Resolution-PC 95-97~
~.FS~ TI ~Q,.L'.~.~.r-~.~.
A RESOLUTION OF TH~ ANAW~IP~JI CITY ~'LANNINC3 C~MMISSION
AMENDING f:EFi7AIN CQNQI710NS UF AFPRC-VAL OF
R~SOL.Ui'ION N0. 84F~•393 ADOPT~D IN CflNNErTION WIl'H
CUNDI~'IONAL US~ PERMiT NO. 2602
WH~REAS, on l~ctober 2, 1984 thA City Councll adoptc~r! ~Iasal~nf~n Nc~, 84R-3~1 In
conn~ction with Cnnditional lJ$a ~'ermft No. 2~02 to pormit a~t0-be~ adult baard and care facility; and that
said facillty at 127-13 f~W~s~ai~1~3 p~a13?.WSauth A alhoim Bouleva d A~0••bed annex to an existing
nc~nconformir~c~ 36-k~ed y
WHEREAS, on May 17, 1988, the City Council apprnved an amendment to conditions of
approval allowing ambulaCory patients at tlie Hill Place facfiity. Ori Aprfl 19, ~1993, the Planriing Commission
approved ~ substantial confprmance request to I~gaily sAparate the two board a~nd care facilities, rondering
ontitlomant to the sub~ect property Qn Hill i~laca und~ar Cnnclftionai Us~ Permit No. 260?., and :e .ipring the
farility on ~nahelm BauiQVard lagal noncontorming.
WHEREA n ta 44 0 O 1I7Argo expai d the p~reviously- purov~d 4Q bedl board and ca9e faci~lity
aiithorfty of Code Soct o
to ailow a total uf 49 beds wfth wafver of the following:
~i~ ~ns 184C,p50.Q,~§.~. - Minimum num ,b.}~r of cNa~kfng~.~•
~~~ (~q roquirec.l; ~ existing ~nd approvod by the
_ n 1.44. ~Q~Q Cfty Traffic and Transp~rtatfon Manager)
WHEREAS, the ~ity Planning Commissian d(ci hold a pubiic hearin~ at the Civic Center in
tho Cfty of Anahetm on July 2~L, 1995, at 1:30 p.m., notice of s~c~l~ publfc hearing haviny boen duly given
as requir~d by law and in accor~ance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municlpal Gade, CPiapter 18.03,
to he~r and cansider evid (~ns in~con ect~ian therewithr~and ~ tsaid public heari giwastcoatinued othe
findings and recommenda
August 7 and August 21, 1995 Plann(ng Comm(ssinn me~tin~.
WHEREAB, said ~n,sideration oftall svidAncs an`d reports~otferecS at saSd~h ~ ng, does ind
and in its bohalf, and alter due c
and detormine thQ following facts:
1. That the requestsd parlcing waiv~r would cause fewer off-street parkln~ spaces ta be
providod fnr such th~ proposede norma' and reas nably fo ese~able c onciitions of op rat~ion of Isuch iuss;
attributable to s~lcl u5o u de
2. That th~ parking wafver woulcJ incroasQ thr~ demancJ and aompetftfoR for p~rking spaces on
tl7e public stroots in the immfxJfate vfcinity of the praposed use;
3. 7hat tho ~arkinc~ waiver wauid increas~ the dHmand and competition far parkin9 gPaces on
adJACent private propertY ~~ hh~~e u~~a~n aS~reement n~ com~lf~ co withhSect~lanp18.06 01a 020pof ihis
providod as parkirtig for suc u
Cod~);
4. That the parkinflo~f~st eetw~ rking a Has or I~ots p ov d~d fq- the praposed IusQ~, or traNic
cirr.ulaEEon conflicts, w~thin tho ~
5. That the park(n9 waiver wouid increase trailfc con9estian, notsa, air pailutfon, o~ 6mpede
vehicular ingress to or egr~,ss from a~1~ac~ni propertfes, upon the pu~iic str~ts in the tmrnc~sJlato vicinKy
of the proposed use;
g That the proposed use is properly one for which a c~ndltiontii use pprrr~ft is authorizecf by
the Zoning Cotfe. ~C85-97
CR?.460~M.WP '~'
;`~~'~ ~
7, That tho propo~ use, as amQndod, would acJvers~ly ~~cated~ adjoining land uses and the
grawth and develaprn~nt af tho erea in whiah ft is proposed ta be ~o ~
g, That the slze and shapo S~ u~tlnfari anno~ not dotrlmental a tl eeparticu~araa eaunor to
~Ilaw the fi~l! developmsnt of the p op
the peace, healtn, safety, and genera~ walf~ra;
9. That tho traffia genara~ad dv nd imr~ oved to cacrY the tr~ff c~ inithoma ea; and ncluo burden
upan tho streets and highw~ys design9 a p
10. 1'hat amonding the conditfana`tu of An he mpu'~ be detrimental to tha peace, hoaith, safQty
and general ~Nelfare ofi the c(tizQns of the C y
11. 7hax 3 p9a~lA fndicated ~t~f~~ pp the subJect peti~tionlic hearir~g in opposition; an~l that no
corr9spondonce was recelved in oppo
~'ALI~ ~NVIRONS~IEPJTAL 0~'!~' ASL~ I~ :~hat the Anahelm City Planning
Commfsslun has reviewed the proposal an e d~ae erver aS he raquirwd ~nvf~ronme~ntall doaumen~ atianSin
approved in cunnection wfth is adequa
cc~nnectlor. with tPiis reque5t upon finding th ~ehaN e`De~la~atfonl toget er w kh any corrum~entserecofive'd
lead agency and that it has conslder~ the g
during the public review pr~cess andlf eVh~e~rnCe ~~hat r~e project with hav`eiaassiynif cantaeffoct on~the
recefved that there is n~ substantfa
envirnnment.
NOW, THEREFQF~~~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pla~nning Commisslon does
horeby does hereby der~y, without prejudico, t nd the afver ofpminimum num(aeryof pa ki g Spd~ board
and caro faaflity to ailow a total of 49 beds a
THE F4R~GOiNG RESC~LUTION was adopted at the Planning ~ommission maettng of
Auc~ust 21, 1595. ~- `,y~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~i _--
C WOMAN, ANAHEIM CI1'Y A~INING COMMISSInN
ATTEST: ,
' c~'/~,r~2.r;~S'
SECRETARY, A~I~ EIM CI'iY PIANNING CO IMM SSION
~'~ATE 4F CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s~.
CITY OF ANAHFIM )
I, Margarita Soloria, Socretary ~E the AnaFieim Cfiy Plannin~ Cammissinn, do h~rehy certlfy
that the fareg~ing resolution was passed a fiallow~n t o e of the m~mbers the Qafheim C!ry Planning
Commission helcl on August 2i, 1995, by the fl
AYES: COMMISSIANFRS: 80STW1CK, BOYDSTUN, BRIS70l., HENylNGER, MAYER, MESSE,
PE(~AZR
NOES: COMMISSIUN~RS: N~NE
ABS~NT: CUti9MlSSIUNERS: NONE / J
Q ~~y,
IN WITMESS WH~REOF, ! have t~Rrdurtta set my hand this ~l ~ day ot ~~'~~
1995. ~^
~ ~
HElM CI~~rY~'LAIVNING COMMISSION
SECRET'AR ,
-2- PC95-97