Resolution-PC 95-80~:~,!!, ~
RE 'Ol. 71QN ,~Q~~R
Ji~,~,:'
A RESOLUTION OF THG ANAh1EIM CITY PLArINING COMMISSION
THA1' i~ETITION FOR R~CLASSIFICATION N0. 9a-9a-12 BE GRANTED, UNGONDITIONA~.LY
V'dHERE~S, thv Anahofm City Planning Commission did ror,eivo a verifi~d ~etition for
FieclassificAtion for real property s(tuatad in the City of An~aheim, County of Orango, State c~f California,
desaribed as iollaw~:
THF W~ST 132 FEET OF THE NOR7HEAS7 QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUART~R OF TI-IE NI~RTHEAST ~UARTER Ot= SECTIDN 24, TOWNSMIP ~t
SAUThI, RANG~ 11 WCST, IN THE FiANCHO L(3S COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, ~O~IPJTY OF ORANGE, S'ATE OF ~ALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP 7HERE0~ R~CORQED IN ~OOK 51, PAGE 11, MISCELLANEOUS MAPa,
R~CURDS 4F SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
EXCEPT AN UNUf~lIDED ONE-HALF IN7EREST IN TME SOUTH '10 FEET OF THE
NO~TH 350 FCET OF THE WEST 10 FEET pF TH~ ~AS'T 4U FEET 7Fl~f~EOF, AS
GRANTED 70 EaGAR B. CARSON, A WIQOWER, BY UEED RECORDED ,1ULY 17,
1956, IN BOOK 3579, PAGE 46Q, OFFICIA~. REGORDS.
WHEF2EAS, tt~e City Pl~tnning Com;~~issian dId hold a public hoarinc~ at tha Civic Center in
the City of Anah~im on July 1A, 1995 at 1:3a p.m., notice of said public ha~ring nav(ng been duly given as
requ(reci by law arJ in accardanro with tha provisions of the Anahoim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, ta
I~ear a-id cnneic;~r ev(c;enco f~r an~9 a~talnst said pronosed reciassltication and ta investigate and mako
find(ngs and rean-nm~t,:sations in con~~ction therewith, and
WW~I~~AS, ~.aid C~7~~imi.~sion, ofter du~ ins~ectfon, invastigation and study made by itself
and ~n ~is behalf, and oste~ cJu~ cansidorat~on cf alt evtd~nr3 and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and dc!~c';nine the fnllo•ruirg fa~tS:
1. That +~he petitione~ prnposas re:;lasslficatian of subject praporty from the RS-A-43,UOQ
(F~~sidenti~l, Agrir,i!Ii! lrali GOne to ~he R~~A-2a00 (:yesidential, Multiple-Family} Zono.
2. ?'hat the Ar.~ha`m c;eneral Plan designates subJect property for M~dium Density Aosident{a!
land uses allowin~ up to :i6 dwolf~ng units ~er acro.
3. That th~ proposed reclassification af subject prnparty is necessary anti/or desirabie for the
orderly and proper development of thQ community.
4. ~hat the prc~posed reclassification of subject proper:~l does properly relate to the zones and
their permiitecl uses locs~lly establishad in close proximfty ta subject property and to tl~e zones and thQir
pormicted uses generally ostablished thrnugliout the community.
5. That two (21 people ind(cat~ their presenae at said public hearing in ~ppnsitlon; and that
r~o correspond~ance was roceived in opposition to subject petition.
CI~2a2SMS.WP -~ - PC~5-80
;,~`~~ ~~
N'~A~N7 L ALI7Y ACT FIND~ : That the Anah~im City f'lanning
SA~J..~.'SZRNIA -.~4~.._ _.....~
Cammfs~ion has reviewed the proposr~l tc~ reclassify s i~ 1~~ ~am 11 y)~ Zone to ~peSmi 4a,02p t~rYSi ~S-uinit
Aqricuituraf) ~or~~ tn the f'M-24CU dResidential, Mu p
candominium complex with waivers oi maximum structur~i ey`a~lish auir~oty 28-uikt airspaco condaminium
zanes an~ mie~imum distance botwaen buildings, and t roxirnatel 1,a4 acros, havinc~ ~
subdivision ~n a rectangula j 32 r feet ~~c+p'~tihel south sidan of tiBs~IIGR~?~, having a m~zximum ciopth uf
frontage of appraximataly
appr~xlmately 607 feat, beirig lacated ap,nroxirna~tely 53a feat west o~f `he ~9~~t`~ve Decl~a ~tian nUn fincJinr~
further describad as 2638 Wo~t S~II Roac~;. ~+nd do~s hereby app ~'
that the declaratian reflects the indepond~~nt judgor~~ent~of~~h~u?ng ha p~Ibllc~revi w~p oc9ss andrfurthee
N~g1tivo Declaratlon ta~ether with any c~mrnents reco
finding on the basis of the inltial study and any comment en~ eived that there is nn sut~s~antial euidence that
the project will have a significant effect on the env.ronm pl~nnint~ ~ommission tic~es
NpW, 7HEi~EFOR~, ~E ~T pESp1.V~~ that tha Anahcaim Ci~y
horob approve the subject {'etitian for Rocla~sification C b~~ ~oOZe~y fr~ ,n the R.S-A-~3 000~1(Residd tial,
Y
tho Anahelm Nlunic~Pal Gc~de to exclude the above de~c p
A ricialt~iral) Zone and to incorporate said describeci pruporty into the HM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family)
9
Znne, unco~nditionally. rov~l af the
Eic IT FURTHER Fi~S~LVED that approval of this application constitutes app
ro osed request only to ttie oxtent that it ~omplies with~al aoes n,ot lncluda~any nlck~ian~or~findings as to
p p
a~plicat~le City, State and Federal rogulations. A~pro
cpmplian~e or approval of tha roquesl reyardii7g ~ ny ather applicable orrlinance, reg~+fatian or requirement.
BE IT FURTHEFi FlESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezaning o~f, ~r a
any such rezaning ~hal{ requlrs an ordinanc:e of
commitment by the Cfty to rezone, tt~~ subject propertY; ro~,Q~ pr denied by the Ctty Caimcil at
thg Clty ~ouncil which shall be a legislative act which may be app
its sole discretion.
THE FOFt~G01NG RESOLUTION was adopte~ at the Planninc~ Commission meetinc~ of
July 10, 1995. ~ ~J
~` ~_
CHAIR OMAN, ANANEIPA C.Y Pl11NNING COMMISSfON
ATi'EST:
~ ~ ~~~______ - ---.
rc,eC~{~ZqRY, AHE(M CI'fY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE 4F CALIFO~NIA )
C;OUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~-TY pF ANAHEIM )
I, Mar'garita Solori~, Secretary of the Anat eim~Ci~y m~~~~ng ofp he fAnaheim~ Cit~,l bp a n nfg
that tho foregoing ~eso l u ti o n Wa~ ~ 3~~h~ a to11~w nc~~ a a e of the members thereo f:
C o m n ~ l s slon hold on June 25, 1995, taY
PERAZA
AYES: CUMMIS~IQN~~S: NONE 1C~' sUYDSTUN, MESSE,
NnES; tJ~MMIS
h{ENNfNGER~ MAYER
P,'3SENT: CO~AMISSIQNERS: CAI.DWELL, '~'-~~.day of V'(.U ~~~ ~199'•
fN WITNESS WN~~~O~~ ~ have her~unto set my hand this _~ _.._ ~
1 )
S~ ~tC ETARY, A HEIM CITY PLP~NNIN~ COMMI~SION
PC85-SO
-2-