Resolution-PC 95-24k ~1r
~~~~~~
:~ ~
A RE3aLU710N Or TH~ ANAHEIM CITY PI.IINNING COPJIMISSION
'PI-IAT F'C'1'ITION FOR COIvDITIONAL USE PE~iMIT N0. 3732 3E GRAN'TEQ
WH~.REAS, the Anaholm City Planning Commission dId receive a verffi~ Potitlon for
Cpnditional Use Perm6t for ccartain real prope+ty situated ir~ the City of Anaheim, Caunty af nrang~, Stato
of Callforni~, dascrlbed ~s:
THE SQ1.1TF~ 20~.00 ~~~'I' C)F THE WEST 203.00 F~ET OF THE SOUTt~V-IEST
qUqR1'~I~ pF SE~TION 13, B~ING A POF~TION OF I,OT 41 IN TOWNSHI° ~1
SQUTH, RANGE 10 WES'T, IN THC RANCHO S~4N JUAN CAJON DE aAN7A bNA,
qg ~hIQWN ON ~1 MAP RECORDE~ IN ~OUK ~, PAGFS 256 AND ::57 4F
PAT'EN'fS OF LOS ANGEI.ES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
1~+H~:REAS, th~ Ciry Plann(n~ Commisslon dfd hold a~utalfc hearing at the Civic Cnnter
in the City af Anar~eim on Docemb~r 12, 199a at 1:30 p.m., notlce of said public hoaring having be~~e~ p~~~
given as requlred by Imw and in accordanco with the provlsic-ns of the Anahe(m Municipal Caie,
18.03, to hear and ~onsider ovidence for and against said ~roposed cQnditional use permit and ta
investigate and make flndings and recommgnd~tions in conn~~ctfon therowith; and that said publfc heering
was cantinuod Yo th~ J~nuary 9, 9~95 Pl~nning Camrnissfor m~eting;
WHER~AS, ~ald Commissfon, after due inspectfon, investination and study rr~ade by Itself
and in its behaif, and aiter due c~nsfderation of all evidence anc; reports offored at said hearing, does find
and determine the following fr~cts:
1. That the praposed use is properly une for which a conditional use permit is ~uthorized by
Anahofm Municipalin ~se vice s~atioa to a m61ni~-ma k~tewith of~premi esisala a d consernptlonnof beer and
are~~ a~ithin ~n Pxist g
wine.
2. That the propased ~se, consisting of a 1,'l36 sq.ft. rnini-markat with a service statian, is
prap~arly one fQr which a conditionai use (~ermit is a~!thnrixed by the Zoning Code;
3. That the prapased use wfll not adversely affect the adJoining land us~s and the growth and
development of tho area in which 1t is proposed to be ~oc~ted;
4. 7hat the size and shape of the sita for the proposed use ls acfequato to alluw the full
developrn~nt of tha proposed use in a manner not detrimentai to the part!cular are~ nor to the peace,
he~ith, safety, and genera! w~l(are;
5. 7hat the traff(c ger~erated by the propos~d use will nat impose an und~.ie burden upon the
stroets anci highwa.ys dvsigned ~nd Improvec to carry the traffic in the area;
fi. That t hog aae healthe safety~andige e a~l wsiifare af the citlz~nts~of h City~uf Ana ~eim'
not be detrimental ta p
and
~ j _ f'C95-2
CR2270~vIS.wp
~'~~ .
"~coi~%
7. That r~a one indicated thoi~ presenco at said public he~rin~ in oppositlon; and that no
carrospond~ance was rec~(ved in oppc~s~ti~n to th9 subject petition.
~;ALIFORNIA ENVI N EN,Ig,~.g ~ Y.Q.~7 ~IN~~NG. 7hat the Anahelm Cit~~ Planning
Commis~lan h~s reviewetl the proposal ta pc~rmit the cunversl~n of a se-vice stat(an repai; l.~ay area within
an oxfstfng sArvice st~tian ta ~ minl-markot with off-premises sale and consumptian of bEar ~nd wine on
an irregulariy-shapod p~rcel af land aonsiotfng af appraximatoiy 0.52 acre, lac~tod at the northeast carner
of Ball Raad and ~tate Caliege Bc~u~evard, havinc~ fronia~es uf approxlmately 150 •feet on the north side
of Ball Ro;~d and 150 feet an the east sid~ af State C~Ilego Boulevard, and further ~Joscribed as 1198
So~~th Statd Gollage Baulovard; an~ doos hereby a~aprave the Negativ~ Declaratfan upon finding that the
declaration reflects thd indopondent judgernont of the I~ad agency ancl that it h~s considered tha Negative
U~claration to~e~` ~lal istucl yA d~any comments r~creived that ther~ Ise onsubstantial~ evicfencen hiat~the
th9 b~Sia Of ~h6 Y
proJect will havs a signitiaant effect on t~ ~a envir~anment,
NOW, 'TF~EFcEFORE, BE IT RESOLVkD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
heraby c~rant subject Petitio~n~QU ~~ Yp the p opu ed use of~hc+ subJect property iniQOrder to prers ryeeehy~
found to ba a necessary p 4
safety ~nd generai welt~are of the Citizens ~f the City af Anahaim:
1. That a olan shaet for saNd waste storage and c~llection ~nd a plan for recyc;ling sPi~ll be submitted
to the qepartment af N'iaintAnanca for revtew and approval.
2. That the sale ~f pr~pared faod items shall b9 prohibited uniess five (5) additfonal on-site parking
spaGes are provided or a parking variance is approvod.
3. That subJe~t praparty shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submined to the C(ty of Anaheim by the petitioner and whEr;h plans are on filo with the Plannin~
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3.
~t. That if the ~pp11 ~ p~ut°~~, the partiart ~f ubj~cti co ditlonal use perm(t psrtaining to thoisafe of beer
tho d~t~ of thfs
and wino shai~ terminate.
5. That no beer ar wine shall be sc-Id, fiurnish~d, or delivered via a drive-up window.
G. That the sales of beer and/or wine shall be perrnitted only between the hc~ ~rs of 9:OD a.m. ;.nd 10:00
p.m. dafly.
7. That the quarterly gross salos of alcoholic bev~ragos ~hall not exceed ten percent (10Q6) of the ~ross
sales of food and/or other commoditie~ sold during the same psriod•
8. That there shall bo the buildin ~dVro~motng or indic t g the a'vailabiliry of alcoholic bevora~es. the
exterlor from inside g F~
9. That no alc~holic bovorages ~1~ail be consumQd on any proporty adjacen? to the Iicensed premfses
~tnder the cantrol of the licenses.
.2_ PC95-2
. a~r•
~'~~~:
~10. (a) Tltiat tho ~arking lot oi the promises shall b~ equipped with iightinc~ ofi stuffic6~nt pow~r to
iliurninate and make e~slly cliscornible tho appaarance and canduct of all p~rsons An vr about
said parkin~ lox; and
(b) That the Iighting in 4he park~ng lot shali be dlrected, positlon~cf and shieldod ir~ such a mannAr
s~ as nAt tc~ unreasonably I'luminata the window areas af ~ny nearby businesses.
11. (a) That, if sold, wine coalers ghall be sold anly fn quantfties uf a four (a) pack ar more; ~nd
(b) That signs shail be prominontly postod at ~tlie wine storage and tl~p cash ~•ogister areas rearaing:
"Wtne coalers rnay be purchased on thls promise5 only !n quan~ldes of a faur (4~ pack or more."
12. (a) Tt~at beer shall bo sold only fn quantities oi a sir. (6) pack ar more; and
(b) That si~ns shall bo prominontly ~asted at the beer storagA and cash re~ister areas raading:
"Beor may be purchased on this premis~s ~only !n quaniltles of a slx (6) pACk or more."
13, That thore shali be no cain•opesated telephones maintained upon or ad;acent to the bufldfn~ at any
timo (othar than tl~ose whlch may currently exist}.
14. That tliero shali be no ca(n-oper~ted gair~s maintained upon the promises at any time.
15. Tliat priar to issuance of a liuflding p9rmPt or within a period of one (1) yoar fram the ~ate of this
resolutfon, v~rhir,hever occurs tirst, Candition No. t, above-mentianod, shall ba compilod with.
~xtensians for furthor tirno to complete said canditlons may be granted in accordanre v~iih Section
16.03.U90 of the Anaheim Muniaipal Cade.
16. That prior to final building and zonin~ insp~ctfons, Conditlon Nos. 3 and 10, above-mentioned, sh~ll
be carnpliod with.
17, That approvat of thia application constftut~s approval of the proposad request only to the extent that
it complies wlth the Anahefm Municlpal Zaning Code and any other applicahlo Cit~, 5tata ar~d Fed~ral
regulations. ApprcvAl does not include any actfon or fir.~(nc~s as ta compliance rar approval of tha
raqu~st regarding any othar applicable orclinarrco, rec~ulatir~n ar requiroment.
[3E IT FURTHER RESOLV~D 2hat the An~hoim City Planning Commiss(o-i daes heroby find
and determino that ado~tfon of this t~esalution fs expressly predicatod upon applicant's complfance with
each arid a!{ af the canditions her~inabove set forth. ~hauld a~~y such condition, or any part thoreof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by th~ final judc~ment of any court of competent Jurfsdiction, then this
Resolution, and ~ny approvals herein contafned, shal{ be daerred null and void.
7HE Fn~EG01NG RE~OLUTION was adupted at the ^:~nnir~g Commissior~ mesting af
January 9, 199~. /~ ,~ -{}---
~ ~ll. C::~~1.~:c.c,~ -
' ,~
HAIFiWOPAAN AI~IAHEIM CI PI.ANNING COMMiSSIVN
ATTEST: _ /~
SEC;REl'A ; A HEIM CIT( PLANNING COMMISSION
,~_ f'C95-2
,~ v.
~ ;r'
rv~,.
STATE OF CAI.IFORNI,~ )
COUN"fY OF ORANc~E ) ss.
LITY OF ANAHEIM )
l, Margarita Sol~ri~, Secretary of the Anaheim Cfty Plann(ng Commissian, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution 9 a~~5~~ ~ edho fallnwi gte oto of the er embers the Qafi;~~oim City Plan~ning
Corr,mission held ~n January , Y
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BQYDSTUN, F~ENNINGER, MAYER, TAIT
NO~S: COMMISSIONERS: CAl.DWELL., MESSC, PCRAZA
ASSEN7; COMMISaIONEt~S: NONE
HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~r~day of
IN WITN~SS W
, 19a5.
J+~or't.~•o
SECRETA Y, / AH~I CITY F~I.ANNING COA4MISSION
~. PC95-2