Resolution-PC 98-58RE50LUTION NO. PC98-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF
RESOLUTION NO. ~C93-43 ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3617
WHEREAS, on April ~, 1993, the Anaheim City Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. PC93-43 to permit the sales, installation and servicing of automo~ive air conditioning, cruise control
and power window/door lock systems on property located at 1141 North Kraemer Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, Condition No. 1 of said resolution specified that the conditional use permit
shall expire five years from the date of approvai, on April 5, 1998; and
WHEREAS, this property is developed with a 13,200 sq. ft. industrial building in
Development Area No. 1(Industrial Area) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 94-1);
that the Anaheim General Plan land use designation is General Industrial; and that the property is located
in the Alpha Project (Northeast Area) Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Nancy Krancz, President of Califomia Auto Refrigeration, has requested
that Planning Comr~ission reinstate this use permit by the modification or deletion of Condition No. 1
pertaining to the time limitation to retain the sale, installation and servicing of automotive air conditioning,
cruise control and power window/door lock systems, pursuant to Code Section 18.03.093 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code; and
WfiEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 13, 1998, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chap:er 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed ame.ndment and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewilh; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigatior and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That in 1996, threo years after this use permit was conditionaliy approved, the
entire Canyon Industrial Area, including subject property, was reclassified from ML (Limited Industrial)
zoning to SP94-1 (the Northeast Area Specific Plan).
2. Tl1at the use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the
Zoning Code under Code Section 18.110.050.050.0505, pertaining to conditional use~ in Development
Area 1 of SP 94-1.
3. That this conditional use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of ttie site for this conditional use is adequate to allow the
full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor ta the peace,
health, safety and general welfare.
CR3253PL.DOC -1- PC98-58
5. That the tra~c generated by this conditionai use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways des:gned and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
6. That reinstatement of this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, wiii
not be detrimentai to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That subject conrlitional use is being exercised substantially ;:i the samE manner
and in con*ormance with all conditions as origina~ly approved; and that a site inspection by staff indicated
that the landscaping, parking lot and building appearance were ali in good condition.
8. That this conditional use is being exercised in a manner not detriTnental to the
particular area and surroundin~ land uses, nor to the public peace, health and safety and general welfare.
9. That deletion of Condition No. 1, the time limitation, is necessary to F~~rmit
reasonable operation under the use permit as granted.
10. That, according to Business License Division records, a valici business {icense is
being maintained for this business.
11. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the
proposal and that no correspondence in opposition to the proposal was received.
CALIFORNIA FNVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that the Negative Declaration
previously approved in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 3617 is adequate to serve as the
required environmental documentation in connectio,i with this request upon finding that the declaration
reflects the `ndependent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the previously approved
Negative Declaration t~gether with any comments received during the public review process and further
finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby amend Resotution No. 93-43, adopted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 3617, by
deleting Condition PJo. •I.
THE FOP.FGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 13, 1998. '" ;
~
`/,
~
CHAIRPER , RO`~'EMPORE
ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATf EST:
~lC~. Sd~
SECRETA , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC98-58
STA fE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN'FY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, ~lo hereby certify
that the foregoing res~lution ~vas passed and adoFted at a meeting of the F,naheim City Plar~ning
Commission held on April 13, 1998, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, NAPOLES, PEFtAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK
VACANCY: ONE SEAT VACANT
-~n„ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand ihis ~_ day of
I Il , 1998.
~l~.an~zru~ ~S'aG~~
SECRETARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.3. PC98-58