Resolution-PC 95-128~~
,~,.,ESQ.J~TION NO PC9~-1 ~8
~
A RESOLUTlCiV OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C~MMISSIQf~
TWAT PCi'ITION FOR CQNDI710NAL ~JSC PERMIT NC9. 3793 t3E GRANTED
WH mREA,r ~ce tain reaeproporty s'i~tuatod i~ ~ti e City of Anahoimt CA tyrlof nreng •o,~5ta~e
Conditfon~l Use Pe
of Caltfornia, described ~as:
TWAT POF~TII~N OF LO"f 6 OF TWE KELLQGG WOME3TEAD TRACT, AS SHOWN
ON A Nif~P RECORDED fN BOOK 8, PAGE 51 OF MISCELI.AN~OUS MAPS,
RECQRD~~ OF ORAPJGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
BCGINNII~G AT A POINI' lN TH~ CENT'ER L1NE OF TFiE 60 ~OOT ROAD ALONG
ThIE N~R'THERI.Y BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 6, OISl'ANT 7HGREF~iOM
W~BTEFiLY 1~ FEE"f FROM !75 INTERSEC7IQN WIThI TI-I~ WEST~RLY UNE OF
7hIC 40 FOOT ROA~ ALONG 1'HE EASTERLY BOUNDAFIY OF SAlD LOT 6, AND
RUNNING TWENCE SOIJTHCFtI.Y, PARALLEL WIThI TH~ EAaTERLY LIfVE OF
SAID I.OT 6, ~95 FEE?~ THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL W!1'H TS~E NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LGT 6, '123.10 FEE7 'f0 A POINT IN SAIf~ PARALLEL~ LINE,
piSl'AM' THEREON IEr~w'I'EpLY 125 FEET FRG~M ~'I-IE WF_STERLY LINE OF ~AID
L.OT 6, THENCE NOR'iHE.RLY PARAL.LEL WITM 7HE WEwT~RLY LINE OF SAIa
LOT 6, 395 FEET TO SAID CENT~R LINE OF 5AID 60 FOOT RC3AD; THE'NCE
V~/CS7FRLY ALO~lG SAID C~NTER LINE 124.~5 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINiVINC.
~I~IHEFtEAS, the City Planning Commission ~id hold a publi~c hearing at the Civic Conter
in the City of Anaheim on Octr~bar Z, 1995 at 1:30 p.m., notic~ r~f ~sid publfo hearing having b Ch Pter
given as requ(rod by law an~ in accardance with tho provislons of tFie Anaheim Municipal Coda,
18.03, to hear an ko find n~s and~rACOmmendattogsi intcunnectiontheewith~fandal use permit ~nd to
investi~ate and ma g
WHEfiEAS, said ~~mmissian, att~r due inspectfon, invastic~atfan and study made by itself
and in fts behalf, and after du~ cansideratian oF all evidence and ra~orts offered at sa(d hearing, doos find
and dvtermine the follow{ng facts:
1. That the propostxi use Is praperly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized b.y
Anaheim Munfcipal Code Section 18.44.050.130 to establish a church within an existing 5,7F3 sq.ft.
wedding chapel.
2, That the praposed use is properly one for which a conditionai use nermit is authorized by
fh~ Zonin~ Code;
3. That the propasad use will n~t adversely affect the adjaining I~nd uses and the grow4h and
devolopmont of the area in whlch it is pro~osed to be locatotl because subject prop~arty has been
d~veloped with a wadding chap~l (AStabl~shed under Conditinnal Use Permit Na. ~184) since 1966 and the
propc~sed church is compatible wlth uses in the ~x~sting neighborhoad;
4. That the s(ze and shape of the site for the proposed uss is adequate to aN~w thR full
development af the proposed use in ~ manner not cietrfmontal to tho particuler area nor t~a the poace,
health, safety, and generai weifare;
-1- P~95-128
CR2~9~OM.WP
~r~~l
`i~
,, That the traifilc gonerated by the propose~d use wili not i aneae ~n undGie bUrtlen ~i{aon the
streets a~~d hic~hways dosi~ned and improved to c~rry tho traffic in the ;
g, That the granting of the conditlonal usa permlt,undn~ tha conditions imposed, wlll n~t be '
dotrim~ntal to the {~anco, health, safaty and goneral wolfare af the citize~s of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
7, That no ~ne (ndicated i~ip~n o~ehA subjectapet tioni~C hearing in opposition; a~nd that na
correspondence was recoived in oppos
~ALI~Q NIA ENVIR d~I~.L4!4.~A ~ T F NDINS~: rhat the Anaheim City Plannfng
Con~mission has rovlswod tha proposal to esta~~li c~nsf ting of ~ppraxfmat ly 0 98 ac e F avin~l a frotage
cliapel on a r4ctangularly-shaped parcel of fa
af appraximately 125 feet an thQ south sidwQSt c f~th~ cent alinegof [Jutwood St eeth anc! furtho degcribed
fe~t, being {ocated approxlmately 2A0 feet
as 1916 V1l~3st Ba~l Fio~d; and doss hereby approve the Neg~t~~e Declaration upo!i finding that tho
~: ~aclaration reflects the indopendent judgem e~~~tdurfead h~g p pl~c ~~~~~~ ~~A~~ss and furt er findig9 `on
~eciaration togethor w(th any c~mm~nts rec ~
the basis of the initial study and any com enviranmont~ that ther~ is no substantlai evidence that the
project will have a slgnificant effect on the
NpW, THEREFORE, BE ~T F~ESQLV~D vhat the Anaheim ~fty Planning Commission does
hereby grant subjoct Petitian for Conditional Us 0$~ useuof~ hehsubJe'ot property n( ~ der~tio p es rvoetho
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the prop
safety and generai ~,velfare of the Citizeris nf the City of Anaheim:
1. That all activ(ties at 4his !ocatic~n shall csas~ by 10:OU p.m.
2. That subJect church shall ry~,1' ~nclude commercial day care or F-arochial scl~r~ol actfvitfes.
3. That any propos~cf frees~andin~ s~9n ~ ubue~0 tot ho eevlewaa d pp ovainof the~ Cityt'fraffi~a dand
efght (S) feet in height and shall be . j
TranspottaTion Mlanager to dotermfne aciequatta lines-of•sf~ht.
4, That subj~ct prnp~rty shall be develo~.- he S stitionea'nnd whi h plan<j are onafile wi h tiie P~a tnpn9
submittecE to the Ctty ~f Anah~im by t p
pgpartment marked Ext~ibit No. 1.
5. That the ~pplicant shall post a"right•~turn oniy` :;ign on tt~e driveway exitin!~ to 43a11 Rv~d.
~. That prfor to finai building and zoning ~ C~~ition N~ 4~ind 5~abovo•m~ntionlad, sha Irbe ompiied
of this resolution, whichever occurs first,
with, Extenslons for (urther cime to camplet~~ed corxlitions may bo gr.~nted in accordance with
S~cttan 18.03•0~(1 of th~ Anaheim Municipa
7. That Approval of this appiication constitutes app~oval of the prQposed r~~q~u~el~t`ii ~Y Sta Q g~ F~QYaI
it compilos wfth tho A~~hoim Munic(pal Zoninq Code and any other app Y ~
regulations. A~proval doas not includo any actian or findings as t~ con~pltance or appravai of the
requu5t rggarding any othor appficable ordinance, regula3ion or requiremont.
BE 17 FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cfty Planning ~c8mmi^s~sno s campl ance with
and dotermine that adopii ons heh~i apbove sat forthp S ouid any such condilion, or any part thereaf, be
eac~ and ali oi thA cond
declared invalid ar unonforceable by the final~ $h ~~~~ deamedu ul ar~d voide~t jur~sdiction, then th s
Resolutlon, anc1 any approvals her~in cn~a ~
PC95•128
-2-
THC FOREGOfNG Fi~50LUT14N was adoptad at the Plannin~ Commission meeting af
4ctAber 2, '1995. ~
. ,,.~-" ---""'~""~7
CHAIRMAN, PRO T PORE
ANAhIEIM CIlY P NING CC7IVIMISSION
ATTEST:
..~~~~ L.G ~~~1~
Sdd~;P
SECRETARY. AHEI ITY PII~NNING COMMIS510N
S7ATE OF CALIFOFiNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CIN O~ ANAH~It~A )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary af the Anah~im City Planning Commission, do hersby certihj
that the foreg~ing res~lution was passed ancl adopted at a meeting af the Anahefm t'ity Plannin~~
Commission held ~n Gctober 2, 1995, by the foliowing vote af the mernbers thereaf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICI<, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, H~P! ~iINGER, MESSE,
NOES: CQMMISSIONERS: NQNE
ABSENI. GOMMISSI~JNE~S: MAYER, PERAZA
IiV WITN~SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~day af ~~ ~
1 ~J5.
?. . ~ ~
E RE7ARY, AHEI ~ CI7Y P NNING COMMISSION
SC
-3- PC95-128