Resolution-PC 95-3.r
}
, ~a
~E SOLUTION NO, PC95~.3
A RE~anI.UTION OF 7HE ANAH~Ib9 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THRT PETITION FOf~ Cf~NDI i I(JNAL. U5~ PERMIT N0. 3733 BE CaRAN7EL~
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannlr-g Commisslon dfd r~caive a verified Petitlon for
Canditianal Use Permit for certafn real proper~Y s~tuatpd in the Cfty of Anahefm, ~ounty of tJran~a, State
of Catifornia, described as;
THAT PORTION OF Tf-IE ,1QNATHAN WRTSON 7RACT, IN '('HE CIT'`( OF
ANAHEINS, C~UNTY OF OF~ANCE, STATE 4F GALIFO~NIA, AS SHUWN ON P.
iVIAP FIL~D IN BOOK 2, I'AGE 4!' 1/2 OF RECnRD OF SURVEYS IN 71-iE
OFFICE OF 7{-1~ COUNTY RECC~RGER OF ARANG~ COUNTY, CALIFOFiNIA,
Tf-!AT' pORTIO~d OF L.OT 21, f3LOCK 3G aF 7HF.. YORBA I.IN~A TRACT, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BQ~K 5, PAGES i7 AND 18 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORtiNGE COUNTY, AND ThAT
PORTION OF 7HAT LAND AL.LOTTtD 'f0 JOSEFA MOtJ'fALVO DE SERRANO,
AS ADMfNISTRATRIX AF L~kNDRq SERRANO, QECEASED, AS DESCRIB~D IN
7HE FINAL DECR~E OF F~ARTITION OF TH~ RAI~~:~-10 SANTIAGO DE SANYA
ANA, WHICH WAS ENTERED PUGUST 12, 1868 IN [3UOK "B", PAGE 410 OF
JUDGMENYS OF THE DISTRICT COURT UF T~1E ~7TH JUDICIAL DI~TRICT iM1l
ANa FOf~ LOS ANCEI.ES COUNTY, CALIf~ORNIA, D~SCR!B~D A.S FOLLOWS:
BEGlNNING F~T 7M~ NORTHERS't'ERLY CORNER OF THF I.AIVD aESCFiIBFD IN
u'cED ?'0 QRANCC I.INlFIED SCHOOL GIS7~iICT OF ORANG~ CQUNTY
AECOCiDED QGROB~R 7, 1965, IN BOOK 7694, PAGE 771 OF QFFICIAL
FiECC?FDS OF' $AID ORANGE COl3NTY, BEING A POINT IN 7HA7 CERTAIN
6~~t fNDAi~Y LIN~ DE5CRIE3ED IN THAT CERTAIhJ AGRE~MENT BE7WEEN
A,~THUR LEM'~~. AND 07FlER8 AND G.V. vHAMBERS AND ~7HEI~S,
R~Cpf~DEC DEC~MBER 26, 1951, IN f300K 22fi7, PAC.~E 513 OF SAIa OFFICIAL
RECORDS; TH~NCF SOUTH 7;~ DEG. 42' 10" WEST ALONG ThiE NORTH~~4LY
LINE 0~ SAID IANU ~ESCRIBED IN L~CED TO 7HE ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRfC7 aa5.92 FEEf TO THF BE~GINNIN~ CF q TANGENT CURVE IN SAID
h~RTHERI.Y UN~, CONCAVE NORTI~iERL1f HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.GC~
FEEf; TH~;~ICE ~NESTERLY F,LONG SAID CURVE ThIROUGN A CEN~'RAL ANGI.E
OF Q6 DE~a. a~' 27'~ AN ARC DIS'I'AN~E OF 1tg.23 F~ET TO A LINE TANG~NT;
TMENCE SOUTH 80 DEG. 2ti' 37" WEST ALO~VG SAI'~ I.AND T.~NGENT AND
ALONG SAID NQR7H~RLY LINE 127.94 F~ET 70 A POINT 1N THE W~57ERLY
LINE OF 7HE LANp DESGI~IBED IN DEED TO ~C.V. ~MAPVIB~RS AN~ OTMERS,
FtECORDED APRlL 2a, 1946, iN BOOK 1d04, PAGE 465 OF SAID QFFICIAL
RECQRDS; THENCE ~IORTH 09 D~Ca. 31' 23" WEST ALONG ~AID WESTCRLY
LINE 7F35.1A FEE~' TO THE NOR~HWEST CORNER JF ~:Alf~ L4Nl~ OF
CMAMBERS; Tl-IFNCE NORTH 69 DEG. 50' 47" EAST RLO~Jr TH~ NOFlTM~RLY
LWE pF S~ID L~NL~ C~F CHAMB~RS a~s.~ FEET TO THE P10RTHERLY
TE~MINUS OF SAID BOUNaARY LINE DESCRIBED IN SAID AGREEMENT;
THENCE SUUT~I 0~ ~DEG. 3~' 2a~~ EaST ALONG ~AID ~OUNDARY ~INE 839.65
FEET TO THE POINT pF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING TI-ICRE~RAM THAT PORTION DESCRI~ED IN 7HAT C~R7AIN FINAL
pRC~~R OF CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COUR7 CASE NG~, 1599$1, A
CERTIFIED COF'Y OF WHiCM WAS RECORDED MARCH 26, 1969, fN BOOK
891Q, PAG~ 268 OF SAIQ OFrIGIAL RECORDS.
CR22~2M~.W~' -1- ~'C95-3
,~' ' ~,~' r
WMFFlI=A~, the -.(ty Planning Cominission did hold a~ublia h~arfng at the Civic Center
in the City oi ~-nalyeim ~~n Jmnuary 9, 1995 at i:30 p.m., notice of said public he~rtng having baei~ d~:ly
givan as requlr~d by I~vv and In accordance with the ~aravisions aE tha Ana.heim Municlpal Ccxle, Chaptgr
i8.03, ta hoar end Gonslder evldence for and a~~lnsti sald proposed r,onditional uso ~en*~it a-rd ta
investigate and rr~ak~ find~n fls antf re~ommendations in aormectian therewith; ~nd
WHERCA~, said Commission, a~t~~• di~e lnspection, inves~ti~ation ,ar7ti study mad~ by itself
and Bn fts bahalf, and aftor due cnnsidoration of ~II evidence and repo~ts ~f~srad at ~fit~i J~earing, d~es find
and cletermine the follawing facts:
1, That the proposed uso ;~ properly on~ for whicP~ tt conditl~onai us~ p~s~o~~it I~ authorized foy
Anaheim Munirlpal Code 5~r,~tion 1 D.86.A50 ta permit a ce(lular f~cility inotuding an unrnanna~i ec~~~ipment
building and a 76-foot high transmisslon tower vrith ~~ ~,: follawinr~ waiver:
,~c ctians 18.Q4,g4.3.10 - P~I xim m n helAht.
aad 18•$ ,(~Q .(~Qf ,gt hl~,~ fence parmi~ted !n requ(red 31dA y~a~d;
~ t ~i l. wall praposed along approximat~ly
60 feet ~f the east ~-ro}~eny line)
2. Th~t there are spoc!al circ~mstancos a,~plicable to the propc~rty conslsting r~f +ts sizs,
IocPUon a~nd surroundings, which do not appiy to othor ld3nt(c~lly zon~cl propar4Kes i~ the viGlnidy, ~ecause
the la~ge size of 1h~ property cre~tes a: pecial circumstanc~s fn 4hat thA inta~fur afi ths pask sft:~ wh9re
the cc~rnmunir.~tions f~cillty is to be iocated is nat visibie ta the public ri~ht-of-way and tho propasac! 7-fi~at
high block wall wlll improve security;
3. 7hat the fe~ce height waiver is mir~imal amounting to ~nly 1 faot m~re than perrr~?red by
Cods;
4. That t~e proposed use is properly or~c3 for which a cond~tional us~ ~~rmit is authorized hy
the 7.aning CAde;
5. Zhat the praposed use will not adversely affect the adjc~inl~~g lan~d uses and tha grawth and
develapment of the area in which it fs propvsQd to b~ tacat~d beaause~ subJect pro~erty already contain~
a similar telscommunicatians tower, and the pro~osed c~llular t~w~r will bo adequateiy screenod b~ the
existing fire station, existinq telecQmmunicat(on tc~wer and ad~acent hospital buflding; and that th~ m~(r
portion of the cellular tower (excluding the whlp ~ntennas) will be lower than ttie existinp communicazions
tower;
G. That ihe siz~ anc~ shape of tho site far th~ proposed ~sa is adequ~to to allaw the tull
development af the nroposed use In a manner not detrimental tp tFie particular ~rea nc~r to the pc;acr~,
health, safety, and general wetfare;
7. Tnat the traffic gener~ted by th~ prop~sed us~ wil! not irnpo~g ar un;iue bd~rdan upon the
stres;s and hlghways designed and improvocl to carry tr~e traffl~: in the ar~~;
8. That the granting of the conditional uso permi: undar the conditions imp4sed will nc~t be
dotrimgnt~l t~ the peace, heaith, sntery ~nd genorai welfar~ of the c:ftlxons of ihe Gity nf An~thein~; and
g. That no one in~icated theEr presence at said pu~lla he~~inc~ in uppc~sftinn; that bN~~
interostod persons spoke; and that nn corr~s~c~ndence in op~osiSion was rQCeiv~d,
~2, F~C95•3
, ~.
I`I~
Wi1~~
~ raf1~~ VI N,~'~,./~lm.~~.L.~L.~ FINt~N_Q; That ti~o An~helm City P{anning
rommlasion has ravlew~ci thA ~ro~os~l to pormft a collular faclliry Including an unmanned equipment
bulldln~J an~:! a 7s-toot hi~Pu br~namisolan tadvor wtth w~alver oi maximum fonc~ h9(ght on a rectangularly-
~
shApad pe~rcel af land consi~tin~ at ~pproxim~t~sly 5.39 ~crAS, h~ving a~rontage of awproximately 500 eet
an tt~9 north slci~ ~f Rivercf~le Avenua, having a maximum depth Af approximately ~70 f9et, being locat~d
approximt~tely 230 tvet west of tho oentorline ~f $tarlin~ Way, and further descrlbod ns 454r t~ 4555 Emst
Riverdalra Av~nue (HiverciplA Park); And d~es her~by apprav0 the Nogatlvo ~eclaratlon upon finding that
tho declaration rAilect3 th~e Indap~ndent judg~ment uf tha lead agdncy and thet it ha~ canaidered th~
Ne~ative Decla~tion to~ethar with any comments recoivod during iha ~ubilc review procASS ancl further
f(ncling on th~ bas(a of th~~ Initial ~tudy and r~ny corr~ments recoiv~d thet thero Is no sulostantial ~vidonce
that tha project wlll havo a signHlcant effeot pn the environment.
NOW, 'THER~FUt~E, :~E IT RESOL.uED that tho Anaheim Gfty Planning Commissir~n does
her~b,y grant subJect Fotitioe ~fo~i~Coe d~ the p oposed use~oft heh ubJ~ict property In+~order to p er erveetho
faund to bo a necessary p q
s~f~ty and ganeral w~lforg ot th~ Citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim:
1. That subJect p~Oe C Y of aAnahe{m by to petit(aner~ila d~ hfch plans aro A I~file wi h ho `P antn~ing
subrnitted ta nY
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. That arn/ tceos ~rhich are removecl ~s a rasuit Af con3tructlon si~ll be replaced on a tw~o (2) tu one
(1) ~atia with minimum ftitaen {t5) gallon sized tre~s.
3, ~'h~t prior to,jonal, bhlch`c3ver~occu ii~sti Condit on No.g i a~ncS 2~above-mv tio`ned, sahallrbe ompl(ed
Of thl8 fQ~GU ,
W~~1.
4. 7hat approva! of thls apnlic~tion c~nst(tutes approval of the propased Ilc bte Cit I~S ace and Federai
it complies with the Anahe(m Municipal Zo~infl Code arxi any other ~pp Y~
regulatlons. Approv~i do~s not Incl~ude any action or findings as to compl(an~e or approval of tho
request regardin~ any other app!icaole urdinance, regulation or requirument.
BE IT ~UR7NER RESOLV~.D tht~t the Anaheim Cit.y Plannfng Commission do~s hereby find
and deteimine th~t ~d~aptlon of this Resot~tion is expressiy p~'ecftcated upon appifcant's cornpllance with
each and ~zl! of thQ condKfans hereinabove set forth. Sh~~uld any such condit(on, or any p~rt thor3of, be
daciared frnalid or unenforceable by the f(nal judgmQnt of any court of competent jurisdlctlon, then thfs
Resolution, and any ~ppr~vo!s harnin containeci, sh311 be deemed null ant~ vokf.
TH~ FOHEGOING RESt~LUTION was ~doptod at the Plannin~ Commissfon meetin~ af
January 3, 1:~5. 7 /~--~
_~ ~ ,. ,~~ ~{~d~- ~r~"'~(~.~'~'`-' -
CHA{RWOMAN ANAHEIM CI PLANNING COMMfS~ION
ATTES'T:
'l '' ~ ''f~~ ---
SECRETARY, F1EI~uS CI7Y PI.AN NNI G CAMMISSIt~N
~3- PC95~3
~:
~TATE OF C:AI.IFOFiNIA )
CUUNTY QF ORAPJa~ ) s~.
CITY Or ANAFICIM )
!, Mar~arita Solorlo, SFCretary of th~ Annhoim Clty Planning Commisslon, do hereby r,erttfy
th~at tho fore~afng n Janua~n S~, ~19A5~ bY tlhe tailaw ngt vc~tetof thQ mdmber~tt e Aof h~i~, ~~ry ~'I~nnh~g
Comm1ssion hH1ci a ~'Y
AYES: COMMISSIONER5: BOYpSTUN. CALDWFI.L, tvi1.YCR, MESBE, PERA~A~ TAIT
NOES: COMMfSSIONEFi~: NON~
ABSENT: COMIJIISS1nNERS: HENNIN~ER
~ F I have hereunto set my li~nd this ~~~day oF
IN WITNES~ WHFREV ,
~l/11a.1C111 ; 1995.
c~r ~:.~.~~~~
SECFiEI'A~Y, ~ NCIM CITY PLANNINC CnMMIS510N
,~„ PC95-3