Resolution-PC 97-37~ ~
RESOLUTIUN NO. PC97-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3911 BE GRAMfED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission did receNe a verified Petitfon for
Conditional Use Permft for certaln real property sftuated in the Ciry of Anaheim, Counry of Orange, State of
Califomfa, descr(bed as:
THE SOUTH 66 FEET OF THE NORTH 264 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST ~UARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTIQN
14, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND
MERIDIAN, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EAST 400 FEET OF THE SOUTH 66.00
FEET OF THE NORTH 2~&4.00 FEET OF THE SOU7HWEST QUARTER OF THE
SQUTHWEST t~IJARTER OF SEG'f'ION 14, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RAI~GE 11
WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS PER
MAP RECORDED It~ BOOK 51, PAGE(S) 11 OF MISCEUANEOUS MAPS, SAID
IAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREAS SHOWI~ ON A MAP FILE~ IN BOOK 27,
PAGES 33 OF RECO~D OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY
RECORDER AND PRR i LY WITHIN THE LAND SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK
33, PAGE 27 OF SHID RECORD OF SURVEYS
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on February 19, 1997 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearfng having been duly given
as required by law and fn accordance wfth the provisions of the Anahe(m Municfpal Code, Chaptor 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to fnvestigate ar.d
make flnd(ngs and recommendations in connection therewith; and that said public hearing was cont(nued
to the March 31 and April 14, 1997 Plann(ng Commiss(on meetings; and
WHEREAS, said Commiss(on, after due fnspection, investigatfon and study made by ~tself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at sald hearing, doas find
and determine the fdlowing facts:
1. That the proposed use is pmperly one for which a condftional use permit is auihorized by
Anaheim Municipal Code Section t8.21.050.315.3151(e) to convert a single family home to a 2,179 sq.ft.
medfcal/dental office wfth waivers of the following:
(a) Soctions 18.U6.050.0211 - Minimum number of parkinq s~aces.
18.06.080 (~ required; 12 proposed and concutred with by
and 18.21.066.010 the City Traffic and Transporta2lon Manager)
(b) Sections 18.05.080.030 - Minimum number and area of sfans.
and 18.21.067
(c) ~tfons 18.21.063.020 - Minimum side vard setback.
(10 feet, fully IandsCaD2d, required;
5~eet proposed for trash enclosure and 5 feet proposed
for building additfor~ adJacent to south property Iine)
(d) Section 18.21.Of3.030 - Iviinlmum rear vard setback.
(25 fe, et, f!ally IGndsca~, required;
25 feet~ronosed wfth t0 feet landscaned and 15 foot
paved trash truck tum-around)
CR2870DM.WP -1- PC97-37
~ ~
(e) Section 18.21 •06~L - Permitted encroachments.
(Parkin~s ~O~~med to encroach intp required
seibacks in the RS-A~3,000 Zone;
14 oarkins so ca .e~ encroachin~ into north and south yards)
2. That waNers (a) and (b)~ Pertain~ng to minimum nwnber of parking spaces and minimum
number and area of signs, are hereby denfed on the hasis that they were deleted following public
notificatio7;
3, That waNers (c), ~d) and (e), pertaining `om~i becauseet er esarespecial~cir umstances
setback and permitted encroachments, is hereby app ~ to other identicaliy
applicable to the properry consisting of fts location and surroundings, which do not app y
zoned properties in the viciniry;
4, That strict apptication of the Zoning Code deprives the property of priviteges enjoyed by
other propeKies under identical zoning classffication in the viciniry;
5. That the proposad use is properly one for which a condftionai use permit is authorized by
the Zoning Code;
g, That the proposed use will not adve~sely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and
dovelopment of the area tn which It (s proposed to be loczted;
7. That the size and shape of the site for the propcsed use is adequate to allow the full
devetopment of the proposesi use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, heaith,
safety, and general vre!~%ira;
g. That the t 9ffic ger.erated by the propo?ed ~~c in theiare,~ase an u~due burden upon the
s t r e ets and hi ghways desi ned and improved to carry
g, Ttv3t the granting of the conditional use permit, under the condftions ~of Anaheim i i l and be
detrimental to the peace, health, satety and general welfare of the cftizens of the Ciry
10. That f~ ~~ ~~~ ppOSnhonrtorthe subject petit on.lic hearing in opposit(on; and that no
correspondence was
GALIFORMIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUR' ~'^' A~T FINDING: That the Anaheim C'dy Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permft convers!on of a single-familmum number and area of
medical/dental office with waNers of minimum number of parking spaces, max
signs, minimum side yard setback, m~~vin aefrontage oft65 feet on phe east side of Knottn~treet, a
rectangula~ly-shaped 0.3 acre property 9
maxfmum depth of 203 feet, a 0~~i~9 ~~~tN Deeclarat on ufpon flnding that h e~IdeclaraUonsefl cts the
Street); and dces hereby app
fndependent judgement of the lead agency and that ft has considered the Negative Declaration together wrt
any anmcommen se eceNedithat here~is no substantial evid nce that hep~oJect will hav~e a signfficant effect
and y
on the environment.
Plannin Commiss:on does
NOW, T{-IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ciry 3
hereby g7ant, in part, subject Petiteoe uis e~o thie proposed u ef of the subjec~lp o{~ertu in onder t preserve
hereby found to be a necessary p 4
the safety and general weliare of the Citi~ens of the City of Anahefm:
PC97-37
-2-
~ ~
1. That tl ~a trash endosure shall be constructed near the southeast portion of the parking Iot, no close~
than sixceen (16) feet to the east properry Iine and in a location approved by the Planning Department,
hentrash~ einclosure shall be spec~ical~Y sh twn o plansrsubmitted fo buildi~g ~permfts.he location of
2. That all proposed signs shall conform to the Code requirements in effect when sign permfts are sought.
3. That an on-site trash truck tum-ar~~und area shall be provided and mafnta~ned to the satisfactio~ of the
pepartment of Public Works, Streets and Sanitation DNision. Said tum-around area shall be specffica~~y
shown on plans submitted for building permfts•
4. That a pfan sheet for solid waste storage, collection and a plan fo~ recycling shall be submitted to the
Department of Maintenance for reylew.
5. That ihe developer ~ li1Cebm~t Wa~ Q~ onM~~ o cont d p ed~ctable Pdlutans'f om sto~mwat e
best managemen p
runoff. The W~MP shall be submitted to the Pubifo Works Department, Development Services Division,
#or review and approvaf.
6. 7hat minimum one (1) gallon sized vir~es shall be planted on maximum five (5) foot centers to provide
landscape screening of all masonry and trash er+closu~e walls.
7. That plans shall be submitted to the City Tra~c end Transportation Manager for review and approval
showing co~ormance with the most current versions of Engineering S~S~Ilthereupon be deve oped
pertaining ta parking standards and dri~eway Iocatfon. Subject properry
and maintainad in conformance wfth said plans.
8. That the driveway on Knott Street shall be reconstructed to 3ccommodate a ten (10) foot radius curb
return in conformance wfth Engineering Department Standerd No. 137.
9 of the adjacentand uses Iandtrhar~sa~iw ~dows shal~l be speciflca~YCShownlonther plans submitted
for building permits.
10. That a six (6) foot nigh block wall shall be constructed to replace the exfsting chain fo al of thelCiry
the north properry Iine. The required fence shall be subJect to the review and app
Traffic and Transportatfon Manager regarding Ii~e-of-sight considerations in the front setbs:k area.
11. That, as specifled by the petftioner, the hours of these medical/dental offices shall be Iimfted to 7 a.m.
to 9 p.m.; and, to conserve parfcing space availability, a maximum of flve (5) employees (including the
doctor and the dent(st) shall be a!lowed on-aite at any ong time.
~2. That the commercial use cf this properry shall be 1lmited to medical/dental ofFce use only.
13.
That a sbc (6) foot high wrought iron gate shall be installed across the driveway. The gate sha~~ be kept
closed and locked when the offices are closed.
14. That the developer shall submft evklence to the PuWic Works Department, Development Services
Divislon, that the sfte ~s a legal parcel of record as defined by the Subdivision Map Act. if the~v~e~is
not a legal parcel, the developer shall submft a Cert~icate of Compliance for review and app Y
the Cfty Engineer.
~- FC97-37
+~ ~
15.
16.
17
18.
That subject property shal~ be developed as conditioned herein and substantfally in accordance wfth
plans arxl specfHcations submitted to the C'dy ~f Anaheirri by the petitioner, which plans are on fiie with
the Planning Department marked Revision No. 1 of Exhibft Nos. 1 and 2; provided, however, that a
minimum of frvine5to cread e an effective sual s fC ~fnur (24) inch box, .rees shall be planted along the
rear properry
That prior to issuance of a buildfng per-'nit or wtthin a~eri~d of one (1) year from the date of this
resolution, whichever occurs ftrst, Condftion Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 14, above-mention~ t~s~n
acco dance fth Sect on818103.090rof the Anaheim Municipal Code. condttioi~s may be 9
That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 6, S, 13, and 15, above-mentioned,
shall 5e compUed with•
That aRproval of this application constftutes approval of the proposecl ri ~u~eetC nly;~t and Federa~
it complies wfth the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other appl nY~
request~ ega di~r gr any other ap~licable o dinarce~ regu at~lon9orrequirement~nce or approval of the
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahoim City Planning ~cammi~no s d~~pi~nce wh
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upo RP~
each and all of the condftions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared inval(d or une~or ~s herein chontained~ sha~l be deemed null and ~oid tent Jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any app
April 14, 1997.
ATTEST: ~~~
~
SECRETA , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE j ss•
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) `
I, Margarita Sdorio, Sacretary of the Anaheim Cfry Planning Cnmmission, do here Planniny
Commissfon hald on Ap 1~14, 997, by hefdlowing otteof the members~hereof•A~heim City 9
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: [i0S'MlICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, MESSE, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~~~' day of ~~
IN WITNESS WNEREOF, I havo hereunto set my hand thls~
1997. Q f lu'a~
SECREfAR , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopt at the Planning Commission meeting of
Y~
CHAI RSON ANAHE CI7Y PLANNING COMMISSION
~- PC97-37