Resolution-PC 96-300
RESOLUTION NO PC96~30
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMI i NO. 3824 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Ar~heim~Ce s~~~t~ i~he City of dAnaheim~County of Orange~Stato
Conditional Use Pernit for certain rea! p P rtY
of Califomia, described as:
THE WEST HALF OF THE NOHTH~'JEST QUARTER OF THE NOFITHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION S, TOWNSHIP d SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, S. B. B• &
M., ~X.CEPT THE SOUTH 263 FEET THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the CNic CeMer
in the Ciry of Anaheim on March 4, 1396 at 1.30 P•m•~ notice of said p~bUc hea~ing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordancs with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ Chapter 18.03,
to kea~nd ncs ande ecommendations f nctonnect on the~ewith~andiQ~ use permft and to irnestigate and
ma 9
WHEREAS, said Comm(ssion, after due Inspection, irnestfgatton and study made by ftself
and in its ~ehalf, and after due cc~~sideration of all evidence ar~d rePorts affered at said hearing, does Nnd
and determine the following facts:
1. niciT~Ctode S~ ion~18.21 0502 0 to permitra 684 ~q•fc. baseball sto ge rooim a`t an exis ing
Ai~aheim Mu pa~
prNate high schooL '
2, 'that the proposed use is properly one for whfah a conditional use pem~ft is authorized by
the Zoning Code;
3, That the proposed usisWi~ro ~ sed to ebe located becausen hIe propased batsebal~orage
development of the area in which ft P Po
room wi11 be set back approximatelY 15 feet from single family residences to Yhe south•~
4. TFat the size ar-d shape of the sfte for the proposed use is adequate to a11ow the full
development of the praposed use in a manner not deMmentai to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safery, and general welfare;
5. That the traffic generatad by the proposed use witl not impose an undue burden upon the
streecs and highways designed and tmproved to car-'Y the traffic in the area;
6. That the grancfng of the condlt!onal use pertnh~ u~der the conditions imposed~ wfl~ not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general weifare of the cftfzens of the Cfty of Anaheim;
7. That no one Indiqted thelr presence at said public hearing in oppos~lan; and that no
sftion to the subJect petftion.
coRespondence was receNed in oppo
ra~ ~FORNfA ENVIRONMENTAL QU~ N A~~ ~IS wnhin the definftion,o9Categorica~
authorized representative has determined that the proposed P 1
Exempt(ons, Class 3, a~ defined In the State Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorica~ly exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
aCSS-so
.~.
CR2617DM.WP
~ ~
PIOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE30LVED that the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commisslon does
hereby grant subject PetRion for Condftional Use Permit, upon the followi~g corxlitfons which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subJect property in order to preserve tha
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That fully dimensioned plar~s shall be submitted to the Zoning Divfsion for review and approval
showing that the tront of the proposed baseball storage room (contatning doors and windaws) shall
be directed towards the baseball fleld to the north.
2. That storage of any kind shall n~t be permftted in the flfieen (15) foot setback between the sKOrage
room a~nd the south properry Iine adjacent to single family residences.
3. That the storage room shall be utilized for the storage of sports related equipment and shall not be
utiiized for offices.
4. That roof-mounted equipment shall not be permitted on the proposed storage room.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially fn accordance with plans and spec~ications
submitted to tlze City of Anaheim by the petRioner and which pians are on flie wfth ihe Planning
Department marked Exhibft Nos. 1 and 2.
6. That prior to issuance of a building permft or within a pe~iod of one (1) year from the date of this
resotution, v~hichever occurs first, Condit~on No. 1, above-mentioned, shall t~e complied with.
Extensions for further time to complete said condRions may be grantec! in accorclance with Secclon
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municfpal Code.
7. ThaY prior to the commencement of the activity authorized by this resolution or prior to Hnal buildi~g
and zoning inspections, whichever occurs flrst, Condftion No. 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with.
8. That approval nf this application constRutes approval of the proposed request oniy to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Codo and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or ftndings as to complfance or approval of the
request regarding any other appticable ord(nance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOWED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissiun does hereby flnd
and deteRnine that acioption of this Resolution is exprassly predicated upon appticarrt's compliance with
each and all of the condftions hereinabove set forth. Should 2ny such condition, o~ any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceabie by the final judgmeM of any court of co~npetent ju~isdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein coritainod, shall be deemed null and void.
.2. PC96,~o
~~~ ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
March 4, 1996.
. ~r~~,
CH MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~~(1~LC~. ~
SECRETARY, A AHEI CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )
CQUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Soior(o, Secreiary of the Anahefm Ctry Pianning Commfssion, do hereby cenffy
that the foregoing resdution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anafneim City Planning
Commissfon held on March 4, 1996, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, Mr~YER, MES5E, PERAZA
NOEo: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hanci this ~'J~~ day of (_I,0/2clL, ,
1996. --~--
/ ~
SECRETARY, AN EIM ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
3•