Resolution-PC 95-163~~
RESOLUTI~N N PC,~-1~
p RESpLU1'ION OF ~'H~ ANAH~iM C1TY ?LANNING COMMISSION
7HAT PETl71AN FOR COND1710I~AL U5E PERMiT N0. 3613 SE GRANT~D, IN PART
WHEREAa, the Anaf~oim City Planning Commissiori did reaalve a verifiad Petitian fo~
Condit9onal Uso P~rmlt for ce~tain roal prop~rty gituated Ir~ the City ~f Anaheim, County of Orango, State
of Caltfornfa, described afc:
THE SOUTHERLY ~62 FEET pF ORIGIPJAL EUII.DING l.OT 5, AS SH~WN QN THE
MAP nF ANAHEIM, IN 1'HE CI~'Y OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY QF ORANGC, STA7C
OF ~ALIFO~ ORDS OF LOS ANG~ ES COUNTY, STAT~ OF CALIFORNlA.~ OF
DEEDS, RCC
WHEREf~S, tho City Planning Commissicm did h~ld a p~blic he~ring at ~tho Civic Center
in the Ciry of Anah~im on Decomber 11, 199~ at 1:30 p.m., notico of said pubiic hearing having `~ Ch~ptor
given as required by law and in accordance v~ritri the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
18.03, to h~ar and consider enlde~~Amrr~endatf~nsiintconnecion~heewfth~andal use permik and to
investiqate and make ~ndings a
WHEREAS, said Commfssion, ~iter due inspeation, lnvestigation and study made by itself
~nd in its b9half, and after due consideration af aN evidence arid reports off~red at said hearing, does flnd
and determine the followinc~ facts:
~. 't'hat tfie propased u~ 8.~5 050.060 andf 18.45j1150 085 tai permit apmotaroycla sali sa nd
Anc~hefm Municipal Code Sectio s
service faciliry with waNer of:
,~g,~tion 1~Q.f~Q4~? _ M(nlmum number of qarkl,___ nct_s_qa~•
1 ~ p6.050.02~~
~:.06.06q
,~nd ~ 8 a5.OG6,05C~
2. Th~t subJect builc~ing is approprfate for the ~r~posed uss bec:~use it was dQVeloped and
prevlously approved far retai9 businesses with the same parking supply as currsntly avaflable (5 spacas)
and, since a motoraycle dealership,requfres less parking than a typical retail business, ths buildfn~ ~nd
parking supply are "grandfa laree numberfof customers hs not ant cipa ~d;~~rship focuses on custom
motorcycies anci, thQrefore, q
3. That the parking waiver is hereby denied an the basis that tho n~ed for said wafver was
deleted fallov~ing public notificatian;
4. That the praposed ~ it s~~l o t cs d rtol be~ occat dadjandn hat~ heSprop sed busin ssr is
developrr~~nt of the area in whicti p P
compatible wlth khe s~irraundinc~ neighborhood;
5. That the size and s~a~p ~~ nee niot detr mental~to the particu a~r area nop toithe p~acelJ
devolopment of the pro~,osed use
health, safety, and general welfar~;
'`k
_~ . PC95-163
CR2559DM.WP
~~` `4 ~'
,;'~,~i;;
6. That the traffic goneratecl b,y the praposed u:;e will not impose an undue ourden upon the
,ireet.s and highways dosignecl ancl impraved to carry the tr~ffic in the area;
7. 7hat the~he~lthgsafet~ and c~oneraluwel a~re af the citizens o'fthe Ciry o~Anah~lilr~Ande
datrimental to the peac , Y
g, Th~t no one indicated tholr presence ~t sairJ public hear(ng in opposftion; and that no
correspondanco was recoived in appositinn to the subject potitlon.
I IF RNIA ~NVI _RQNMEN7AL UALITY Cl' FINAING: That tt~e An~halm Ciry Plarn~ing
Commission h~as r~vlew~ci the proposal to perrnit a motorcycle sales and service f~cility with walver c~f
minlmum number of p~rking spaces on a rectanguf~rly-shapecJ parGCl of {and consisting of approx~iX ~~te
0.16 acre located at the northwest comer of Adele Skreet and Analieim Baulevard, haviny app
frontages of 103 feet on the narlh sir~e af Ad21~ Street and 47 f~et on the west~vi~d h~o~~ ati ve Decla~ ataon
and furthe~ described as 401 North Anaheim Boulevard; and does nereby app 8
upon finding that the cJeclaration reflects the independent jud~emenfi of the lead a~ency and that it has
cnnsidered the Negative Declaratlon together with any cnmments rcaceived dur(ng the public review
process and further fi d~tng e~n ~p e b~wil! have ai significant efFecton he envi anment ed that ther~ is na
substantfa{ evidence p 1
NOW, THEREFOFE, BE IT RES~I~V~O that the Anaheim Cfry ~'lanning ~ommission does
I~ereby grant subJect Petitian for Condit(anal Use ~'~rmft, upon tho follawing conditions which aro hereby
found to be a nece~sary prerequfsite to the proposeri usp of the subje~t property in ordar to preserve tho
safety and general welfara of the Citizens of the Cit~~ of Anafieim:
1. 'T'hat ttiere shali be no autdoor di~play or repair af vehicles on subjeGt property.
2. That tes7 driving of vehicles on adjacent residential str~Qts shalV be prohibfted.
3. 7ha4 the signage propossd for ~ubj~ct businoss shall be Iimited co wall sign~.
4. That any proposed wall signs sha~l be submitted to the Zoning Qivfsion for review and ~~prova! by
the Plannin~ C~mmission as ~"Reports and Recammendations" item.
5. That the developgr shall obtain ~ right-of=~vay construction permit and r~ronstruct the driveway
approach on Adele Street in accardance wfth the Enc~ineerfng Standard DetAil No. 111.
6. Th~t subject property sh+all be devPloped substantiaily in accordance with pl~ns and specifications
subm(tted to the City of Anaheim by the petitianer and which plans are on file with the Plann(ng
Department markad Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2; provided, howpver, that the ~etftion~r shali instal! (where
pc~ssfble) iandscapa planter boxes adJacent ta Adel~ Street ancl that ths location of said planters shall
be reviewed ~nd approved by the 7_oning Division prior to installation.
7. 7hat prior to commencement of the activity autharized by this resolution or v~fthin a perlod of one
(i ) year from the date of thls resolutiun, whichever accurs first, Condftion Nas. 4 and 5,
above-mentno~din acco dance w(tt~i Sectian 1~ 0:3i09p of the An~hemm Munici~ IQCodeid conditians
may be ~ra
8. That prior to firial building and zonfng inspectlons, Condition No. 6, above-mentioned, shall be
camplied with.
-2- PC95-163
,~,
g, ~'hat appraval of this ~ppiication canstitut~s anr~roval of tho prc~posed request oniy ta thn extent that
ft compiles with tr~e Anahe(m Niunicipal7oning Cocle and any vther appiicable City, State and ~ecferal
r~gulatians. Appruval does not include any action ar findlnc~s as to complian~e or approval of th~
request r~garding any other appiic~bfe ordindnce, regulatior~ or r~quirement.
BE IT FUF~THER RESOWE.D that the Anat7efm Cfty F".«nning Comrnisslon does ha~~by flnd
and determine that adaFtiur af thls f~esolution is expressly predicated upon appl(cant's compliance with
each and ~II of the condit(ons her~inabova set ~orth. Should any suCh condition, or any part thereof, bo
declared invalid ar unenforceabla by the firaal judgment ot any court of aompotent Jurisdiction, thon th~s
Resolution, and any approvais herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TWE FOREGOING Ft~50LU1'IQR was adoptecl at the F'lanning Commission meatin~ of
~ecember 11, 1995. ~
~~ ~
CH MAN AfvAHEIM ~iTY F1~4NNING MISSI N
~1'TTEST:
~~~
SECREl'ARY, AH~IM CITY PL4NNINC COMMISSION
STATE OF CALI~ORNIA }
COUNTY AF QRANGE ) ss.
C!TY OF ANAHEIM )
I, N4ar~arita Solario, Secretary of tho Anaheim City Piaiming Commissian, do heroby certify
that the foregoi~g r~solution was passed ~nd adopted at a meetin~ of the Anahelm City Planning
Commfssian held on Dec~mber 11, 1995, by the foflowinc~ vote of the members thereof;
AYES: CO'MMI,~iSIONERS: BOaTWICK, Bl~YOSTUM, BRISTOL, HENNINGEFi, MAYER,
MESSG, f~GRAZA
NOES: COhAMiSSIONERS: NONE
AE3SENT: COMMISSI~NERS: NONE
U ~N 1-VITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ day of _ ~ ~
199~. , .
~ ~~~
SECRET~RY, NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC95-163