Resolution-PC 96-113~ e
11CnV~~ ITIf~AI IJC~ Pc~
A RGS~~ ~p~NG CERTAIpN HONDITIONS OF APPROVpL pF SION
RE~.SOLUTION~ONNDI ONAL USE PERMIT NO 3N83 ~ON WITH
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1989~ the Cicy CuuncU adopteci Resolut~°n No. 8~R-3 to appr~e
Conditiona! Use Permit ~lo. 3183 and permn sales businesses and off~ce uses at 1501 North Raymond
Avenue in the ML °Umfted ~ndustria~~ ~one;
WHEREAS, Cornlft~on No. 18 of said Resolu~~°n No. 89R~ read as fdlows:
•~g. 7hat rataA sales busiresses shal~ be ~~mned to the fdaowta9~ Spe ~ t~~~.~ ca~fined to'BuUding
No. 19' as ideMifled cM the hereinabove described p~
~, pry Cleaners
2. Hair Salon/Barbe.r Shops, and Related Supp-ies
3. ~.ock and Key C~~r~npanies
4. pffice Supplies
5, post Office and, M~ail Services
g, p~iM Shops/Photocopy Services
7. Travel Agents to all conditions of
u~ ~~m~ pursuar~t to Zoning Code Section 18.61.020, and subject u~ a~
e. MY
said sectio for the M 9Zo~e Section 18.61.020 is the Iist of 'Pemnttted P marY
Structures' ~g~, ~equestin9
WHEREAS, Matthew Monnig has submitted a letter dated Septembe~ 10,
reviously approved sa~es businesses ar-d office
t
modiflcation to the condft~ons of appro v a l p e rt ainin g to the p
uses to indude a whdesale a~ retaii flooring contractor, and that he has f n d ica t e d t h a t a ma jo~Y
siYe and that this use wroutd not be a typ~cal retan estab~~shmeM.
t-usiness Is conducted at th~ j
WkEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission did hdd a public hearing at the Civic Ce~~ey~gNen
heim on Octaber 28, 1996, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said P~b~~c hea~ing h~~~g ~ er 18•03,
Ciry of A~
as required by I~w and in an e~do! a~ aga nst said proposed amendm muandP° ~~~i~ a^~ ~ke
to hear and c~nsider evkie
flrxiings and recommendations fn connection therewfth; and ~de by ltself a~d
WHEREAer due o sideraUon of all evidenceeatnd reportstoffered at said ~~~~9~ dOeS ~~ a~
in its behalf, and
determine the following facts: for General Industrlal ~a~d
~, That the Anaheim General Plan designates the subJect properry
uses. ML •umnea
2. That sub]ect proPe~'ry is developed with an industria~ subdivision and i~ z~
Industrial '
_~.
P(~.113
cR2no~M
,g~ ~
i
rimaril serve and are compaUble wfth
g. '(hat sales businesses and office uses which Poval of a~ondftfonal use pe-'rt-it a~d ~t
,ndustrial uses are permitted In the ML Zone subJect to eC~ P~P~y ~tes that'•••a~Y (s~eg Iws~~~ °~~~
gec.tio~ 1g.61.050.145 of the Anaheim Municipal Code sp
use whfch is found to encourage retail sales of aroducts or merchandise or to attract customers other than
industria~ users for industrial purposes penr-itted in this (the ML) zone shall not be deemed a use w~~h
primartly serves and is compatible wnh tndust~al uses.'
q, That subJect 6usiness, Monnig's Floori~9~ is currently located at 1544 ~Nest lJn~dn Avenue
erxi, due to the I-5/Santa Ana PreewaY `^~~en~~9' h~S ~come necessarY for the owner to reloc~te the
business.
5, That Monnig's Floori~9 h~S °Perated ~n the City of Anaheim as a whdesale and retaU floo ng
contaacto~ that serves the commercial, contract, property rr~ana9emerrt, builder and retail markets; that
oods, and 1096 over-the-couMer
~les typically consist of 6096 commercial/contract~ 309(' retail {nsta~~ed 9 roducts.
retali sales~ that~ in all, app~o~~~~y ~`~' ~~es are made at the job site; and that du~ing a norrt~al
business day, only ten to twenty customers visft the current showroum to select floorii9 p
6, That, as described in the testimony gNen at the public hea~in9 ~nd~~"g t~ ~~ ~e~~ the
business witl Pr:mar~Y serve surroundin9 fndustna~ users and is not a ryp~~ fe~ ~~ ~ON~'
proposed the petftioner, customer trafflo is very minimal.
a~d that, as desc~ibed bY ~e, the
to rotect
~, That, in accurdance with Section 18.03.092.060 of the Anaheim M~^~~~ ~tto~ under
pro~ed modffication, including~'heen ~ wielfareaandj~ nnecessa~Y t° Rem'-n re~s°~~e o~peN P
the public peace, health~ safety 9
the co~dftional use pertnft as originally granted• ~n o osx~o~. a~ that no
g. That no one indicated osttiion t the subJect ipetitionic h~~ng Pp
correspondence was receNed ~n oPP Planning
AUF RNIA ENVIRONMENTA~ W"ei iN ACT FINDWCa: That the A~18heim Ciry r~oUSly
uired
Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby flrxl mat ~ne Negative De~c~aratfon p
approved in connection wfth Condftional Use Permit No. 3183niflnding that the dedarat reflects the
ernironmental documentatioii in connection with this request upo
~~-dependent judgement of the omments receNed during the pub c re iehw process and furthefl nd~i~n9ton
peclaration together wfth any c
the basis of the inftiai studY and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that t e
project wp~ have a signfficant effect on the environment.
NOW THEREFORE BE a o E~ ~n connectton wi hhBCo~dn °~~~~ P~^k NO 3~~ fd row$
amend Resdut~on No. 89R-382, p
(q) T~at Condftion Nos. 18 shall be amended to read:
18. That retail sales bus~e ffj~so ~t ~hgfen~bove described plansand peciflcat° sc',.o~n~ to
'Building No. 19' as
1. Dry qeaners Iles
2. Hair Salon/Barber Sh npe and Ralated Supp
3. Lock and Key Compa
q, Office Supp~~es
5. po~ Office and MaU Se $ervices
g, Print Shops/Photocopy
~. Travei Agents
8. Wholesale arxl Retap Flooring Co~itracting Services
pCg6-113
-2-
~ ~ .
g, Any use permiited Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 18.61.020, and subject to atl cu~siand
of said section' [Zoning Code Section 18.61.020 is the list of'Permme~ P~"~ry
Structures' for the ML Zone].
(g) That the three following new conditions shall be added: -.:
21, That wholesale and retail flooring contracting businesses shall be subject to the following
requirements:
Saies shall consist of sixry percent (6096) commercial/contract, thirtY Percent (30%) retaii
(a) over-the-coumter retail sales;
installed goods~ a~d ten percent (1096)
(b) AppreximatelY ninety percent (90%) of sales shall be made at the job sfte; and
~~) q maximum avera9e of twenry (20) customers shail v:s~!t the showroom to select floorin9
products during a norma~ business day.
22, That no Special Event Permits shall be issued for the subject business.
p3. That no outdoor display or storage shall be permitted•
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT~ON was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting a~
October 28, 1996. ~
~
CH MAN PRO TEMPORE,
pNAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
HE~M C~r( p1~1NNIN~ COMMISSION
SECRETARY, A
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
COUNTX OF ORANGE ) ss•
C~TY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission, do herebPlanni g
that the foregoing resolution `n'as Passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City
Commissian hel d on October 28, 1996, bY the followin9 vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTW~CK, BRISTUL. HENNINGER, MAYER, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, MESSE ZS~` day of I~y~w,~~-""°_~
IN WI7NES~ WHERE~F, I have hereunto set my hand this
. ~
1996. ~ ~~
SECRETA Y, AHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
PCgg-113
-3-