Resolution-PC 95-123
~(~'ZION NO PC9~~
A RESOHATI PET'O I~?N F'AR VARIA C~- NO ?_76 BE DEN Ep SION
WHEREAS, the Anaholm City Planning Commissfon dld raceiN~ a verlfiEd Petitlon fr~r
Varlance Na. 427~ for certain re~f property situ~ted in the CIry of Anahelm, Courrty of Or~nge, State of
California describod as:
THE NQRTH HALF OF THF ~DUTF~ i A ACRES ~~ TN~'+NE$7 2o AC RANGE
ThIE NOR~'NWEST G1lDARTER OF SEC71dN 1 S, TOWNSHIP 4 50UTH,
~p WEST, IN THE FtANGF~~ L~S COYOTES, IN THE CITY aF ANAHEIM,
COU~I'r`~ QF ORANO 0~ ~15CELLANEOI~S MAPS,~ N 7 EAUF~ CE OF DHE
BOOK 51, PAGE
GOUNTY RECOFlDER qF SAID COUNI'X.
WH~REAS, the City Planning Commis~fon did hald a public hearinfl at the Civic CentAr in
the Giry of Anahelm on September 18, 1~e~ With Ahe prc~visinna of t AjAn~P e`im Muni cpal Code, Ch pter
giv~n as requfred by law and in acc~rda
1E3.A3, 4o hear and consider evidenc~ fior ~i n herewith;ia d~hatgsald publ ceh~arirg wasSaontinued o the
find(ngs and recommend~atfons in connect o
Octaber 2, 1995 Plannin~ CAmmission meoting; and
WHEREAS, sa(d CommissZonpf al~l evidence and re~portsgo~'~oried atnsaid ear n~, doe,s find
and in its bet~alf, anrJ ~fter due consideration
and determine the following fac:s:
~, That the petftioner praposas waivars of the following to construct a 42-foot high mlarowrave
disM antenna:
~~~~.+ +a.. 0 0.0~5 Per~~ aC~°QCON i!S~S 8n~~t~llC#ura~.
~a~ $~'~'~ `""~~'~'~ . (maximum ~~ high dish type antenna pormitted;
~ c,~gt high dlsh antenna praposed)
(b) e tion 1$s,3a•~62,011 - LV1." i~,x mum structural h_~~•
(2 stories f t p~rmitted;
42 f,~@~ proposed)
2. That the above-mentianed waivers are hersby denied•
3. Th:.t there ~ro no speclal circumstances applicable to the prop~rty such as size, shape,
!opo~raphy, location or surr•c~undings, which do not s~pply to other identf~..~~iy zoned propert~es ln the vicinfty;
and
Iication of th~ Zaning Code does not dsprhre 4he properry of p~ivileges
4. That strlct apQ
enjoyed by ather ,~ropertiPs un~er idonticai aoning classification li~ the viciniry.
.,` PC95-123
GR2494DM.WP
' ;,,
5, 'i'hat the requested variance is not necess~ry ,
for e v c nit s andt aonr~ r~and denlad to the
substantial property right possossed by other praportY fn the sam Y 1
prnperty in questian. ~
6, 7hat the requested variance will be materiail~ywhich th~~p apertY Isbiocated~r~ or inJurious
to the prnportY or ~m{~rqvoments in such viaintty and zane
no ane indicated ~heir prosence at said public hearing in oppositian; ~tid that no
7, That Qsftiori to subJect petitian.
cor~espondence was received in opp That tha Anaheim Ciry Planning
~AI~IFORNIA -NVIRONM~NTAI. A.~~N A~~ FIND.~~ ~-.,
rcei ~f ';
Commisslon has revlewed the proposal fior waiver pwave di ~ antenna on a r~ctan~{ula yrshaped taa mu o
structural height ta c~nstruct a~2-foot high micro roxim~tely 333 fset on the east side ;+
f~nd consisting of ap~; oximately 4.59 acres having a frontage of ~pp r,~~imately 333 feet
M~gnolia Avenue, havin~ a maximum d~Rth of app~'oxim~tely 62~ feet, being located app
dwa and further described as 150 South ~a~ heideclarat on refl cts
~qrth of the conteriln~ of Broa Y
Apartments); and do9s heraby apprave the Negativa Deciaration upon findirig that t
e ondent udgement of the laad agency and that it has ~~nddurther fi di gaon th~e basSiaf t~e inftial
the ind p 1
wlth any camments received dur(ng the public review process
and an camments receiveci that tNere is no substantial evidonce tha4 the ~project wili have a signific~~tit
study Y
effect on the ~nvironment.
NpW, THEREFORE, E3E 17 REcOI.V~D that th~ A~aheim City Planning Commission does
hsreby deny subject Petition for Variance an the basis af the aforementioned findings. fon rnoeting of
THE FOREGOING R~SOL.UTiON was ac~eq~ted at planninp Commfss
l~L~ .
October 2, 1995. ~1~~"~''`~
CHAIRMAN, PRO 7 MpORE
ANAH~IM CITY i'I.ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
l. GL..) (~.G~/'~-cS
~EC_~F E~R AN~EIM CITY PIANNIN~ COIVIMISSIO~!
g ?tA
$TATE OF CALIFOFlNIA )
COUN7Y OF QRANGE ) ss.
C~TY pF At~AHEiM ) ~a hQreby certif~
I, W1a~garita 5alarto, 5ecr~tary of the Anaheim Gity Planning Commission, plannin
that the for~going ~esolution was passed and ddQ~t~Qte of the members th9reofaheim City 9
by tho fall~winc~
f;ommissfon held an October 2, 1995,
AYES: COMMlSS1dNERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BPlST01_, HENNINGER, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NQNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MAYER, PERr1~A ~;7~~ day of
~~ WI7N~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set rny ttiand this ____~___
1 f F~ , 1995. ~ . c n •
~i ~~ /'j,.G• ca2 ~OI ~ '
SECRETA Y~ AH'~~ C~N p~`NNING C4MMISSION
PG95-123
-2-