Resolution-PC 95-149f
.'
r71'.1~'.
,~1
A RESOL~ ~~~R CQNDITIONAl.IUSE'TR'EWMIT P10~17A~ BE1 CRANTED
THAT R~T1T
WHERE~IS, tho Anaheim City Piannirig Commosslon dfd grant Conditional Use Permit No.
i'744 (to permit tha oxpansfon of a prevlously appraved drivo through rest~urt~nt) on SAptember ~977.
WH~~iEAS, tho Potitionar requ~sts approval of a candition~l use permft under the authority
of Cocie Section No. ta.4~t•O~Q,300 to permit the expansion of an existing drive through restaurant.
WHERFJ~S, the G~ty Planning Commis~lon dld hald a public hearing at the G-vic Center
in trie CFty of Anaheim on November 13, 1995~a~~ th~ ~~~g~o ~~g ~f ~fi~ A ahei~m Munic palCode, Ch nter
given as requiretl by law and in Rccordance P
18.03, to hsa~ ~nd cansidor evidence for ~nd aqainst sald propas~ci condttion~l use permft and to
investigate and make findings and recor~mendations in cdnnection therewith; ~nd
WFiERE~,S, ~Id Commiisio~no~ faf~ ev donco and eports offe~od at sald he ri g, doe~ ~ind
and in its b~half, and after duo consider~ o
and dotermino the followin~ facts:
1. That the proposad u5e ~ 5p 300 to exg nd aniexisting drive throu~h estaurt~nt twfth wai er
Anaheinn MuNcip~l Cotle Sectfan 18.44 0 pa
of ttis following:
.~r~~ g.~A
~1~4~~
,~Inlmum num~aer of o rkinn se~~•
(~q..~rg,g requirecf, .~ proPosod)
2, 7hat the parkl..q waiver, under the conditfons impusAd, ~neill not cause fewer off•street
parkin~ spaCes to be provided for su ~~r che Q mal a d~ ensonAbly 9oeseeable corxiitiar ~COf per~ation
ali vehicles attributable to such use u
of such use;
~. 'That the waiver, under t ubl c~str6ee~s Ini hepimm~sdi~atanvicin tyrof the p oposac! use;~
r,ampetftion far parkfn~ spaces upnn the p
a. That the waiver, under the cnnditions imposed, wUl not increa5e the demand and
comp6tftlon for parkina spaces upon adja~~nt pr(vAte property in the immediate vicinity af the propased
use (which prapRrty ~s nAt expressly pmvided as p~rking for such use under an agreemcant in compliance
with Section 18.Q6.010.020 nf this Code) ~
g. That the wafver, und~ei~e~c` h~d~the off st~reet~parking arsas or lo s provded torisuch uise;
ai~ pallution, or trafflc circulatfon con ,
$. That the waivor, ur~der the conrfitions (mposed, wi~~ not Incraas9 traffic congestion, nuiso,
air pollution, or impede vc~hicular ingres~ to Ar egr~ss fram adjacent prr~perties, u~n the public streets
in the fmmediate vicinity af the proposed use;
,,~ _ PC95-149
CR2536nt~f.WP
I~J~~~
, e deom~d eontingont upon c-peration of the
~, That t-~e gronting of the parking waiver shall b
conformance with tho assump~~nns relatfngiac~ the pperatian and intensity of the usA a
for a proval of subJeGt wafvar; and that
conditiona~l iase in that formed th~ ba$ ~~ ~~~ g~gumptlons, as c~ntalned ln thA
contained in the parking demand etudy
exceadln~, vialating, Utensifyln9 c~ ~therwise daviating from anY
shall bo de~mad a violatlon of the expr d3 ~91 and 1~.A3.0920 t e Zaniny
po,rkin~ demand ~tudy~
terminatlon or modlflcation pursuant to the provisions of Se~t~an 1.
Cnde,
h~ ro osed use will not adversely aifeat the ~au$1~ ~~~ip~ ~ g~~ has~aee ndo e opred
g, T h a t 4 p p ~~ in t s f r a m n e l g h b a~
developmont af the area in w~ h~ $In~eg~971~and the City has o b~A~Od a`~n~312psq~~t,~ wpl bg used for
with a c1rive-througl~ restaura roximate1y 6p~6 af the prc-pcs~d add t
regarding tts operation; and that app
stor~ o ln contrast to on~Y 40°~6 of tho addition baing use~d f~r addition~l dining ~ro ~
g g~ use is adoquate tio allow the full
eace,
g, That the size and ahapo of the sfte far tho p~a ~
f tha rapaaed use ln a mannor not detrfinental to tho particuiar area nor to th~ p
development o p
heaith, safoty, ~nd ger.~ral weffare;
traffic generated by th~ pro~ased use will nahem~pea~ an u~U° burden upon the
1 p. That the th~ traffic in
streets and h~ghwaY~ dasfgned and improved to car~Y
h~ rantin~{ of the condit~onal use permit, und~~i~e g~~ he Cit~y~Q°A~ hel'mn~t be
~ 1, T1~at t 9 ener~i welfa~a of 4he
detrimontal td tho peace• health, sufer! a~d fl a~ftian; and that na
1?. That no ane Indicated thetn pr jh~ su~l~~ petnl~ n~ic ~0arin~ In opp
corresp~ndenc9 was recelved 1n aRPasnio
Qiannin
~~~~: That the An~helm Clty 9
R ~
review~d the prapasal Qo expand an existinQ d~~ I of land lsoc~-ted at t e s uthwest
~ o m m i s s i o n ~ a s acAg Qn a r e c t a n g u l a r t y- s h a p e~ c l p a
venue an d Defano Street, havi~g frantag~ f~~ 3~1 teet o~~ he so u t h s i d s a f L f n c o n
minimum nurr~b~r of parking sp her descritx~~l ~S ~~ WA~ Uncaln
comer of Lincoln A
that the decla~tion reflects the
Avenue and 163 feet on t~e rpVet the Nega ive DAC arat(on ups a~ ~_~~ NQaativa Declamtlon together
A~venuo; and daes her~by app
independc~nt judgement of the iead a9ency and that tt has con ~o ~~~ will have a
ceived durin4 the pubiic review process and ~~ faenaetha ~h~hp bj sis af the inttia
wi4h any commonts re
study ~~ anY commentsvi onment that th+~re is na ~ubs~anda e
signfficant vffe~t on the on
W'fH~REFO~E, BE !T R~SOLVED that the Anaheim C1ry P~annfng C~mmission does
NO , n the fotluwin9 condition3 which ara hereby
hereby fl~M subf ect Petition for Conditinnal U~se~~ u~ of° he subject property in order to prese~ve tho
founcl to be a no~o~~ry Prerequistta to the p P
safery and generai welfare of the Citizens of the Ciry c~ Anahelm: ~~h lans and sqeciflcatfons
1, 7h~t subjoct proper~Y $~~~ be develaped substantfally in accord~~ng are on fil¢ wRh the Pia~nning
pf Anahsim bY ~e P~ton~er and whlch p~ ubllc tolaphone shall be
subrnltted tia the Cfty rovided, however, that any P staff~ gn~ that
DepaKment marked Exhlbit Nos. t through 3; p
laced Inski~ the buflding or noar the ~iuflding e~nLOmi ~healis can be mor~ttored by
P pl~ af receivin~
the telPphone she~ll not be capa ~~ f~om tl~e date
ied with.
T}~t p~far to finai auudUg and xoning inspo~ttian No. 1hia~~ m~ on~e $~0 be G wkh Sectlon
2.
ot thta resa+ut~on~ w~~~h~et occurQ fl~. ~ rant~cl in ~ccondance
~xt~nsions for ~turther t imeMunlc pa~~Code~ candRlong may ~
18.03.090 of the Artahe
PCS5-t 49
-2-
i
^~~l ~:!
3. Tha~ approval of this ~pplication constitutea approval of the propossd requsst only tc~ the extent that
it campli~s wfih the Anaheim Mun(cip~l Zanin a~lon~ar f nclings as to aornpli~nae ~or~aPProv~l of the
regulationa. Approval da~s not include any
request rega~dinq any otliAr apRlicable ardlnance, re~ulatic-n ar rAquirement.
B~ IT FUR7HER RES~LVED that the Anahelm City P~anriin~ Comm(ssiarr daes hereby flnd
mnd determine that adoption of this Wnsoiution is oxpressly predlcated upan appiicar~t's compliance wfth
e~ch anel a!{ r~f the conditions herelnabav4 set forth. Should any auch conditton, or any {~art thereof, be
d~aciared Invaltd or unenforceablo by the final judg~ Ilnbe deemeclu ul~andmold~~~ ~urisdiction, then this
Fiesol~~tlnn, and any approvals hereln contained,
THE FOREf~OING RESOLUTION was ~dopted at tMe Planning ~ommission meetin~ o~
Nov~mber 13, 1995• ~
~'~-""_"'7
CI~aIFI A~V, PRO TEMP R'~,
ANAH~IM CITY PLANN C COMMIS:ION
ATTEST:
~ f ~~:__.-~==-- l~ti'~'~
gECRETARY, AIVAN~INI CIlY PI.ANNING COMMISSfON
STATE OF C~IIFORNIA )
COUNTY UF QR4NGE ) ss•
CITY OP ANANEIM )
do herc~by cer~ify
I, Edith L. Harrfs, Secr~tary of the Anaheim City Planning Camm(ssion, vlannin
that the foregoing resolution was 9g5 ~~L~Ze folpcwing vo e af thenm mbe s he eof: C~ g
Commissio~n held on Navember 13, , Y
AYES: COMMISSIONFRS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNING~~, M~SS~, PF~iAZA
NOES: COIUIMISSI4NERS: N~NE
ABSENT: COMMlSSIOPJERS: MAYER
day of ~ r~~
fN WITN~SS WF~ER~OF, I h~vo hereunto ~et my hand this ~
1995. ' ~Q ~''' -
r o~ ~~-'t~
S~CRETARY, aNAFiEI(Vi ClTY PLANN{NG ~OMMISSION
~` pCJ5.149