Resolution-PC 96-64~ ~
RESOUlTION NO. PC96~4
A RESOL.UTION OF THE ANAHE~M C~N PLANh11NG COMMISSION
M1IENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC88-288.
ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH CONDRIONAL USE PERMIT Nn. 3070
WHEREAS, on Qctober 10,1388, r'~anning Commissfon adopted Resdution No. PC88-288,
amaximum structural he gh of microwave t wero ~ operty I'ocated at 301 Nort `Crescent Way~~~er of
WHEREAS, the petitioner proposes a total of ~6 antennas on the existing tower; and tJ~at
the submitted plan and the letter of operaUons discussed in the July 8, 1996 Staff Report to the Pianning
Commissfon describe the proposal; and that no change is proposed to the existinp eqGipment shelter,
WHEREAS, subject property ~s currerrtly developed wfth an industrlal buqding and a lattlce
antenna suucture and Is znned. ML (llmfted Ir~ustrial) ~ arx! that tha existlng 200-foot high corr~municationc
tower consists of a centra~ pr~le with a triangular framework suROU~ding it;
WHEREAP;; tha City Pianning Comm(ssion did hdd a pubUc hearing at the Ctvic Center
fn the Ciry of Anaheim o-,i July 8, 1996 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said publia hearing having been duly gNen
as required by law and in accordance wfth the provfsions of the Anaheim Mun(cipal C,ode, Chapter 18.03,
to hear arul conskler e,'vldence for and against said Proposed conditional use permit and to irnestigate and
make flndings and rr,commendatbns in connectlon therewfth; and
WiiEREAS, said Commission, after due (nspection, Irnesiigation ar~d study made by icself
and in Rs behaif, and after dua consideration of all evklence and reports offered at sald hearing, does flnd
arx! determtne f.he fdlowing facts: __
1. - That the proposed use~ as amended, is property one for which a conditional use permft
is suthorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.460 to permft additional antennas on an
existing cc~mmunication tower.
' 2. That the proposed addftionai antenn~s wUl not adversely affeci the adjoining land uses and
the grciwth and development of the area in which they aroe~p~poSed~t fbe fr°~t~e ~6Se~ esident~fa~~y
tower is located in an industrial area and is located app Y
zonrid property;
3. That the size and shape of the site Yor the praposed use is adequato to allow the full
developmeM of the proposed use fn a manner not det~imental to the pantcula~ area ncr to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare because the existing tower Is on an industrial parcel which is adequate
in size and shape to allow the full developmeM of the existing tower and ProPosed antennas;
4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not Impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways desig~ed and improved to caRy the traffic {n 2he area;
5. That the grant~ng of the conditio-~al use Porm~~ ~~der the condi:lons imposed, wAI not be
det~imental to the peace, health, safecy and general welfare ef the citizens of the Ciry of Anaheim; and
6. That one person Udlcat~ ^h`i~r P~s ~tiJ~ ~i~~ ~ic hearing in opposftion; and that no
correspondence was received in oPP~
-1- PC96-64
CR2690DM.WP
~ _ _ ._ _._._.~.~ _.__~a..
~ ~
~,_ CAUFORNIA ENVIRONMEMAL QUAU ~ Y ACT FINCt1NG: That the Anahetm Ciry Planning
P. Commtssion has revlewed the proposal for add~lonal antennas on an existing communtqtion tawer an~
~ does herety flnd that the Negative Dedaration prevtously approved in connectfon wfth Condftfonal Use
i Permft No. 3070 is adequate to serve as the required ernironmental documentatlon In connection with thls
, request
NOW, THEREFOR~, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Plannfng Cammissfon does
hereby amend Resolution No. PC88-288, adopted in connection w3th subject Condittor~al Use Permlt, as
follows:
(a) Amend Condition No. 13 to read:
13. That subJect property shall be developed substantlally in accordance with the plan and
spec~icattons submitted to the City af Anaheim by the peUUoner and which plan on file wiih the
Planning Departmerrt m;~rked Revfsion No. 1 of Exhfbit No. 1.
(b) Add the fdlowing new condiUons:
16. That only the antennas shown on Revis(on No. 1 of Exhibit No.1 shall be permitted on the
extstfng communfcatfon tower, and that saki Exhlbft st~all supersede any prevfous exhibfts.
17. That all arrtennas shall be patMed to match the cdor of the existing tower and that no ar~tenna
shall bs utilized In any way for advertisement purposes; and that the tower and aMennas shall
be patnted a neutrai cdor which blends into the surrourxiing ernlronmenL
18. That prior to ftnal bunding and zoning inspecttons or wttFifn a period of one (t) year,from the
date of thts resolution, whfchever occurs flrst, Condition Nos. 13, 16 and 17, abpve-mendoned,
shall be complied with. E~denslons far further E:7ne to comple4e said corxlitions may be {irarrted
tn accordance wit~~ Section 18.03.09p of the Anahetm Municipal Cod
19. That approval of this applicatlon constftutes approval of the proposed request oNy to the exter~t
that ft compltes with the Anaheim Municfpai Zoning Code and any other applicat~le Ciry, State
and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or flndings as to compllance or
approval Qf the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requlremerrt.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahe(m City Planning Commission does hereby ftnd
and determine uiat adoption of this Rosolution is expressly predicated upon appli~M's complfance wich
each and all of the condiUons hereinabove set fath. Should any such condftlon, or any par4 thereof, be
dedared Irnalld or ~neMorceable by the flnal Judgmerrt of any court of competeM jurisd(ctlor9, then th(s
Resolutton, end any approvals herein conta(ned, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREaOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 8, 1996.
/"'~
CHAIRMAN, PRO TEMP E
ANAHEIM CIN PLANNI COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, EiM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PCS6-64
~ ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNT°f OF ORANGE ) ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sdorio, Secretary of t{~e Anahefm City P~annfng CommissiQn, do hereby certffy that
the foregoing resolution wae fdlo~na ote o th amembers hereofe ~hefm Cfty Planning Commi3sion
held on July 8, 1996, bY 9
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK BOYDSTUN, BAISTOL, HENNINGER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MAYER
IN WITN~SS WHEREOF, I have hereurdo set my ha~d this ~'J ~ day ~~~
,~. ~ ~-Qo~
SECREPARY EIM CITY PIANNING COiVIMISSION
~- PC9664