Resolution-PC 96-3~ ~
RESOLUTIflN NO. PC963
A RESOLUTION 0;,~ T• HE ANAH~IM CfTY PLANNIN~a COMMISSION
THAT FE~I710N FQR I;ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3816 BE GRAn'TED
'i
WHEREAS, tlie Ans~heim Ctty Planning Commission dId receNe a verifled PotYlon for
CondRional Use Pennff. for certain raal properry s!tuated in the Cfty of Anaheim, Courty of Orange, State
of Cat#omia, describad as:.
THE WESTERLY 4D0 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 795.34 FEET OF THE SOUTH 10
ACRES OF -?H~ SOUTHEAST ONE-0UARTEli OF THE SQUTHWEST ONE-
QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, 1N THE
RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA A~W1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUMY OF ORMlGE, STATE OF CALJFORNIA, AS 5HOWN ON A AAAP FlLED
IN BOOK 51, PAGE 7 OF MISGELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUhlTY.
SAtD LAND IS SHOWN AS PARCELS 1 AND 2 ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 10,
PAGE 37 OF PARCEL AAAPS, IN ThiE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECOFtDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
1A~HEREAS, ti~e Ciry Planning Commissioi~ did hold a public hearing at the CNic Center
in the City of Anaho(m on January 8, 1996 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said pu~lic hea~ing having been duly
gfven as required by iaw arr.i !n accordanca wfth the provisions of the Maheim Municfpal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and aga(nst said proposed conditional use permft and to
investigate and make findings arsd recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Comrnlssion, after due {nspectinn, irnestigation and ~tudy made by ftself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evkience and reports offered ai sald hsa~ing, does flnd
and dotermine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for whlch a condftional use permft is authorized by
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.0~0.1~0 to permft a church in an extstfng office/industrial buil~ing
wfth waNer of the following:
Sections 18.06.050.0266 - M(nimum number of~,rkinQ s~ce_s.
18.06.080 1 1 existing and proposed, as concurred with by
and 18.61.066.050 the City Traffic and Transportation Manager)
2. That the parkir.g waiver, under the cond~tilon~ imposed, will not cause fewer off-strbet
parking spaces to be provided for the proposed t;se than the number of such spaces necessary to
accommodate all vehicles attributabla to such use under the nomial artd reasonably foreseeable condftions
of operation of such use;
3. That the waNer, under the condRions imposed, wiil not increase the demand and
competftion for parking sFaces upon the public straets in the immediate vicinriy ot the proposed use;
CR2566DM.WP -1- PC96-03
~ ~
4. That the waNer, under the cvnditions imposed, w~~ nat increasa the demand and
competftion for parking spaces upore adjacent jprivate properry in the immediaie v~cinlry af the proposed
usa (which property is not ~cpressly arovided as parking for such use urxJer an P.preemerrt in compilance
rvfth Secti~n 18.06.010.020 of this Code);
5. That the waNer, urxler the conditions ~mposed, wAI not increase trafflc congestion, noise,
air polltrtlon, o~ traffic ci~cutatinn conflicts, within the off-~street parkinfl a.reas or lois prrsvideJ for such uce;
6. That the waiver, under the condftions Impc»sed, will not fncroase trafflc congestton, neise,
air pollution, or imp~xle vehicular ingress to or egress from adJac.errt commercfai and Industrtai properties,
upan the public streets In the immsdiate victniry of the proposed us~;
7. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permfi is authorized by
the Zoning Code;
8, That the proposed use will not adversely affect tlie adjofning land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which ft is proposed to be located;
9. That the size and shape of the ske for the proposed use is adequate to allow the full
deva!~,:,cnent of the proposed use in a man~er not detrimeMal to the particular area nor 4o the peace,
health, safety, and general welfare;
10. That the traffic generateci by the proposed use wil! not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area;
11. 7hat the granting of the condicional use permit~ under the condftions (mposed will not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and generai weifare of the citizens of the Ciry of Meheim; and
12. That no one indicated thefr presence at said public heartng in opposftlon; a~xl that no
correspondnnce was receNed in opposftion to the subject petftion.
~AUFORNIA EN~lIRONMENTAL QUAUTY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has revlewed the proposai to permit a church in an extsting offlce'f~g ~~ coinsstfng
waiver of the minimum number of paricing spaces on two rectangula~ly-shaped pa
of approximately 2.5 acres, having a ftontage of 400 feet on the north side of Orar~gethorpe Avenue,
having a maximum ~lepth of 275 feet, being focated approximately 310 feet east of the centeriine of Lemon
Street, and further described as 10L,East Ora.ngethorpe Avenue; and does hereby approve the NegatNe
Declaration upon finding that the declatst!;,n reflects the independent judgement af the lead agency and
that ft has considered the Negative Dedaration together wRF~ any comments received during the public
review process and further finding on the basis of the inftial study and any comments receNed that there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a sign~icant effect on the ernironment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plannfng Commisslon does
heret~j~ grnt subJect Petitfon for Conditional Use Permft, upon the foilowing condftions which are h9reby
found to be a necessary prerequis!te to the proposeci use of tt~e subject property in order !o preserve the
safety and ge~eral welfare of the Cftlzens of the Cfty of Anahelm:
-2- PC96-03
That the gra~K(~g of the parking waNer is comingeM upon operation of tye uae i~s canfnrrTsa~ce with
the assumptions relatfng to the operation and intensfry of use as coMa~~ad ~n tha park~ng demand
study that formed the basfs for approval of. the parking waiver in conjunction with subject use peren~.
Exceeding, violating, intensifying or othervvise deviating ftorn any of said assumpt?ons, as cortained
in ttie parking demand study, shall be deemed a violation of the express9d condftbns innp~sed upon
suoject condftional use pQRnit which sha~l subJect safd use PermK a~d Park~rg `^raNer to tertnlnation
or mod~ication pursuant to the provEsions of Sections 18.03.091 and ~18•fl3•092 of the Anaheim
Municipa! Code•
That a plan sheet for soiid waste, stora9e an~ cd~ec~~on a~xl a plan for re~,ydi~g shall be sub~nitted
to the Department of Mafrdenanca for review and approval.
That an on-sita trash tnl!:k tum-around area sha~l be prov~ided and mai~alned i~ ihe satlsFactian of
the Department of Main"renance. Sa~i tum-around area shall be speciflcai~y sho~nm on plans submitted
for building permits.
That plans shall be submNted to the Ctty Traffic and Traasportation Manager for his review and ,
approval showing conformance wfth the most current versions of Engineariny Standard Plan Nas. 436 ''
and 602 pertaintng to parking standarda and drNewPy locations. Sub~ect property shall thereupan '
be davelopad and maintained in confa7mance with saki plans.
2.
3.
4.
5. That approvai of the church faciliry does ,n~'. tnclude chUd day care or pre-schonl actbftiE
6. That the hours of operatlon shal! be Iimfted to the fdlowing:
Sunday Worship Servlces
Sunday Bible Studies:
Wednesday Fellowship Services and YoutY~ Meetings:
9:00 a.m. to t:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
~•pp p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Friday Fellowship ~ervices ar~d Youth Meetin~s: 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.rr,•
On religious holidays the hours of opsratlon may be exfendod beYond the hours shown ai~ove.
7. That subject property shall be developed substarrtially (n accordance wich plans and spacffications
submitted to the Ciry of Anahaim by L•~e petitfon~r and which plans ar~ on flle wi~h the Planntr~g
Departrnent labeled Exhibft Nos. 1, 2 and 3. .
8. That prior to commencement of the sctNity authorized by this resGution, or pri~r to Issuanca of a
building permft, nr wfthin a period of one (1) year from the date of this resd:ltion, whichaver ocaurs
first, Condftion Nos. 2, 3 and 4, al»ve-mentioned, shall be complted with. Extenstons ~or furth~r timo
t,o complete said conditions may be granted in accordarsce with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim
; Municipal Code. : ~
g. That prior to Bnal building and zaning Inspections, Condition No. 6, above-rneniionad, sl~all be
complied wfth.
•3-
~ ~
10. That approval af t~ifs appiication constftutes appro~ral of the proposed request oniy to the exterrt that
ft complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Cude and any other appllcable City, State and Federal
regulatfons. Approval dces not indude any actlon or firxlings as to compliance or aparoval of the
requost regarding any other applfcable orcllnance, regulatlon or cequirement
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that :he Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission d%-s hereby flnd
and deteRnine that adoption of this Resolutton is expressly predlcated upon applicanYs compllance with
each and al of the condftions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or,lny part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the flnal judgment af any court of competent jurisdlction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shail be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Comm(sslon meetiny of
Janu2ry 8, 7996•
.
RWOMAN ANAHEIM C PLANNING COMMISS!ON
A7l'EST:
SECRETAR , IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAL1FO~iNIA )
COUMY OF QRANGE ) ss.
C:TY OF AhnHEIM )
I, Margarl°.a Solorio, Sacrotarv,r of the Anaheim Ciry Pianning Commission, do heseby certify
that th6 foregofng_ resdution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheirrs Cky Plannfng
Commissicn hel~ on ,;a~uary 8, 1996, by the following vote of the member~ thereof:
AYES: CAMMISSIOVERS: BUSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYF9, MESSE. PERA7A
NOES: COMMISSIONEH3: iJONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ` ~
IN WITNESS WHERcAF,,i have hereunto"set my hart~ this ~~ day of ~-- ' _
S 396. ~•
~
SECRETARY, AHEIM CITY PIAt~NiNG COMMISSION ---_._-~
~ PC96-Q3