Resolution-PC 99-3RESOLUTION NO. PC99-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM~AISSfON
THA'f PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4086 BE GRANTED FOR TWO (2) YEARS
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified PFtition for
Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as:
LOT 12 IN BLOCK A OF TRACT NO. 158, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS
SHOV1'N ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 12, PAGE 8, OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE CF THE COUNTY RFCORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THE WEST 5.25 FEET.
LOT 13 IN BLOCK A OF TRACT NO. 158 AS (~ER MAP'~ HEREOF RFCQRDt~
IN BOO~< 12, PAGE 8 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF URANGE
COUNTY,. CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pt~i,;:~ hearing at the Civi~ Center in
the City of Anaheim on January 4, 1999 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hcarir,a having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipa! Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make fin~ings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by
,ar~,~t;eim Municipal Code Section 18.45.050.170 to expand an existing alcohol and drug rehabilitation
center.
2. That the proposed use, as approved, will not advPrsely affect the adjoining land uses and
the growth and development of the area in which il is proposed to be located because the existing
operation has not had an adversely impact and the proposed expansion (710 North Anaheim Boulevard)
will operate in conjunction with the existing facility (714 North Anaheim Boulevard).
3. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use, as approved, is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor ta
the peace, health, safety and general welfare because of the nature of the operation and provision of
Code-required parking for both addresses (existing and expansion).
4. That the tra~c generated by the proposed use will be minimal and will not impo~e ar
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. That granting of the conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition to the proposal;
and that no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to expand an existing alcohol and drug rehabilitation
center on a rectangularly-shaped, 1.34-acre prope~ty having a frontage of 104 feet on the east side of
CR3519PK.DOC -1- PC99-03
Anaheim Boulevard, a maximum depth of 143 feet and being located 134 feet north of the centerline of
Wilhelmina Street at 710-714 North Anaheim Boulevard (Hope House); and does hereby appro~;e the
Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of thc; lead
agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during
the public review process and ~urther finding on the basis of the initial study and any comrnents received
that there is no substantial evidence that the proje~t wili have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit for a period of two years, upon the following
condi;ions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the veh?cles stored outdoors shall be removed and that parking on this property shall be
limited to vehicles associated with the permitted use.
2. That ihe windows at 710 PJCrth Anaheim Boulevard shall be repaired.
3. That the owner of he subject property shall be responsible fur the removal of any on-site graffiti
within lwenty four (24) hours of its application.
4. Condition No. 4 was deleted at the Planning Commission public hearing.
5. That no signs shall be permitted for this property.
6. That the proposed use shall be accessory to the primary a~cohol and drug rehabilitation facility
located at 714 North Anaheim Boulevard, as stipulated to by the petitioner in the letter of
operation attached to item 6 of the 5taff Report to the Planning Conmission dated January 4,
1999, and on file with the Planniny Department.
7. That the proposed trash enclosure shall be either redesigned to orient the doors of lhe enciosure
away from the alley or the trash enclosure shall be set back a distance equ~l to the width of the
doors to prevent the doors from obstructina the alley when open. Said trash enclosure shall be
designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets or
highways. The walis of the trash enclosure shall be protected f~om grG'rfiti opportunities by the
use of plants such as clinging vines planted on maximum three (3) foot centers or tall st~rubbery.
Said information shail be specifically shown on the plans submitted for Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation Division, approval.
8. That a plan sheet for selid ~vaste storage and collection and a plan for recycling shall be
submitted to the Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval.
9. Condition IVo. 9 was deleted at the Planning Commission public hearing.
10. That the on-site landscaping and irrigation system shail be refurbished and maintained in
compliance w~th City standards.
11. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and
approval showing conformance with the current versions of Engir.~ering Standard Plan Nos. 436
and 601 (or 602) pertaining to parking standards and driveway locations. Plans submitted for
building permits shall indicate the removal of the three (3) parking spaces adjacent to the south
property line. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained fn conformance with
said plans.
12. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses;
and that the parking stalls shall be marked "for tenant use only."
-2- PC99-~3
13. That al~ existing mat~~re landscaping shall be maintained and immediateiy replaced in the event
that it becomes diseased or dies.
14. That subject property shali be developed substantially in accordance with plans ana specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhib:t No. 1, and as conditioned herein.
15. That prior to issuance of 2 building permit, or prior to commencement of the activity herein
approved, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first,
Condition Nos. 1, 7, 8 anc 11, above-r~ientioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further
time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
16. That prior to final buildiny and zoning inspections, Coridition Nos. 2, 10 and 14, above-mentioned,
shall be complied with.
17. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent
that it complies with tne Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any otfier applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not i~clude any action or findings as to compliance or
approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
18. That subject use permit is hereby approved for a period of two (2) years, to expire on January 4,
2001.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City -''Ianning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanYs compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth~hould any such condition, or any part thereof,
be declared invaiid or unenforceable by the final judgrp nt of any court f competentjurisdiction, then this
Resolution, 2nd any approvals herein contained, ~a ( be deerried ull nd void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT N s.add ted t the lanning Commission meeting af
January 4, 1999. _~ , ~ „~.P
ATTEST:
~~anAa2~iv ~Co,~
SECRETARY, NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
COMM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of!he Anaheim Cily Planning
Commission held on January 4, 1999, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BrSTWICK, BRISTOL, rSPING, KOOS, NAPOLES,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENl': COMMISSIONERS: Y:;~.IIAMS, BOYDSTUN
IN WITNESS Wh!EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~/~ day of
_ ~~' ° 1999. ~~^ /_ ^ :
~LYGGd`•
SECRETAR , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC99-03