Resolution-PC 95-81'>;;;' ~
F~ESQLUTIQN NO. P~.9_~$1_
,',~
A RESOLUTION OF THG ANAHEIM CITY' PLANNING COMMISSION
Th1AT PET'1710N FOR CONDITIONAL U5E PERMIT t~10. 3777 BE GFiAN'T~a
WH~REAS, th~ Anaheim City Planning Gommissfon did recolve a vorlfiod Petitiui~ fnr
Conditionai Use Permit for certain real ~rop~rty sftuated in the City of Anahelm, County af dran~e, State
of Calif~rnia, described as:
THE WEST 132 FCE7 O~ THC NpRTHEAST C~UARTEii OF TME NQRTHEAST
Ql1AF~'fER OF THE NORTHEAST ~UARTER OF SECTION 2~4, TOWNSHIP 4
SQUTH, RANG~: 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO I.OS COYOTES, lN THC CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ST/Al'E OF CA~IF'ORNIA, AS aHC~WN ON A
MAP THEREOF FiECORDED IN SOQK 51, PAGE 11, MISC~LLANEQUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAiD ORANGE C~UNTY.
EXC~PT AN UNDI~'IDED UN~-HAL~ IIUTEFiEST IN THE SOUTH 10 FEE7 OF THE
NOH7M 350 FEE'i' QF THE WEST 10 FEE7 OF ThIE EAST 4Q FEET TH~NEOF, AS
GRANTFD TQ EDGAFt B. CARSON, A WID4WER, BY qEED RECORD~D JULY
17, 1956, IN SOOK 3579, PAG~ a60, OFFICIAL RECOFiDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissiori did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
In the City of Anaheim an July ~10, 't995 at 1:30 p.m,, notice af said pu~lic hearinq having beon duly ~Iven
as requirod by law ~iid in a~cordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ci ~apt~; 18.03,
to hear and consider evidonco for and agafnst said proposed canclition~i use permit ar~d to investic~ate and
make findings and r•ECOmmendatfons in connoctian therewith; and
WHEFi~AS, safd Commissian, atter due inspecti~n, InvEStigatlon and study made by itself
and in its behalf, ar~d after due consideration of ~II eviden ;P and reports offered at said hearing, cloes find
and c~eterrnine thQ foilowing facts:
1, That the proposed use is properly one for which a c~nditional us~ permit is authoriz~cf by
Anaheim Municipal Cado Section 18.3?_.050.045 to {~ermit a 2-~tory, ~8-unit condominium complex with the
following waiveTS:
(a) _$~e .ti~n, 18.3_?_.0~2.012 - Maximum struciur~l hei hi.
(on~ stary ~tructure pormitted wit in
i;ig fc~~t of a single•f~nily residential zons;
two-st structuras pro~osed at ,t 1 feet from
RS-A-43,000 "Residential/Agriculturai" zoning)
(b) , ti n 1~2.063.02a - Rgguireci ~,~t~ack ad~a~~nt to sinale-familv zon~s.
(minkmum ~0-fQot~l n~r,~~sgt~ck requireci;
11 to 12 feet proposed fram the east [RS-A 43,OOU
zaningJ and south [single famity rQSidences in the
City of StnntonJ property liries).
(c) S~ t~ ion SP~32^.~65.071 - Minim,~,~m fst ~e betwean buildinas.
(i~,fget req~ired; 1 f et propos~c!)
CR2426MS.WP -1- PC95-81
~~ ..
~
~ ertaining to maximum structural had acen`t niarcel~a hou~h ziogod p~~iA
2, That waiver ( ~ ~ roved on the basis that thQ 1 roved for
resldantial zonis~g to the east, is hereby app that ihe petitic~ner ~
General Plan desi~nation far medium d~hs`Reclassi icatfonnNo~74-75•11aS been ~P~Wa from
43,000, has a ~M_~ 2Q0~ }n conn~ctiun wi
muiti{~le famlly zaning (
I{ne-of-site clrawln9 shQW~n~ that the existigg sin~lo-family residence is lorated 35 eic
xistin singls family garac~e will prevont vis ~tosta totai
submitced a lan ind
the closost proposod cor~cior~~~niurri bullding; that the
and further, that the submltted landscapa p ;
from the proposed ca~nd ~~d~~Cent ~r~~ the prap~~Y Iine for additional scrEening;
of six treAS wlll be p
r b, ertaining to minimum rec{uired 20•fo~t landscaped setbacks a~l~ lication
3. Tha.t W~~~~~ ~ ~ p is hereby apArnved on tho basis that strict app ~
dd by other properties un~~e~ similar zonfng
s~n~~e fa~}-y resicfentlal zanls gub ct p opertY of privileges enJoy urrently have average 10-foot setb~cks
~ f t he Z a n i i:~ g C o d a d a p r N e 1 a K m e n t c o ~ n p l e x e s c ,;
ro osed wa ivar a d j a c~ n t t o t~u ert s t
and that tho p p
classiffcatlon in the viciu~f~y because nefghbor ing ~ p residenco because tho ~mderlying p p Y,
adjacent to thQ aingh~ tam`Im ra~ on~tihe~exis ing~sing~e family ~d~um density re5identlal tand uses and ;
praperty ~ing has myniiria p
although zo~~d RS-~'a~~~pn~ has ~ Generai P~an ~aesignatfon f4r m ;
~ti le iamily z~nin~ (RM-1200) in connection with Reclassificatifln No. 7M75-~ 1:
has been app~o~~ 'for mu p roved on ',
ertai~ing to minimum dj~e ~`a~ bondomin~lum bu~di i9sesg~ m~aa p~ 10-fnot '
4, 7fiat waiver (c), P
the basis that the proppsed 1p `oot s~tbacka betwesn res
separations typical-Y pravidc3c~ for adJacent single fa+~nily residen~es;
osod condaminium comQlex is consistent~rtunitfos initt e City af /~nahaim;`ng
5, ~h~` t~~ ~r~p rovide greater home ownership opp
Commission's state~ objectiue to p
sed use will not adversely affect the adJoiring land uses and the growth and
g, That tlle pr~p`~ich it is proposed to be located hecause ~~ ~~ proposal is cansistent with the
dev8lopmenl of tl~o area in w ro 8~ far -~nedium dE~,°,~ty ~•esidenti~l land uses;
Anaheim Cit~/ General !'lan w~iich designat~s subjec~- ~~' y ro osecl use is adequate to aUow the full
7, ThaZ the aiza and ~hape of tho sito for the p P
use ln a manner not detrimental ta the partfcular area nor to the peace, healt ,
development of the proposed
s~fety, and c~eneral welfare;
ffic ene~atecf by tha proposed u5e wil- tha~ ~ ea~se an undue burden upon t e
g, ~Thae the tra 9 ths traific ln
streets and 4iighways ciesigned ~nd lmpraved to Ga~ ^e ~rmit under the condit(uns impased will nut be
g, That the granting c-f :he conditional ua p
ace, heaith, saf~ty ancl 9eneral welfare of tha c~tizens of the City of Anaheim: a~ that
detrimental ~c~ th~ p~ osition; and
~p, That tv+o (2) peop~e Indicated their presence at said public hearing in opn
i:~ correspondenco was received in oppositton tu th~ subject c~etittan
~N 1 M N7AL A 1'Cr" A T FIN ~ EronhthehR ~-A ~~ ~~p (pesidentia~l,
C..~~~~N~ subject proN• Y 28_u~it condominium
ro osa~ ~o r~aclassify ~rmit a 2-story,
Cc~nmissi~n has rgvieweci th~ p p
Agricultur~l) ~one to the RM-24Q4 ~~~5identia~, Multiplo-Famity) 7.one to Pir, ace condominium subclivision on
t maximum structural hat3h~, feQ~~'re~ gtunlt a adp ~Qnt to single-family zones an~{
;,c,mpiex witYi waivers o frontage
minimum dlstance between buildings, and t~ estabfish a i; ot, ma'`imum depth ~f app
ecel .~f I~nd ~nsisting of a.p~roximatsly 1•a4 acres, h~r~%imateiy 607 feet~
a rectangulariy-shaPe~ Aa
5a~ feot wast of t, ~e centerlfnQ oi MagnQ-ia Avenue and further described as 26
~~Pr~,cir~ ~ately 132 foet an the sauth ~lde oi E3a1! R~ad, ~ r~~~ ~ on finding that the declaration reflects
beirrg located ~pPr~ximately rove the Negative Declarat~an up
nt ~f the leati ac~ency and tn~c tt ~as consi ue ~ d t~ie ~ ~e9ative l~eciaration toget e t
Wsst ~all Road; a~nd d~es hereby app h~r finding on the basis of the initial
t he in d e p e n c i o n t j ~ rc i c~ a m~ tn~ ~y-~ p lic r a v i e w p r o c a s s a n d rn ~~ t ~ y i l l h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n
with any cornments :eceived during
stud and anY comments reaefvad that there is nr, sutastantial evidence that the p 1
v
effect on the environmont• P~~ $1
-2-
;;{;~,p
;'~
NOW, THFREFORE, BE IT FlESOLVED that tho Ar~aheim City Planning Commission doos
h~r~by grant subJc~ct Petitfo~nepuislto ott'r~e p opoPecl uiseuof the sub~ecWpropert yln order tio p o Erve the
f o u n d t o b e a n e c e s s a ry p q
safety and genoral welfaro of the Citizens ~f the City of An~ ha im:
1. That a plan sheet for solid wasto storage and collection~a~ d a plan far r~~cycling shall ba submitt~d
to tha Department of Maintc~nance for review and app
~, 'That ciathes wasi~er and dryer hookups shall be incorporatod into each condominium dwellinc~ unit
and shaH b~ shawn on the plans submitted for bulldfng ~ermits.
3. That any ~roposed f~°~sn~ ~`lall be sub e~ ~ta tl}erppor~yevhew and ~p oval af tiio~Cfty T afffc and
eight (8) feet in hofght a 1
7ransportation Manager to deYormine adequate Ilnes-of-sight.
~. That ali 4he resid~ntial condominium units shall be addross~d frorn Ball Road.
5, 7hat ~n unsubardinated r,nvenant shall be reaorded with th~ Office of the Oranc~e County Recurder
agreeing to provide the buyer of oach dwelling unit wlth wrttten information obtained frorn tho scho~i
distriat(s) pertaining to possible overGrowded conditfons and busing status of the scho~i(s) servin~
the dweliing unit; n cApy~of tpf thev eco deda~lovenant shaltlbe submitted totheyZ.oniCgt Dvispon~y
~rior ta recordatio pY
6. That this conditional use permit is c~ranted subJect ta adoptf~n of a zoning ordinance in connection
with Reclassification No. 94-95-12, now pending.
7. Th ~t subject property shall be developAd substantially in accorclance with plans and specif(cations
suumfttecl tn the City oi Anaheim by the petitfoner and which plans arP on file wfth the ~lanning
D~partment marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through ;~.
8. That prior ta issuanae of a buildinq permit or wlthin a periad of ane (1) year from the date of 4his
rosolutfon, whichevor occurs first, Candition Nc~s. 1, 2, 5 and 6, above••mentfaned, shall bQ compliQd
with. Extensions for further time t~ complete said conditions may be granted in accor~ance with
5oction 18.0~.090 of the Anah~im Municipal Cade.
9, That prior to finaf building and zoning inspecttons, Cnndition Nos. 4 and 7, ab~ve-mentioned, shall
be compfied with.
10. That appraval of this ap~licatlon coiistitutos approval af 4ha proposed request only to the o.~ctent that
it corr~plies with tho A~aheim Munic(pal Zaning Code and any othier applicable Clty, Stata and F9deral
regulations. Approval doos ~ t licat~ e~o d nanoenrequlato g oarequ remen~ nc~ or apprcval ot the
rr~quest regarding any othe pp
BE IT FURThIEFi RESQLVED that the Anehsim City Plannirg Commission doss hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is eh pressly pred~ ated upon appl;cant's complianc;e with
each and all of the conditions hereinabove set fo, Should an such condition, or any part tr~ihen ~this
~ic~cl~rEd invafid or unenfnrceable by thp final j~d~ment of any court of competent jurisdictlon,
i~e~ ~lutlon, and any approvals hereln contained, shall be deemed nu11 and void.
PC~5-(31
-3-
a~
:~
THE FOREGOIh~G RES~7LUTION w~s adop4Ad at tha Planning Commissiam m~oting oi
July 10, 1995. ~„ „
;~ o~-~ __---.~
hAIRNV MA,fv ANAHEIM CIY PLANNING COMMIS510N
ATT~S7:
_____I~ ~ °~~QO~o
SE~RE7ARY, Al EIM CITY PLANNING C~MPJII~SION
STAT~ OF CALIFnRNIA )
COUNTY vF QR~INGE ) ss•
CITY' OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorlo, Secrstary of the Anah~im City Planning Comm~sslon, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resalution ~~5 ba5th~ follawi g~vote of the me~rr-bars the eoAnaheim City Planning
Commission held on July 10, , Y
AYFS: COMMISSIUNER~: BOS7WICK, BOYDSTUN, MESSE, FERAZEI
NOES: COWIMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COPAMISSION~RS: CALQWEI.L, HENNIN~ER, MAYER
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~' c~ay of 1.,~ ~srt~~
1995. . '
~ ~pIL~-O
SECRETARY NAHEIP,A CIT`( PI.ANNING C~MMISSION
-4-
f~C95-81