Resolution-PC 95-67~ ,
!~E}~4~~!TIO N0. ~' 95-67
A RESOLUTION OF TH~ ANAHEIh/~ CI7Y PLANNING COMMI~SIOIJ
AMFNDiNG CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF
R~SOLUTION NOS. ~ONDITIONAL SE PERM T NOD gng ONN~CTION WITW
WHEREAS, ~n June 14, 19~3 the Planning ~ommission granted ~onditional Use I'ermlt Nn,
3606 (to pormit nn-s~1e ~Icoholic boverages in conJunotion with an existing restaurant in a~n Incloor swap
meet on property locateci north and east of the Cerritos Avenuo and An7heim Baulovard, and furthe~
descr(bed as 1440 South Anaheim Boul~vard) far a period u~ one year under Rosolution Na. PC93-70, and
that on May i6, 199~ Pfanning ao-'ne ~S~p ~xnde~on June~lhtiQ995Uand that no further act o sitwere tabcen
t o p e r m i t t h e u s e f o r a r 9 a d d i t o ~
by the C(ty Counc(I;
WWEREAS, Resolutic~n No. PC94-57, adapted in conner.tfan with subjoct use p~ermit, includes
the fc~llawing condition c~f approvai:
°11. 7hat the condltional use permit shall expire or+ Jun9 14, 199:'i."
WHERFAS, tho petitioner requ~sts amendment to sai~ conditlon c-f apnrnval ta c;untinua the
on-3a14 alaoholic bevorages in the rastauranc and delete ths time 11m(tation.
WHEFIF.~4S, tr~e City Pfanning Cammissian did hold a publfc hearf;~g at th~ Civic ~enter (n
the City of Anaheim an ~lune 12, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., noticp of saici public hearing having bCh~pter 8i 03
~as requlred by law and in accordance with ihe {~rovisions of the Anaheim MuniGipal Code, ~
ta hoar mnd consider evide~nce inrco n a c oinstherowi~ti~~ and d amendment and ta (nvestiga4e and make
iindings and recommendation
WF~IEREAS, saie ~onsideradan of all eviden e~and reportstoffered at gaid hea ng, doesffind
and i~i its behaii, and ~fter du
and determine tho following facts:
1. 7hat th~ Planning Commission hereby deterrnines that Gantinuing tha time Iimitatian is
necessary to pormit r~asanabl eqpce and hat eubjectr estauranteis the~or ly onetioif~ring~such servicoan
a complimontary use to mea
tr~e indoor sw~p me~t;
2. 7hat subject conditional usa ~erm;t is beinc~ exercised in a manner not detrfinental t~ the
' particular area and surrounding la cd~~e violat~lo s re atingtlo thisat nantalandsafety and fleneral weifara,
. nor have thara beRn any reported
~. That no Ane indicated their pressnce at said public hearing in appasi4ion; and that no
~ correspondenco was received in apposition to the ~ubj~ct patition.
~a~ iF RNIA EN JIRQNMEN7AL Q~l UTY A T FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
~ A
Commissior has roviewed the propo las and cioes hereby firuf that the Nggative Ueclaration previously
approved (n cannection with Conditfonal Use Permit No. 3f06 is adequate to serve as the requir~d
environmontal documentation in connection with tliis request upa~ ffnd( ~hp Ne tativeeDecaarat on togother
indapendont judgemont of the lead ac~ency and that it has conside ed 9
with any comments recefved dur`v g~t `ha ub,P~Qei~t~W psubstanti ~ feviGfence that ~he praJecit wi l~1haveia~l
atudy and any cornments rece e
si~nfflcant effect on the environrnent.
PC~S•6T
CR2397M~.WP '~ ~
~ Q r,
'~.~, 'i'~r f ~ ib' ~
~'~~' ~'r
NOW, THEREFOR~oBEpC9~ ~0, as D~ended byi PC94 57, ~toi o d~a,s ollaws:~g ~~~~itlan
Na. 11 contained in Rosolutio~
"11. 7hat su~ject uso ~erm(t ~hall expire on June 14, 1996."
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTiON was ado~ted at the Planning Commission meeting of
June 12, 1995. ~ ~
~.~ ' ,Y/~l,~R/ ~i('-Q .~l.c-2-~~.._...._
CHAIFiW MAN, ANAHEIM CI PIANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~L~S~~+~o
SECFiETARY, p AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
S7ATC OF CAL.IFORNIA )
C~UNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI7Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita S~lorio, Secretary of the /~nahQim City Planning Commisslon, do liereby certify
ttiat the foregoing resolution Wa 5 pby the fol owingvto e of the metmbe sfthe e0 nah 31m Clty Planning
Commission hpld on June 12, 99 , Y
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYQSTUN, CALpW~L.L, HCNNINGER, MAYER, PERA~A
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NT: COMMISSIONERS: BC~STWICK, MESSE
IN WITNESS WHEREO~, i havo herounta s~t my hand this ~~ daY ~f , J~~ =r=
1995. ~ .
c ~ ~
SCCRE AR , NAMEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PV95-G'