Resolution-PC 97-99~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC97-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CtTY PL;aNNING CUMMISSION
TI~AT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Nd. 3953 BE GRAM'~D
WHEREAS, tne Maheim City Ptanning Commfssion did rec:eiva a ~?!ecifted Petition for
Condftional Use Permft for certafn real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Couny of Orange, State
of Calffamia, de~ribed as:
PARCEL A: ~ `` !
~
PARCEL 1, IN THE CI1Y OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, 5TAT~ OF CALiFORNlA; !~
AS PER MAP Flf.ED IN BOOK 141, PAGES 26 AND 27 OF P0..9CEL MAPS, !N 7F:1° .
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL B:
I ~` _ _ ~
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ~UARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWP'Shlic ,4 SOU7H,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, IN THE CITY' OF I 4NAHFIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CAUFORNfA, AS PEH MAP RECORDED Ild BOOK 51,
PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANCOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~
BEGINNING AT A POI~JT ON THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHWEST (.IUARTER OF ~'
SECTION 6 WHICH IS SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21' 20' WEST 766.88 FEET FROM THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID S O U T H L INE, -
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21' 20' WEST 60.00 FEET TO THE 30UTHEAST CORNER OF THAT
CERTAIN IXCEPTION OF THE SOUTH 284.00 FEET OF THE WEST 163.00 FEET
RECITED IN THE DEED RECQRDED JULY 31, 1962, AS INSTRUMENT NQ. 23009, IN
BOOK 6197, PAGE 76, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THEPICE ALONG THE
BOUN~ARY OF SAID F.XCEPTION NORTH 00 DEGREES 46' 20' WEST 284.00 FEEf AND
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21' 20" WEST 163.00 FEET TO 7HE F~ORTHWEST CORNE:R OF
SAID EXCEPTIOIV; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 46' 20' WEST 230.35 ~EET T() THE
SOUTH~AST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF UWD CONVEYED TO THE ENEi3SON
ELECTRIC MAN~JFACTURING COMPANY, AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL NO. 2 UF .THE
DEED RECORDED JULY 31, 1962, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 23009, IN BOOK 6187, Pi4GE
76, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 57' 10 "
EAST 193.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 46' 20' 1MEST 891.75 FEET TO A
POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHTAF-WAY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD RIGHT-0F-WAY; THENCE ALONG ~AID RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE SOUTH 57
DEGREES 13' 50' EAST 956.10 FFET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST UNE OF
THE SAI~ SOUTHWEST ~UARTER OF SECTION 6; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE
AND THE CENTERUNE OF GILBERT STREET, SOUTH 0 DEGREES 46' 30" EAST 545.69
FEEf TO A POIiVT IN A UNE PARALLEL WITH AND 331.50 FEET NORTHERLY F~i'.iiJl
THE SOUTH LJNE OF THE SAID SOUTHWEST QiJAR7ER OF SECTION 6; THENCE
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21' 20' WEST 766.86 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL L1NE; THENCE -
SOUTH 0 DEGREES 48' 20' EAST 331.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGiNNING.
CR2984PLWP -1- PC97-99
~ ~
IXCEPT THE MOST SOUTHERLY 53.00 FEET.
PARCEL C:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER MAF FlLED IN BOC~K 26, PAGE 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFlCE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDcR OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commisston did hold a public hea~ing at the Civic Center
in the Ciry of Anaheim on July 21, 1997 at 1:30 p.m., notice of sakl public hearing having been duiy gNen
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and sgalnst satd proposed condittonal use permft and to investigate and
make firv.iings and recommendations In connection therewfth; and
WHEREAS, saki Commission, after due Inspe~tion, irnestigation and study made by kself
and In tts behalf, and after due conslderation of ali evfdence and reports offered at said hearing, does flnd
ar.d determine the idlawfng facts:
1. That the proposed use is properiy one for which a condftional use permft ls auchorized by
Anaheim Munfcipal Code Section 16.61.050.145 to permit industrially-related office uses within a former
394,629 sq. ft. corporate comple~c.
2. That the proposed use w(II not sdversely aHeot the adjolning Iand uses and the growth and
development of 4he area in wh~h ft is proposed to be located because Said multi-tenant oftice uses will
have the same effect on the suROUnding neighborhood as the previous large single-tenant corporate
headquarters campus, particularly t~ terms of the traffic generated;
3. That the slze and shape of the sice for the proposed use is adequate to allow full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and generat welfare;
4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic i~r the area;
5. That the graM(ng of the conditional use permit~ under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrfinental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare ot the citizens of the City of Anaheim;
6. That the proposal meets curceM code requirements, and that this properry is large enough
to provide the required number of parking spaces a~d landscaping; and
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was receNed in opposftion to the subject petftion.
~AUFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Ciry Planning
Commission has rev(ewed the proposal to permit industrfally-related office uses in e former 394,629 s.it.
corporate complex on a 27.94-acre Irregularly-shaped propeRy located at the northwest comer of L.a P~~ma
Avenue and Gilbert Street, and having frontages of 780 fe~t on the north skle of La Palma Avenue and
830 feet on the west side of GAbert Street (2411 West le Palma Avanue - CalComp); and does h'~~eby
appmve the Negative Dedstatlon upon flnding that the dadaration refl~cts the irxfependent judgem~nt of
the lead agency and that it has conskiered the Negative Uedaration together wRh arrv comments received
during the public revlerv process and further flnd(ng on the basis of the inftial study and any cornments
receNed that there Is no substantial evidence that the proJect will have a slgnHicant effect on the environmeM.
.2. PC97-99
, ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ~tESOLVED that the Anahelm Ciry Planning Commissfon does
her$Uy ~=ant subject Petftion for Conditionaf Use Permft, upon the followfng conditions whfch are hereby
tourxi. io be a neces~:ry prerequisfte to the preposdd use ef the subject properry in order to preserve the
s.^fety a~xi general welfare of the Cftlzens Qf the City of Anaheim:
1. Titia~t the existinq freestanding sign may be used for a period of three (3) years as a real estate sign.
At the end of the three (3) year period, the sign shall be removed ar an altemate sign proposal shall
be submttted to the Zonirtg Divfsion for Plannfng Commfssion for review and approval as a"Reports
and Recommendatfons' Rem.
`~ 1. That the property owner shall mafMafn the exfsting trees and hedges on this property and replace
damaged, dyfng and dead vegetation with stmilar specfes of a similar size,until a tree removai plan,
In conJunctia~ wfth mere detailed Iandscape pians, Is submitted to the Planning Commission for
review and approval as a'Reports and Reccmmendations' ftem.
3. That the two (2) parcets comprising this propeity shall be managed and ma~ntained as one (1)
Integrai pa:cel for purposes of parking, vehicular circuiation, signage, ma(ntenance, lend usage, and
archftactural coMrd.
4. That the proposed office uses shall be Ilmfted to the following Iisted uses and that an unsubordinated
covenant, revfewed and approved by the Cfty Attomey's Office saiimiting said uses, shall be recordr3d
in the Office of the drange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be submfttad
to the Zoning Dhiislon.
(1) AccouMing - Bookkeeping, CPA Firms or temporary CPA Firms
(2) Advertising
(3) APPraisers
(4) Banks
(5) Brokers - Real Estate, Business Opportunities, etc.
(6) Business System Companies
(7) Communlcation Consuitants
(8) Computer Analysls Fimu
(9) Credit Reporting Agencles
(SU) Designers - Industrial, Inte~lor, Graphic
(11) Development Comaanfes
(12) Facilfty Ma(rrtenance and Planning ,
(13) Insurance Companies/Agencles
(14) IrneMOry Services
(15) Leasing Companies
(16) Management Consultants/Companies
(1~ Marketing Research
(18) Personnel Agencies
(1g) puality Contrd Anaiysis
(20) Sales Offices (which serve the irv~ustrial area)
(21) Secretariel and Business Services
(22) p~ny uss permftted under Zoning Code Sectlon 18.61.020 'Parmitted Primary Uses and
Structures; and subJect to all condftions of said Section.
Each (ndividual use shafi require the writters approval of the Zoning DNision pr~or to occupancy which
approvai shall only be gNen when ft Is demonstrated that such use Is efther an ~xpressly permitted
use in such zone or meets the criteria of Section 18.61.050.1A5 of the Anahetm Municipz! Cade.
-3- PC97-99
;~;. ~
5. That three ;3) foot high reflective address numbers shall be painted on the building roofs in a
contrasting cdor to roof materials, and shall not b~ visible to any street. Buildings with the same
address shall be further designated by adding the assigned bu(Iding number (i.e., 2400-1) to the roof-
mounted address.
s Yohthe Public Worlcs pepartment, Streets and Sanftation DNsfon' for~eview and approba'submitted
7. That an on-site trash truck tum-arnund area shall be provlded and maintained to the satisfaction of
the Public Works Department, Streets and fianitation Divlsion. Said tum-around area shall be
sper,ffically shc::^ ~.^. plans submitted for building permfts.
e. That subject property shail be daveloped substantially in accordance with pians and specifications
submitted to the Ciry of Anahefm by the patitioner, and which plans are on file wfth the Piann(ng
C~epartment marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3, and as condftioned harein.
9. That prior to commencement of the actNity authorized by this resolution or wfthin a period of one
(1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8,
nayV be gran~ed in accllordance wit~h Sect on 8 03j090 of the Anaheim Mun cipaeCode.d condftions
10. That approval of this appl(cation constftuies app~oval of the proposed request only to the extent that
ft complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other appiicabie Ciry, State and Federal
regulatlons. Approval does not include any act(on or find(ngs as to compliance or approval of the
request regard~ng any other appUcable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anane(m City P~anning Comnticsasnos comS hanceywith
and determine that adoption of this Resdution is expressly predicated upon app P~
each a~ all of the condftlons hereinabove set forth. Should any such co~dftien, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the flnal Judgment of any coun of competent jurisd(ction, then this
Resolution, and any a{aprovals herein con'ained, shall be deemed null and vofd.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 21, 1997.
...G~_ ^ ~Z~~
CHAIRPERSON ANA EIM CITY PLANNING COMtvIISSION
ATTEST: C~
SECRETARY, AN HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSlON
~_ PC97-99
~- ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF CIRANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sdorlo, Secretary of the Anahefm Cfry Planning Commission, do hereby cettffy
that the foregoing resdution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on July 21, 1997, by the fdlowing vote of the members thereof: ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, MAYER, PER.4ZA, NAPOLES
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER$: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day of ~~~ ~,
1997.
Q~1~J ~d1CNKUJ"
SECRETARY, A AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5- PC97-99