Resolution-PC 95-46^ !r
M1!1
~~W~
~.1~~•~~~~
A R~aC)LUTIOPJ OF THE ANAHEIM CiTY ~'LANN~(~IC CAMMI~SION
THl~il" PET1710N FOFi C~NDITIONAL US~ PEWMIT NC~. 3753 BE GRANTED
WHERF..aS, the Anahelm Cifij Pl~nni~~ Commissian d(d recelve a ver~l~acl Patiti~n for
Cor~ditional USe Parmit f4r Certain real pra~erty situated in the ~City ~f Anaheim, County of ~range~ State
uf C.~lifc~ml~, describod as:
LOT'S b81~1ND 59, OF TN~ EUCALYPTUS FOREST TFiACT, IN TNE CQUNT( UF
ORANGE, 57AT~ AF CAUFOFiNIA, AS PcFi MAP RECORn~Q IN BAOK w
PAGE(S) 29 AND 30 dF AAI~CEI~I.ANE~US MRPS, IN THE OFFICE f~F 7HE
CnUP~ITY RrCORDER l~F SAIQ COUNTY.
WIaEREA5, the Gity Plannirig Cammis~ion did hold g publi~ Mearing txt the Chric ~enter
in the ~ity of Anahel;n an M~Y t~ 1~3~5 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hc3aring ~iav(ng bC~n p e~~ $~ 0~
as required by law anci in ~cc for and a`ahnst said p~opc~se~tcondit(ona usouperm `and to investigate and
in hear and ~onsider ~avtdenco 9
m~ko findin~s arrd recommendatlons in cr~nne~tlon therowith; and
WH~REA~, s~(d Commi~sion, afte~ due ~nspection, Invostigation and study mada by tcsel~
and in fts behalf, and after due C4i~sideration af all evidence and raports offered at sald hearing, does flnd
ancl dc~termino tha f~liawing facts:
1, Tt~at the proposed use is properly one for which ~a cunditlAnal use permit is ~uthorized by
Anaholm Municip~l ~~ade Sactian 18 ~hicl~e wash n~ fac iry~ uehide repair~, A x~ Af~aie uses) ~Ing outdoor
storage o~f vehlclos, fuelirig islands,
2. That the proposod usa will not adversely af~~ct the adjofninp iand us~s and tha, growth ancl
dovetopment of the area in wh(ch ft is proposed to be lacatai because ~ ~s ~omPatft~le wnh the
surroundirig Indust~ial land use~ and with tho ~~neral P{an larui usR design~tion of Umitet~ inciustrial;
3, 1'hat tho size and shapo of the site far the praposed use Is adet~ua4e to allow th~ full
developma-~t af the pruposad use in a manner not detrimeMal to the particular are~a nor to the peacA,
healih, safety, and y~nora! welfare because the subject propeny consists c~f two parcels which wili be
utifizai as or.e property and that ~aid two propert(es wii; be jofned thruugn rocordation ~af ac reciprocal
access agreement;
4. That the traffic g~erat~ci by the prnposod use will not Impos~ an undue burden upon tha
streets and highways desi~nod and ~mpf e~ u°ements~for parkingtand that vehfaa3 boingrscorod wi1~ Ibe
malntenanc~s hacility exceeds Zon(ng Cod eq
maintained i~ thelr ~wn deslgnatod aroa;
,y. That tha grantin~ of the canditianal use Pemnh ~nder the corulEtionz Imposed will nat bn
detrimentaf to the peace, heaith, Safoty and genoral woifare af the citizens of tha Ciry of Anaheim; and
b. That no one ~~n1~t ~~Ion orthe ubjoct patiptlp~Ec hea~ing in opposltlon; and that +~o
correspandonce was receiveci ~ opP
.1 _ P~ls-~
CR2361 DM
.~ M
~ i ''~ire,~',
~h~C.~,RhJIA FNVIRARME"~'fAL QI.~A~ ~N AG'~-E.I~4~Ij~,: 7hat the Ar~ahelm Cit~- r~~anning
Commission h~s reviewec! the propo~a! t~ p~rmk a truck malr~tanance faciliry (includin~ outdoor stpra~e
o~ vehicles, fueling islancls, vehicle wmshing facilitu, vAhicla renalr, ttncl office uses) on ~ raatt~ngular~y
shapod parcel of land ~onsisting of approximataly 1.8~ acrAS~ having an a~.~praximate frontage of 264 feet
on the south sid~ of La Cresta Avenue, having a maximum dep'h of rapproximately 310 feot, bafn~ located
approximately 785 feet east of the centeriine af Blue G~im Stre~¢ and ~urther described as 2860 and 2870
~ast LR Cros~ta Avanue; and daea he~9by ap~rova the Neg~tive Declaration upon find(r~g that the
declaratlon reflecrs tl~~ lndonendent Judgemant af 4tig lead ag~;~cy and thtat k i~~s coi~sid~ered ~he NeQativa
Declaration tcgether w(th any no~m~mnencommonts eceh od that ther~ ~s~ ops bsta~tistl evidence~thagthe
tho basis of tha inftial study a Y
prAJect wlll I~ave a sigr,fficant effec:t on the env(~onrnent.
NOW, THEREt=ORE, BE IT ~ESOLVED that the Annhaim CKy Pl~nn(ng ~~mmission do~s
heraby grant subJect Fatitlon fUr Cond~t ~~ ~ raS osed u~uof the sub~ect property iniQa der to p e erv~ tho
f o u n d ~ a b e a n e c e s s a r y p r e r e q u i s t t e p p
safery and ~yeneral welfare of the Cit(zen~ of the C(ty of ~".nahelm:
1, That th~ prnperty owna~~h` ~Lfai ~ e~ta Avenue ~ from IRS A-43 OOOg (Res dent a~ Agric ~ u,ral) to ~IL
the~ proporty at 2850
(Limited Indu~tr(ai).
2. That prlor to approval of a grading plan or i~suanc~ of bui{ding permit, whtcriever occurs first, tho
dev~loper shal! submit a wa~er quality er-anagemer~t plan (1NflMF'1 spocificaliy identiiyin~ the best
management pr~cticeshthl t~~will~ ~e~f~ tl ~~ the publ cntW~rks D'eG+anmentluDevelopment S nrices
runo~€. 7ho WQMP s a
D(vision, for r~vi~w and approval.
3. 1'hat a lot line ~djustment ~Iat (ta merga the two [2J existing lots ar to adjust tho proporty Iine to
~dmpiy with Fire Cales as relate~i~tW t~he~lo~cat ov~f~y thor Ciry Engine~r51 Sald Iotaiina dtu men
to Zhe ~t~bdivlslon Soction for re pp
shall then k~e recorded in tho Off(co of fho Orange County Recorder.
4. That an unsubordinated recfprocal accesa anci parking agreement bdtwo~n the two (2) propetile:~, in
a forrn sa4lsfactory to t~a ChY~~a~n~Q~manll sh II be subm tt~d to~th~effZon nfg Divi~afon.~~ ~unty
Reco!der. A copy of th~ reco 9
5. That the maint~nance ~f vehicles shall be conducted wholfy inskte a buildin~!.
C. That tne vohicle and equipment scorage area shal{ be tuliy and permanendy scrAanod from public vlew
th~our~h the use of solid fencing and landscaplny.
7. That subJect property shall be developed substsantfa,ily in accorciance with plans ~and speciflcatluns
submNted ta the Giry of Anaheim bhroue h~itioner ~ncl which plans are on file with the Planninq
qepah~m~nt marked ~xhibit Nos ~
8, That the appAcant :~h~li ~ubmit a~ emof ~~te t~he compiPp~ scrE nhng of the qEulp ner~t sta age area
apprav~l by staff. S~id plan shat! d
iram publ(c vlew.
.2. PC95-4fi
,:~.
','.'~~'
i~. That prior to -~suance af a bullc~ing permtt or within a~orlad of ane (1) yoar Prom the date af triis
resolution, ~Nhichever Q~~ for furthe ~imc~itA complete sald co dit~lons m~ sy ba gr~nted 1~ccord~ ce
compii~d w-,th. Extenslons
wtth Sectic~n 1 g.03.090 of tNe Anahelm Mur~icipal ~ode.
10. That prtor to final butlding anti ::oning inspectlons, Condition Nos, 6 and 7, abave-montioned, sha~l
be c~mplie~d with.
11. That approval of this appllc~tion consti-~~tes approval of ther proposed il q~u`e~t~~YS°~te a d Fede al
K~~r~niles with ttie Anaheim Municipal Zaning Cucin and any other app
regulatfons. Approval does a t ~~~b o~o dinoncenregulato~~ oarequlromenitnc~ °r approval of thA
request reg~rdirig any nthe pp
8E IT FU~'~MER RESOLVED that tho Anahelm Ciry F~lanning Commi~noig C~~plianc~a vvith
and dotermine that adoption Af this ~te~alut(on is oxpressly predlaAted upon app 0 rt thereofi, be
each and all of the aonditions hereinabove sec forth. 51~ould ~ny such canditlon, r any pa
dec~~;red invalid or unenforcoable b~ tcontained~s allnbe deemEC! null and voldent J~arisrllctfon, then this
Resalution, and any approvals here
7'HE FOREGOING RES01_I.ITiOPJ wms adopted ~t tho Planning Commissio~ meeting c~f
t,Aay 1, 1995. ~~~ ~/~~ G~~" _' -
i 1
GHAIRWOMAN ANAHEIM Clfl' PL-~1NNING GOMMISSlU(N
A7TEST: ,
. ~ ` ~0~
SECRETARY, AN EIP~A CIiY PLANNING C~~MiV11SSI0N
SSATE uF CALIFORNIA )
COUPJl'Y OF ~RANGE ) ss.
~I'fY OF ANAHEIPN )
i, Margarft~ Snlo~io, Secr~tary af the ~lnahaim Cf4y Pianning ~mmissl~n, do hergby cer~Hy
that the farogaing resolutian was ~pa`~~o'~o~in ~vot of the mem~bo ~ he eofAnahefm City Planning
CommisslAn held an May 1, 1995, y ~
AYEa: COMMISSIONE~ NONE ~G~' s0Y0~1'UN, HEi~1~IINGER, MAYER, MFSSE, PERAT~1
N~~S: COMMIS5i0N~ ,5:
ABSCNT: ~O~A~4lSSIVNEFiS: CALDlNEL.L
~ ,~ , ~
IN WlTNESS WFIEREOF, ! F~ave hereunEO sat my hand this ~_ day of Q
1995. .
~ ( ' ..-~-=
SECRETA , AHEIM C4TY PLANNIlVG COMMISSION
.3_ PC95-46