALOf~G SAID PARAI.LEL LINE
ANU YHE PROLONGATI~N 7HEREOF, FHOM THE CENTERLINE OF CYPR[SS
AVENUE; 7HENCE SOUT}i~RLY PARALLEL WITH SAID WtST LINE TO THE
SOU7HEASTFflLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHWESTEHLY ALONG SP,ID
SOUTFiEAST[RLY LINE TO THE 50UTH LINF. OF SAIU LvT; THENCE
WESTERLY 85.90 FEET ALqNG SAIL~ SCUTH LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNItVG.
EXCEPT TIiE NORTHERLY 12c).00 FEET (MEASUREn AL(3NG THE WESTERI.Y
L~NE) 7HEREdF.
ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF, DESC~iIBED AS FOLLOWS:
DEGINNING A7 THE SOUTHWES7 CORNER OF SAID LbT A, SA~D CORNER
HAVINIi BEEN CONSTRUED BY FqRMER DEED TO BE THE INTERSECTION
OF 1'H[ WEST LINE OF SECTION t, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST,
SAN ESERNAADINO MER~DIAU, kS SHOWN ON SAID MAP W-TH THE
WESTER[.Y PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTFlEFiLY LINE OF LOT 2 OF SAID
TRACT; TI~ENCE NURTHERLY 199.52 FEET ALONG SAID WESt LINE; TH~NCE
GASTERLY 197.~~ FEET QARAILEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID t0T 4;
THENCE. SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITN SAID WEST LINE TO THE
SOUTHEAS'ERLY I.INE ~JF SAID l07 4 WHIrH HAS BEEN CrJNSTHUED BY
FOHMER CE~pS 7U 6E TIiE CENTF(t LINt OF 7HE l1N•NAMED STREET NOW
KNOWN AS PLACENTIA HOULE`~Af~Q; THENCE S~UTHWESTCRLY ALONG SAID
SUUTH[ABT~RLY LINE TO '~HE SAID WESTERLY F'ROL4NC~ATION OF THE
SOUTHERLY IINE UF SAID LOT 2; 'fF1ENCE WESTERLY ~5 ~0 FE[7 ALONG
SAID PROLONGATION TO THE PO~N7 OF 6EGINNING.
Wl1EREA5, the City Planning Commissfon d(d t~dd a pub~ic haaring at tho Civic Centcr
in tho City of Anaheim on Jun9 27, t~34 et 1:30 p.n~., notice of sa!d pubNc ~~earing twving baen duly gfvon
as roquirocf by law ancl i~ eccordance wflh tho provisions o! the Anahefm Municipal ~odg, ~h~pter 1l3.0~,
ta hoar and consi~er eviclence !or nnd aflainst s~~id proposal conditlonal use permit ancf to Ir-vestigato nnd
make Itndinfls nnd recommencleti~na in cannection therm~vith; anc
WHEREA~, sakl Commiscion, a(tcr dua Inspection, fine~stf~.3!lon ond atudy maclo t~y ftsoll
~rxf in itc behatF, erxf after due, conskforatfon oi all avklaciCU and roports oflered at sakJ hearinQ, does find
and detcrminn tho tdlow(nfl (acta:
CR2127MS.WP •t • PC~34~
t. That tho pr~~posod uae is properly one for whichi a conditional use permit is authorizecf by
~nahefm Municipal CrxJe Sc~ctlon 1b.44.050.130 to permit a tU,000 sq.ft. church w(th accessory Iivfng
qu~rtors and wfth waivor of the following:
~~~tfcZn 18.04.Q42.020 - MiP(murn landsc~pe reauiroments.
,~.og.os t• t landscapod ~etback betwee~ fnstitutfo~ial
and 18.44.063.040 usos and residentlal use~ with ,~ trb~s roqwrod,
,~ setback or trees existing aiong north and east property Iinos;
and 22 t•ses requ!red adJacent to pubtic r(ghts•of-way, ~ oxisting)
2. 7fiat thQ reyuested waiver (s hereby app~oved, in p~rt, permitt(ng the minimum landscaped
sotb2ck waiver elong the east property Ifne but denyfng it along tlie north property Iine on the basls that
there are ~peclai circumstancay applicablo to the property consisting of'ocs~tlun and surroundings, which
do not Epply to othor i~entically zon9d pr~pertfes In tho vicinity, because existing carports abutting the
east property Iine provide a visual screon between sub~ect property and the edj~co~t aF,artmonts but tliat
thare is n~ visual barrler alorg the north property I(ne whore ap~rtmen!3 iace ~ubject property; and that
the existinfl d-iveway along the east property lino shou~d remain in its current locailon because it serves
as an emergency accessway for both subjoct proporty and 4he ac'jacent ep~rtmant c~mplex to the north;
3. That strict application ot the Zoning Codo deprives thg property of prfvileges enjoyed by
~ther properttes under identi~al zonin9 classitication in the v(cirnty;
4. That thR pro~osQCi use Is prnperly one for which a conciftional use permit is authorized by
the Zonin~ Code;
5. That the p~oposed uso will not advorsely affect th~ edjoinfng land uses and the growth and
dwe~opment of thQ area in which K fs proposecl to be locatod;
6. That tha size and shape of the site ior iha propesai use is adoquate to allow ihe (u~l
development o( tf~e proposed use In a manner not datrfmontal to the parllcular area nor to ihe poace,
health, safety, and 4eneral wolft~re;
7. 7hnt thp traHic Boneraied by the proposed use will not impose an undue b:~rden upon ihe
streots ancl highway~s ~esignad Ancl improvecl to carry the 1raNic fn the area;
8. That fhe granting o( the conditional use permit under the canditions imposed w(II not bo
d~trimental to the poace, he~flth, 3afety and QnnF:rai weltai~ nf the citizons ~t the City of Annheirn; and
9. 7hat no ono Indlcated thelr presence ~t sakl publfc hearlRg !n uppasition; and that no
carrPSpondance was rec2lved in o~position to the subject petition.
~AL F~A ENVI~tI~ENTAL QUALITI! 9~LE~lD1.tV~: That 1hQ Anaheim City Plann(ng
Corr,mission haa revfawed th9 proposal to {~±rrr~it a 10.()00 sq.ft. church with accessory living quarters and
whh wniver of mf,7imum landscapo roquirert-erns on an Irregula~lyshaped parcel ol land consistin~ of
approximataly t.ey acres Ixatetl north arxf easi of tha nonheas'. cornar of ~tacentia Avenue nnd Stato
Cdlege BoutRVa-ct, having approximate ~ront:.ges oi 170 toet on tha nortli sicfe of Plac~ntia AvQnuo and
~79 fe~t on tho east uide o( State Ca~ege ~cxdevard, ursd turther descrikxxf ea 122t Nonh Plncen!fa
Avenue: and does hereby ap~rovu tho NQQativo Oeclarallon upon tincling that The declaratipn retlects tho
Irxlepend~nt (uclflem~nt ol tho lead aqency ancl that it h~~s c~nsi0c~recl tho Noqati~ie pacaaratlon to~ather
with any comments recelvecl durinp the pudic rwicwv process ancf iurthor tirxiing un Iho basis of cha In(ttal
stucty and any comrnents ruCaived lhat ther~ fa no substantial evkfance that tho prQ~ect will hsvo a
signN~cant eHoct on thB ernironment.
.•_,. FCfln•as
NOW, THEREFOFlE, BE IT RES01_VEp th~t the Anaheim Cfty Planninp Commisslon does
hereby grant sub~ect Petition for Conditional Use Permit, in part, upo,~ the (oliowing cnnditions which are
heroby iound to be a necessary prerequlsite to the p+nposed use oi the subject property in order to
preserve the satety nnd gEnera~ welfare of tt~c~ Citizons uf the City of Anaheim:
t, That a~n(nimum of one (1) covered parking sp~ce sF;all be pr~vidod for the on-slto resldent.
2. That plans ~hall bo submitt~d to tha City TraH(c ar!d 7ransportatlon Alanager ~or his revfew and
opproval showfng conformanca with the Iatest ravisions of Engineerinp Standnrd Plan Nos. 436 2nd
602 portaining to park(ng standards and driveway locations. Subjoct property shall thereupon be
developad and maintained in conformance with said plnns.
3. 7hat all drivaways shall be reconstru~tod to accommodate ten (10) foot radlu~ curb returns in
conformance witf~ Engineering Department Standards.
4. That approprinte park and recr9ation in•IiQU faos sha~' be pa(d to the City oF Anahe(m (n an amount
as established by City Cour!cil resolution.
5. That a,~lan h•i ~^~ solki wnsle storafle and collaction, and a plan (or recycling shali be submittod
to tlie qo~. 'me+~ ~,i Malntenance for review and approval.
6. Th~t a~~ ,de•~e~uirecl landscap(ng shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspecttons.
7. 7hat sui~)e. nroperty shall ~e daveloped substantfally In accordance with plans and speci(icatlons
submitted ~' City ~t Anaho(m by the petit(oner and which plars are on file with the Planning
nepartme~~~ ~narke~ Exhibit Nos. t and 2; including tf~e landscapeti setbacks and trees requfred by
the Zoning Code along tha north property Iine and in the setbacks alona State Cotloge Boulevard and
Piecenti~ Avenue, as specified In Cundition Nos. 6 and 8, herein.
6. That a landscape pian shail be submitted to Iho Planning Comm(ssion tor review and approval as a
Reports and Recommendatfons item sl~owing on•sito landscap(ng consisting of a ni~nimum fiReen (15)
foat tandscapc~d setback along the north eclge of tho property and the Code•requ(rod trees to be
plant9d tn the setbacks alonq State Collego Boulevard and Placentia Avenue. Installat(on of such
landscap~ng may invoive relocating certafn paiicing spaces into th~ proposecl landscaped courtyard
In front ot the propcsecl ~hurch buildinfl.
9. That priar to issuance ot a build(ng parmit or within a period of on4 (1) year from the data oi this
resolution, whichever occurs fitst, Condition Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 8, abave~mentio~~ed, shall be complfed
wflh. Extensiens tor turther time to complete said condf11on3 may be grantQd in acco-dance with
Soctlon i8.03.09U of the Anahelm Mun(cipal CcJe.
10. That prior to tinal building nnd zoning (rspections, Concl(tion Nos. t, 3, 6 and 7, abova•mentionod,
shatl be compllud with.
t t. That aaprova! of thts ap~licat(on r,onstitutes apprnval o' lho proposod requost only to the extent that
it complios wfth the Anahelm MunicEpal Zoning Code and nny otFior applfcable City, State ~nd Federal
regulatfons. A{~proval doos n~t inctu~Je any act;on or findings as to complfance or npproval of the
request regarding any o!her applicablc~ ,rdinance, rogulatiun or requfroment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tt~at tho Anahoim City Pl~:~ning Commission does hereby (fnd
a~xl dotermine that adoptfon of lhls R~soiution is oxpressiy pradicatecl upon opplicant's compilance w8h
each end all of the condittons ?Inauovo set Rortli. Should any such condit(on, or any paR thereot, be
dectarecl irrvalid or unenforceat ~y tho final judyment of any court of competent juristfictfo~i, then ihls
Resolution, pnd ony approvals herein :ont~ined, shall be de~mecl null and vofcJ.
•3- PC94-Wi
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION w~s adopted at the Planning Commissinn m~eting of
June 27, 1994.
~~ ~~ ~~_~
CHp:IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G CQM1IMMI,^~SION
ATfEST:
~a~OfLL.~~
SECRETAR , HEiM CITY PLANNING COMMISS(UN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF rJFlANGE ) ss.
CI1Y OF ANAHEIM )
f, Margarita Solorio, Secrotary of the Anahoim Cfty Plannin~ Commission, do horeby certih~
that lhe foregoing rasolutfon was passed and adopted at a meeting ot tl~e Anaheim City Planning
Cornmisslon held on Junc 27, 1994, by the tollow(ng vote of the membors thereoi:
AYES: COMMISSIONFRS: ~OYDSTUN, CALDWELL, !-IENNINGER, MAYER, PEAAZA, TAIT
NQES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEFiS: MESSE
~,. n IN WI7NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thfs ~ day oi
(.<X~, t 9~.~4.
(J Z~ (,cfti6
SECR~A HEIM ITY PLANN{NG C~MMISSION •
.q_ PC94~84