Resolution-PC 99-114RESOLUTION NO. PC99-114
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIMG COMMISSION
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC90-03,
ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 3230
WHEREAS, on ,lanuary 3, 199U, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Na.
PC90-~3 to grant Cond?'!onal Use Permit 3230 to permit an office use in a resfdential structure with waiver
of minimum side yard seiback on property located at 2111 East Lincoln Avenue; and
WHEREAS, this property is developed with property is developed with an office
converted from a residential structure in the CO (Commercial, Office and Professional) zone; and that the
Anaheim General P~an designates this property fc+r Commercial Professionai land uses; and
WHEREAS, the petitioner requested that this use permit be re-advertised to establish a
medical o~ce in the converted residential structure and a parking waiver because the parking requirement
for medical offices is greater than for general office uses; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anahefm on June 21, 1999 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the pravisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditianal use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the fol!owing facts:
1. That the proposal is authorized by Code Sections 18.03.091 and 18.41.050.130 to amend
subject conditional use permit to establish a medical o~ce (general office use previously approved) in a
converted residential struc'ture with ~:aiver of the following under.
Sections 18.06.050.020.021.0211 - Minimum number of oarkina soaces.
18.06•O80 9 s ac s required; 6 spaces proposed and concurred
and 18.41.066.050 with by the City Traffic and Transportation Engineer)
2. That the parking wa(ver, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street
parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to
accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable
conditions of operation of the use.
3. That the waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the d~mand and
competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use
4. That the waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not fncrease the demand and
competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property In the immediate vfcinity of the propos~~d
use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance
with Section 18.06.010.020 of this code).
5. That the waiver, under the cenditions fmposed, will not (ncrease tra~c congest!on within
the off-street parking area provided for the proposed use.
6. That the waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehfcular fngress to or
egress from adjacent properties upon the pubifc streets in the fmmediate vicinity of the proposed use.
CR3670PK.DOC -1- PC99-114
7. That the amended use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth
~nd development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
8. That the size and shape of the site for the amended use Is adequate to allow full
development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare because, as indicated in the petitioner's parking analysis, no adverse impacts
or increased competition for parking will occur as a result of this proposal based on the Iimited number of
employees and ciientele.
9. That the traffic generated by the amended use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
10. That amending this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and generai welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
11. That one person spoke at the public hearing with ccincems about the proposal related to
parking problems in the area; that no one spoke in oppos(tion; and that no correspondence was received
in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposai and does hereby find that the Negative Declaration
previously approved in connection w(th Conditional Use Permit No. 3230 is adequate to serve as the
required environmental documentation in connection wlth this request upon flnding that the declaration
reflects the Independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the previously approved
Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further
finding on the. basis of the initial study and any comments recefved that there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissfon
does hereby amend Resolution No. PC90-03, adopted in connection w(th Conditional Use Permit No.
3230, to estabiish a medic~l o~ce in a converted resfdential structure with waiver of the fallowing:
Sections 18.G6.050.020.021.0211 - ini um number of oarkina soaces.
S 6.080 ( saa e required• s a e proposed and
and 18,41.066.050 concurred with by the City Traffic and
Transportation Engineer)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Condition No. 22 of said resolution is 2mended to read
as follows:
22. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the Ciry of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on
file with the Planning Depa~tment marked Rev(sion No. 1 of Exhibft No. 1.
BE IT FURTHER ~~SOIVED that the following 12 new conditions are added to said
resolution:
27. That three (3), minimum twenty four (24) inch box trees shall be planted in the setback
adjacent to Lincoln Avenue,
28. That, if required by Urban Forestry Divfsion of the Community Services Department,
street trees shail be installed by the property owner within the public right-of-way
adjacent to Lincoln Avenue. The type, size and number of trees shall be provided as
agreed to by the Urban Forestry Divlsfon.
29. That the on-site landscapfng and irrigation system shall be refurbished and maintalned
fn compliance with C(ty standards.
CR3670PK.DOC -2- PC99-114
..~.
30. That the air condit(oning unit shall be ground mounted and property shielded from view.
If ground-mounted equipment is prohibited by the Building Code, the air-conditfoning
unit may be roof-mounted and shall be visually screened from the public rfght-of-way
and all nearby residentially zoned properties in a manner approved by the Planning
Department.
31. That the existing trash enclosure shall be screened with landscapfng consisting of vines
planted in vine pockets on maximum three (3) foot centers around the perimeter of the
trash enclosure.
32. That the concrete area located in front of the handicap access ramp shall be removed
and replaced with minfmum five (5) gallon sized shrubs planted on maximum three (3)
foot centers.
33. That the hours of operation shall be Ifmited to 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through
Saturday, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
34. That there shall be no more than three (3) employees on the premfses at any one time.
35. That all signs shall be subject to review and approval by the Plann(ng Commissfon as a
"Reports and Recommendations" item.
36. That the existing buiiding shall be refurbished and repainted, as shown on Revision 1 of
Exhibit No. 1.
37. That the parking lot shail be re-striped in conformance with the current versions of
Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 436 and 602 pertaining to parking standards and
driveway locations; and that plans shali be submitted to the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager for review and approval showfng compliance, The r~~p~erty
shall then be dovelopPd and maintained in accordance with the ~{31~~e_~ ~'~~' an "
38. That prior to commencement of theactivity aul~horized by tl~h'~ ~e.~~x;tton,6~,wti~in a
period of one (1) year from the date~ of thls~"r~sailuNcgn, whicP~avea~ o~ur~ fir~~, c;or~dition
Nos. 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35 and 36, ~~o~ne-~mentaan~,, 5na~, ~e ob~plt~d ~llh'~.
Extensions for further tlme to compl~ s~lc4 conditions n~ybe~ ~f~n«d in accorcdanc~
with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municl~pal COde.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thed~'+naheim City Plannir~}?~,~~ wian l¢o~,¢j„er+~by
find and determine that adoption of thls Resolution (s expreso~ly predicated upin~app~,,~nt's C~pliaiiac9
wilh each and all of the conditicns herefnabove set forth. ~auld any ~ ch cU~dtl~18n,,~F~1~3 ~!t ,~q@teef,
be declared (nvalid or unenforceable by the flnal Judgmeni of eiAy cburt f~oncipehell{~ Juris~ic7+ir~, then this
Resolutlon, and any approvals hereln contained, shall be deemed djrq(~,
THE FOREGOING
June 21, 1999.
cin
ATTEST:
!~~
SECRETARY, ANAH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~elfng of
CR3670PK.DOC -3- PC99-114
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Sotorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cammission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission hetd on June 21,1999, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, ESPING, KOOS, NAPOLES, VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK
n.' IN 4VITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunio set my hand this ~ day of
~, 1999.
~~ ~~
SECRETARY, A AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CR3670PK.DOC -4- PC99-114