Resolution-PC 98-23RESOLUTION NO. PC98-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3965 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petilion for
Conditionai Use Permit for cerlain real property situated in the City of 0,~~~heim, County of Orange, State
of Califomia, described as:
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTF_R OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN
THE RANCHC- SAN JUAN CAJON THE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10, OF MISCELLAP~EOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 458 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROUI THE WEST 4.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION
THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 10
ACRES OF SAID EAST HALF.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF LYING
WITHIN THE f21GHT OF WAY FOR HARBOR BOULEVARD.
SAID LAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREA SHOWN AS PARCEL 1, ON A
MAP FILED IN BOOK 30, PAGE 41 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pubiic hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on February 18, 1998 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, 2nd after due consideralion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and delermine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorizr,d by Anaheim Municipal ~ode Section 18.48.070.050.0504 to retain a car rental agency with
on-site storage and/or parking of rental cars as an accessory use to, and in conJunction with, an existing
hotel and with waiver of the followirg:
Sections 18.06.020.0241 - Minimum number of aarkina spaces.
18.05.080 1( .112 required; 766 existing and proposed)
and 18.48.110.120
CR3189PL.DOC -1- PC98-23
2. That the paricing waiver, under the conditions imposed, wil: not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for such use than the number of such spaces necessary to
accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable
conditions of operation of such use based on the information contained in the Parking Demand Study
prepared by Daniel Benson and Associates dated November 7, 1997 and reviewed and approved by the
City's Traffic and Transportation Manager;
3. That the waiver, under the conditia~s imposed, will not increase the damand a~d
competition for parking spaces upon the public streels in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
4. That the waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and
competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed
use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance
vvith Section 18.06.010.020 of this Code);
5. That the waiver, under the conditions impcsed, will not increase traffic
co~igeslion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for such use;
6. That the waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress
[o or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed
use;
7. That the proposed car rental agency with on-site storage and/or parking of rentai
cars is a proper use for which a cnditional ue prmit is authorized by the Zoning Code in ihe Anaheim
Resort;
8. That the proposed use, under the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect
the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
and that it will provide a convenier~t and desirable service to hotel guests and visitors in the Anaheim
Resort;
9. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the parlicular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare;
1G. That the traffic generaled by the proposed use, under the conditions imposed,
will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area;
11. That granting of this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will
not be detrimental to the peace, heallh, sa(ety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim;
and
12. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and
that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: Thal the Anaheim Cily
Planning Commission has reviewed ihe proposal to retain a car rental agency with on-site storage and/or
parking of rentat cars as an accessory use to, and in conjunction wilh, an existing hotel and with waiver
of minimum number of parking spaces on a 11.09 acre property located at the noAhwesl corner o(
Convention Way and Harbor Boulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding
thal the declaration reflects the independenl judgement of the lead agency and that it has considered the
Negative Deciaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further
finding on the basis of the inilial study and any comments received that there is no substanlial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environmenl.
-2- PC98-23
NOW, "fHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Us? Permit, upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to
preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That rental vehicles shall not be parked and/or stored in any pa~king space located within the
required twenty-six (26) foot setback immediately adjacent to Harbor Boulevard.
2. That identification of parking stalis reserved for the car rental agency shall consist of a maximum
twen4y-four inch (24") wide by thirty-six inch (36") long stenciled numbers painted on the asahalt
in each reserved stall.
3. That, with the exception of limited vacuuming of vehicles complying with Condition No. 4 of this
resolution, there shall be no on-site maintenance or servicing of rental cars, including, but not
limited to, fueiing, washing, detailing or repairs.
4. That prior to any on-site vacuuming of any rentai car fiacility vehicle, ihe petitioner shall submit
the following information to the Planning Department for review and approval by staff:
(a) A site plan, approved by the property owner, showing where rental cars shall be
vacuumed (the location shall not be adjacent to any noise sensitive land use and
vehicies parked in the "resenied" car rental facility parking spaces along the north
property line shs;l noi be vacuumed); and
(b) A letter specifying the number of vehicies io be vacuumed each day and ihe hours that
vacuuming shall occur. The letter shall a~so specify the type of vacuum cleaner that will
be used and describe the levei of noise associated with said vacuum cleaner.
5. (a} That wiihin a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this resolution, the petitioner shall
submit a pian to the City Trafflc and Transportation Manager for r2view and approval
showing modification to the internal circulation for on-site bus traffic closest to the most
southerly driveway fln Harbor Boulevard; and
(b) That within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager's approval, the improved bus turn-out shall be implessiented.
6. That within a period of ihirty (30) days from the date of this resolution, ihe petitioner shall remove
ali illegal signs (such as the metal plaques on poies identifying Alamo "reserved" stalis and neon
window signage).
7. That there shall be no advertising displayed on, or inside any rental vehicle, which is parked or
stored on the property.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted by the petitioner and on file with the Planning DepartmEnt marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 3, and as conditioned herein.
9. That eight (8) reserved rental car parking spaces shall be permitted adjacent to the hotel building.
These spaces include five (5) existing reserved spaces. That the two (2) existing handicapped
spaces shall be replaced with three (3} new reserved spaces. The two (2) handicapped spaces
shall be relocated to the south side of the lobby adjacent to the building. These spaces s?~all bs
restriped to the satisfaction of ihe City Traffic and Transportation Manager within thirty (30) days
from the date of this resolution..
_3. PC98-23
10. That one (1) vehicle (van) displaying the car rental agency's name shall be permitted to park on-
site in either.
(a) One of the eigh± (8) resenred car rental facility parking spaces adjacent to the building; or
(b) One of the designated car rental reserved parking spaces along ihe north property line.
11. That approv2l of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent
that it ~omplies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other appiicable City, State
and Federal regulations. Approvai does n~t include any action or findings as to complianr,e or
approval of the req~~est regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requl~ ement.
BE IT FURTHEF2 RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicar~Ys compiiance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof,
be declared invalid or unenforceabie by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then
this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
February 18, 1998.
~~
~ ~ ? ~~~--r ~ ~ _~
CHAIRMAN ANA ~fM CITY PLANNING CO MISSION
ATTEST:
Ca~~+~GC~
SECR ARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO(~
S7ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Soiorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannirig Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on February 18, 1998, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNiNGER, NAPOLES, PERAZA
NOES: CJMMISSIO~ERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
VACANCY: ONE SEAT
IN WI7NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day of
~/~~~ 1998.
~~~
SECRE7ARY, AHEIM CI7Y PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC98-23