Resolution-PC 95-141;
~,
A RGS(JLU"PION UF 7hiE ANAhIEIM CITY PIANNI~lG CGIMMISSIUN
AMENDING RCSOLlJ714N N0. PC~32-J3 ADOP7E0 iN CnNNECTION WITH
CONDITIONAL USE P~RMI7 Nd. b334
r WHEREAS, on 5eptembor 2~3, 1976 the F~lanning Comm(ssl~n ~pproveci Condikional Use
; Pormit Na 156a, ~n cqnnection with Fles~lutlon No. PC75-194, to permit an ~~domobilo auction and
" recanditlonln~ facllity at 1320 North Tustin Av9nuo !n the M[. Zone; and tt~t no ~urther t~ction was taken
uy the Ciry ~ouncil;
WFiER~AS, on Aprll J, 1980 the City Coun~il approved Cond141Qnal Use Permit No. ~052, In
connection with Resalu:lun No. 80R•ta2, to exFand tha oufstin~ automobii~ auction and r~conditiuning
fec(lity;
'~ WHEREAS, on May 17, 1982 the Planning Commiss(on ap~roved Condltional Use Permit No.
2334, in cannection with Resolutlon No. PC82-93, to expand 4he oxistin~ autamabila auction and
reconditio-iing facility; and thet no further a~tion was takon by the Cfty Councfl.
; WNEREAS, Condftian No. 6 af saicl Resolu4ian Na, PC82•93 reads Aa the toUaws:
"6, That subjeat proporty~ sh~ll be ~leveloped substantially in accordanca wtkh plnns and
~ specifications on file wfth the Cfry of Anahelm ma~ked Exhibit No. 1."
WHEfiEAS, t1~6 appli~~nt has svbmitted a revised nlan labA(ed Wevislon No. 1 of Exhibit No.
1; that said plan expands th~ exlsting nutdaar automobfle staging area to the es~steriy slx acr~es and adds
a 3,600 sq.fi. bullding Qxtons(on to the Ex(sting 78,720 sq.ft. buiidin~ (subsequeM to submitting tt~e revised
plan, th~e petitianor ind(cated they are r~o longor interested in expanding tl~e buildin~); and that a Crfaat high
chainifnk fencing intorvvoven with redwood slots is ~hown abutting Jefferson Street end Etci~andy L~+ne; Hnd
WHEREAS, s~id revfsed plan necessitates appraval of twa waivers pertflining to (a) r~inimum
landscaping requireme~tits f4r thQ ~et~acks along Jefferson Stroet ~nd Etchand.y Lano and (b) permitt9d
encroachmonts ir~ta the seiback alon~ Jefferson Street to permit a 6•fo~: chainiink fence.
WHEREAS, the Clty Plann(ng Commission d{d hold ~ publlc hearlr~q at tho Cfvic Center in
the Ciry oi Anah~im on October 2, 1995. ~t 1:30 p.m., notfc~ of said public he~ring having been duly given
as r~qufred by law and In accardancA with the provisians of thA Anaheim Nlunicip~i Coda, Chapter 1t3.03,
to ho~.r and consider evidenae for and agalnst ~id proposed amendmerit and the propos~d waivers, and
ta (nvesiigate and make findings and recommendations in conn~ction therQwith; and ih~t ~Id p~~lic
hearing was continued ta the October 30~ 19~J5 Planning Cornmission meetin9; and
WHEREAS, sakl Commi~sion, uFter due (nspectfon, investigation and study made by itsalf
an~ fn fts bohaN, and after due considgration of ali evidence ~nd reports oitereci at said hearin~, does Hnd
and detormine ths foliawing facts:
t. That th3 petftionor requests amendment to Conditlonal Us~ Permft No. 233a to expand an
ex(st(ng automobile r~uction and reconditloning faciNty with a~aiver4 of the f~ollowSng:
(~) `3~,G.ZI.RlLs 18.1'?O.C3Q. . .Q~_2~b}
~(~j 1~,.110•OSb.0y0,090~5
jy)i~Nrn ~~m tandscanlna raa`ire _ en s.
(Required: y0•foot wid~.lgnd~~,~!d set~C~i
with ~ r s along Jet~er~n Str~et and
.!,~;~Q~t,~v~le Iar,~,.g~Qg~, s b~c wfth
~g,p~ along Etchandy l~rug); Proposed: oonel
CR25?_7MS.WP -i - PC95-141
i~~~ ~~~i~~ !~
i„ .
(b) ,~@,~tlon 1 ti ti,t~.Q~1Q4~. - Fc~~mftt~d er~~ro~.hm~nt int~a,..~.__~~l4•
(parmitted: ,~fAS~l..l1~h.~S~orative scr~o~
y~all lo ~ted iQ f~at fr~m Jafferson Strer~t and
~ feet from Etahandy Lan~; Prap~~~~d: extsting ~Qt
~~„~.l~, I~jr~ fonce interwoven with woud slats abutting
J6fferson Streot and Etchandy Lane)
2, That tl~ere are special circumst~nces applicablo to the property cansist~nq of tapography,
locatlon and surro~mdin~s, which do nc~t apply to other id~n4lcally xaned proparties in the viclnity bec.susA
the ~osthotic benefit envisfoned by aompllance w{th the Cocle-required landscaping would not bA ~chlaved
because tho appraximately 50•foot frontago ~long Jefferson Street fa ~levated 2-3-feQt ab~v~ the grade of
subjact proporty and is set baak apQror.imately 15 feet from tho im~raved rfght-c~f-way; Rnd that the view
of the ~ub~oct frontege is also linpacted by tli~ railroad right•~f-w~y borclering the ~ast~arly b~undary of tha
subJect property;
3. 'ihat 5trict application of the Z.on(ng Code deprive~ th4 property af privilr~gas enJoyed by
other propertios under fdantical zoning classification in the vicinity;
4. That the proposed use, as proposed to be expandecl, wifl not advArsely affiect. th,e adjAinin~
land uses and the prowtli and deveiapment r~f iha area In which it is proposod to be Ic~ated bar,ause the
storage lot oxpansion is con~s~i~h rrt~wut ~ sl tst servest~o screen the s orege~~~ea fromepublic vlew;t~t
chainifnic fencing in.erwoven
5. That the siza and shape of the site for th4 proposed ex~analon is adequate tQ allow the fuil
development af tho pro~~sed use In a manner nat ~otrimenta! to th~ particular ~roa nor to the peace~
heaith, safety, and general welfar~ beaause the City Traffic and '~ranspottatio~~ Man~ger has teviewed tiha
subjeCt raq~ 3st antl determinod thai sufficient porkin~ is available;
g, That tho Zr~ tle~ened dbimt~ o ed o~ carrythe t affic~ilin the apeae an undue burdon up~n
thR streots and highways g
7, That expanding the ene ai! iweffa e of theecit zo sQOf tthe (:fty c-f Anahefmnar~d~ ~etrfinental
to the peacA, health, safoty and g
8. That no one~ ind`n o ~g °un ta tho subJect (petition~ hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was recQ ed pp
ALI ORN A,~ ~L1V.1~,4i~iJ~~..~A~.~Y-Y AC7 FINDING: That tho An~heim Ciry Planning
Commission ha~s rev(owed the ~roposa! ~nd doos hereby find that the Nega~ivs Dscfaratlon previously
a,pprovad in connectfon with Cc~~ditional Uso F~ermit No. 2334 Is adequate to serva as the requlred
environmentai documentatfan in connection wKh thls request upon findlnp that the declar~cion reflects the
independent jucigement of the lead agency and that it has cansidered the prev(ou~ly rapproved Negative
Declaration to~ether with any comm~nts r~caived during the public review pro~ess ancl furt~ier finding on
the basis of the inhial study ~~ ~~~ the environment~ that th~re is no sub~tantial evldence thai the
project wfli have ~ signi~icant ~ffec
NOW 'fHEaEFNR 2~3 ~ 13 ~Io oby tt ended to o,xpa dNhe existzf g~auto m b lenauclfon and
w ft h C o n d i t i o n a l U s e P e r m i t o
reGOrxiftianing tacility arxl to include the following w~ivers:
(~) C t~ions t~.i 1Q,~0 (~~0.0~21b1 . ~"in~~*+'~r~L~..'~M1sc-~~IRa reat!Itementa.
~~ (RBC~UifBd: ,~:~.~~.~nnrlq~an~ gBt,~Ck
~~`~~ Wi-,, 2 crees ~long Jefforgon St tree and ,~.:f4.4S.Y~~S
~j,~~caoed s@~S~S with 7 t~,.rees along Etchandy Lane);
Proposed: n n
NC95-t d1
-2-
~' ,Y~
(b) ~ection 18,110.n6Q„100.1dq~.
,p,~r,rn'tt~d encro~chm_etaS intp setbr~.,ck..
(Permittod: ~- hi h ~cor~axivo sGrQon.,y~~l,
J~cate 10 feet fr~m Jeffersnn Street ~nd F, feet
from Etchandy l.~no; Proposed: ~xisting ~,4~
i'in fence interwovan wlth wood slats a~buttin~
Jef~ersan Street and Etchandy Lane)
SE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the c~nditlona of appravfd canteinod !n Re;~olution No. PC82-93
ara hereby arnended ~s follaws:
Amend CAndition Na. 6 to read:
G. That subjoct property chali be devQloped substantf~lly in accardance with plana and
specificattans on fite wlth the City nf Anaholm mark~d R~vi~lon No. 1 of F.achibit No, 1.
And acld tho followinfl new conditions:
10. That tha ~~n~ngr/developer shall provide a f~ve (5) foot wide landscaped plRnter within the City's
riflht-of-way along Etchandy Lane conslsting of ground cover ~xnd an irrl~ation systom; and tha4
at the 4ime sidewalkc are Instaile~ alang Etahandy Lsjrc~, the owner/developor shall, at thefr
expanse, ~eloc~te the exi5tin~ chain link i~•,nGe f.vo (5) feet from the front praperly line and
prov~de landscaptng in ac~ordanr.e with Code roquirements.
1~. That the chr~lnifnk fence, intervvoven with afther redwood, cedar or PVC slats, shall b~ malntained
;n geoci condition to prav9de continuaus effective ~creenin~ of the ~ut~oar starage areas.
12. That subject pruperty shall be developed substantially in acc~rdancA with the plan and
speciflcat(ons ~ubmitteci ta tha Cfty of Anaheim by thA petitioner and wh(ch plan is on fllo with
the Planning Department marked ~tevisl4n Na. 1 of ~xf~ibit Nu. 1.
1~. That prior to commencement of the activity heroin approvQ, ar prior tn final buiiding and zoning
inspections, or whhin a period of ane (1) year from the date ~af this resolution, whichevar ~occur~
first, ConditiGn Nos. 10, 11 and 1?, abov8-mentioned, shall be complled wlth. Extensi~ns for
further t~me to complete s~Ed conditions mAy be granted in accordance wfth S~ction 18.03.090
of the An~helm Municipal Co~e.
14. That approval of this ap~+~ic~tion constitutes a~pravai of tha proposed roquest o~ly to the extent
that it complles with the Anahefm Municipal zuning Caie and arry otho~ applicahle Ctry, State
and F~derai regulations. Approval does not include any aci(an or findin~s ~3 to compilance or
approval of the requESt reg~rdin~ any other applicable ardinance, rogulation or requirement.
B~ {T FURTt-IER FtESOLVED tliaC the Anahelm City Planning Commission do~s hereby find
and dotermine that adoption of this F~esalution is e.cpressly preclicated upon appiicant's compliance wfth
Aach and all o~ the conditians here(nabove set farth. Shauld any such cond'rtion, ar any pan thoceof, be
declared Inva~id or unanforceabls by the flnal Judgment of any Court bf competent jurisdiction, thon this
Re~lution, and any ~pproaals here(n containe~, ahal! b~ deamed nuf! and vald.
THE F4REGUING RESOI.UTION w~s ~dopted at the Pl~nn{n~ Commisslon m~etin~ of
October 30, 1 a95. ~' _
~.J _._._,___.~
~ ~MAN, ANAH~IM C PLANNING COMMlSSiON
ATfES7:
1
SECRET Y, NAH IM CITY PLANMNG COMMiSSiON
.3_ PC~5-141
~~~
,:~~
~w
STATE QF CALIFORNIa )
C~UNI'Y OF ORANCE ) sa.
CI7Y OF A-NAF~EIM )
I, Mar4arlta Snlorio, Socretary ~f the Anahaim City Pl~nning CQmmfssian, do heroby oertiiy
that the foregolr~c~ r~solutlan was passed ~nd adopted at a meotln~ a~ tho Anahoim Cfty Planning
Commissfon held orr ~ctaber ~0, 1 J95, by the foilawing vote ~f tho memk~era thereof:
AYES: COMMISSION~RS; MESSE,I F'ERq7-~DSTUN, B~iISTOL, I~I~NNlNG~FI, Iv{AYEW,
NQ~S: COMMISSION~RS: NUNE
ABSENT, rdMMISSIONERS: N~7N~
IN WITN~SS WHEREDF~ ~ 17ave hereunto set my hand this „~~ day of ~,~ '~--~
~ ss5. . ,
a,~ J,_s- -
~CRETAR , A AI-~EIM CI7Y PLANNING COMMISSION
S
~- PCS5-i 41