Resolution-PC 95-34h,•'~r ~:,~;
U',~'~ ,'~" ::
p,.~~! ri,~-Q.N No..~s-~a
A RESnLUTION 4F THE ANAHEIM CI'1'Y PLANNING COMMI8SI0~!
THA~' W~1'ITION F~R CONQITIONAL USE P~RMI1' NA. 3748 BE dRANYED
WHEREAS, the Anal~eim City Planning Commission di~ receivo ~ vertfierf PetitiQn for
Gonditional U~e ~'ormlt far certain real property situated in the City of Anahoim, County of fJrange, ~:ate
of Caiifornla, doscribed ~s:
P~hRC~L 2~r a1 ~INQ 42 OF ARC LI fV~~AP5s N~ HE Iv FICE Orl WE ICOtJNTY
113, PA~E~
RECORDER OF SAIO COUNTti'.
WI-IE~ICAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a publfc hearing ~t the Civic Conter
in tho City of AnahE3lm un March 20, 1995 at 1:~0 ~n.m„ notice of said p~iblic hearing having b~h~~~er
c~ive~- as roqufred by law and in accordance with the provisions Af the Anaheim Muniuip~l Cotie,
18.p3, to hear an~J consider ~n~QrAGOmmo dat ans( intron~nectlon~heewttt~~~a dai use pormlt and to
lnvest{gato anci make findinc~s a
WH~R~AS, seid ~sfderationnof ~H e~vid~nce and ropo tsso(~fered ~t~said ear ng, does find
and in its behatf, and after due ca
and determine the follUwinfl facts:
1. That the praposen ~~~1.050 21ra tol peomit hac phys ~a~l ifi ness t aln~ng I cionterh(Kung Fu
Anaheim Muni^.ipal Code Sectfo
schoolj with waiver uf the fo{low(ng:
tinn 1 ,0~ 6,Qa0, 2 - ,~i.lllnimum~~L9.~.~1~kiC9-~E?~-~~
~~Osp,~~ (7~ requirQd; ~ existing and recommendod by the
~~Q~ C(ty Trafffc and Transportatlon Mana~er)
~4.~.4~.R
and 1 ~.61.OC§,~.Q
2. Th~t the parking wafver, under the canditions impos~rJ, will not cause fewer off-strgAt
parkin~ spaces to ba provided to~e under thehnormai a d~easonably fo eseeable condi la sCOf per~a~t on
all vehicles attributable to such u
of such use;
3, Tt~at the waiver, ~nder the conditions impo~ed, wfll not increase the demand and
competition far parking spacos upcan the public streets in the immediate vicinity of thQ propased uae;
4. That the waivar, under the conditions imposed, wiil not increasa the demand anr~
comp~tition for parking s~acas upan adjacent private property in the immed~at~ vic(nity nf the proposed
use (which property is r~ot expressiy pravlded as p~rking far such ~so under an agreement in complianco
wfth Sectian 18.OG.010.U20 of this Code);
g, Th~t the watv~r, u~nflicts wP hinithe off s~ ee parkin~ aress~orslots prov ded forisi~ch u~se;
air pollutfon, or traffic circulati~n ca ,
g. That the waiver, c`n 8 essQtoQOr~ieg essm om~adjacen ~pr4perties t upan the~publia~ t eiQts
air poliution, or impede vehlcula g
in the imrnediate viainity af the pruposed use;
_~ ~ PC95-34
CR233dM5.Wf'
f y~~
t' ~r
'VY
7, That tho granting of tho parking variance shr~ll be cnn~ingent upon operation of the
~pprnved conditlonal :tsa in canformanca with the assurnptians, relating tn th~ ~peratlan and infiensiry of
such uae, contained in the par{<Ing riem~nd study that fnrmed tho basls for appraval of thls w~ivar; and
that exco~ding, violating, intenstfying or otherwise doviatir~g from any ~f the assumpt(ons contained in $aid
parking domand study sh~ll be de~ nat onvQOla~i~dif cfat on pursuan~ o the provpsions of Sectfon 18 Q`3 091
use permit and may result in te
and 18.03.09?. of this Code;
8, That tho proposed usc~ wlll not adversoly affect the adj~ining land usos anci the growth and
develapment Af the ar~a in which it is proposed to bQ located;
g. 7hat the size ~ S Sn~~ manne~r nat dotrimen aQto the 'paKicul~r areat no~ tolthe peace`
development of the proposed u
health, safety ~znd general welfare;
10. That tho traffic generated by tho proposod use will not impose an undue bt,trden upnn the
streets and highways desic~ned anrJ lmproved to carry tha tr~fflc in the ~rea;
11, That the 9haalth9safQtpa d gene aIl welfaee oif the cftizens cafthie City of Anaheilm~and~
detrimantal co thv pe~ce, e , Y
12. That no on~ IndicaLod thefr presence at salct public hAaring in apposftion; and that no
Gorrespontlence was recoived in Appositlon to the subject pvtition.
~ALIFARNIA ENVIROr~ENTAL ~UAI.ITY CT FINDING: That tho Anahoim City Planning
Commissian has revfewed th~ praposal to ~,ermit a phy~ical fitness iraining center with wa(ver of minlrnum
number of parking spacos on an (rre~ul~rly-sha~~d parcel af land cansisting of approximately 1.5 acras,
having a frontaga of approxlmatQly 355 feet on the north side af Rogai Park Drive, having a m~ucimum
depth of appraximately 150 fEet, bein~ located appraximately 240 f~~t west af the conterline of l31ue Gum
Street, and further dpscribed as 2765 Regal park Driv~; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaratfon
upon finc1ing that the ddclaration refiecls the indepandent judgement af the lead agency and that (t has
conald~red tlio Negative Declaration together with nny commants received during the public review
~,°ocoss and further finding an the basis of the fnitial study and any comments received th~t thore is na
su~~st~ntial evidence that the proJoct will havs a signfficant effec- ~n the environment.
NOW, THERCFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that the Anaheim ~ity Planning Commissfun does
hereby ~rant subject Petition for Contlillanal Uss Pormit, upon the following canditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prere~uisito to the prapased use of the subject propercy in order to pres~nre the
safety and genei~al welfare of th~ Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, TMat cla~ses shali not k-e conducted prior tn a:00 p.m., Monday thraugh Frlclay.
2, That there shail b~ no public Kun~ Fu or other sirnilar ~xhibitfons permitted at subJeat faciifty.
3, That subject propert~ s f aA aheim bQt 6 po itioneialandl which plans ar~h on! file wi h thaCiPiantn~ing
submitto~ to tho C ty o Y
Department marked Exhlblt N~s, 1 thrauc~h 3.
4. That prfor to commencement of the activfty herein approved, ar pr(or to fina4 building and zoning
lnspentian~, or wtthln ~ period af one (1) year from the date of this d~cision, whichever occurs first,
Condition Nn. 3, above-merttianed, shall be complied wlth.
5. That mpprovai of this appNcatic~n constftute~ approval of the prop~s~d roquest anly ta the ~xtent that
it camplips with the Anai~eim Municipal Zaning Code and any other appficabie City, State and FAderal
_2_ pC95•34
~ ^' ,
r ,e ; ~~},.
nt 'V~y
t W!i>' ~
roval doos not Inclucie any action or flndin~s as to compliance or approval of tho
regulations. ~1pp Ilcable ordinance, re~ulatinn or requirement.
roquest, rec~arding any atPier app
~lE IT FURThI~R RESOI.VEb that th~ Anaheim City t'lannin~ Commi~s~sno ~ compilance with
and determine that adoption af ~hls Resolutian is axpr~asly predlcated upon ~pp art tt~ereof, be
~ach and all of tho conditlans hereinabovo ~et torth. 5houl~l any such condltlon, or any p then thls
declarocJ invalid or unanfiorc~able by the fini~~l~dshallnbe deomod nul~andrvoident jurisdiction,
Rr~splution, and any approvais hereln conta ,
TM~ FOFtEUOiNG RESOLUTIpN was r~dopted at the Planning Commisslon meoting of
March 20, 1995. ~ • G~
, l '~
CHAfRWO AN ANAHElM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI~JN
A1TES7: -
l n '~~~ -
SECRE"I'AF?Y, AHEIM CITY f~I.ANNING COMMISSION
~TATE O~' CALIFOFtNIA )
CQUNTY OF vRAtd(aE ) ss.
CITY l~F ANAHEIM~ )
I, Margarita Sol~rio, 5ecrotary oF the ~n ed i a atym~eting of ~he Anahefm~ City Plann g
that the foregoing re~olutfon was pass~d and ad~{~t
Commfssion hold ar3 March 20, 1995, by the fpllowing vote of th~ meml~ors thersot: P~R~
Al'ES: CnMti1{SSIONERS: BC~YDSTUN, CALDWE~L~ HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE,
N~jEg; COMMISSIONERS. Np~E
tiBSENT: COP~AMIS~IONENS: NONE
VACANCY: GNE SEAT ~j ~~day of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi~ ~
__ ~'LL~s--' 1985. ~ ~
' ~ Ll,t'i,e t~~~ ~
SEC~tFTAR ,'AN EIM CITY PLANNING CQMNyISSi NO
PC95-34
-3-