Resolution-PC 96-60~ ~
RESQ~ NO. PC96-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITtONAL USt PERMIT N0. 3t344 BE GRANTED
WHERFAS, tfi~e Anaheim Clty Plannin~ Commission did recelve a veriflecl Petftion for
Conditional Use Permit for cerGein real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Califomia, described as:
PARCEL MAPS N HE OFOF CE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission c!d hold a public hearing at the CNic Center
in the City of Anaheim on July 8, i996 at 1:30 p.m., notice of;~aid public hearing having been duly gNen
as required by Iaw and in accordance with the provisi~on s~tconditiona u e perm~and to nvestigate and
to hear and consider evidence for and against sakl P Po
make findings and recommendations in connection tharewith; and
WHEREAS, said Comrrefssion, after due fnspection, investi~ation and study made by ftself
and in its behalf, and after due consideratiQn of all ev6dence and reports offared at sak! hearing, does find
and determine the following facts: .
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is author¢ed bY
anaexisting appraxima0t~ely 30,703 sq.ft1lndus n'a~ bu d ng with waiver of the foilowicn9.body and repair in
hpr pa~(inp spaCBS.
Sa~ti~o_ns_18_O~i.050.Q212 - Minimum num_s._~~--o~~ by the.
~ 7 r uired; ,~,~ e~~~ng and app
~ B os 05U.0?L2 (1~ ~9
18 p~ ~gp ~ny Traffir, a~id Transportation Manager)
~nd 18110.09~:1i~~-<,-
:2. That based on information contained in the submitted parking study, the Ciry Traffic and
Transportation Manager concurred wfth the parkln9 waiver (allowing a minimum of 55 parking spaces, ~s
indicated on;t.he submitted plan labelled Exhibit No. 1) under the assumptions and conclusions described
in said parki~9 studY re~ating to the operation and intensity of the proposed use, and conditioned upon
employees parking in the south parking lot, with the north parlcing !ot utilized salely for customer parking
to reduce on-site driving and congestion;
3. That the parking waiver, under the cond'Rions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street
parking spaces to be provided for the conditionally permitted use than the n~tmber of sach spaces
necessary to accommodate all vehlcles `attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably
fore~eeable condftions of operatton of such use; and
4. That the parkin9 `nraiver, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and
competition for parking spacas upon the public streets in the immedi2te vicinity of the proposed Use
because the proposed on-site parking supply (55 spaces) exceeds the observed demand identffied in the
_,_.r,arking study (46 spaces) arxi, therefore, addftional demand for parking spaces upon the public streets
and adjacent prNate properties should not occur,
-1- PC96-60
CR2686GM.WP
~ ~
5. That the parking waNer, ur+der the conditions imposed, wfll not Increase the demand and
competftion for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate viciniry of the proposed
use ~which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement fn compliance
with Section 18.06.010.020 of this Code);
6. That the par{cing wafver, under the condftions imposed, wili not increase traffic congestion,
noise, air pollu:ion, or traffic circulatlon co~licts, wfthin ihe off-street paricing areas or lots provided for the
conditional use;
7. That the parking waiver; under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion,
noise, air pollution, or impede vehlcular inc~re~ :o or egrass from adjacent ~roperties, upon the public
streets in the Emmediate vicinfty of the proposed use;
8. That 4he proposed use is properly one for which a condftional use permit is authorized by
the Zoning Code for DevelopmeM Area 4'Transft Care' of 8p9cffic Pian No. 94-1;
9. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoinfng lacxi uses and the growth and
development of the area in which ft is proposed to be located because said use is compatible with, and
similar to, other uses in the immediate v'cfnfry; and that the submftted floor plan indicates interior work
space for all aspects of the proposed automotive repair use;
10. That the size and shape of the site for the praposed use is adequate to allow the fuil
development of the proposed use ln a manner not detrimental to tha particular area nor to the peace,
hQalth, safaty, and general welfare;
11. That the traffic generateo by the proposed use wUl not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways desiqned and improved to carry the traffic in the area;
12, i'hat the granting of the condit(onal use permft, under the cnrxiitions imposed, will not be
detrirr~ental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim;
13. That no one indicated their presenc,e at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in oppositton to the subject petition.
C~ALIFQRNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIT1f ACT FIfVDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
~ommissicn has reviewed the proposai to permit su2omotive vehide repair and body work in an existing
approximate 30,709-square foot indu~trial building with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces on
an ircegularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximatesy 1.4 acres located at the southeast come~
of La Palma Avenue and Grove Street, having frontages of approximatefy 240 f@et on the south side of
La Palma Avenue and 400 feet on the east side of Grove Street, and further described as 1070 N. Grove
Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Dedaration upon find(ng that the dedaration reflects the
independent judgement of the lead agency and that ft has considered the NegatNe Declaratic.-r;together
wfth any comments recebed during ~he public review process and further flnding on tlie basis e~f t~:e in(tial
study and any comments receNed that there is no substantial evidence that the proJect vjiill have a
signfficant effect on the environment ~I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the P,naheim City Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petftion for C~;ndftional Use Permit, upon tfie fdlowing cond-tions which are hereby
foaind to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subJect property in order to preserve the
safety arxi general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Maheim:
_p_ PC96~0
- ~
~
1. Tha't the deteriorated woai slats shall be removed and shall be replaced with new wood slats or PVC
inte.rvvoven into the chainlink fencing and rolling gates on the south side of the building.
2. That required lar-dscaped areas shall ba plarrted as shown on the submitted landscape plan
(cxhibR No. 4) arxJ, further, that the existing mature trees adjacent to the north and west property
Iines shall be ~etained arxl incorporated (rrto the proposed landscaping.
3. That the graMing of the parking waNer is contingent upon operatinn of the use in cor~formance wfth
the assumptions relating to the operation and intensity of use as contafned in the parlcing demand
study that formed the basis for approval of safd variance. Exceeding, violating, intensffying or
otherwise deviating fram any of said assumptions, as contained in the parking demand stu~iy, shall
be deemed a violation of the expressed conditions imposed upon said variance which shall subject
that variance tQ teRnination or modiflcation pursuant to the provisio7s o' Sections 18.03.091 and
18.03.092 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
4. That a minimum of fifty five (55) park(ng spaces shall be maintained as shown on the submitted ~fte
plan (Exhibft No. 1).
5. That the south parking lot shall be used exclusively for employees, that the north parking lot shall be
used for a combination of customer and employee parking, and that said lots shail be posted
accordingly.
6. That no outdoor storage of, d(splay of, or wor{c on vehicles or vehicular pan: shall be permitted•
7. That any tree planted on-sfte shall be replaced fn a timely manner in the event that ft is removed,
damaged, diseased and/ar dead.
8. That security night lighting shall be provided in the landscaping and parking areas.
9. S'hat the developer shall submft a water qualiry management plan (WQMP) speclflcally identffying the
best management oractices that will be used fln sfte to control predictable potlutants ftam stormv~ater
runoff. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works-Engineering Department, Development
Services Division, for review and approval.
i0. That a plan sheet for sotid waste storage and collection and a plan for recycling shall be subrritted
to the Streets and Santtation Division of the Public Works Department f~r review and approval.
11. That an on-site trtish truck tum-around area shall be prov(ded and maintained to the satisfactio~ of
tha Stree:s and Sanitation DNlston of the Public Works Departmert Said tum-around area shall be
specffically shown on plans submitted ~o said division for review and approval.
12. That subject property shall be developec! substantially in accordance wfth plans and s~~~tions
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and whkh plans are on ~le with the Planninc~
Department marked Exhibft Nus. 1 through 4.
` 13. Thsd prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this resducio~ or wtthin a period of one
(1) year from the date of this rasolution, whtchever occurs flrst~ Co~dnion Nos.. 2, 9, 10 and 11,
"-"--- above-meMioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to completa said c~nditions
may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of tlie Anaheim Municipal Code.
14. That prior to flnal buNdfng and zoning inspections Corsdition Nos. 1, 5, 8, and 12, above mentioned,
shall be compli~ with.
~- PC96-fiU
~ ~
15. That approval of this applfcatio~n constitutes approval of';he proposed request only to the extent that
ft complies wfth the Anaheim Muni~ipal Zoning Code and any other appllcable ~ity, Staie and Federat
regulatfons. Approval does not include any actlon or findings as to complfance or approval o` the
roquest regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requiremarit.
BE IT FURTHER RESULV~D that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby flnd
and determfne that adoption of this ResoluGbn is expressly predicated upon ap~!~canYs compliance with
each and all of the condi~ions hereinabove st~t forth. Should any s~ch condi;ic. , or any part thereof, bs
declared irnalid or unenfo!ceable by the flna~ jtadgment of any c:ourt of compe.snt jurisdicilon, then 4hts
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, sh~'! be r~aomed null snd vc?d.
THE FOREGOIPJG RESOLUTIOt~ was adopted at the Pianni ; Commission meeting of
July 8, 1996. ~~~"
V~"~
CHAIRNlAN, PR TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSION
ATTES ~'•
SECRETARY, HEIM CIN PIANNING COMMISSION
STATE ~F CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sdorio, Secretary of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission, do hereby certffy
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the ~.7ahefm Ctty Planning
Commissior~ held on Juiy 8, 9996, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CGMMISSIONERS: BOS7WICK, BOYDSTUN, SRISTOL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COM~AISSIONERS: MAYER
IN YJITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ day of
1 ta96. n ~
SECREi'ARY, AfIE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ PC96f0