Loading...
Resolution-PC 98-2RESOLUTION NO. PC98-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COA~MISSION THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 4319 BE DENIED WHEREAS, tne Anaheim City Pianning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Variance for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as: LOT 8 OF TRACT, 4096 IN THE CITY OF ANAH~IM, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 147, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTI'. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 5, 1998, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by ~aw and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for ~nd against said proposed variance and to investigate aiid make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invesiigatio~ and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of aIl eviden~e and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the following to retain an existing 144 sq. ft. wood irellis attached to the garage and a 126 sq, ft. patio cover in the side yard: (a) Sections 18.04.043.102 - Maximum fence heiaht. and 18.26.068 (b) Section 18.26.063.010 - Mini~num front vard setback. 25 feet required; 18.5 feet proposed) (r,) Section 18.26.063.020 - Ninimum side vard setback. 2. That the proposed waivers are hereby denied on the basis that there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property ir.volved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone; 4. Thai the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a subslantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question; 5. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in sucii vicinity and zone in which the property is located; 6. That there are no special circumstances appiicable to the property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity; 7. That strict application of the Zoning Code does not deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under identical zoning classificaiion in the vicinity; and CR3149PL.DOC -1- PC98-2 8. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject pPtition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Commission has u~termined that the proposed project does not fail within the definition of ~ategorical Exemptions, as defined in the State Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Guidelines and is, therefore, not categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of January 5, 1998. ' ~ ~~ ~~ u.~ ~ ~'~~-~ ~ CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEINf CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: l • C.7dt.6HUQ' SECRETARY, A HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 5, 1998, by tlie following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, iVAPOLES, PERAZA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AEiSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 61AYER IN ~NITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand this G~~ day of r /_~~l~h~~.1998. , . `/ l3GW~GG~~ SECRETARY, A H~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON -2- PC98-2