Resolution-PC 96-37~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC9C>37
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSIUN
THAT PECITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMtT NO. 3u32 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anahe(m City g~k~i~ In~he C t of dAnahet~mNCouncy of O~a ge~Slate
Conditional Use PeRnft for certain reai properry KY
of Calffomia, described as:
P.IRCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOllTHWEST QllARTER OF THE
NQRTHEAST QURRTER OF THE ~~ORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, IN
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGS 10 W~ST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AN7
MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBcD AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A PQINT IN THE CENTER UNE OF MABLE :'sTREEf' 60 FEET IN
WIDTH DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 88' 52' WEST 659.0.3 FEET FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERUNE WITH THE 4'VESTFFtLY BOUNDARY OF
THE CITY UMITS OF ANAHEIi1A, CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING
DlSTANT ALONG SAID CENTER UNE OF MABLE fiTREET. NORTH 88' 52' EAST
659.04 FEEf FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CEM'ER LINE OF LOARA
STREET; AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 0' 12' WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY
LlNE OF THE SOUTHWEST G~UARTER OF THE N0:2"i HEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SEG'TION 16: 310 FEET TO THE SAID CENTER
UNE OF MABLE STREET; THENCE NO~iTH 88" 52' EAST 142 FEEf TO THE
POIN7 OF BEGWhING.
PARCEL 2: A TRIANGULAR PIECE OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHEAST ~UARTER IN THE NORTHWEST ~UARTER OF SECTION
26, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RlWGE 10 WEST, S.8.8. & M., BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE
1NTERSECTION OF THE NORTH sOUNDARY OF MABLE STREET WITH THE
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD IANDS, SAID POINT OF INTERSEC~ION ABOUT
380 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH ~JNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ~UARTER OF SEC710N 16,
AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID STREET
WESTERLY TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE LAST NAMED
SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 16; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID W~ST
BOUNDARY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE RAILROAD LM1DS; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LANDS TO TFiE PWCE OF
BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the Cfty Planning Commission did hold a publlc hearing at the CNic CeMer
in the City ai Anaheim on Aprii 15, 1996 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said p~b!~ heari~9 ~`~~9 ~n duly gNen
as requfred by law and fn accordance wfth the provisfons of the Mahaim Municipal Code, Cha~sier 18.W,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed condftional use permit and to Irnestigate arxl
make flrxlings and recommendations in connection therewfth; arxf
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, a(ter due inspection, ~mestigatian arxi scudy made by ftself
anci In its behalf, and after due consideration of all evkience and report3 offerecS at said hearing, does flnd
arxl deteimine 2he following facts:
CH2631 DM.WP -1- PC96~7
~
,~•
1. That the propased use Is proPerlY one for wh~h a condRbnal use Pertnlt is authorize~ by
Anaheim MuMcipal Code Sectbn ~S•~•~•Ot0 to permit e temP°~rY ~~r d~O°m bupding in
Fakrs~ont PrNate Scho~l).
conJuRCtion vdith the relocation d an exisdng teacher's ~ou~9e ~
2. That the ProP~~ u~ ~~ Ifsted In the 2oning Code as being a~se~ml~ed use;
3. That the proposed use wlll not adve~ be locatedthe adJolntng land uses snd the grorvth e nd
development of the area in which R is WoPo~
4. That the size and shaPe ot the sRe (or the ProPosed use Is adeq~ate to ailow the fiull
development of the proposed use In a manner not detrimentat to the particular area nor to the peace~
health, safery, and 9eneral welfare;
5. That the uaffic generated by the proposed use wpl not impose an undue burclen upon the
~t~eets and highways designed and in~proved to carry the trafflc tn the area because tha temporary
building wU~ be ~sed ~n conJunctlon wfth a previously app~~ed P~te educati°nal ~~~~°~i~ a^~ no
add~ traiHc or parking impacts wUl occur since no additlonal studerrts or facuiry
6. That the grar~ting of the condftiona! use permft, under the cwiditions imposed~ will not be
the tem ~rarytstru~u~e ~Is not visible to the publ~ or~anY adlac~M r~es~de ~ se a~ heim bec:ause
Po
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public headng In opposhion; and that no
correspondence was receNed in opposition to the subject petftlon.
The Planning Directors
~`°aFORh1e Fh:~IRONh"ENTAL QUALlTY ACT F1LD1I~~
authorized representative has determined that the proposed Prolect fa~~s wnhin tho definition of Categorical
Eacemptfons, qass 14, as deflned in the State Environmonta! Impact Heport (EIR) GuldellnAS and ~s~
theretore, categorlcally exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the l+naheim City Planning Commisslon does
hereby g!ar~t subJect Petftion for Condft~onal Use Permn. ~p°n the fdlowing cond nI ~ewh~o ~~Nee he
found to be a necessary Prerequfsfte to the proposed use of the subJect properry
safery and general w~lfare of the Citizens of the Ctty of Anaheim:
1. That this condftional use permft shall expire five (5) years from the date of thia resolucion, on Ap~~
15~ 2001.
building permns for the modula~ ~n~.
2. That the petRianer shall obtain any necessary
3. That subject proPerhi shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specffications
submitted to the Ciry of Anahefm by the petftioner and whlch pians are on fNe wfth the Planning
Department marked Exhibft Nos. 1 and 2•
q, That withln a period of n~~etY ~90) days ftom the date of this resolution, Condftion Nos. 2 and 3,
above-mentioned, shal: be completed.
5, That the dassroc~ms replaced by the temporary s~N~~re sha~l be used o~Y f~ ~O^t °tflce' and/or
a teo,cher's la.inge.
PG96-37
-2-
_ _ -= ~ ~
6. i'hat ap~rmal of this a~piication constftut~s approval of the proposed request only to the e~derd that
`: 2 compilas,~3th th~ Anaheim Munfcipal Zaning Code and any other aPP~~able Gty, State and Fecleraf
,'~r~iyulatlons: Ap^roval does ~ot indude any action w flndings as to compUance or approvai of the
request regarding any other applicaWe ordinance, regulaUon or requiremem.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahefm Ciry Plannirsg Cummtssbn does herebY find
~nd determine that adoptlon of this Resolutfon is ?~Qressly prediqted upon applicarrt's compliance with
each and all of the corr~ ~rims heretnabove set forth. Shoutd any svch conditio~~ or any part thereof, be
dedared irna~kf or w~ar;~orceable by the flnat Judgment of any court of comPetent jurisdlction, then this
Resol~tior, ~ any apprqva~a herefn contr.Jned, shal~ be deemed nul~ and void.
TIiE `r'C?oEGJii~G RESQLUTION was adop:ed at the Planning C•ommission meetir.g of
\ A~rii 1~. ~f)96; O / r~
C WOMAN ANAHEIM CITY NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
!1^ r
~ v~,~~ ~~, ~' ` ~,- ~~~
SECR_TAR'•a :'t .~N~' E~ld C~TY PLANNING COMl~AISSION
, gT~1?~. , ALIFORNIA )
~pE;•:'~y. 7F ORANGF ) ss.
CITI' qF F:NANGIM )
. I, Margarita Sdorio, Secretary of the Anahelm City Planntng Commfssion, do Iwre Pla(nnf ~
Commi~sioneheld onBApril I15, 996, bys the fdlowing v ot e cf the members thereof: helm Gty 9
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUP~, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~~'day of ~~~
tJ
, ess. ' ~~
SECRETAR , EIM CITY PI~}WNING COMMISSION
~- PC96-37