Resolution-PC 95-94R: SOLU'fION NO. P~~.5-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITI~ PI.ANNING COMMISSIQN
~"~MENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPRQVAL. OF
RESOLU'fION N0. PC91•74 ApOPT~CD IN CONNECTION WITH
CONI~1710NAL USE PERMIT NO, 3417
WHEREAS, on June 3,1991 Planning Comrriisslon adaptod Resolutian Na. F'C91 ••'74 ~apnroving
Cunditianal Use ~'ermit No. 3417 (permitting a temporary mecifcal office trafier [for MRI "magnetic resanance
imaging"J at ~n c~xistiing medical complex in a commerclal center with waiv~r of mfnimum number of parking
spaces); tha2 no further action was taken by the City Council; and thAt the property is located at the
narthwest corStr et a d 135 f et Q~the n~orthvsid~ af prange A~enuet anrd ~ur her descr bEd ast5h5-595
s(de of Knott
Sauth Knott Street.
WHEREAS, Concl(tion No. 11 nfi Resoiution No. PC91-7~ rpads as follaws:
•11, That this conditional use permit is granted for a period of one (1) year to and slial~ terminate
on JunG 3, 1 ~192.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. PC91-74 has subsequently been amended faur times, as fc:ilows;
On June 3, 1992 Glty Cauncif adopted Resolution No. 92R-105 amending Condition Nos. 1 and 11. and that
amended Condition No. 11 allowed the use for a second year untfl J4me 3, 1993;
On August 1~, 1992 City Cauncil adoptod Resolution No. 92R-181 amending Conditfon No. 1.a, to fncrease
the riumber of days for on-s(te operation of the MRI trailer from one to twa days por we~k;
On July 26, 1993 Pla d Co dit an No~11 alUlow d~tho uso foNa thi d~year unt~'~I June 3~199~;nand 1•a. and
11, and tha4 amande
On July 25, 1994 ~'lanning C~mmisslon adapted Resolution No. PC94•'~6 amending Conditlon Nos. i.a, and
11, and that amended Conditfan No. 11 ~Ilov:~ed thQ use f~r a fourth }~ear until Juns 3, 1995.
NIHEREAS, the petitioner, Sim C, I-loffman M.D., representing ,4dvanced Professionai imaging
Medical Group, has submittecl a letter dated May '15, 199~ requesting modificaxion of Condition No. 11 to
permit the medicai affice trai{er (MRI unit) for an add'rtionai fiith one year pericxl.
WHEREAS, tt~o City Planning Commissian did hold a public heariny at the Civlc Center ir
the Glty raf Anahsim on July 10, 1995, at 1:3Q p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly give~~
Chaptt~r 18.03
as requl~ed by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anahoim Municipa! Cade, ,
to hear and consider evidence for and aga;n~~t said proposed amendment and to investigate and m~ke
findings and recommendations in connection tt~erewith; and that said public hearinc~ was continued to the
July 24, and August 7, 1995 Planning ~om~r~ission meetings.
WHEREAS, safd Commission, after du~ inspection, investigatfon and study made by itself
and In its behalf, and ~itAr ~ue consld~ration ot all evidenco and reports offered at said hearing, do~s find
and det~rmine tha foNowinc~ facts:
1. 'fhat said permit or v~rfance is being exercised in a manner not detrimenial to the particular
a~9a and surraunding land uses, nor to tho public poace, health, ~afety zncl goneral welfarQ.
_~ ~ PC95-94
CR2444DM
~i
1~' 1„':
2, That no ono indlcated their presenco at sald puk~ilr, hearing in ~~pposition; and that no
carrespondenoe was received in oppositfon to the subject ~etition.
l~LITY A~T FINDiNG: That the Anaheim City Planning
,GALIFORNIA ENVI_RONMFN7A -~-~. find that the Nr,gativo Declaration prevfously
Commissio~i has reviawed the proposai and does heroby
a proved in connection with Conditional Use f'erm~e NO~st u tonifinding hat the declaratfon reflectsit e
P
environmontal documentatfon in cannection with this q
independent judgement of the load a~ency and thaW it pCea~ ~anid fur he`r fin ington th~e k~asisf of he initia!
with any commonts recaluec! during the public revie ~
study and any comments received that there is no substantial evid~nce that th~ project will have~ a
si5nificant effect an the environment.
NOW, 'ThIEREFORE, BE IT t~ESOI-V~'p 1 74 tas amnanded byf R so~lutfongNosm9?_R-1 U5, 92R-
h~reby amond Candition No. i 1 of Resolutian tio. V'C~ ~
~g1, nC93-84 and PC94-96, to read as foliows (and that all othPr conditions shall rEmain in full f~rce and
Effect):
~~1 ~, Tnat this conditlonal use permit is granted for a period of one (1) year, to expire on June
3, 1996."
71-IE FOREG4ING RESOl.UTION was adopted at the Pla~nfng Commissic~n meeting af
August 7, 1995.
d '~~
C RWQMAN, ANAHEIM C PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: , ,
~
SECR TARY, AHFI CITY PLANNING COMMISSIQN
S'~ATE OF CALIFaI~NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF ANAHEEM )
I, Margarita Solor'.o, SeGretary of the Anai ~ aC~ay meeting of~ he iAnaheim~ City byanninfg
that the faregoing resolution w~r ~asse~ fptlo ~~ vote of the mombers therPOf:
Commission heid on August 7, 1995, by
AYES: COPJIMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGFR, MAYER, MESSE,
PERAZA
NOES: CQMMISSIONERS: NQ~lE
ABSENT: COMMISSIaNEH5: NONE ~
~ day of ~, ~
!N WIT~lESS W~EREOF, I havA hereunto sot my hand this _
1995. ' ~ ~ ~.
r .~
SECR ARY, NAH M CITY PLANNIPJG C4MMISSIvN
PC95-94
-2-