Resolution-PC 99-218RESOLUTION NO. PC99-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC99-88,
ADOPi'ED IN CONNECTIOiJ VJiTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4002 AND AS AMENJED,
TO D[LETE CONDITION NO. 26
WHEREAS, on Febr~ary 18, 1~98, the Pianning Commission adopted Resolution No.
PC98-25 to grant Conditional Use Permit No. 4002 to permit and retain a large equipment storage and
rental yard at 1801 East Ball ftoad; and that on May 24, 1999 Commission adopted Resoluqon No.
PC99-88 to amend said resolution, inciuding the imposition of an additional conditions, including new
Condition No. 26, as follows:
"25. That six (6) months from the date of this resolution, th~s conditional use permit shall
be reviewed at an advertised public hearing for compliance with the conditions of
approval and other city and state laws and regulations to determiiie whether the
Planning Commission should further modify or terminate s~.~bject use permit "
WHEREAS, the property is developed with a large equipment storage and rental yard
(Hertz Equipment Rental) located in the ML (Limited Industrial) zone; and that the Anaheim ~eneral Plan
Land Use Element designates this property for General Industrial land uses; and
WHEREAS, this is a City-initiated public hearing to consider further modification or
revocation of this conditional use permit for a large equipment storage yard which contains a condition
requiring a six month review; and
WHEREAS, th~ City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on December 6, 1999, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by
the Zoning Code.
2. That the use, as it fs operating, has not adversely affected the adjoining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is located.
3. That the siza and shape of the site for the use fs adequate to allow full development of the
use in a manner no+ detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, heaith, safety and general
we!fare.
4. That the tr3ffic generated by the use has not imposed an undue burden upon the streets
and highways designed and improved to carry the tra~c in the area.
5. That the modification of this conditional use permit, under the conditions fmposed, will not
be detrimental to ;he peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CR3836PK.DOC -1- FCy9-21 S
F. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal;
~.^.~' :iiat no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission recons(derat(on of ihis conditionai use permit, which is conditioned for a six month
review of the exfsting large equipment storage yard at 1801 East Ball Road to determine whether any
further modification or revocation proceedings should take piace at the conclusion of the six month time
frame, is made in conJunction with an advertised public hearing; and that the Commission does hereby
find that the Negative Declaration previously approved in connection with this Conditional Use Permit No.
4002 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in connection with this request
upon finding that the deciaration reflects the indepenrJent judgment of the lead agency and that it has
considered the previously approved Negative Declaration together with any comments received during
the public review process and further finding on the basis of the fnitial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evfdence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby amend Resolution No. PC98-25, adopted in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 4002
and as amended, to delete Cond(tion No. 26 (n its entirety on the basis of the foregr~fng findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was ado ed at)he,Planning Commission meeting of
December 6, 1999. ' ~ L /) `
C/
%
CHAIRPE ON PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEI ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~_ ~ ~~
SECRHTARY, NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commiss(on, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Ciry Planning
Commission held on December 6, 1999, by the foliowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD, BOSTWICK, BRISTOL, KOOS, NAPOLES, VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 80YOSTUN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day of
_~~i,~, 2000.
/ ~ .S~,e~s
SECRETARY NAHEIM C;iTY PLl1NNING COMMISSION
-Z- PC99-218