Resolution-PC 95-66r ~
~~~M 1 ~~~F~.~.
A RESOl.U710N OF ThIE ANANI~IM CITY PI.,ANNING COMMIS510N
AMENDING ~iESOLUTION NOS. PC78-287 AND PC79-17
ADOPT~17 IN COPVNECTION WITW CqNDIT6QNAL USE P~RMIT N0. 191~3
1-'VHEREA5, an Dec9mber 4,1978 the Wlanning Commis~ic~n ~pprovod Condf4lonai Use P~rmit
No. 1918 (to ~ermit a traflar rentel aritl loasing f~cili4y with wafver of r~quired enclos~are of ouldoor uses)
~ander Hesoluti ~ tha cent.e~line of E~s~St eet~ sacnd~furkl er de.g bad as 9 8 East Vermonte3treet~andathat
635 feot west o
no further ~ction was taken by the City Counc!I;
WHER~AS, on Janu~ry 15, 1979 the Pl~nntng Commi~sfon adoptec! resolution No. P(:7~-17
arnending Resolutfon No. PC7818~, nunc pro ti~nc, to add two conditions that wer~ inmdvertently omittod,
and that no furth~~ acxion was t~kan by th9 City Council;
WHCREAS, the ~etitfonor submitt~d a request to establish a contractor's storage yard for ~
concrete company~clih~ ~th Sexist~ing 900 sq.itflbu d~ingrw(Iglrbo u ed for~ h~f~r off ce aperat ans~riais used
by the campany, a
WH~REAS, the City Planning Cammission did hnid a public hearing at the Givir Center in
the ~Clty of Anaheim on .funA 92, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., notic~ af said public hearfng having been duly given
as requirvd by law and in accard~nce with the pravision~ of tho Anaheim Municipal Code, ChaptAr 18,03,
to hear and consider evidence for and r~gRinst s~id prnpc~~e~c1 amenclment ~nd to investigate and make
findings and recommend~tl4ns in cannection ther~w{th; ~nd
WMEREA~, sald Commissian, si'~r due inspQC:tfon, invostigatfan and study made by itself
and in its aehalf, and after due c~nsideratipn of all evkience and rAports offorod ~t safd h~aring, does ffn~f
and determino the foilowing facts:
1. 7hat the conditio~al use and waivers for which approval was ori~inally grt~nted have not been
detrimental to the publlc heaith or safety, nQr havo they constitut~d a nuisance;
2. 7ha: the use, as amendad, is properly one for which ~ c~nditfonal use permit i~ authorizod
by the Zoning Goc1e;
3. 'That the use, as aEnended, will not adversely affert the adjoining lar~d usvs and the growth
and c~evelupm~nt ofi the ar~a In which i~ is proposed tA be located because (a) tho previnusty approved
otrtdoor use has existed Qn the praperty for d numb~r of yeRrs wfthout problems, (b) the nroF~osed
contractor's storage yt~rd is compatibl~ with tMe surrounding industrial ne(ghborhaod, and (c) the petitioner
will improve tha appearance of ;;ub~ect property by remaving the pole sign ad~acent to Vermant Street,
u~gradin~ oxistin9 landsa~ping and reh~bHitating the axist(ng ~ffice building;
~l. Th~ :t the size and shape af the slte for the use, a~ a~renclecl, i3 adoquate to ailaw tt~e fu11
dev~lopmant af tha proposed use In a manner ~ot detrfinental to the par:icular area nor to thR peaco,
hoal~t~, safFty, ~nd gengrai welfara;
5. 7hat the t~affic ~pener~tecl k~y the use, as amended, will not impose at~ ur~due burdsn upon
tl~e streets and highways d~signed and impraved to carry the traific {n the area;
CR2396N1S.WP -1- PC95-S6
. ~';~a;-
~i~~4wlt~ I'~~~
~. 7hat the granting of the conditional use perm(t, as am~ndeci and und~r tha r,onditions
~mpasoti, will not be detrimontal to ti7e poece, he~lth, ~afoty and general wolfare of th~ citizons ~f the City
of A~iaholm bec~use the praposed contr~ctor"s yard for ~ho stora~e of trucks, matarials and equfpment
is essentlally th0 sarrie Opr gtara etiof trallars mn~ +equipmant~, Incluciing treflers typically lused with t actor~-
w h i c h u s~ i n c l u d e d o u t d 9
t~ailer riys; and
7, That ~ne (1) peraan indicatad hls prosence sat said public t~oaring in opp~sitior~; an~ that na
correepondenca was recoiv~d In apposlxion to the subJ~cc petition.
~,~FOFiNi,9...~:NVIRnN~."~ ~'A4 Q~~I I~G7 F N: That the pnaheim City Wlannin~
Commission has reviawed tho proposal and tloes horeby Pind that the N~agativ~ Doclaration previausiy
approved in connectir~n with Cand!tlanal Use PormEt No. 1918 is adequate to seNe as tho requirod
onvironmental daaumaiitatlan in connection wfth this request upon finding that tho declaration rQflocts tho
Independent Judg~rnent of tha lead ac~eney ar,d ~that it has eonsiciArad the Negative Deelaratian together
with any comments reconts recefv dtkthatut `are~isAn p ubstantial fev denc(e that ~hehproJact wfllhhavet` al
study and any comme
significant 9ffect on the Anvironment.
NOW, THE~i~FOHE, f3E IT R~SOLVE~ that ~he Anahelm City t~lanning Commission does
hereby 4ak~ 4he foilowing actfAns in:
A. Arr~end RosoluNan No. P'C7a-287 ta permft a contractor'~ storag~ yard under the autharity af C~de
Section 1a.61.0a0.502 instead af a trailer rental and leasirig faciliry; and
B, f~mend the cor~ditlons of approval cantained in Resalutfon No. PC79-17 in their entirety to read as
foilows:
1. That all materials shall be st~red below the top af tlie existing rence line.
2. '~hat tho existing pole sign shail b~ removeol and any nQw freestanding signage shalf be limited
ta ono {1) monumont sign not Qxceedinp elght (8) feet in haight.
3. 7hat thR existing fence slats shall be repiaced wfth PVC (polyvinyl chlaride} type slats.
4. That subject praperty ~hall be dev~lopc~ si~bstanti~lly (n accordanco w~fth plans and specifications
submitted tu the Cih~ of An~hAim by the petitioner t~nd which plans are on ffle wfth th~ Planning
De~artment mariced Revlsfon No. 1 of Exhibit No. 1.
5. That priur to commencement of tho ectfvfry att~horized by this r~salution or within a perfoci of one
C~ndftion Nos. 2 3 and 4,
(t) year iram the date of this re3oluti~n, whichevor occurs flrst, .
abovo-me ~ni~ ~n ~clcn dancopw h S ctiont~~0.03 090 of thaeAnaheim Mur~ici~palSCode. nditfons
may be g
6. Th~t approval of this ~pplication constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent
that it c~mplfas with the Anaheim l~iunicipal Zonln~ Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval do~~ not include ~ny action ar findings a~ tc~ compiianae or
approvai of the request rec~arding any ottior applicabie orcilnance, regulatfon or requfrement.
BE IT FURTFIER RESOL~: ED that tlie wal~er of re~~uirad en~l~sure af outdoor uses originall,y
permitted under Rosoltdlon NQ. FC7&267 remains in fuif force anci effect;
-2- PC95-66
,~,.
~i~~ , ~,,
~3
( ~t•'; ~~'
THE FOR~GOIPVG R~SOLU710N was adapted at tr~e Planning Commission meeting of
June 12, 1955, '
% ~ A ~~ ~
f ~~ ./L~('~l.dJ J ~`- ~"~=ai ~ ~..~
. ~
CHAIRW MAN, p~!AW~IM CI~ PLANNING ~AMMISSION
AT1"EST:
,~_~r~ , {~ii.l~
aECR~TARY, AHEIM CITY PL.ANNIfVG COMMiSSIQN
STA"fE UF CALIFORMl.4 )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHCIM )
I, Margarita Solorfa, Socretary of tho Anaheim City Planning Cammisston, do hereby ceitify
that the tar~goinq rasolution was pr~ssad and adoptoci at a meQting of tha Anaheim City Planning
Cammission h~ld on J~ene 12, 1995, by the fallaw(ng vote 4f the members thereaf:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: BOSTWICK, 80Y6STUf~, CAI.DW~I.L, HENNINGER, MAYER, PERAZA
NQ~S: GOMMISSl4NGRS: NON~
AI3SENT: COMMI~SIONEFiS: M~SSE
fN WITNESS WNERFOF, ! have horaunto set my hand this ~~~day of _ ~Uy~._.._~,
1995.
Gl. ~ G-~~ ~' fv.~
SECR~'TARY, HEIM CITY PLANNING COM^~ISSION
-3• p~:95•Fi6