Resolution-PC 98-75RESOLUTION NO. PC98-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAH[IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4009 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission did receive a verified Petition for
Conditional Use Permit for certain real propert~• situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as:
PARCEL A:
LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 11830, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FcECORDED IN BOOK
540, PAGES 14, 15, 1& AND 17 OF R1ISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CAL.IFORNIA.
PARCEL B:
LOTS 2 TO 17 IiJCLUSIVE OF TRACT NO. 11830, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 540, PAGES 14,15, 16 AND 17 OF lV11SCELLANEOUS
MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on May 11, 1998 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required 'uy law and in accordance with the provisions of lhe Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter ?8.03, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and that said public hearing was conlinued
from the March 3U, and April 27, 1998 Planning Commission meetings; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consfderation of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the followino facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.303, to construct a 74,593 sq. ft. self-storage facility with a
caretaker's unit and an outdoor recreational vehicie storage Iot with waiver of the following:
Sections 18.04.045.014 - Minimum structural setback.
and 18.44.063
2. That the proposed waiver is hereby d2nied because the need for the waiver was deieted
following public notification.
3. That the proposed use would adversely affect adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That granting of this conditional use permit would be detrimentaf to the peace, health,
safely and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use wouid impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
7. That three people spoke at the public hearing in opposition; and that a petition was
received in opposition to this proposal.
CR3280PL.DOC -1- PC98-75
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMEN7AL QUALITY ACT FINDING: 7hat the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to redesignate ihis property from the Medium Density
Residential land use designation to the General Commercial land use designation, to reclassify the
properly from the RM-1000 (Residential, Muitiple-Family) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone, and
to construct a 74,593 sq. R. self-storage facility with a caretaker's unit and an outdoor recreational vehicle
storage lot and with waiver of minimum structural setback on a 3.0-acre rectangularly-shaped property
having frontage of 265 feet on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, a maximum depth of 500 feet, and being
Iocated 330 feet east of the cenlerline of Beach Boulevard (2951-2961 West Lincoln Avenue); and does
hereby deny the Negative Declaracion upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment
of the lead agency a~.d that it has considered the Ne~ative Declaration together with any comments
received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received lhat there is substantial evidence that the proJect will have a significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditionai Use Permit on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING r•,ESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 11, 199~.
~ ~~~ ~! r?
C~1H .-PERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATfEST:
l YLG~ ~ZG~;UZI(G(J ~cr~U~fl'~
SECRETARY, A AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sotorio, Secretary oF the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on May 11, 1998, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSN/ICK, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, NAPOLES, PERAZA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN
VACANCY: ONE SEAT VACANT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this a7~ day of
~, 1998.
r ~~Gl':~a~22/f~(iT(~L.. ~L~~~E.~~
SECRETARY, AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC9a-75