Resolution-PC 97-155~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC97-155
A RETHA'f PETITOION FOR VARIANCE NO. 43 2 BIE GRANTEDSION
WHEREAS, the Anahcim City Planning Commission did receivc a verified Petition for
Variancc for cer[ain real property situatcd in the City of Anaheim, County o[ Orange, Slate o[ Cali[ornia
dcscribcd as:
PARCELS 1 AND 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FiLED IN BQi7K 8,
PAGE 46 OF PARCEL MAPS, 1N THE OFFICE OF TNE COUNTY
RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, thc Ciry Planning Commission did hold a public hcaring at thc Civic Ccnlcr in
thc Ciry of Anaheim on Octobcr 27, 1997> at 1:3~ p•m•+ noticc of said public hearing having becn duly given
as rcquircd by law and in accordancc with thc provisions of thc Anahcim Municipal Codc, Chaplcr 18.03, to
hear anJ considcr cvidcncc for and against said proposcd variancc and to invcstigatc and makc lindinys and
rccommcndations in conncction thcrcwith; anJ
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftcr duc inspcetion, invcstig.+tion and study madc by itsclf
anJ in its bchalf, and aftcr duc considcr~tion c~f all cvidcncc and reports offcrcd at said hcaring, docs find
and dctcrminc thc following Cacls:
1. That thc pctitioncr rcqucsts waivcr uf thc following to cunstruct six-foot high acccssory
groand-muun!cd cquipmcnl .tind chain link fcncing fnr a lclcct~mmunications facility:
i ~ n ci~4ntl.fl %O~C. 1( n~Cll
Srrlinn 1R ~i~1.0(i3.1140 - Minimum slructur~l tiGb•ick •fdi'icCr- -^ '' -!
rcyuircd; 3 fec!_4 inchcs proposcd ad~accnt t~i RM-1200 ~oncd apartmcnts
tu thc ~ast)
2, 1'hat thcrc are spcci:sl circumsCanccs app~~cahlc to thc propcrty cc.nsisting oC its location and
surruundinga, which du not apply to uthcr idcntically r.oncd propcrtics in thc viciniry bccausc all adjxccnt
propcrry is zoncd residcntially and, thcrcforc, a grcatcr sctback is rcquircd than wuuld bc it adjaccnt
propcrtics wcrc commcrcially zoncd; and that subjcct prupcrty is fully dcvclopcd with an cxisting motcl to
its minimum scthack rcquircmcnts;
3, Thal stricl application of thc Zoning Codc dcprivcs thc propcrty of privilcbcs cnjoycJ by
othcr prupcrlics undcr idcntical zoninb c{~~ssification ir thc vicinity bccausc ncarby commcrcial propcrtics
abut othcr commcrcial prupcrtics which ~Ilow zcro sctbacks instcad uf thc l0 fcct rcquired adjaccnl to
residcntially •r.oncd prupcrty;
4. That thc proposcd acccssory lclccommunications cquipmcnt and cnclosurc will nol bc
visiblc above thc fcncc to adjaccnt propcrtics;
5, That thc rcyucstcJ variancc is ncecssary for t?~c prescrvation and cnjoymcnt of a substantial
propcrty righl posscsscd by othcr propcrly in thc samc vicinity and zonc, and dcnicd to thc propcrty in
qucslion;
~. That thc requested varianec will not be materially dctrimcntal to lhe public welfare or
injurious to thc propcrty or improvcmenls in such vicinity and zonc in which thc property is located; and
1 PC'~)7-155
CR3093PL.WP
~ ~
'7, That rto one indica[ed their presence at said public hearing in opposi[ion; and that no
correspondence was reccive.d in opposition to subject petition.
,~ALIFQRNiA ENVIRONMENTAL OU ALITY ACT FINi~ING: The Planning Director
or his authorized repres:.ntative has determ~ned that thc proposcd pro~ect [aUs wdhin the definition of
Categorical Excm.ptions, Class 5, as defined in the Statc of Califernia Environmental Impac[ Rcport (EIR)
Guidelincs and is, therefore, catcgorically cxcmpt from thc rcquircrncnt to orcpare ar~ EIR.
r1pW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahcim City Planning Commission
docs hercby yant subjcet Pctition for Variancc, upon thc following condilions which are hcreby Cound to be
a neccssary prerequisite to the proposed use oC the subject property in orJer to prescrve the saCety and
gcncral wclfarc of thc Citizcns of thc City of Anahcim:
l. That prior to installation of thc cquipmcnt, satisfactory cvidcnce shall bc submittcd to thc Building
Division showinb that lhc proposcJ cquipmcnt is in conformancc with Council Policy Numbcr 542
"Sound Altcnualion in Rcsidcntial Projccls" and wilh Noisc Insulation Standards spccificd in TiUc 25 of
thc California AJministrativc Coda
2, That thc niaximum hcight of thc cquipmcnt and chain link fcncc cnclusure shall not cxcccd lhc hcighl
o( thc cxis!.ing hlock wall to thc cnst or six (6) fcct, WI11CV1CVCf IS ICSti.
3, 'I'hal thc chain link (cncc cnclosure shall hc cntircly intcrwovcn wilh simulalcd wuod or PVC slals and
shall bc mainlaincd in goi~~J condition :U all limcs.
4. That subjcet variancc shall cxpirc fivc (5) ycar5 Gom lhc Jalc of this resi~lulion, on Octobcr 27, 2IX12.
S. That thc subjcct propcrty sha11 bc devclupcd substanti.illy in aceurd.m~c with plans and spc:ciGcalions
submiucd to thc City of P.nahcim by thc pctiti~mcr and which pluns arc on Glc with thc Planning
Dcpartmcnt markcd Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5, and as conditiuncJ hc:rcin.
G. That prior tu final building and r.oning intipcc:iuns ur within a pcriod of onc (l) ycar from lhc Jatc o(
lhis resolulion, whichcvcr occurs first, ConJition Nus. 2, 3 anJ 5, ahovc-mcntioncd shall bc cumplicJ
with. Gx~cnsi~ms for furthcr timc to cumplctc said conditions m~+y bc grantcd in acattdancc wilh
ticcliun It{.03.(MIO uf thc Anahcim Municipal CuJc.
7. Thal approval uf lhis application cunstitiucs app:uval of thc pn}posc:f rcyu~~st ~nly to thc cxtcnl that it
complics with thc Anahcim Municipal 7uning Codc :+nd xny olhcr applicablc Cily, Stalc and Fcdcral
regulalions. Approval docs niri include any action or finJin~.ti as to compliancc or approval of the
rcqucst rcgarding any othcr applicablc urdinancc, rcgulation ur rcyuircmcnt.
I3E IT FURTHER RESOLVEU lhat thc Anahcim City Planning Commission docs hcrcby
{~ind and Jctcrminc that adoption of this Rcsolulion is cxpressly predicalcd upon applicanl's compliancc with
cach and all o( thc conditions hcrcinabuvc sct forth. tihouW any such condition, or any parl lhcrcof, bc
dccl.ircd invalid or uncnforccablc bY thc final judgmcnt of any cuurt of compctcnt jurisJiction, thcn this
Rcsolution, anJ any approvals hcrcin containccl, shzll bc dccmcd null and void.
2 pC97-155
~ ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adoptcd at the Planning Commission meeting of
Octobcr 27, 1997.
, ~~..~ ~
CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
AHE 1 CI'TY PLANNING COMMISSION
SECRETARY,
S'TATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Sccrctary of thc Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the fore~oing resolution was passcd and adopted at a mecting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission
held on Octobcr 27, 1997, by the following votc of the membcrs thereof:
py~; COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BR1STOt; HENNINGER, NAPOLES,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NON~
ABSENT: COMMiSSIONERS: MA`CER, PERAZA
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hcrcunto sct my hand this ~ day of ~i`~'~,
1997. ~
/~ i
SECR TAR , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC97-155