Resolution-PC 96-101~ ~
oceni i rrir>N NO P 101
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC80-92,
ADOPTED IN COtJNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2090
WHEREAS, on June 2,198~, the Anaheim City Plann(ng Commissfon adopted Resolution No.
Resolution No. PC80-92 to approve Condnional Use Permit No.2C90 pemiittfr`9 a public dance ha~l in
conjunction wfth a restaurs~nt for a period of o~e (1) Yea~ o~ P~OP~~'h~ 0O^~~~~ng of approximately 0.9 acre,
having a frontage of approx~matolY 175 feet on the east side of Kraemer Boulevard, having a maximum
depth of approximately 216 feet, being located approximateiy 242 feet south oF the ceMerline of Coronado
Street, and further desc~ibed es 1~60 Ncxth Kraemer Boulevard; and thst nfne subsequent excensions of
1i34 a V PC95-6~ and~ ~ thellatest extensi a~cpiring~on August 27~, 1g37~ aC85-179~ PC87-155~ PC91-
WHEREAS, on September 4,1996~ the Planning Commission directed that subject conditiaial
t e provisions of Sections~18.03.091 and~18.03.0~9 ~ette AnaF-ei Mu icipal Code nandr~~ ~~rn to
WHEREAS, tl~e Ciry Planning Commission did hc,ld a publ~ heartng at the CN!c C~nter in
the City of Anaheim on September 30~ 1996, at 1~30 p.m., notfCe of said publ~ haaring haviny been duly
given as required by law end in accordance wfth zhe provisior~s °f the ~~ ~~~~~ ~ o andtto
18.03, to hear and consklor evidence tor and agalnst safd ProPosed
irnestigate and make findings and recommendatbr . In connect~on therewith.
WHEREAS, sak: Commission, atter due inspection, Im~estigatlon and studY made by icself
arxlln fts behalf, and atter d~e consideratbn of all evidence and rep:xts oNered at said hearing, does flnd
and detoRnine the fdlowfng facts:
1. That on September 12, 1995, Spec~ic Plan No. 94-t was adopted, placing subject property
in Deveiopment Area 3'La Palma Core' of the 'Northeast Area 5pec~ic Plan';
2. That subject properry is developed wftr an approximately 5,400 sq•fc. restaurant/pubiic
dancc ha~l (Bobby's Shack) with on-premises sale and consumPt~o^ d a~~°h°~~c beverages and ifve
entertatnment;
3. That subject use permit is be~ng, or recently has been, exero~sed contrary to the terms or
condftio~s of lts approval~ or in violation of certatn statutes, ordlnances~ lawo or regulailons (Section
18.03.092.040 of the Anaheim Mun~ipal Code);
4. That the use for wh~h appruvel was 9ra~ted has bee~ s° e~ercised as to be detrimaMal
to the publ(c health or safety, or so as to ~onstf~~e a nulsance (Section 18•03•OJ2•U50);
5. That modificatbn, ~nc~~d~~9 the imposftbn of addftlona~ condftbns the'eto, is reasonaWY
necessarY to Protect the puW~ peacb, health, safery or 9enerai welfare, or necessary ta PermR reasonaWe
operaUon under the condftionai use Pt~~nK °r ~a~~ eS g~nted (Sectbn 18.03.092.C~70);
6. That the evldence Presented by the Mahaim Pd~e Department and the Cc,tie E~orcement
DNision during the publb hearing condudes that subJect restaurant with cocktaii loun9e has sxperienced
a high number d aerv~ce ca~ls; and t1~at based °~ ~~ntiated complairns, the condKbns d approva~
pertaining to Condftbnal Use PeR^n No. 168 sha0d be modified 1o Prevent future prob~eRU~ reyarding the
on-Premises sale and consumptbn o( alco!~ol{c beverages, and
-1 • PC96-101
CR2749DM.WP
~ i
7. That no one indicated their presence at satd Pubik hearin9 in oppositbn; and that no
correspondence wes recefved in op~ositicxi to the soy~act proPosal•
,.,,,,~..~.~~~ s.~ ~on-~MEp~rq~ Q~q~mr AGT FlNOING: The Planning Director's authorized
representaWe has determined that the proposed prulect fal~s wichin the definftian of Cate~oriqt
Exemptions, pass 21, as deflned {n the State of Cal?icl~:~ i-'~ronmental Impact R~pat (EIR) Guidetines
and is, th~refore, categorically exempt fran the re~i~~reme~t .o arepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ~T RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cfty Plannfng Commission does hereby
amend Resdution No. PC80-92, as prevbusly amended and as adopted in connection with Co~it(onal
Use Permit No. 2090, to add the fdlowing new condfttons:
1. That the Cfty Business Ucense and any related permfts Q.e., Dinner Dancs, Entertalnmetrt, eic.) shall
be transferred hom the cu.~errt busfness owners rrame and issued in the name cf the property
owner or a new bustness owner.
2. That no outdoor actNities, ~~dudUg but not Umfted to dining, drinking, entertainment, dancing etc.,
shall be permitted on subJect property.
3. That enterceinment provided an ihe premi;.es shall conform to the Clty of Anahelm Noise Ordin~. ~ a.
4. That the exterior doors shaU be kept dosed at all times during the operation oF the premtses ~• ~pt
in csses of emergency and to peRnit delNeries.
5. That at any time eMertainmeM Is provided on ths Psemises, the ,xoperty owner shail {xovide
unHortned security guards~ 1~ a number as requfrod by the Anaheim Pd~e Department.
6. 7hat the parking lot serving this facUlry shatl be equipped wfth IigF,Ung of sufficient power to
Uluminate and make easqy discemible tr~e appearance ar~ conduct of ~! pe~sons on or ebout the
parking iot. The I(gMing In the area shall bo shielded t~ preveM unreasonable qluminatbn of the
wlrxiow ereas of nearby businesses.
7, That the number of per~~ns attending any event at the subject property shali not exceed the
maximttm occupancy load as determined b~~ the Mahalm Flre Department ;two hundred ninety nine
[299J persons). Sig~s indicsting ths ma~cimum occupancy shall be prominonUy displayed wlthin the
premises.
8. That thbre shall be no cdn-0perated or credic card telephones ai the property that are located
outside the buUding and within if~e centrd d the property owner.
~. Th~t the o~nn-er of the subJect bus~nesa sF-a~l Pay for the tx?st d any Code Erdorcement Inspectbns
wh~h may be required to address Code vlolat(ons.
~0. Thac che public dance hall u.~e st~a11 oxpire on Augusc 27, 1s9~. My requesc for excenstnn d ilme
must be recefved and appruved~ p~lor to Au~ust 27, 1f1.97. or the puW~ dance hall use shall no
longer exlst at this locatbn.
1?. That N the publtc dence hall use expires. the puW~ dance hail wUl no longer be pemdtted because
sald use is not permltted in DevelopmeM Area 3'La Palma Core' d Specific Pla~ No. 94-1 'the
Northeast Area Specific Plan' in which zone subJect ProPerty Ia lucated.
12. 1'hat the ptoperty owner shali provide any new business operator/c,wner or property owner wfth the
conditirns af ap~xoval contained hereln.
-2- PC'96-101
1'.
~
Shal~ be developed substa~t~~Y ~n accordance with plans and specif(cations
13. That sub}ect propercy
submttted to the City of Anahe~m by the pethioner and wh~ch pians are on flle wfth the Plann ng
Departmorrt ma-ked Exh~btt No. 1.
14. That Condition Nos. 1, 6, 7 and 8~1o~'e'mentioned. sha~l be completed wiihin a period of thirty (3U)
days ftum the date of this resol ~~~est anly to the extent that
roval af this app~i~tion constftutes approval of the proP~~ gtate and
15. That app other a i~~e C~~ rov~l
it complies wfth the Anah~e~~ a ~s~not nc~l~die any a~~~on or findings as tocompliance or app
Federal regul~tions.~AR9 any pp~ r ulation or requirement. ``,
of the request rega other a icabie ordinance, e9
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
September 30, 1996•
ATfEST: ~
SECRETAR , A EIM CITY PLANNING CAMM~SSION
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss•
CI'fY OF ANAHE~M ) cert'rfy that
of the Anaheim City. Planning Commission, Planning Commission
I, Margarita Sdorio, S~ a~ adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Ciry
the foregoing resolution was Pa the fdlawln9 vote of the rnsmbers thereof:
held on September 3~~ 1996, by MESSE, PERA7J~
AYES: COMMIS~iONERS: NONE IC~ B~YDSTUN, 8RIS7GL-, HENNINGER, MAYER,
NOES: CQMMIS
~4~SENT: CdMMISSIONERS: NONE 2C~'' da of~~ •
~N WITNESS Wf1ERE0F, I have hereunto s at my ~~ !~is ___-- y ~-
1996. ~ ~Wv~'v~"i
SECRETARY A EIM CIN PLANNING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN, ANAHE~M CI PLANNING COMMISSION
P(~6-101
3-