Resolution-PC 99-79RESOLUTION NO. PC99-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE F~NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
7HE DISNEYLAND R~SORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-1
(ItvCLUDING THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, DESIGN PLAN AND GUIDELINES
AND PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN)
(CHAPTER 18.78 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE)
WHEREAS, on April 29, 1986, City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance
No. 4709 to establish uniform procedures for the adoption and implementation of Specific Plans for the
coordination of fuYure deveiopment within the City, and "Zoning and Deveiopment Standards" where fhe
Specific Plan includes zoning regulations and development stand~rds to be substituted for e1•isting zoning
under the Zoning Code which shall be adopted by ordinance independent of the rest of the Specific Plan;
and
WHEREAS, pursuan4 to the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, on June 29, 1993, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance No. 5377
amending the zoning map to reclassify certain ;real property described therein into The Disneyland Resort
5pecific Plan No. 92-1 Zone subject to,certain coriditions as specified therein, and Ordinance No. 5378
relating to the establishmenf of Zoning and bevelopment Standards for The Disneyland Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-1 by the addition of Chapter 18.78 to said Code; and
WHEREAS, nn April 12, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5420 amending
Ordinances Nos. 5377 and 5378 relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Pian No. 92-1, Amendment
No. 1 which amendment established "District A", redesignated a portion (approximately 9 acres) of the
East Parking Area to District A, and established Zoning and Development Standards for District A; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 1995, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5503 amending
Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
No. 92-1, Amendment No. 2 which amendment redesignated a portion (approximately 10 acres) of the
East ?arking Area to District A; and
WHEREAS, on October 22, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5580
amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 3 which amendment encompassed modificatioris to The
Disneyland Resort Project including a Revised Phasing Plan; modifications to the Specific Plan Guidelines
and Fublic Facilities Plan) to implement the Revised Phasing Plan; and, incorporation of text and graphic
modifications to the document; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1998, pursuant to Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code and a request by Robert H. Shelton, representing Anaheim Center for Entertainment, LLC, the
Planning Commission initiated applications for General Plan Amendment No. 359, Amendment No. 4 to
The Disneyland Resort Specific F ian No. 92-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 associated with the
Pointe'Anaheim pr~ject for approximately 22.2 acres of the 29.1-acre Pointe"Anaheim project area, more
specifically described as the 1.35-acre City parcel, the 9.54-acre Melodyland parcel, the 8.9-acre Pyrovest
Anaheim r'laza Hotel parcel, the 1.4-acre Berger parcel and the 1-acre Ursini parcel, for the purpose of
presenting the applications for study and'consideration at a public hearing (Resolution No. PC98-192).
Robert H. Shelton, authorized agent for the remaining 6.9 acres of the 29.1-acre project area, initiated the
above-noled applications for the remaining properties; and
WHEREAS, the Pointe"Anafieim project area is irregularly-shaped and consists of ten
parcels totali.ig approximately 29.1 acres with frontages oF approximately 585 feet on the east side of
Harbor Boulevard, 1,483 feat on the south side of Freedman Way (future Disney Way), 887 feet on the
west side of Clementine Street (future Freedman Way) and 726 feet on the north side of Katella Avenue,
and more particularly described in Attachment A of this resolution; and
WHEREAS, proposed Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specifc Plan No.
92-1 encompasses text and exhibit changes throughout the Specific Plan document to reflect the
establishment of the new Pointe•Anaheim Overlay which provides for the development of the
Pointe`Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex (hereinafter "Pointe"Anaheim projecY')
including amendments to the Development Plan, the Design Plan and Guideiines, the Pubiic Facilities
Plan and the Zoning and Development Standards. The Pointe`Anaheim Overlay encompasses the
boundaries of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. ?32-1 Disfrict A(18.9 acres) and a portion of the
Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overl2y south oi Freedman Way (10.2 acres); and
WHEREAS, the proposed Pointe'Anaheim project includes up to 565,000 gross square
feet of retail/dining/entertainment uses; two to three hotels comprising 1,050 hotel rooms/suites with
approximately 86,985 gross square feet of related accessory uses (the hotel rooms/accessory uses would
encompass a maximum of 923,800 gross square feet) and an approximate 141,200 gross square foot
area on the top floor of the parking structure to be used to provide parking and/or hotel amenities serving
guests and patrons of the Pointe`Anaheim hotels only; up to three theaters with a total of 4,600 seats for
live performances or, alternatively, a 24-screen movie theater with 4,757 seats; and, a,1,600,000; gross, ,•
square foot parking structure with 4,800 striped park;ng spaces and 25 bus spaces with provision'to pa~k
an additionai 400 vehicles which would bring the total number of vehicles that can be accommodated in
the garage to 5,200 cars, and including a 21,600 gross square foot bus terminal/facility for airport transport
and to/from sightseeing venues; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic
Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, in the City of Anaheim on May 19, 1999, at 9:00
a.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ct~apter 18.G3, to hear and consider evidence for and against
said proposed amendment and to investigate and make finding and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, after due consideration, inspection, investigetion and study made by itself,
and after due consideration of informalion provided within the Specific Plan document and other
in`ormation and evidence received during the public hearing pr~c~ss, and after incorporating staff's
recommended adjustments to the project detailed in the May 19, 1999 staff repo~t, as refined during the
May 19, 1~99 Planning Commission meeting to include adjustments recommended by staff and a
modification to the icon signage provisions recommended by the Planning Commission (to allow up to two
icons in the Poin'e"Anaheim Overlay subject to the approval of a conditional use permit with one near the
corner of Freedman Way and Clementine Street and the other at the Katelia Avenue entry to the site), the
Planning Commission DOES HEREBY FIND:
That the Pointe'Anaheim Overlay, which is the subject of f+mendment No. 4 to The
Disneyland Resort Specific Pfan No. 92-1, is uniquely sited adjacent to two major
arterial highways (Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue) and two secondary
erterial highways (Freedman Way and Clementine Street) in the Anaheim Resort
and encompasses ten parcels totaling approximately 29.1 acres which would be
enhanced by the consolidation of the parcels to develop the Poinke"Anaheim project
in accordance with the land uses and site development standards proposed for the
Pointe"Anaheim Overlay; and
2) That as set forth in the General Plan Consistency letter submitted by the petitioner
(attached to this Resolution as Attachment B which is incorporated herein)
Amendment No. 4 to ~'he Disneyland Resort Specific Pian is consistent with the
goals and Nolicies of the General Plan, as amended by proposed General Plan
Amendment No. 359, and with the purposes, standards, and land use guidelines
therein; and
That Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan results in
development of desirzbie character inasmu~h as the Pointe'Anatieim Overlay
provides for the same types of land uses currently permitted or conditionally
permitted by The D~~neyland Resort Spec~fic Pian for the project site; that the
Pointe'Anaheim project includes the consolidation of several smaller parcels which
is encouraged by the Specific Plan; that the Pointe•Anaheim project will provide
another venue for visitors to the area, which could result in longer stays for visitors
4o the Anaheim Resort; and, the Pointe'Anaheim project will provide for the
deveiopment of up to 565,000 square feet of retail/din(ng/entertainment uses, 1,050
hotels and accessory uses, up to three theaters totaling 4,600 seats for Iive
performances, or alternatively, a 24-screen movie theater with 4,757 seats end,
parking facilities which will be compatible with existing, approved and proposed
visitor-serving uses in the surrounding Anaheim Resort area; and
4) That Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan contributes to a
balance of land uses in that it implements commerciai recreation land uses
consistent with the land uses permitted or conditionally permitted by the existing
Specific Plan for District A and the Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R
Overlay; and
5) That Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan respects
environmental and aesthetic resources consistent with economic realities by
providing for the visual enhancement of the Pointe'Anaheim Overlay and the
Anaheim Resort with the implementation of the Pointe•Anaheim project and fulfilling
the goals and objectives of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan by efficiently
utilizing the project site to develop an integrated Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment
Complex which will provide ano~her venue for area visitors. The Pointe'Anaheim
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigatio~ Monitoring Plan No. 004 also address
project-related environmental impacts, and provide for tfie feasible mitigation of said
impacts; and,
fn conjunction with the initial adoption of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan on
June 29, 1993, Ciry Council adopted Resolution No. 93R-146 which included a
detailed description af ine Specific Plan's consistsncy with each of the above-noted
findings. Staff has reviewed and determined that Amendment No. 4 to The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is consistent with the above-noted findings.
Copies of said findings in Resolution No. 93R-146 have been provided to the
Planning Commission and are available for review in the Anaheim Planning
Department.
WHEREAS, the Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan text and
exhibits, incorporating the changes recommended for approvai by the Planning Commission, are identified
in Attachment C to this Resolution and incorporated herein; and,
WHFREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to amend
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 and by its Resolution No. PC99-77 has found a~~d
recommends that the City Council determine that the Mitigated Negative Deciaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 004, including the associated Errata, are adequate to serve as the required
environmental documentation for the proposed amendment; and, further findirig on the basis of the Initial
Study and the evidence presented that there is ne $ubstantial evidence, with the imposition of the
mitigation measures identified in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004, that the amendment will have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings, the
Anaheim Cify Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council, by ordinance, adopt
Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (including the Zoning and
Development Standarcis, Design Plan and Guidelines and Public Facilities Plan) (the Specific Plan text
and exhibits are identified in Attachment C to this Resolution), and subject to staff's recammended
conditions of approval (identified in Attachment D to this Ftesolution and lncorporated herein); and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption af this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanPs compliance
with each and all of the conditions of approval set forth in Attachment D and incorporated herein. Should
any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any
court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approval~ herein contained, shall be deemed
null and void.
/~
THE FOREGOING RESO U~~ was~adQ~ d at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 19, 1999. ~ ~
~ .~f, =~
CHAIR SON, A AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATl'ES~T:I
i~~ ~ ~ •
l•. X.C,~ ~C ~l~u~c.~
SECRETARY, ANAHE M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY dF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretar,~ of the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission, do hcreby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meE;E~g of the Anaheim City Planning
Co~rmission held on May 19, 1999, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, ESPING, KOOS, NAPOLES,
VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ ti7` day of
"~, 1999. ~
rl C~ ~<- ~ ~l • I%u~-c..~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAN ING COMMISSION
CR3630EH.DOC
~-TT'ACHMENT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Pyrovest Parcels:
PARC[L 1:
THE EAST 660.00 FEET OF THE WEST 720.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 585.00 FEET OF THE
SOUTH 1260 FEET UF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEE2 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHit' 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED F'ROPERTY:
BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 0° 13' 22" EAST 15.03 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF THE ABOVE UESCRIBED PROPERTY SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY
LINE OF HARSOR BOULEVARD 120 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 0° 13' 22" EAST ALONG
SAID EASTERLY LINE 100.08 FEET; THENC~ NORTH 89° 54' 30" EAST PARALLEL TO THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 111.34 FEET; THENCE NOkTH 0° 13'
22" WEST, PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD 30.75 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89° 54' 38" EAS7 36.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 13' 22" WEST 84.36 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FREEDMAN WAY, 60.00 FEET WIDE; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FREEDMAN WAY, SOUTH 89° 54' 30" WEST 134.97 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
15.Q0 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 07' 52" A LENGTH OF 23.60 FEcT TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION.
Melodyland Parcels:
PARCEL A
THE WEST 20 ACRES OF THE NORTHERLY 645.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 1320.00
FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10
WEST, IN THE. RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, ClTY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY
EXCEPTTHE WEST720.00 FEET.
ALSQ EXCEPT THE NORTH 60.00 FEET.
PARCEL B
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 VVEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELI.ANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
REORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING A7 THE ;>OUTHWEST CORhIER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
NORTH 675.00 FEE7 ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
EAST 833.51 FEET PAFcA1LLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTEP, TO
THE TRUE POINT OF 9EGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0° 16' 30" EAST 675.11 FEET TO A
POINT, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO AL`NYN S. JEWELL AND LUCILLE G. JEWELL, RECORUED
OCTOBER 5, 1979 IN BOOK 4912, PAGE 102, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE EAST 486.49
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO 7HE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LAND CONVEYED TO DONALD F. REA BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 1,
1958 IN BOOK 4521, PAGE 453, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THEhCE NORTH 675.00 FEET
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO REA, TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WESTALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAND OF REATO
THE TRUCE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THE WEST 292.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 360.00 FEET THEREOF.
liasenyager Parcel:
LOT 3 OF TR,4CT NO. 3330, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 113, PAGES 21 AND 22 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
Zaby's parcel:
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF TRACT 3330, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 113, PAGES 21 ANO 22 OF
MISCEI_LANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNN.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ANAIiEIM SY DEED
RECORDED JULY 30, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 97-0359942, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
8erger Parcel:
LOTS 4 AND 5 OF TRACT NO. 3330, IN TIiE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 113, PAGES 21 AND 22 OF
MIS :EI_LANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
Rist Parr,el:
PARCEL 1:
THE WEST 292 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22,
IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH. RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA
ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STA7E OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A IViAP THEREOF
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
NORTH 675.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF 5AID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
EAST 833.51 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0° 16' 30" EAST 875.11 FEET TO A
POINT, SAID POINT BEING ALSO TtiE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ALWYN S. JEWEL AND LUCILLE G. JEWELL, RECORDED
OCTOBER 5, 1959 IN BOOK 4912, PAGE 102, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE EAST ALONG
THE SOtlTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 486.49 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LAND CONVEYED TO DONALD F. REA BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBF_R 1,
1958 IN BOOK 4521, PAGE 543, OFFICIAL RtCORUS; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO REA, 675.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
THEREOF; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAND OF REA TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BE(;INNING;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WEST 150 FEET OF THE SOUTH 360 FEET;
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTH 60 FEET INCLUDED WITHIN KATELLA AVENUE,
120 FEE'T WlDE.
Parcel 2
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHE4ST QUARTER OF SECT~ON 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESGRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
NORTH 675.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
EAST 833.51 FEET PARALLEL WITt; THE SOUTH L(NE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0° 16' 30" EAST 675.11 FEET TO A
POINT, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ALWYN S. JEWELL AND LUCILLE G. JEWELL, RECORDED
OCTOBER 5, 1959 IN BOOK 4912, PAGE 102, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE EAST ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE CF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 486.49 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LAND CONVEYED TO DONALD F. REA, BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 1,
1958 IN BOOK 4521, PAGE 543, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO REA, 675.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
THEREOF; TH~NCE 1NEST ALONG THE NORTH I_INE OF SAID LAND OF REA TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTH 60.00 FEET If~CLUDED WITHIN KATELLA AVENUE,
120.00 FEET WIDE.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THE NORTH 315 FEET.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WEST 292 FEET.
City Parcel:
TNE NO°THERLY 280.35 FEET OF PARCEL 1, IN 7HE CITY OF ANAHEIM, C~JUNTY OF
ORANGE, STA i E OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN AN A PARCEL MAP FILED iiJ BOOK 55,
PAGE 46 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
Ursini Parcel:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 ~;VEST; IN THE CIlY OF ANAHElM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIt='vrcIVIA, AS SiiOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORQS t~F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRlBEG AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT TI ;E SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
NORTH 675.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
EAST 833.51 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTH 0° 16' 30", EAST 675.11 rEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID
POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED
TO ALWYN S. JEWELL AND LUCILLE G. JEWELL, RECORDED OCTOBER 5, 1959 IN BOOK
4912, PAGE 102 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 0° 16' 30" iIVEST, 360.00 FEET
ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LAND; THENCE EAST 150.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH
TIiE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 0° 16' 30" EAST,
360.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO JEWELL
TO THE SOUTHERLY LlNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID SECTION 150.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
E~CEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING SOUTHERLY OF
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT PORTIOtd DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN FINAL ORDER
OF CONDEMNATION DATED JANUARY 30, 1998, CASE NO. 782833 O:' rHE SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF N;HICH WAS
RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19980071~d1 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
QH/LEGAL.~OC
ATT~LFiNIENT B
ApplicanYs Explanztion
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 1 of 11
Applicant's Exp9anation
Pointe Anaheim Overlay
Proposed Amendment #4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Pian
PURPOSE
The purpose of this document is to identify the requested amendments (the "AmendmenY') to The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (the "Specific Plan") and explain why these amended standards
are needed for the proposed Pointe Anaheim project ("Pointe Anaheim" or the "Project").
UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES
Four underlying principles form the basis for proposing the Amendments to the Specific Plan with
regard to the L-shaped land parcel comprising approximately 29.1 acres across from Disneyland
(the "Project Site") that will be used for the Project. These principles are:
1. To Help ~ulfill the Basic Intent,
Goals and Policies of the S~ecifc Plan
The primary principle behind proposing the Amendments is to make it feasible to develop a half-
billion dollar project in the Anaheim Resort that will help to implement the goais of the General
Plan (also see May 19, 1999 Staff Report, Attachment C, Petitioner's General Plan Consistency
document), and help to fulfill the purpose, goals and policies of the Specific Plan. When the Ciry
of Anaheim adopted the Specific Plan in June 1993, these goals and policies were articulated in a
comprehensive document. In the words of the Specific Plan itself, this purpose was:
• to assure that the planning area will become the high qualiry destination resort envisioned
(Section 1.1, Purpose of the Specific Plan);
• to encourage the development of quality facilities which complement conventions, family
entertainment, and recreation within appropriate areas (Section 1.4, Implementing the
General Plan);
• to enhance The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area by providing a wider range of
attractions, hotel accommodations, restaurants, shopping opportunities and public parking
(Section 1.5, Project Goals);
• to lay a foundation for future economic expansion (Section 1.5, Project Goals);
• to establish a unifying character of the Specific Plan area with extensive landscaping
within the public rights-of-way, along pedestrian promenades and within building set-backs
(Section 1.6, Summary of Districts); and
Applicant's Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 2 of 11
• to ensure ihat the Resort's various elements come together to create an exciting,
attractive environment (Section 2.1, Purpose of the Specific Plan).
The concept renderings for Pointe Anaheim (collectively, the "Illustrative Plans") were prepared for
the Applican! by Tha Jerde Partnership, one of the foremost architects in the worid for this type of
development project. These Illustrative Plans (including Floor Plans, Elevatians of Disney Way,
Katella and Harbor Boulevard, a Birdseye Perspective View and two Interior Vignettes) reveal a
project that helps to fulfili the stated goals of the Specific Plan. The Illustrative Pians show an
integrated project with 1,050 new high quality hotel rooms; 565,000 square feet of retail, dining
and entertainment uses; a 4,600-seat multiplex theater a~d more than five acres of landscaped
areas, i~~luding Private Ftealm setback areas that either meet or exceed those required by the
Specific Pl~~n, ;:,s well as pedestrian walkways, outdoor s~ating areas, several water features and
interior courh~ards.
Although this Project meets the stated oals of the Specific Plan, it is not capable of being
developed without some minor modifications ~nd clarifications in the Specific Plan's implementa-
tion details, generally as set forth in the Amendments. This need to amend the plan from time-to-
time was envisioned by the Specific Plan, in that it provides a context for future changes which is
integral to the success of the vision. Regarding this possibility, in the words of the Specific Plan:
• modificatio~s to some of the design concepts provided for in the Plan may be necessary in
order to accommodate new or changing conditions unforeseen in the Specific Plan
(Section 1.7, Impiementing the Specific Plan); and
• this kind of modification is a normai part of the development process and will be permitted
if the basic intent of the Specific Plan is preserved (Section 1.7, Implementing the Specific
Plan).
As discussed below, the Specific Plan has previou~ly been modified three (3) separate times.
This documer~t summarizes the changes proposed in Amendment #4, and describes why these
modifications: (a) are consistent with the basic intent of th~ Specific Plan; (b) serve to further the
purpose and vision for the Anaheim Resort; and (c) are vital to the proposed ProjecYs success.
Based upon these factors, Applicant assesses that the proposed Amendments are reasonable
and good; nece~sary and appropriate; and wil! be positive and reinforce the Specific Plan.
2. To Help Establish Anaheim Itself as the Destination
A variety of studies conducted for the Resort Area show that guests coming tc Anaheim currently
need to board charter buses and/or get into their cars and drive to surrounding cities in order to
pafro~ize high quality restaurants, visit world-class retail shopping experiences and attend varied
evening entertainment offerings. The second important principle is the desire to attract more high-
profile, world-renowned tenants to locate in the Resort Area. In tum, this will provide area guests
with more to do without needing to leave the City, which will help lengthen the average duration of
stay by making Anaheim itself the destination.
Ap~licant's Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 3 of 11
Currently, there is only one Retail Entertainment Center that has been entitled thus far in ihe
Resort Area. This is the 300,000 square foot Downtown Disney complex that is heing built along
West Street/ Disneyland Drive. In order to create the proper commercial environment within this
Retail Entertainment Center, Disney proposed a Specific Plan amendment in August 1996 to be
able to build the types of signs that guests expect in ihese types of complexes.
The Staff Report for Amendment Specific Plan Amendment #3, which was approved on October
22, 1996, summariied these modifications to the Specific Plan to provide for signage associated
with the Retail Entertainment complex at Downtown Disney as follows:
• Signage - The standards currently exempt signage inside the theme parks from the
provisions of the signage requirements [of the Specific Plan] .... The proposed
amendment would exempt F2etail Entertainment Center use signage in the Theme Park
and Hotel Districts from the Specific Plan signage requirements .... Also proposed is a
provision to allow the placement of private signage for Retail Entertainment Center uses
on the West Street/Disneyland Drive pedestrian over-crossing (private signage is currently
not allowed within the public right-of-way). (Item 5., August 19, 1996 Staff Report)
Hence, in 1996, all signage associated with a Retail Entertainment Center was exempted from ttie
provisions of the Specific Plan for the areas INSIDE and OUTSIDE the project proposed by The
Walt Disney Company. Relative to these amendments to the Specific Plan, the City made the
following findings:
• The proposed Project modifications and proposed actions do not substantially cha~ge the
visual resources and aesthetics impacts associated with the Project; there is no evidence
of new or substantially worse impacts. (Section 3.13.1, Visual Resources and Aesthetics)
The Pointe Anaheim Project needs a comparable exemption - particularly to address the signs
that are inside the Project - since many of the kinds, placement and sizes of signs that are
required in order to make these types of Retail Entertainment Center projects exciting and festive
are not allowed under the Specific Plan. The most desirable tenants for these rypes of projects
expect to have the freedom to create such signs in Retail Entertainment Centers. And even more
impartant, guests patronizing these types of projects expect the atrnosphere fhat they create; and
without this being provided, it is uniikely that the centers can be commercially successful.
The proposed Amendment #4 would implement such modifications.
Just as the previous City's Findings concluded, these proposed changes do not detract from the
goals and objectives of the Specific Plan. Rather, by creating an atmosphere in which multiple
entertainment opportunities can occur and be successful within a short walking distanc~ of each
other, such modifications will stimulate more pedestrian activity by providing guests with more
places to visit. In tum, this will serve as a catalyst to the entire area, thereby helping to rnake
Anaheim itself the destination.
App{icanYs Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific ~lan, Amendment #4
Page 4 of 11
3. To Provide Nl4re Detail and
Greater Implementation Specificity
The proposed Amendments define a specific project for the project area as well as specific site
development standards. The square footages and types of uses are definsd, as well as the
conczptual site plan, elevations and architectural design character. The Illustrative Plans also
show the setbacks, landscaping, building heights and layout for the Project. As a result of these
details, the public has a more precise understanding of the nature and extent of the proposed
development.
4. To Create a Situation in WF~ich New
Flotel Development Can Realistically Occur
The development of new notels in the Resort Area is one of the most important aspects to the
City's plans to fulfill the Anaheim Resort vision and ultimately repay the bond indebtedness
associated with the Anaheim Resort capital improvements projects. The economic forecasts
prepared for the City by Economic Planning Systems, Inc. included a projection of the build-out
schedule for the Resort Area. This forecast included the following:
Land Uses TotalNet Fiscal YearEnding
Annual DeveloAment New Dev. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Disney Hotel - Luxury (room) 760 0 10 750 0 0 0
Other Hotel - Luxury (room) 1,000 500 0 0 500 0 0
As shown above, by the end of 2003, a total of 1,000 new Luxury Hotel rooms were forecast to be
built in Anaheim in addition to the 750 new rooms currently being built by The Walt Disney
Company (Table 3, Anaheim Resort Area Fiscal Analysis, 10/19/96).
The Pointe Anaheim project will result in 1,050 new Luxury Hotel rooms. ~
A rule of thumb in the hotel industry states that for luxury hotels to be economically feasible,
underlying land costs should generally not exceed approximately $25,000 per room. And yet in
Anaheim, the land surrounding Disneyland is selling for about $40,000 per room or higher - the
asking prices for some land being significantly higher. This fact creates a situation where it is not
financially feasible to develop new fuil service hotels without extensive financial assistance,
significantly greater density or both. Whereas other cities often solve this by re-investing future
Transient Occupancy Tax revenues and property tax collections to offset land prices, these tools
are not availabie due to the TOT having already been pledged and the property not being in a
redevelopment area.
One of the key principles of the proposed Amendment is to solve this complex puzzle, thereby
making near term deuelopment realistic for all of the anticipated Luxury Hotels between now and
2005, and for approximately 20% of the total necessary r~on-Disney hotel rooms to fully retire the
ApplicanYs Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 5 of 11
Disney-related bonds. By providing for the combination of land uses and development intensity
on the Project Site, this objective is able to be accomplished.
EXPLANATION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
A. LAND USE.
The Project Site falls within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, District A and the Parking
District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay. The Specific Plan states that District A and the C-R
Overlay were established "to permit the uses set forth in Chapter 18.48, entitled 'ANAHEIM
RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 ZONE' of the Anaheim Municipal Code." By reference to
sub-sections of Chapter 18.48, the Specific Plan currently allows on the Project Site the same
Primary, Permitted Secondary and Permitted Temporary Uses and Structures, as well as the
same Conditional Uses, as permitted in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. (Section 18.78.095
and 18.78.100, Anaheim Municipal Code)
Create the Pointe Anaheim Overlay
Applicant proposes the City of Anaheim create an additional overlay, entitled the "Pointe Anaheim
Overlay", to the Specific Plan. Creating the Pointe Anaheim Overlay within the Specific Plan will
preciseiy defne what types of uses are allowed on the Project Site. 7he Pointe Anaheim Overlay
will permit identical land uses to those that are currently allowed on the Project Site pursuant to
the Specific Plan. The main difference between the Pointe Anaheim Overlay and the Specific
Plan is that whereas the Specific Plan establishes separate districts and defines land uses for
each by reference to various sub-sections of Chapter 18.4a of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the
Pointe Anaheim Overlay incorporates all of these land uses in one overlay, identifies these
permitted uses directly rather than by reference to another document, and provides additional
detail and specificiry regarding how these uses will be developed on the Project Site.
~oncept Plans
Creating the Pointe Anaheim Overlay will also provide greater certainty to the surrounding com-
munity regarding the nature and timing of future development. It will provide other detailed regula-
tions and project design features to ensure the compatibility of these uses with surrounding
development, both existing and proposed. '1'he conceptual site plans a~d elevations within the
Illustrative Plans identify approximately ~vhere the hotei rooms, specialty retail stores, restaurants,
entertainment facilities and parking uses will be built and show access points, setback widths,
compliance with height restrictions and the general intemal organization of the Pointe Anaheim
project. These plans are being supplemented by the Birdseye Perspective and several interior
vignettes within the Illustrative Plans, which add insight into the architecYs concaption as to how
the Project will look, and an indication of the overall quality level standards to which it will be
developed. The Specific Plan currently does not contain conceptual plans for District A or C-R
Overlay development.
AppficanYs Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 6 of 11
E3. DEVELOPMEN7 IMTENSITY (QENSITYj
Currently, the density permitted for the Project Site is established by the District A an~ :,i the C-R
Overlay designations. The Land Use Element indicates that the maximum density aliowed in
District A and the C-R Overlay is up to 75 hotel/motel rooms per gross acre. The Land Use
Element also indicates that hotei accessory uses may also be developed as well as other visitor-
serving commercial/retail and restaurant uses. Non-hotel uses permitted under the designations
must have traffic generation characteristics less than or equivalent to the traffic generation
characteristics of the permitted hotel densiry.
Many municipal jurisdictions in Califomia base the permissible levels of development intensity on
a calculation of the maximum square fiootage of legally permitted improvements per acre, in what
is commonly known as a projecYs floor-to-area ;atio, or "FAR". EIR No. 311 estimated that a hotel
room built in the area would comprise approximately 750 square feet (including public space, but
excluding parking). Hence, assuming the minimum size of the Project Site is 28.4 acres, the
maximum square footage of improvements was expected to be 1,597,500 square feet (75 x 28.4
x 750), for an FAR of 1.29 : 1.
The Applicant proposes to develop approximately half of the allowable hotel rooms and
anticipates that the 1,05C! rooms developed on the Project Site will actually comprise a maximum
of 879 square feet, for a total of 923,000 total square feet of hotel uses. In lieu of the remaining
maximum allowable density of hotel rooms, Pointe Anaheim proposes to build 565,000 square
feet of retail, dining and enter4ainment uses; and 85,000 square feet of theaters. Hence, in place
of the original densiry anticipated for the Project Site, the Applicant is proposing to develop a
maximum of 1,573,000 square feet of improvements (excluding parking), for an FAR on the same
28.4 acres, of 1.27 : 1.
Based on the FAR approach that is commonly used for planning, and which the City of Anaheim
has itself recently adopted in the Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, the proposed Pointe
Anaheim square footage is lower than what could potentially be developed on the Project Sife per
the Specific Plan. The proposed Amendment confirms that this density is allowed on the Project
Site and assures that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied so that all environmental
impacts of the Project are reduced to a level of insignificance.
C. EXEMPTION FOR IMTERIOR SIGNS
In order to reduce visual clutter and create consistency throughout the Resort Area, the Specific
Plan contains comprehensive standards and regulations governing the location, size, type,
construction, means and intensity of illumination, and all other matters relating to signs. As stated
in the Specific Plan, the purpose of these regulations is to enhance the community appearance; to
protect the public investment in, and the cha~acter of, public thoroughfares; and to aid in the
attraction of tourists and other visitors important to the economy of the City (Section 18.78.020,
Anaheim Municipal Code). With the exception of very limited use of icon/themed signage as
discussed below, the Applicant proposes to adhere to all of these regulations with respect to
signage on the exterior of the Project within both the Setback and the Private Re?Ims, but seeks
Applicant'~ Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendi~ent #~4
Page 7 of 11
to amend the Specific Plan so that these same restrictions will not apply to signage located on the
inside of the Project.
This amendment to the signage standards for the Pointe Anaheim Overlay dea.!s exclusively with
signage fo be locafed in the Private Rea/m and on the inside of the Project, and consequently will
not detract from the overall resort theme established in the Public and Setback Realms.
Specifically, it is noted that no changes are being proposed for monument signage, exterior wall
signage, setbacks or layered landscaping on the exterior of the Project.
Distinguishing Interi~r Slgnage from
Signs Addressed to the Public Rights-of-llVay
As discussed above, both the theme parks and Retail Entertainment Center in the Theme Park
and Hotel District are already expressly exempt f*om all of the Specific Plan's signage regulations.
Other than in these areas, the sign standards set forth in the Specific Plan do not specifically
address a long, intemalized, non-public pedestrian walk such as the Applicant is currently
prooosing for Pointe Anaheim. The Specific Plan standards do not presently include separate
standards for "interior' versus "exterior" signs.
The Appiicant is Froposing an Amendment to exempt "Interior Areas" in the Pointe Anaheim
Overlay from the sign regulations and standards in the Specific Plan. This Amendment is required
in order to attract high-quality retail, restaurant, entertainment and hotel tenants, which in tum is
critical to helping fulfill the goal of Anaheim itself becoming a multi-destination, world-class resort.
Achieving this goal is a key policy of the Specific Plan. The Applicant proposes to implement this
intent, and ful~ill this goal, in the following manner.
• by narrowly defining "Interior Areas" to mean areas of the Project that fall into one or more
of the foilowing categories:
(a) An Interior Area is any area of the Project that is not visible at ali to the
adjacPnt public right-of-way; or
(b) An Interior Area is any area of the Project that is at least 160' inside the Project
and that is only visible through very limited view corridors created by the
pedestrian entrances to the Project, but that is atherwise not visible at all to the
adjacent public right-of-way; or
(c) An Interior Area is any area of the Project that contains a sign that is situated
behind a building facing the street, but which sign is positioned low enough so
that no portion of its commercial message is legible from the adjacent right-of-
way.
• by permitting signs within these "Interior Areas" at Pointe Anaheim to be exempt from the
signage regulations of the Specific Plan to precisely the same degree as BOTH interior
App{icant's Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 8 of 11
and exterior signs are already exempt along Disneyland Drive/West Street by virtue of
Amendment #3, discussed above.
The effect of the Amendment proposed by the Applicant is consistent with the precedent that has
already been established for the only other location within the Resort Area where a Retail
Entertainment Center is entiiled.
In order to be ce:tain that the Project maintains the spirit of a garden district, the language of the
proposed Amendment is more restrictive than the previous Amendment. On the exterior of Pointe
Anaheim, except for the very limited usE of icon/themed signage as described below, the
Appiicant proposes to adhere to ali aspects of the sign regulations and standards set forth in the
Specific Plan.
This will provide Pointe Anaheim the ability on the inside of the Project to encourage well-known
tenants to display their brand equiry in innovative, highly exciting storefronts and signs that are
different than visitors to Anaheim will find in their hometowns. The best example in Southem
California of these ~ iypes of interior-facing signs and interesting storefronts is at Universal
CityWalk.
Since Pointe Anaheim is not an ~ndoor mall, it is conceivable that a sign that is generally oriented
toward thz interior of the Project couid be visible, or partially visibie, from the public right-of-way,
As noted above, the amendment language seeks to clarify that this is acceptable. This could
include signs on the interior of Pointe Anaheim that may be higher than certain portions of the
building masses that face onto the street, as well as interior signage which may be visible along
very limited view corridors from the pedestrian-oriented openings at either end of the Project and
on Disney Way.
The "Win-Win" result of these two conditions is that while they will retain for Pointe Anaheim
tenants the maximum flexibiliry for creative expressian inside the Project, they wiil simultaneously
avoid creating any disruption whatsoever to the visual continuity planned to be achieved through
the consistent use of landscape and other streetscape elements on the ProjecYs exterior.
D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SIGNAGE AND ARCHITECTURAL ~LEMENTS
In the Specific Plan, "guidelines" are considered to be generalized rules to be applied hy
designers with "discretion and judgement" to the particular conditian they address. As ncted
above, Pointe Anaheim presents a unique condition.
Pointe Anaheim is unique because the size of the Project becomes possible only with a very large
(and costly) lan~ assemblage. It is also unique because its mix of uses, like Downtown Disney,
need to be festive, energetic and visible in order to be successful. The "street appeal" of the
largest, most widely-recognized and appealing tenants becomes of paramount importance to the
success of the overall Project. These high-idenfiry tenants serve as the ProjecYs "anchors".
Although they often will pay the lowest ren4s and receive the highest level of concessions, the
viability of the balance of the Project is greatly dependent on their drawing power, immediate
ApplicanYs Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Pian, Amendment #4
Page 9 of 11
market recognition and commercial success. If these tenants are not visible to the public, other
sm211er and less well known tenants won't come; and moreover even if they would, the Project will
never be in a position to function up to its full potentiai.
To address these ne~ds, while simultaneously adhering as ciosely as possible on the Project's
exterior to the signage standards set fo~th in the Specific Plan, the Applicant is proposing an
Amendment that will provide the City future discretion to consider through the Conditional Use
Permit process certain design elements associated with these key tenants. This issue, and its
relation to the disi;r,%;tion between "guidelines" and "standards" is discussed below.
Icon Signage
The Pointe Anuheim Overlay proposes to add a new definition in the Specific Plan for
"icon/themed signage elements," which are proposed to be defined as:
• a building, structure or sculpture of, or having the nature of, an icon, which is a known,
nationally-recognized image or object, including, but not limited to, trademarked objects,
logos, or other images and figures associated with nationally-recognized corporate
identities.
• limited t~ five (5) in number, and limited in size to no larger than two-thirds the height of
the adjacent buiiding, or to a maximum of 75' on Harbor Boulevard.
The Specific Plan standards currently do not Fermit this type of signage in areas other than in the
Theme Park and Hotel Districts for which Specific Plan Amendment #3 previously created a
special exemption for signage in the Downtown Disney Retail Entertainment Center. In these
exempt areas along West Street/Disneyland Drive, such icon signage could be installed without
any discretionary review by the Ciry.
The proposed Amendment provides the City the discretion to allow such icon signage elements at
designated locations in the Private Realm on the exterior of the Pointe Anaheim Project. Rather
than having the same sort of blanket exemption adopted in Amendment #3, however, any
proposed icon signage within the Pointe Anaheim Overlay would be subject to Applicant subse-
quently filing for, and receiving, a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") for that element. In es~ence,
therefore, what is being proposed at this time is simply an Amendment that will provide the right
for the Planning Commission and potentially City Councii fo consider this sort of signage in the
future once all of the specifics conceming the design, the identity of the end user and other
relevant details are formally presented in a public hearing.
In order to show the type of icon signage that could be presented for the City's discretionary
review in the future, the Disney Way Elevation Illustrative Plan shows an icon sign in the Private
Realm forecourt of the "Music Hotel" at the southwest comer of Disney Way and Freedman Way.
The proposed Amendment seeks to clarify that this sort of an icon sign will be permissible in the
Pointe Anaheim Ouerlay, subject to the CUP process, if subsequently proposed based on detailed
Applicant's Explanatican
The Disneyland Resort SFecific Plan, Amendment #4
Page ~ 0 of 11
sign plans and if associated with a nationally-recognized user. This will provide such icon signs to
be considered by the City on a case-by-case basis.
It u~ould b~ unrealistic to propc,se an amendment tn the Specific i~lan for each major prominent
tenant potentially interestad in becoming an anchor within the Project. ~nstead, the propased
Ame~dment lays the foundation now that is necessary to negotiate with these kinds of highly
sought-after users that the Applicant intends to attract in order to help fulfill the goals and policies
of the Specific Plan and General Plan.
Picture Post Card-Vliorthy Qrchitectural Elements
The Specific Plan permits themed architectural buildings, fountains, sculptures and other works of
art such as the sculptural element shown in the Katella Avenue Elevation, the fountain iliustrated
at the southeast corner of Disney Way and Harbor Boulevard, and the approximately 25,000
square foot "upside down" building design shown in both the Disney Way Elevation and f3irdseye
Perspective Rendering. Such design elements are permissible under the Specific Plan and
cansistent with mariy of its guidelines.
Applicant believes that these elements of the Project provide its character and will become a
significant part of its long-term appeal. Accordingly, these kinds of elements have been integrated
into the Project design at several locations along Pointe Anaheim's approximately 3,700 lineal feet
of street frontage. When properly implemented, these elements are likely to be so unique that
they will be worthy of commEmorative photographs and picture post cards for visitors to Anaheim
to send to friends and family members back home. Accomplishing this objective will enhance the
Resort Area and reinforce the unique, exciting and appealing environment encouraged by the
Specific Plan goals.
E. ALTERNATIVE NiID-BLOCK TURN ON DISNEY WAY
The Applicant has proposed an arterial/secondary system modification that would provide for a
mid-block median break on Disney Way to ailow for southbound left-hand tums to be made
directly into 4he main Project entrance on Disney Way. The altemative for this is to require any
motorists approaching from the east on Disne,y Way to make a left-hand turn at Freedman Way
(Clementine) and then an immediate right-tum into the Project entrance next to the Fire Station.
Applicant believes that it would be much more appealing aesthetically for guests coming to the
Project to enter Trom Disney Way as opposed to a side entry next to the Fire Station, despite the
fact that providing the mid••block tum would admittedly reduce to a minor extent the amount of
landscaping and trees on the new median. Moreover, the transportation study that accompanied
the MND document indicates that the level of service at several nearby intersections will be
improved by providing this mid-block left-hand tum.
Applicant believes that it would be preferable to approve the mid-block tum than compelling west-
bound motorists wh~ inadvertently pass the feft-tum at Freedman Way (Clementine Street) either
to make a U-turr: on Harbor Boulevard or to circle the block and impact three key intersections
Applicant's Explanation
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment #4
Page 11 of 11
before ente; ing the project. Both of these iatter movements are considered far less desirabie and
could raise pedestrian safety concems.
For the foregoing reasons, Applicant respectfuily disagrees with City Staff's recommendatio~
deny this item, and requests careful consideration of the matter by the Planning Commission.
vork3pn7.doc
ATT/~CHNiENT C
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-1
List of Amendments
All page references relate to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 document. New
text inserts are depicted in bold, deleted text is depicted with ~eld-stfikeea~
Table af Contents and List of Exhibits:
The Table of Contents and List of Exhibits will be adjusted to reflect tl~e netv sections
and exhibits relating to the Pointe`Anaheim Overlay and corresponding page numbers.
Section 1.1 Purpose of the Specific Plan (page 1-1):
"The purpose of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is to provide for the development
of an international multi-day vacation destination resort on 489.7 acres in the City of
Anaheim's Anaheim Resort. The overall goal is to change the existing Disneyland
the~me park area from a day-oriented attraction to a multi-day destination resort by
integrating the Specific Plan's existing and proposed theme parks, hotels, and visitor-
serving facilities into an exciting, appealing, unified resort environR~e nt. To achieve this,
the Plan contains a land use plan, a public facilities plan, a design plan, and zoning and
development standards which describe how the Plan's goal will be realized. It creates
five new planning districts - a Theme Park District, a Hotel District, a Parking District, a
Future Expansion District and District A- and a C-R Overlay and a Pointe+Anaheim
Overlay which provide the regulations and guideUnes t~ assure that the planning area
will become the high qualiry destination reso~t envisioned. 7he Plan will permit
development of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment areas, new
parkinq facilities, and an internai transportation system. The Pointe+Anaheim Overlay
als~ ~rovla'es for the development of a Lifestyle Retall and Entertainment
Complex subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078. In addition,
the Plan permits the existing Disneyland theme park to continue to be modified with new
attractions and other improvements.
Section 1.6 Summary of Districts, first and third paragraphs (page 1-4 and 1-5):
First Paraaraph
"The Disneyiand Resort Specific Plan establishes five land use districts: the Theme Park
District, the Hotel District, the Parking District, the Future Expansion District and District
A. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes a C-R Overlay, which allows certain parcels
to become part of the overall Resort development or to be developed with the uses set
forth in Chapter 18.48 (Anaheim l~esort Specific Plan No. 92-2) of the Anaheim
Municipai Code as it currently exists or may be amended in the future. The Specific
Plan additionaily establishes the Pointe+Anahr:im Overlay which encompasses
Dlstrict A and the portion of the Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay
south of Freedman Way (renamed Disney Way) and provfdes for the development
of the Pofnte+Anahzim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Compiex subject to the
approval of Conditior:~l Use Permit No. 4078. Exhibit i.6.6b shows the District
boundaries."
Third Paraqraoh
"The foliowing is a summary of each of the Districts and the C-R and PointeaAnaheim
Overlays planned for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area."
Section 1.6.5.5 Pointe*Anaheim Overlay (page 1-7):
"The Pointe+Anaheim Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the
Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay south of Disney Way
(approximately 29.1 acres). This Overlay is a special provision of the Specific
Pian that provides for the development of the Pointe+Anaheim Lifestyle Retail ard
Entertainment Complex subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No.
4078. The Pointe+Anahelm project includes the following: 565,000 gross square
feet of retail/dining/entertainment uses; two to three hotels comprising a
maximum of 1,050 hotel rooms/suites with approximately 86,985 gross square
feet of related accessory uses (the hotel rooms/accessory uses would encompass
a maximum of 923,800 gross square feet) and an approxlmate 141,200 gross
square foot area on the top flaor of the parkir+g structure to be used to provide
parking and/or hotei amenitles seving guests and patrons of the Pointe*Anaheim
hotels only; up to three theaters with a io:al of 4,600 seats for live pertormances
or, alternatively, a 24-screen movie theater witn ~;757 seats; and, a 1,600,000
gross square foot parking structure with 4,800 stripea parking spaces and 25 bus
parking spaces with provision to park an additional 400 vehi~!ps which would
bring the total number of vehicies that can be accommodated in ths ~arage to
5,200 cars, and including a 21,600 gross square foot bus terminal/facility ~ar
airport transport and to/from sightseeing venues. The Pointe+Anaheim projeci
will be an integrated development to be constructed in one continuous single
phase.
Add two exhibits to this section:
Exhibit 1.6.6c - C-R Overlay (same exhibit as on page 3-21)
Exhibit 1.6.6d - Pointe+Anaheim Overlay. New exhibit show(ng boundaries
of the Pointe~Anaheim Overlay.
Section 2.2.3 Supply Visitor Facilities to Meet Long-Term Demand, third and fourth paragraphs
(page 2-3):
"Second, the Plan provides for the addition of up to 4,Ei00 resort hotel rooms within the
Theme Park and Hotel Districts (not includins hotels constructed in District A and under
the C-R and Pointe*Anaheim Overlays) to accommodate the increased number of
visitors.
Third, the Plan provides for visitor-serving retail, entertainment facilities, and parking
within the Theme Park and Hotel Districts, District A and the C-R and Pointe+Anaheim
Overlays."
Section 2.4.3 CEQA Requirements (page 2-7);
"The Final EIR for The Disneyland Resort project was certified on June 22, 1993. No
additional CEQA documentation was required for Specifi~ Plan Amendments No. 1 and
No. 2, since the changes proposed as part of those Amendments were within the scope
of the project analyzed in the EIR. in conjunction with Specific Pian Amendment No. 3,
Development Ar~a Summary
Developmrnt Mea Name Land Ux Mea ExLSttng @
(aad) Propoeed
nevclopmrnt
'Cheme Park Dlstrict • E~dsttng Dlmcylancf S36 2.600
000 sf
(Dcvelopmrnt Area I l • PlannM QLSnryland aad Back-oC•houx Uses .
gpp.ppp y
• AdminL~tratlon Bufldtag 9 475.000 sf
• Adminlstratlon Bulldiag Parking z.3pp
~
~
• Ncw Theme Pazk Q Hack-0f-hauee [Tees 147 3.350.00p at
(2
dc 31
• Hotcl Rooms (2) rooms
• Parking for HoteLs ~ Theme Park Uses (2) ~~
• Theme Pazk parking 5.000 spaces (41
Hotcl District • HoteY Roama (lna 1.000 atlsttng rooms) 97 5.600 rooms (2)
(Development Area 2~ • Retall/Rntauraat gpp,ppp ~~1~
• Pazking Spacw (lnc. 570 c~dnting spaces) 9.930 apeoes (2 ~ 3)
• Meeung Room/Canveanon Space 200.000 sf (11
Pazking Dl~trict • East Parkiag Area 30.1 (51 17.600 spam (3 ~ 4)
(Developmrnt Arw 31 • Wwt Pazldng Area 2~ 16.700 spacn (31
Future Expanalon Dlstrlct • Theme Park 24.7 0 sti6)
(Developineat Azea 4) • Pazklag Spaces 5.100
spaxs (3)
Disvict A Commarcial Recrcmion Uses 18°9 (~)
(Devalopment Area i)
-- --- - - - - -- rooms
Combined totai. adating aad propoxd 7.825.000 sf
5.600 rooms
489.7 51.630 s~cu
C-R Overlay l5) wlthla Theme Pazk DL~trict 19.~
withln Hatel Dtshict 0.5
withln Pazking LLstrict
East Parking Area 30.1
within Fumrc Expansion Disvict ~-~
Subtatal 5~ Z
Pointe•Anaheim Ovsriay (8) within Parking DlstricL
East Parking Ar ea/C-R Overlay ~ p, y
within DistrictA ~g.g
Subtotal 29.1
~otes. •
~ I 1 Includos esiumg and anticipated neu de~elopmenc co ;ervlca eristing & new hotals
i'1 Cp to 1.000 rooms with thair accompancmg parkme may be constructed within tha Theme Park District and up tu 3:0.000 ;quare feet uf a rccail
ancertainment ~entcr may ix ~ons~ructed in the T1umo Puk and/or Hotcl Disuict(s)
i31 Vumbar uf ipaces wiil Fx detrrtnmeJ bc tha proviswns oCSecuon 7.0,'Zoning and pevelopment StanJards'
i a~ Up eo :.000 uf the guest parkmg >paces identified tbr [he East Parking Area ma} be located in the Themc Park Dutnct
i i i The C-R Overlay may be developed wrth hutel rcoms or visitor•serving uus and/or paricing fxilitia, see Sectiun 3 3 5'C-R cherlay
Ibl Zoning and l7evalopmant Standards p:rmi[ eheme park uses in ~he Fuwrc Expansion Disviu
1'1 Up to'S hutel rooms per gruss xrc ur pertntttcd in Disvict A
(81 The Pointe "Anaheim Overla~• may br drvrfoprd wirl~ ~hr Pointe'Anaheim project subject to thr approval ojCunditionu/ L'sr
Prrmir Vo. ~078 vr wrlh usrs srt jonh in Dislrid .~1 or thr Parking Distrid (EasY Parking .areaJ/GR Ovrrluv. /:4d~f~hrrrtorrrs
Page 1-8
The Dlsneyiand Resort Specific Plan +:• Section 3.0: Land Use PZan
Hal! Rootl ~
~~~- _ - ~ I ~
I ~ ~.-•l -rr--
~ ~...... `,.:.......~
.~
~ r•--~:::: .:::.:::::::.
II':::::::: .....:::::::::::.~
~~:........ :::::::::::::::::i
~ ~: : • WQ=~ • : : : : : :: : : : : : : : : : :
• Par%inp • : ~
I ; : Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' •Exating . . . . . . .
. ,Daneylantl ,
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :Theme Pork . . . . . . .
I CBrrifosAvenue • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I ........ ...................I
... Il .......... ..............
I~ ........ ...................~
'I
~'
I . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
I I ~ , ; ~Hotel ' ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
~ I . . .DmriCt : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ f
~• ..... .G
~~:......... ...................~
I ~ . . . . . . r ~ l . ° . . . . Theme Paik . . . . . . .
I ~. . . . . .~ ~,o+a ~ 0 ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OaR ~
b •
yl I. . . . . .I~.~I ~O . .... . .. . .. . . ...
v`~ ~......... ~m.... ...
~j ~. . . . . . . . . .?p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
~~ L~___~--~ - . . .. . .. .. . ... . . . . . . .
lo Avenue
~~~ ~
L 1
~
~
~ ~
i G
N
~ ?
AvBnuB
Anah?im
Convernion
Cemei
Convenrion
------ i
~
~ m.
m '~i
o 'm~ ~
m O~~co
a°
_ ^ _. ~, ~
~. . 'Eo:+ `
;
. Po~ting .
( . nrea ~ . .
. . .
.
_
4
- ~ c¢
'
I:
'' ~ ~' •
c
~ C
I:..... a`
_~. . . ~Future ~ ~~
• • • Expansion . ~ - -. -
~ . . . • • pistrict . . . . . ,
•SovT Poiking hreo • • •
~-"--
--- r===
I
I Poc~hco
ua~~ecnnw~nu~n~,i~i'i
~
I
~
~------~ m
J _ ~
b
O
0
a
~
m
0
e
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan r
Anaheim, Colifomia '
Legentl
Pointe:~Anaheim Overlay ~_- ~ Anoneim Resort Boundory
L_'_ :1 D'aneyland Resort Specilic Pian Bounaary
~ n~uen D?signoted tor Future Extension in Existing
Generat Plan CircWOtion Eiement
~ ~~ 2o00Fee~ ~i` Noh~ ;,;,;; pointe~AnaheimOverlay
Exhibit 1.6.Bd • Pointe+Anaheim OveAay
an Addendum to the EIR was prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA.
The Addendum demonstrated that the changes to the Specific Plan which were ircluded
in Amendment No. 3 would not result in any new or substantially worse environmertal
impacts and that no supplemental or subsequent envir~nmental review was required. In
conjunction with Specific Plan R~mendment hlo. 4, a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA. The
IVlitigated Negative Declaration demonstrated that the changes to the Specific
Plan which were included in ~,mendment No. 4 would not result in any new or
substantially worse environmental impacts and that, after incorporation of the
recor3-~mended mitigation measures identified in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
004, potentially significant environmentat impacts would be eliminated or reduced
to a level considered less than significant"
Section 3.3 Land UsP Plan (page 3-6):
"The 489.7-acre Disneyland Resort includes five land use districts: the 292-acre Theme Park
Distri~t, the 97-acre Hotel District, the 57.1-acre Parking District, the 24.7-are Future Expansion
District and the 18.9-acre District A. In addition, a C-R Overlay and a Pointe*Anaheim
Overlay apply to particular parcels within the Specific Plan area. This section contains a
general description of each Oistrict and the C-R and Pointe+Anaheim Overlays, while Section
7.0, "Zoning and Development Standards," contains specific, detailed, district zoning and
development standards. The exhibits on the following pages summarize development in the
Specific Plan area. Exhibit 3.3b, the Development Plan, shows the boundaries of each District.
its accompanying table, Exhibit 3.3a, is a summary table that includes pertinent facts about the
size and intensity of development for each District. Further information about development can
be found in Exhibit 3.3.5.a (the C-R Overlay) and Exhibit 3.3.6a (the Pointe*Anaheim
Overlay), which show the location of areas where the provisions of these Overlays will apply.
With adoption of The Disneyland Resort S~ecific Plan, the Development Plan and the C-R and
Pointe*Anaheim Overlays, wiil serve as t:he zoning maps for The Disneyland Resort."
Exhibit 3.3a Land Use Plan Development Summary - See revised exhibit on next page.
Section 3.3.1 Theme Park District (second paragraph on page 3-10):
"Up to 1,000 hotel rooms may be constructed as part of the theme park. If any of these
rooms are not constructed in the theme park, then the number of rooms permitted in the
Hotel District will increase by an equal amount of rooms. The total number of rooms
permitted within The Disneyland Resort, however, wili not exceed 5,600 rooms,
excluding those rooms permitted by District A and the C-R and Pointe*anaheim
Overlays (discussed in Section 3.3.3.5, District A; Section 3.3.5, C-R ~verlay; and,
Section 3.3.6, Pointe*Anaheim Overlay). Guest and visitor vehic~tlar 3ccess to hotel
rooms within the Theme Park District will be from West Street/Disneyland prive. Up to
350,000 square feet of the theme park square footage may be developed as retail
entertainment center uses in the Theme Park and/or Hotel District(s), with associated
parking evithin the Hotel Dist; ict. The retail entertainment center use may straddle West
Street/Disneyland Drive."
Section 3.3.2 Hote{ District (second paragraph on page 3-13):
"The Hotel District will contain approximately 4,600 hotei rooms including approximately
1,000 existing rooms in the Disneyland Hotel that will be retained and renovated, and 3,600
new hotel rooms. Up to 1,000 more hotel rooms may be added to the Hotel District if they
are not constructed in the Therne Park District, bringing the total of hotel rooms permitted
Development Area Summary
Developmmt Area Name Land Ux Area
(aaa)
Theme ParL' D1atriM • E~dsting Dt~neylaad 13B
(Dcvelopmeat Area U ~ Planned Dlsncylartd and Back-oFhoux Uxs
• AdminL~cratlon Hulldtug g
• Adminlatratlon Hulldiag parking
• Ncw 7'heme Pazk dc Back.of-haux Usa 147
• Hotel Rooms
• Parking for Hotels &?heme Pazk Uses
• Theme Park Parking
Hotol Dtstrlct
(Development Area 2)
Pazking DLsuict
(De~~elopment Area 3)
Future Expansion D1;
(Development Area 4)
• Hotd Ruoms (lac. L.000 c~clstlng rooms) 97
• Retail/Restaurant
• Paz}:tng Spaces (lnc. 570 e~ting epaces)
• Meettng Room/Conveatlon Space
• East Pazking Area 30.1 (51
• Wut Pazking Area 27
~trict • Thecnc Park 24.7
• Pazking Spaces
E~dsting ~
Propoeed
Developmrnt
2.600.000 sf
900.000 sf
475.OOU sf
2.300 spaoes
3.350.000 et(2 dc 31
(2) rooma
(21 spact+
5.000 spaces(4)
5.600 room~ (2)
300.000 sf (1)
9,930 spaces (2 ~ 31
200.000 sf (1)
17,600 spaoes (3 dc 4)
16,?00 spaoes(3)
0 sf (6)
5.100 spaca (31
District A Commcrcial Recrcation Uscs 18°9 (~)
(Development Area 5) rooms
Combined total, existing and proposed 7,gZ5,00q qf
5,600 rooms
489.7 51.630 spaas
C-R Overlay (5) vdthin Theme Park Dlstrict 19.5
wtthln Hotel Dlstrict 0.5
wtthln Pazking Dlstrict
East Parkfng Area 3p.1
within Fumrc Expansion Distnct ~-~
Subtotal 5~ Z
Polnte'Anahelm Over/ay (8) wlth/n Park(ng DlsGiet
East Parking Area/C-R OveAay ~ p,p
wlthin Dlstrief A 18.9
Su6total yg, ~
~otes:
1 I) Includes e.eisting and anticipated naw Jevelopment to service eristing & new hotels
1=) Up to I,000 rooms with their accompanying parking may be conswcted within the Theme P.rk Disuict anJ up ta 350,000 square feet of a retnil
en~ettainment center may be construceed in tht Theme Park ytd/or Hotel Disvict(s)
13) Uumber of spaces will be determined by the provisions oFScchon 7.0,'Zonin6 and Development Standards'
(~) Up to 5.000 of the guest parking spaces iJentiticd for the East Parking Area may be located In the Theme Park District
1~l The C-R Overlay may be develuped with hutel rooms or visitor-serving usa and/or parking facilitia, see Section 3.3.5'C-R Ovcrlay'
(6) Zoning and Development StanJards pcrtnit themr park uses in ~he Futurc Expansion Distri~t
17) Up tu 75 hotel rooms per rross acrc are pertofned in District A
(8) The Pointe*Anahrim Ovrr/ay mrry br devrloped wirh rhe Poinle^.dnaheim projec! subject !o !hr opproval vjCondirlonal LYe
Permil No. 4078 or with usrs srt jorth ln Districr A or thr Parking DJstrici (Eart Parking Area)/C-R Ovrr/ay. jridd~r/rirrrorrro
Exhibit 3.3a Land Use Plan Developrnent Summary Tabulation Page 3-7
within The Disneyland Resort tr~ 5,600 raoms (excluding hotel rooms which currently exist
or may be built within District A and the C-R and Pointe*Aoahelrn Overlays). l!p to
350,000 feet of Theme Park District square footage may be constructed in the Theme Park
and/or Hote! District(s) as retail entertainment center uses."
Section 3.3.3 Parking District {second paragraph, page 3-18):
"The parking facility north of Katella Avenue will be a maximum of seven levels and the
maximum height will be 75 feet. Since the parking facility will occupy only a portion of
ti~e 30.1 acres in the East Parking Area, the remaining acres will become hotel or other
visitor-serving uses as provided for in the C-R and Pointe*Anaheim Overiays (See
Sections 3.3.5 and 3.3.6). Final layout for the parking facility in the East Parking Area
will be subject to Pianning Commission Review as a Report and Recommendation item."
Section 3.3.6 Pointe*Anaheim Ov~rlay (new section to start on page 3-23):
"The 29.1-acre Pointe~Anaheim Overlay encompasses Distrlct A(approxlmately
18.9 acres) and the portion of the Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay
south of Disney Way (approxtmately 10.2 acr~s) as shown in Exhibit 3.3.6a. This
Overlay Is a speclal provision of the Specific Plan that provtde~ for the
development of the Pointe*Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex
subject to the approval of Condit3onal Use Permlt Mo. 4078.
The Pointe*Anaheim proJect is a fiully-integrated, mBxed-use development which
will have an integrated management, a festive theme orientation and
plaza/pedestrian-oriented amenities, and consist of the following: up to 565,000
gross square feet of retail/dining/ enterltainment uses; two to three hotels
comprising a maximum of 1,050 hofe! rooms/suites with approximately 86,985
gross square feet af related accessory uses {the hotel roorns/aacessory uses
would encompass a maxlmum of 923,800 gross square feet) and an approximate
141,200 gross square foot area on the top fioor of the parking structure to be used
to provide parking and/or hotel amenities serving guests and patrons of the
Pointe*Anaheim hoteis only; up to three theaters with a total of 4,600 seats for
live performances or, alternatively, a 24-screen movie 4heater with 4,757 seats;
and, a 1,600,000 gross square foot parking structure with 4,800 striped parking
spaces and 25 bus parking spaces with provision to park an additional 400
vehicles which would bring the total number of vehicles that can be
accommodated in the garage to 5,200 ~ars, and including a 21,600 gross square
foot bus terminal/facility for airport transport an~i to/fram sightseeing venues.
The Pointe*Anaheim project density is set forth in rnore detail in Exhibit 3.3.6a.
Program Summary for Potnte*Anaheim Overiay
i Maxtmum Area : Maximum Numbi
Land Use (S9uare footage); Rooms/SaatslPer
fTel w-~n tu~....._ . .. ... . ~ e_ _ _ :.
notel (2 to 3)
Hotel Rooms 1,050 rooms
RestauranULounges 836,815
Banquet Meettng Rooms ~8~~$5
Retail 68,000
seats
seats
seats
seats
seats
ng
Bus
~~~ a~~~n,ooue spacos
and 25 bus snacA~c
of
a Approximato square iootage. The analysfs presented in the document is based on num6or of hotet
rooms and 86,985 square teet of accassory uses.
b The actuai square footage ot the itve theater may vary, based on lobby, stage, and backstage area. The
analysis presented in this decument is based on lhe number of ~eats; therefore, a ehanpe in the square footago
would not change tl~e results of the analysls presented with the exceptlon of electrlcal use. W((h a larger
thuater, a test for addltional electriwi usdpo would be requirod to dotermine ii a signiftcant Impact to electrical
capac(ty would occur. If sa, additional mittgatfon would be required. As an altemative, the theater usos could
consist af a 24-screen movie theater (Including approxfmately 4,757 seats).
~ A provtsion to park an addttlonal 400 parktnp spaces which would bring the total number of veh(cies
that can be accommodated in tho garage to 5,200 cars.
d Park(ng a~ndlor Hotel amenltle~ Includ(n tennis courts, a swlmmtn
playground or simtlar uses servin onl 0 0 Paol, roof garden, chlldren's
9 8uests and patrons of the Pointe•noati.,~.,, ~._._~_
Exhibit 3.3.6a - Pointe*Anaheim Overlay DevelopmF~t Program
5
The retail/dining/entertainment square footage would (nclude the foilowing:
banking facilities; children's, men's and women's apparel, shoes, jewelry and
accessor[es; entertalnment factlities (amusement arcades, skating rinks, outdoor
recreationai playground areas, etc.); shopping services; speciaity merchandise,
gifts and toys; transportation/travel services including an automobile rental
agency office (with no on-site storage of cars); radio and tefevision studio to
enable live and/or taped broadcast facilities at the site; ioaby-sitting services; fast-
foot/food court-type and walk-up/specialty restaurants; enclosed an@ semi-
enciosed full-service and thEme-type restaurantslciubs with on-site sale and
consumption of beer, wine and alcoholic beverages and associated entertainment
uses (billiards, dancing, live and recorded performances, efc.) and art
qatleries/museum uses.
The Pointe*Anaheim Overlay would also permit, as part of Conditional Use Permit
No. 4078, an indoor amphitheater (the square footage of this use would be
deducted from the maximum theater square footage); outdoor events uses held
within the confines of Pointe+Anaheim, out of view of the public right-of-way and
not directed taward the public right-of-way inciudi~g open-air festival events
oriented toward tourists and guests (i.e., for pubiic gatherings, speeches,
concerts, presentations or shows); outdoor booths, kiosks, and stands; and
outdoor special lighting.
As pre~i~usiy noYed, the majority of the project would be concentrated on three
levels oi ~evslopment. The ground level is at street level at the auter perimeter
and descends to approximately three feet below grade at the center of the project.
The Ground Level would consist primarily og hotel ground floors and parking, and
accessory and service uses supporting xhe restaurants and retail stores, including
truck loading ar2as. Levei 1 also starts at street grade at the outer perimeter of
the project, beginning at the same point as ~ths Ground Level. Level 1 is built on
an ascending incline over the Ground Level. At the center of the project, the floor
of the Ground Level is at three feet below street gracle, Level 1 is 12 feet above
street grade. Levels 1 and 2 would include the various retail uses listed above,
theaters, and hotei rooms. Remaining hotel rooms wouid be on higher floors.
More detailed descriptions of the various land uses are provided below.
Hotel Uses
The plan depicts up to three hotels on-site. Hotiel uses ~re proposed generally
along the perimeter of the project site fronting on Disney Way and Katelia
Avenue. The hotels would feature convention, specialty and family suites-
ariented facilities including, but not limited to, banquet and meeting spaces,
exercise facilities, restaurants, and retaB facilities.
The first hotel is located in the north-central portion of the site on the south side
of Disney Way. The second hotef is pianned at the southwest corner of Disney
Way and Freedman Way. The third h~tel is planned on the north side of Kateila
Avenue, at the western edge of the project. The total number af hotel rooms w(II
not exceed 1,050. The hotels would be high-rise construction. As currently
designed, the hotels would range in hetght from 66 to 133 feet. The ultimate
height of the structures wiil be de4ermined by the hotel companies who develop
within the project site; however, the hotels will comply with the height
requiremersts of The Disneyland Resort Speclfic Plan, and if shade/shadow
impacts exceed those addrassed in this document, additional environmental
review wiil be conducted.
The final design and ultimate number of hotels will be based on the hotel
develo~aer(s) a~d w,ill be shown on Final Site Plans to be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits.
~~p to 141,200 gross square feet of a-ea on the top of the par~ir,g structure, may
be utilized for parking and/or hotel amenities serving guests and patrons of the
Pointe*Anaheim hotels only. The amenities could include swimming pools,
courtyards, tennis courts, or other similar recreational uses.
Retail/DininalEntertainment (RDE)
Retail, dining, and entertainment (RDE) uses are located primarily on l.evels I and
2 of the project. Restaurants include fast-food and faod court-type service, semi-
enclosed, walk-up/specialty, enclosed full service establishrnents, and theme-type
restaurants.
As currently designed, the project evould include :ip ta three live theaters with a
total of 4,600 seats (situated in approximately 85,J00 square feet of space).
Flowever, dependent on market demand, the theater complex may aiternatively be
developed as a 24-screen movie theater (4,757 seats). The Final Site Plan will
iden4ify the theater use to be developed and number af seats and will be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to approval of grading or
subdivision plans or issuance of buiiding perrnits. The theaters would be located
immediately west of Freedman Way, south of the sxisting fire statlon. The helght
of the theater strucfur2 vvc~uld vary, but wnuld not exceed 751`eet in haiyht.
Bus TerminallFacilitv in the Parkinq Structure
A bus terminal/facility is planned in conjunction with the project to provide bus
transport to and from regional airports ~For visj'ors to the Anaheim Resort area. In
addition, the facili4y may be used as a terminal for sightseeing bus trips to
accommodate hotQl visitors. A losding area of approximately 120 feet by 180 feet
will be utilized on the ground level of the parking structure. Bus ingress and
egress is planned to be via Freedman Way and Harbor Boulevard. The facility is
not planned to serve as a"park and ride" facility for locaf residents. A high fee
will be charged for overnight parking (oYher than for hotel guests) as a deterrent
to use the facility as a park and ride facility or for other overnight parking needs.
Landscapinq
The perimeter of the project site wiil be landscaped fn accordance with the
requirements of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. The following fully-
landscaped setback areas will be ~ro~rided: a minimum 26-foot wide setback
adjacent to iiarbor B~ulevarci; a mdr~Imum 11-foot wide setback area adjacent to
Katella Aven~e; a minimum 20-foot wlde setback area adjacent to Disney Way and
Freedman Way except adjacent to the hotel lot at the southwest corner of Disney
Way and Freedman Way where the buiiding height exceeds 75 feet, where the
minimum. setback will then be 30 feet wtde; and, a minimum 10-foot wide setback
adjacent to lnterior property lines.
Si~ns
A coordinated stgnage program wili be developed for Pointe+Anahelm in
compliance ~nrith the requirements of The Dlsneyland Resort Specific Plan, as
amended. All permitted signage will be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Department as being in conformance with t6e Specific Plan, as amended, prior to
the issuance of sign permits. Signs which require the approval of a Conditional
Use Permit wili be processed concurrently with the Final Site P[an.
Concet~tual Site Plan Exhibits
The Conceptual Site Plan exhibits are provided in Section 5.0, Design Plan in
Exhibits 5.8.3f.1 to 5.8.3.f.4.
Section 3.4 Phasing Plan (page 3-23):
"The anticipated opening date for the new theme park is in 20~1. Development of The
Disneyland Resort is planned to take place in several phases: the first completed in 1996;
the second concluding in 2001; the third (buildout) completing in 2010. Phasing for Dislrict
A and the C-R Overlay is not known at this time.
The Pointe*Anaheim Overlay project will be an integrated development whi:h will be
constructed in one single continuous phase, subject to the approval of Conditional
Use Permit No. 4078. The 1,OS0 hotel roams will be developed as an integrated part
of the project, with at least 51 percent nf the hotei rooms to be opened concurrent
with the grand opening date for the ret;t(f(dining/entertainment component of the
project; and the baiance of the hote" .., ms are to be completed as soon as practical,
but tn no event later th;~n 13 mor:";;; ~~altc~wing 4h~ grand opsnina ~1?'ce for the rest of
the project.
Exnibit 3.4a shows the locatic:~ of phasing c~mponents. The prir,-..sry objective of the
Phasing plan is to minimize the ~Yect of consi~ uction on the local street thoroughfares and
adjacent residential neighborhao~s, and to ervsure the provision of adequate infrastructure
as weil as !o ensure smooth operation of the existing Disneyland theme park and
Disneyland Hotel, Anaheim Convention Center, and other area businesses during
construction. Specific improvements associated with each phase are indicated in the
foliowing descriptions of each phase and in Section 4.0, "Public Facilities Plan," which
contains information on the phasing of public facilities."
Exhibit 3.4a - Phasing Plan {page 3-23):
Change exhibit to indicate the following:
Change "Phasing Undetermi~ed" in Legend to state "District A and C-R Overlay
Phas~ng Undetermined"
Add to Le~end -"Pointe*Anaheim Overlay: ~001" and indicate, with a triangle
design, the Pointe+~Anaheim Overlay on the map.
The ~Isneyl~nd Resort Speeific Plon .;. Sectiore 3.p: Lancd Use PIan
earrnoad ` ~ 1
~..~ ~:.-- ._. -
'
'
~
' . ... ...
I
I
t.: ~ L'. `, __~__
.~~ .......~ +. _.._. .
.~
.~ .
.
l_-, _1. '. \
~
~
~
' ~
r`~"~r' r'' ~ .. '. . ~' ..
~"'
I
t'+~`i~iC?~:':Y:Y':t};'"• \ ~ ' •
'
i ~..: \ '
I' .
i r,,:'.., wen~PC~iinq ;": ~ `
A~eO
)
' S::::~~'{i{i:~ii"~i:?
:'
'~
:
;
\
:•. ...
:
t:':°:;:;:;::;':;
;
DISNfYUND
n
f
A
I .~';~ C
i, \
t
B
03
vBnua
t'r'i'i'i•'•'•
~
I
. ...
~~
"
~
~
~
.
~~.~.~•~
•
i , . •'•~" G .r
'•'
''
"'
'
'
'
" i
\ P
1::;•~;;:'::~;~~~;~~;~:;.;`:r';;.
, o
.,\ ~
~
' :~';:°;;:;:~,'•i~`:~:;:~:i;;::: ~ ~ m
.
. . . •
a
~.
~
.
:..:...
c
s .r
c.~ :+.:
i r;;~~;'~;<::~~;:~;;~::~::~:~~: o
s>{i:.i::. > p ~
$ 7
~'{i:''r::i:::t+%~"•::}}:; ~i:,:::::' D
:
c
. . . . ~.;.~:;... ~ p '.\
I f:.;~:.:::'i::;:';:.;,:;.;.:;?: J:;:;: "~ O
... .. o;;:::;::~::::~:::.:..~:::::~:~~. m
:
~
~
~
:: .... .... ...... . . . . ::..:~::. ~~~
~.;;.:;:;;.:::::;:;:;:~ :::
' NOIBI }:..: m::,:,.;.::.;~i•::":;+::i'{i~::'.:~~::'.".+'.~::'''::i:' :~ ~ D
:;:;::,:,:
.
~'
I
:
:
~ a
m
;
m:•.:{:i:.,:{:: :•.::
:
r::}.~°:"1
~
i::ti"ti::;
' D6t~iCt'::i:~:. ' ' : : : . . . .. . .:::~ ~ o
~,::,::;;:,,:::;~::~:~~::i::~;i.:i:~':.:;:.;::.;t.:.::. x East . . .
I•i;;i;r;i.;':::i.::~: ":'yrl
+
- +
( . Porkin
: : •+
•
'
~ c
m
i
.,
.
.
:
0
. . . . .. ... . G ........:..::•::: :ii,:.ri'ri
: secona :`::;I
•.; I • A
. 0
.
. . .
~eo
. f::{iy°i:'•:~ ~:yir ~Y:;`(~r 3?i :i: {:;:;ii.j T~eme Pa~k 'fii;::;i1;j:+:;:
:;
.+._-..F~eodmonWav . . . . ~ ~
•
a
~_
......
i I,
• .......... ..:{~S'ssL•isi~.i SL••su.•W1W~
\
I r.oio
~I I: I~~ ; Dti1nC1A••• • ' ~
Ci • • ~. ~ N \
N~ Ii `_• • .. ..
:I ~
,
.
--~
.
'
, ••,,•~
~ 1
SC=
e_~Reioca~ea
l~nes
~
~ : :: :: :
m
? ~ ~`c•a~•LC•u•c•
u
= L L••L••SL•ti•i!•~L•L ~.~ ... J .. .. .. I CJ
Ka:euaavenue ~ ; ':':•::.-.;::{
.._...
~~~~"i
'~
~
ufuie
.:
~_..~
':;~' .~~
::.:.::ExDCl190fi:;::~:
~.
~
^:7
:
.
.
,
4n~ne~m
~- Convenuon ' Dufnct :~""""'
•
r'"
`~
..,_r:::•..
......~~._.~_....
` ~`i
CertP~
,
I
I ~ COr.v2~:~Jn LtaY I~OC:hCO I
c A
..-
venue
I
I
m
L..._..___. - ~- •
~
I ~.._..._.._..._
~
N
oro~pewooaavenue I ~ ~'
_.. _.. _ o
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Ana~eim, CalHornio
legand
Phasing Plan r•_-~ ,y~a~ei~ pesorf 5ounoory
~__~ Drsneviona aesort Scecn~c aion Bounaorv
e...,,..~~~ Des~gnoiea ~or %urur= Extenmon m Eaisung
„ ~ Z Generci Ptor ~ucuiar~cn Eiement
[CKl_ ~-e• u North --r"'--. "~~~' OrnGomfl ineme P~rt Operahons
/~. ' Pnose r 1956
•. ~.._.:~.:r PhC52 It: ~001
~ A1e05 t/~ CC D@vBlOtl@O ~n P~p50 II 011tl ?~OS@ III
•~~ ~~USIf10 ~i~0@iB(T.If1Ed
Exhibit3.ao-Phcs~ngPrcn ::::, P~b~Malb4nproryy,pneeyqy~~~~yw.
~es Sectlon ~.4~ entlued ~P1u~yp Plen•
Section 4.3.2 Arterial/Secondary System (page 4-22):
Change Clementine Street description on page 4-22 as follows:
Freedman Way (previously Clementine Street) will serve 1wo lanes of travel in each
direction and will be widened to accommodate a new
landscaped median and ~afieas.~eft and rlght turn lanes. The right-of-way is 105
feet just south of the Disney Way/Freedman Way intersection. It increases to
approximately 118 feet just south of the intersection to provide for a right turn
lane into the pointe+Anaheim Overlay project. South of the City Fire Statlon, a
north-bound left~:~rn pocket and median break is provlded for left turns into the
Pointe•Anaheim project. North of the Katella Avenue/Freedman Way intersection,
the right-of way decreases to 102.5 feet. ~~ Freedman Way improvements
will be completed in Phase Iil. However, improvements associated with the
development of the Pointe+Anaheim Overlay project (as required by the
Pointe+Anaheim Mltigation Monitoring Plan) will be completed in conjunction with
project development.
Exhibii 4.3.2p -~ler~e~{r~e~ee~Freedman Way Cross-Section
Change exhibit to inddcate the revised right-of-way.
SECTION 5.0 DESIGN PLAN
Section 5.7.2 General Site Plannina
Section 5.7.2.1 Applicability (page 5-83):
"The guidelines in Section 5.7.2 apply to the Hotel District, District A and the C-R and
Pointe*Anaheim Overlays..."
Section 5.7.4 Service and Loading Areas
Suilsection 5.7.4.1 Aaalicabilitv (paae 5 911•
"The guidelines and standards in Section 5.7.4 apply to the Hotel District, Parking District,
District A and the C-R and Pointe+Anaheim Overlays. They do not apply to the Theme
Park District (except for the C-R Overlay) and the Future Expansion District because
Section 5.7.3 contains guidelines and standards intended to appiy to the comparable areas
located within those Districts."
Subsection 5.7.4.2 Guidelines and Standards:
Last bullet. oaae 5-91
Screen refuse collection areas from public view with a solid wall (minimum six feet,
maximum twelve feet high except for District A and the C-R and Pofnte+Anaheim
Overlays where the maximum height Is eight feet) using materials and colors compatible
vvith those of the adjacent buildings (Code Section 18.78.05Q)."
J Vavel 2 travel
sidewalk ~anes
and planting lanes
sidewalk
area median/
left-tum i and planling
lane
1 area
12 ft VAR • VAR VAR 13 ft
93.5'
Righl-ot'-way: 118,5 feet
Exhihit 4.3.2p (1) - Freedman Way Cross-Section n/o Fire SlaGon
• 3 travel 2 lravel
sidewalk lanes lanes sidewalk
and planting
area and planting
landscaped area
median
1 •
12ft 35.Sft 20ft 24.5ft 13ft
Right-0f-way: 105 feet
Exhibit 4.3.2p (2) - Freedman Way Cross-Section s/o Fire Station
and n/o Signalized Inlerseclion
2 travel 2 iravel
sidewalk Ianes lanes sidewalk
and planling rtiedian/ and planting
area Ieft-tum area
lane
1
12ft ~
24ft 20ft 24ft 12ft
Right-of-way: 92 feet
Exhibit 4.3.2p (3) - Freedman Way Cross•Section
s/o Signalized Intersection
Second bullet, second Et~~n ~aqe 5-92
"Screen all storage areas with solid walls (minimum six feeE, maximum twelve feet high
except for District A and the C-R and Pointe+Anaheim Overla,s where the maximum
height is eight feet."
Section 5.7.5 Exterior Lighting
Subsection 5.7.5.1 Aoolicabilitv (pape 5 92)•
"The guidelines in Section 5.7.5 apply to the Hotel District, Parking District, District A and the
C-R and Pointe+Anaheim Overlays."
Section 5.7.6 Surface Pa~ king Areas
Subsection 5.7.6.1 Apolicabilitv (pape 5-93)~
"The guidelines and standards in Section 5.7.6 will apply to District A and the C-Ft and
Pointe*Anaheim Overlays, and to surtace parking areas associated with hotels located
within the Hotei District and the Theme Park District. They will not apply to parking facilities
intended for theme paric and entertainment center parking in the Theme Park, Hotei, and
Future Expansion Districts because of the specialized nature of the surtace parkina that may
be provided in those areas. They will apply to the Future Expansion District only if it is
developed with C-R Overlay uses. (Also see Section 5.7.8, which contains parking layout
guidelines for the public parking facilities and other specialized facilities intended for the
theme park employees and visitors).
Seciion 5.7.7 Parking Structure Appearance
Subsection 5.7.7.1 .4pplicabilitv fpaqe 5-96~;
"The guidelines in Section 5.7.7 apply to all Districts and the C-R and Painte*Anaheim
Qverlays."
Section 5.7.5 Building Appearance
Subsecti~n 5.7.9.1 Apolicabilitv (paae 5 105)~
"The guidelines and standards in Section 5.~.9 apply only to buildings that are not parking
facilities in the Hotel District, District A and the C-R Overlay. The guidelines and standards
do not apply to parking facilities as the~e are guidelines in Sections 5.7.7 and 5.7.8. They
do not apply to the Theme Park Disfrict or the Future Expansion District, if developed as a
theme parlc, because the buildings in these Districts are uniquely designed to house theme
attractions, back-of-house industrial functions, and other uses that do not readily adopt to
the kinds of design g~~idelines and standards that are needed to create a destination resort
atmosphere."
The guidelines and standards in Section 5.7.9 also apply to the Pointe~A~aheiRn
Overiay ~vith the eaception that thQ guideline "avoid crea4ing building masses which
are perceived as objects" would not apply to any icon(themed signage element as
defined in Section 'l8.78.030 of the Anaheim Municipa{ Code.
10
Section 5.7.10 Signs
Subsection 5.7.10.2 Aoolicabilitv (page 5 109)•
"The guidelines and standards in Section 5.7.10 apply to all Districts. !-iowever, in the
Theme Park, Hotei and Future Expansion Districts and interior portions of the
Pointe*Anaheim Overlay as described in Sec4ion 18.78.105.110, if developed as a
theme park or retai! entertainment center uses, the guidelines and standards shall only
apply to signs adjacent to perimeter streets and within the Setback Realm, excluding West
Street/Disneyland Drive."
For th~ Pointe*Anaheim Overiay, the guidelines shall only apply to "non-interior"
signs with the exception of icoNthemed signaga elements as defined in Section
18.78.030 which shall not be subject to these guidelines. In addition, these guidelines
and standards shali not apply to interior signage which is defined as:
Signs, objects, or structures locatec! in the Poinfe*Anaheim Overlay are
considered to be "iRterior" for the purposes of Sections 18.78.020.0209 and
18.78.105.100 if they are:
(a) Not visible to pedestrian or vehicular traffic from the adjacent public
right-of`-way at an equal elevation as the Pointe*Anaheim property line (as
measured from 5 feet above any po~nt on the public right-of-way); or,
(b) At least 16U fieet from Yhe adjacent public right-of-way or correspand
with the setback of the last building bordering the view corridor whichever
is fiurther, as shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5, entitled Pointe*Anaheim Interior
Signage and Icon/Themed Signage Element, and only visible to pedestrian
and/or vehicular traffic through fimited vie~nr corridors at the entrances to
Yhe Pointe*Anaheim L9festyle Retail and Entertainment Complex as shown
an Exhibit 5.8.3f.5. The final dimensions of the vie;~ corridnr will be shown
on the Final Site Plan.
Section 5.7.11 Landscape
Subsection 5.7.11.1 Aoalicabilitv (paqe 5-117):
"The guidalines and. standards in Section 5.7.11 apply only to the Hotel District, District A
a~d thr-: C-R and Pointe*Anaheim Overlays..."
S~~b~ection 5.7.11.6 Landscaqe Wall and FPnce Guidelines and Standards ~paqe 5 1201
7th buliet :
"Ensure that walis intended to screen stora~e or refuse areas, outdoor mechanical
equipment, or to provide separation between different uses at a property line be of masonr;~
construction and not be less than six, nor more than twelve feet in height, provided that in
the C-R and Pointe*Anahelm Overlays and in District A, the maximum wall height is eight
feet (Code Section 18.78.050).
41
Section 5.8.2 Half-Street Reference Plan and Cross Sections
Amer,d Exhibit 5.8.2a - Half-Stre_et Cross Section Kev as follows (page 5-1361•
Add the following haif-street cross section ID numbers: 3c, 3d, and 27a
Add the followina exhibits to follow Exhibit 5 8 2a in the aooropriate order:
Exhibit 5.8.2e(1) - Ka4elia Avenue: Setback Adjacent to Pointe*Anaheim Overlay
(interim condition)
Exhibit 5.8.2e(2) - Katella Avenue: Setback Adjacent to Pointe*Anaheim Overlay
(uitimate condition)
Exhibit 5.8.2ak(1) - Freedman Way: Setback Adjacen4 to Pointe"Anaheim Overlay
Section 5.8.3 District Concept Plans
Add the followinq exhibits to follow paqe 5 1$2•
~xhibit 5.8.3f.1 - Pointe+Anaheim Ground Level Concept Plan
Exhibit 5.8.3f.2 - Pointe*Anaheim Level 1 Goncept Plan
Exhibit 5.8.3f.3 - Pointe+Anaheim Level 2 Concept Plan
Ezhibit 5.8.3f.4 - Pointe*An~heim Roof Concept P!an
Exhibit 5.8.3f.5 - Rainte*Anaheim Interior 5ignage and Iconfl'hemed-Signage Efement
.`'lan
Hmend Exhibit 5.8.3f - Wall/Fencinq Plan as follows (paqe 5 183):
Change the exhibit number to "Exhibii 5.8.3.g - Wall/Fencing Plan"
Add a note to the exhibit as follows: "For the Pointe+Anaheim Qverlay, with the
exception of a required 8-foot high wall adjacent to the interior property line abutking
the ,4naheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (this is ~Iso the boundary between the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and the Parking District), no additional walls are
required."
SECTION 7.0: ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STAIVDHRDS
List of Sections (page 7-1):
Add "18.78.105 POINTE*ANAHEIM OVERLAY."
Amend Subsection .020 of Section 18.78.020 (Generai Provisions) as follows (page 7-2):
".020 Disneyland Resort Design Plan. The site development standards set forth in Sections
18.78.050 through 18.78.110 of this Chapter have been adopted to operate in conjunation
with the Design Plan for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan identified in Section 5.0 of the
Specific ?lan document (hereinafter referred to in this Chapter as the "Design Plan")
approved by the City Council on June 29, 1993, as amended on April 12, 1994 (Amendment
No. 1); June 20, 1995 (Amendment No. 2); October 22, 1996 (Amendment No. 3);
and, , 1999 (Amendment No. 4), as the same rnay be hereinafter amended in
accordance with the Specific Plan amendment procedures set forth in Chapter 18.93 entiiled
SP~CIFIC PLANS" of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said Disneyland Resort Design Plan
is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in this Chapter. All development
12
otherwise permitted by this Chapter shall comply with any applicable provisions of the
Design Plan:'
Amend Subsection .020.021 (a) and (d) of Section 18.78.040 (Methods and Procedures for
Specific Pian Implementation) as follows (page 7-7 and page 7-8):
.02U Final Site Plan Approval. Final Site Plans (as described in this Section and
'hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Finai Site Plans") shall be processed in the
foliowing ways:
.0201 Process for Approval
(a) Planning Commission Report and Recommendation Item. Final Site
Plans for the following types of plans shall be subject to the review
and approval by the Planning Commission at a public meeting as a
Report and Recommendation:
(1) All development in the Hotel District with the exception of
development subject to the standards and requirements set forth
in Section 18.78.100 entitled "C-R Overlay" of this Chapter.
(2) Streetscape and landscape within the Theme Park District,
Parking District and Future Expansion District Setback Realms, as
described in the Design Plan.
(3) Minor boundary and acreage variations not exceeding ten percent
(10%) of the larger parcel.
(4) Final layout e~tqe-for parking facility in the East Parkin~;; Area.
(5) Final detailed layout of the Pointe*Anaheim Overlay Lifestyle
Retaii and Entertainment Complex designed in accordance
with Conditional Use Permit fdo. 4078 approved in
comp9iance with the Pointe*Anaheim Overlay requirements.
Further provided that the Final Site Plan shall be in
accordance wi~h the requirements set fo~th In Sectian
18.78.105 entitled, "POINTE*ANAHEIM OVERLAY" of this
Chapter; encompass the entirety of the 29.7-acre
Pointe*Artaheim ~Dverlay; and, provlde for the development
af one comprehensive project to be constructed in one sirrgle
co~tlnuous phase.
If the Final Site Plan is found to be in substantial conformance with
the Specific Plan and the provisions of this Chapter, the Planning
Commission shall approve the Final Site Plan. The Planning
Commission's decision shall be final unlsss appealed to the City
Council within ten (10) days from the date of such decision. Pfans
submitted for issua~ice of building permits shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved Final Site Plan.
(d) Exemptions. Development within the Theme Park District intended
for theme park and theme park back-of-house support uses, hotels
within the theme park, retaii entertainment centers in the l'heme Park
and/or Hotel District(s), parking facilities i~i the Parking District and
parking facilities within the Future Expansion District as shown ~n
Exhibit 5.8.3e entitled "Future Ex~ansion District Concept Plan" o'f the
Specific Plan document, and permitted signage in the
13
The plsneylond Resort Speclfic Plcn o;• Section 5.0: Design PIan
~ e '~ : ~ ~ `
BanROrad ; ~ - •.~ : '' . ~.
--~~t ~ -'d ::.:c _ ~''°_•~...1+'`'~~J:..i„',;~~,~i~.,~. : ,...,.~~ '•.
2J -^ ~T . .2,. . . ~, '.;"'r~`i'.`=_... ^~_:~_.c:e : -..;-._ ~
zy zn •,C~ : ~ _
I. ~ ?~~y 26 ,0 . . . . . . . . Y r '.*'^.
I . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . 16 ~ : i :.
. .PO~ktnq . . t . . . . . . . . . . . .
I : . .o~,~~«: . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : J - . __' .
.wes~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. `•, •.
~ 21 •POrk~ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - • ~
. .Arec , 10 : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~'.~•. ~
i Cerntos:.venue • • : : : . D~snev~o~tl ; ; : : .
Z\ •• 12 . ine.~ne Park . 8b \ so
I . . .~J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :~ "^' . • \ ~~o
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I •'~S~ .
' ~
I :...... ..................8a ~~ ~, °
....... :.......:.........~~ ~c~ •\ ~o
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ p . i
. Tne~e Pork . ti °'y ~ ~~~ D
: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~6~lICi . . . . . . . I O p
. .. ~ ~O O
. 19 ~ Hotel 10° . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ee o° \ ~u' ~
• : ; Du.nct ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 26 cast . •~. ~
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ o ~Po:k~~g' ~~ G
11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ~ , Aieo . 2) 16a~ •, -
. i Gisnev L ' ' o
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'G j6'~L^15 . . . ~ c`
, . . . 28 ^ = . . . . Tne-~e Pork . . . . . 1)p, ~~ 17 -~'~ ~
• ~ N~' C I •
, x,' =° ~ ` Deleted
~ ~ za ~ ~ ~,,,, ~ `c ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : » . . ,e ` : 27 ~ 17-C
N . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~
, loa. ~M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! ~' I: . . . . =
_ I . . . . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C~ I~ :orkin9:27a `
~~ . . . . T6 ' uitrri `~~
' I ~~ . . ~.-~.~ ~` . . '1 L ~ ~S' If, d 3e : J
~i ~ _'-'.
. Ka.euc Avenue
~.._.'- i _ y_o,_ '""~',~~~ a
•-~ ~:.'1vE:lt~Ol1 2~ 26 4J~
Cen:e: -- --- -z-~%C.~.
I ~R~O'IFO~ I
Poci7~CO I
° L¢:nci ven~e
~ ` ~~ L..-
N CO/IV2nhOn WOy
. I T I
._.._.._.._..-..- • _.._.._.._..J ~
~ ~ ~
orcngewooo avenue ~ _ _ j c
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Anaheim, Calitomia Legentl
Half-Street Cross Section Key ~~, _,~„~ anone~m Resors 6ounoory
r__~ D~snev~pnC Resor; Specitic Plon 6ounOOrY
~~^s~~ - Des~gnoted to~ Fuiure Extension in :xis~~ng
Gene~ol Plon Grculohon Element
~ ~~ i'J~%FEBt North ~~
("u"~ .:reo Crou Secncn oppl~es; ID numeer
••••••••• Setoacks od~ocent to oine~ pr~vofe
properry
c.~^~o~; s.b.?o-HO;r.~rree; cross Secr~on rerere^ce Pion
Revised at 5/19/99 PC Meeting.
Arcmotruo oc..ce W cmOnvn uu oamr. wi¢n
: wo~e io ar~1c npr. W.nI
~ '
, i 6unonqenre.oe
I ur_~eoi_i~icooe~•.meao:~
~ I co~~mr a nee~. sn,uo~. p~o~n:
I o.r o~e an
~ ~ ~ oune ~o. o~ Oae ~eeo~e ~o. ot Dc~e
I pi~y Iwl~h.tOU' 1(t' P0~^IS ~~'l~iV IOU11ppi
~ ~ V ~Oe'1 on ceve~ I(~e ~ o' :eme~
' ~ Scr'o :ynf 1•:iuie I 'v~a np eove~ mov
~ t a~a x~ne: oor m I neuae wn p~o~no
~`~ +~ r~^ I\ oaa.or ox I\ I~ covm. o~ sn~uos
~ Y : Teoc~. M1~cai ~} \
i.r ~ ~ r
~ 1 I~
a I '
~~ I I~ nti ~ - VIl I~ ~.,
- - - I J !
o~ne~e ~ se+noe~ `
nea~m i :eoir =~bec nea:-~
c
~mv~ s+nciua: neqn n k~mu Arorn.~ p.ancy
ia' COWf I.MO¢T~/T PoRrv1100 ARICtUO' 1~0¢'v{
I i PWO~~.~ln.l~_0!
J ~ F/ernaNa DerCa
I ~ tia~num o~e~n- ne ;~ o~
~ se~wc. ~siem
~ ancs:coe ^. Se~~oe~
%I~./~ YI ~ ceoi^ ar io^.:o~n~~
~//,// I I
Icon not permItted tsller than 30 feeG
I lo~CiCOpeO OC~~ wo~
~ S~oewolt
~ lona~r.aoee
v IDOikwOy Cl~~llu~l~l
IOn:1CODf0~ I
ii~ !` 6r, fl' Tl7~O~I '
!~~~rf'~]~!1 ~
• ~'~ f
1~ •~•rlllttl ?:^ 1 ~~11 I IJ! 1
I
' w~cie ic ::e~a.ee e2 •0 6: n
i
bnrAVy~p(.~~/Tp1~Y,0~l~~CAvlRUlIIQbIO~..ov ~o~~eroc~re~
IIOr~ PQ~~ 0~ .pr O~~Nqnl O~~ ~~OC~• 0~0 nC~ ~6~ np~n
~OH I~D.n 1~Oh. 1~ y 900~0~} it ^M C+~ Inp~1~•
3C Kafiella Avenue: Setback Adjacent to
Pointe Anaheim Overlay (interim condttion)
E#~Ibtt 5.8.2e (1) • Hon Srreer Crpss 56Cfip~ 3c Korel!o A~anu=
Revised at 5/19l99 PC lO~Eeeting.
NCiYbR.l~ OQVC! W C6~OM~0 40t OM1Y wt~M1
Mry! 10 R10~C I~1 d W/
.. ~C'+. ~~t
3~.!'2~:~•.~.:~~~.E ~ SE':~:t
I ~L'11Ti:'••FE3 S~'..~5 ~ =.!'.~
I _:~•E 7~~ ~
I ' 'iP ': w : ~'f ~ ~ 1'r ' '7'£
' ~ w•P_'\, ~ .'C!' : F]'~'.: r~C~y; C~, •Pe'
y ;ic ::- ee~•e~ ,~_ .- ce"e
I _.°"o.,,~ ...,._e :-i : =:crece.
a-~e'cce- r~:•'
. ~.~, ~ c..o~. o^e '`e• a r.•.ot :•
\ ~l7.:' Sy9t~~ t\ 'v .
:~ ~•~ ~
a ~ ~
•E ,~ -
~~ , ~ ~I - - `~! 1If ii
~ ~~ '•. if
Y=C Y.. .~ ~ 7"-~ 1!
i
_~ -
~-~ ;4'~ -=ic:ee-
i
Icon not permttted taller than 30 feet.
~ ' ' .'4f' __.
".a " ' ~ !4 '~ .. " ~~ ~ `.' ~' k:
...: ~.C•~." e
~ ~ !l" .~ ~~ !.t• _! Y ..
~ 'i ~, '~ _'._.~.~:Bw.., w]. `.~...p'r.
// , ~
/~ ~ ~'~l•r.01~
~/W j ~ /~ w ~ - ~.. ~ . 75.~~'2~C...
f. _ // ' . e. t' '^C~~' ~
~ 1:
~ Lt I
~ .v..• - . t _ _ F: • .
Setback Adjacent to Poiote*Anaheim
_ . f:'_ ' _ :.,,.~.: ~ ,:•,. _ _.~-.~ . a-•....., _., .,,_ .: O ~erlay (ultimate condltian)
.,~,~ ~...,~•.~.~-.-.:-:~ - .._. .-
-:K~-~--:-•.. . __..... ~_.~~~•.~
3d Kafella Avenue: S
C3istri - j--
F_duDn 5.8.2e (2) • Had Sneet doss Sech'on 3d ICrn~:;~ Wb,~
Rev{sed at Sf 19/94 PC Meeting.
~ 6wanpenwax ~~10^'OR1O0e"r~wcv~ran
\ i v~o~efoan~e~ped..c,•
IOYQ'!C /J~OS~CD! COnW~my p' fi!!3. ~ f
\ SNLJ3. CIOJ~G Cpv~~ O~OIO' IJ~, I I
I
\ C~~L^O~ I~pCS ..nr. vnei ow~~e: o~ oox. ~ ~
tn~nr•~ac ~ee• t=71 or Cenie~ tvotio • I j I
MlONm O• IOtq! ~OCV 1~!!! n D~r~vOV O~C i I I
meoio~.. t~nryawc ee~ ;22) o•. eemr e~,_o~ i . .
! i . . ' .
~ S~e w:.;,i ur~~e cr. j • ' ~
~ oo~+ • vo4 r. oonw:~r ~ i I
~ C' mlOi~f NO~_O I I ' ' I
I ~ I '
~~~'t' ^ O~ QtOU~~ I I
I I~C CC~ • CI S'1:J~1 I I •
' C~DU.~~ ~v!' ~ 1 Y ' .
~ ' ono~a•~u i J I
1~ l i '~ -~~
~ ~
. ~f ' / ,
~~ ~ ~
~ ~+~~, e~ vw..a .~ . . ~ . ~ . _ .
~uDU[ GPCI.^.. \ I 5l107Ct ~ OlrvVl!/
~:eo~^ re~ri
~ . ,/ Icon not permitted taller than 75 feet
_
~ j
/ ~ Ncmen„~ oeMCa
~+~~+ .saroq~nnte~e~v~onamo.~e~ i Deleted
~ce uc+~ .r.+con.n Pom.noa strunuu Hwpm I ~
Banan; en.eKCe~ j ~
t I
6:cn-~a^. aaudnp napn: oo r
se¢oc. )S~ae' ~/ :
mncs:ooe ~ Se~oo;~ ~ron i ~/ ~
0~ q.:^.:.v11t~ I / ,
l0 :OSCplC~ I
oo~~..o.~ I ~
inawne ~ j, ~ ~
~
~
.C~.l_OGE7 . /
I COiaw~Yl . ~ . ~ ~
, iones:coec ~ r .
v Jmec~~' . E~., E,~~
~ t~.~ hn ~
~~ ~..~~~~~^~~ •
~ ~
Iibil~ i ~ .
:~r•: '•:~•... . :O' ~ 1
w~ein ~e cen~en~ne ec_+y ~ , o~ ~~,.
unrt-~ur.e•o: t»KVaeep~ao~wor ::t.•:.'+n ro+~~~c+.^wrar
~~ npn. o~ ~e, o~-.~~a~.1 oy No2n~ o•.c no.
•pi~ IrM ~n01f IY~r. 1u0hC~ ~C ~~f O~O~C~O~ C'
~M ~~~. I~.QMI•
17C Ha~bor Boulevard: Setback Adjacent So Poi; ite Anaheim Overlay
ExNd7 5.8.?s (1) • HaN 57ree1 Qpss Sechm 97c Ha~ba Boulevo~d
~~~c~ \
i ~
Aaiii! \
~r \
•\ \
~\
Revised at 5/19/99 PC Meeting.
~
NCM9~TSO oer~ca w cmmuro ue p~rt.r w1pr~
~wwu~a+e adc iqs a wq
' i BJUpn~ !nvlUpe
I I h!!3! Z'uq~O3~OD! Pf StSOCt iC CO'1:6' 0~
I Wf vN21 p~OUf~C COvl~ O~0/O' lUt'
' ' I iOi~wOY 0~~~~n~ IC ~OnLS• O' On!'~Cin^y
~ vlrl~:0~ ti!!1'~nG {^~O~ Or ml~w^. COnODV
, ' I ~~!!:
-_--__' v ~ I>L'1'11T~ 7' ~'DU'1C t~OV i~_UO! C'DJ~C
~ I COV!• On0~0~ lyr!
1 r.~eo~~ en~~~n~ +c come• o~
imol Co'10ov ~~ee1. 3!:~JDi.
I vnp3 9~DJ~~ CO~G~ O~OIO~
1~~'
i
I
~ f
I I ~ 1~7'•
a . :1 ( ~ .=,J ~
~~~.o~e I Seto:t~ I
Feo~~ aeo~r D~ouc nw•-+
c
3
G
; aemonua oe.ca
~
~ Moar.rr~ ~n,KVa roqn n rwne tiwx ~ O+ana~
IN arrY. l~.~cv~wn 1M+moa+nuouC Mcq'rt
j~ / E,.n.o; e.,.ecu
/
~COI'1'7't
Icon not permitted taller than 30 feet
/~ ~ ~crn:oee r Srm_u ~~~u~e oeaesnp~. o~ uonseonouon svuee.
//~/ I Ge~~. er ~anco.nr ~~c :en~~~~ ..m iu~um F+DOns~on Da~K~
I :C;D~C~inpi! :uYO/1~ Qnvlqp! )
, / ~
1
// ~
~ ' :~eewoi~ ~~ i~/
~/
. ~j
~' :
~
'~ 1 ,
I i/// •///i
i ^c~owecaeo ~~Ceme~u~e
i
ov
. •
) i y /
^
--
~~
`~ ~ ~
7ttweib~eY/"! ~ono~cooromro~on
_~~-
.
j, :~• E~'I
~~„~k~.
; ... ~~„_,.
~~~eo:~: ,
'1r ~ ]Sh i)St10n
I Ki." 1: ClntLlv! S7 fl
Wntp-N~v~a~O~v'I~I=~[ Fymp~y~b/fqTO~*~W1Ufl
~rc~r ip,~ c• .o, aw.~~~~ov o~~ ~.e ,o o~ ~o. . o•, ~~aT
oir ~ o..~ ,,,o.:~ ~c M~ oco~~.o a~ ~n~ C.~. Inpnrr
27Q Freedman Way: Setback Adjocent to Pointe Anoheim Overlay
ExNdrr 5. b.2o~ (~) • HoN. Sreer Goss Sechon 27a FreeCmm Wo,~
Rcvised a1 5/19/99 PC Meedng.
The Jlsneyland Resort Spectflc Plcn ~s° SeCtion 5.0: Desigit PICUi
BauRood._.._.._..J ~ 1'r'i`~"_ `~ \
i ~
~ ` ~,,..~ :.~ a:
. ~..
~ . ~ ~`.:
. : i'' ..~.
,.j
~ ~r 4~,1
I ' I
~ ' . .
` 4`iF ~
~
~''•
I , r ~
' O
.ROO^ (
`\~ .
I.~ ............. ~ ..~Y61111p... Z` \-
• . ~
~ : : : : : : : : : : : : .
' D6neYlonG : : : : : : ". ; .
:. •:•
~
I ...........
~~..-...,.-.~..~.... :inemePa~k .........
. ........... ~-~\:
•
.
I ; M Carntot Avenue
~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : ; ; ~ ; ; :
: : : : : : : ; ; : : : : • • • • •~ • •_~~
Exisfing Fenee
: : : : : : .
`\50
~o~`\ '• "o
c
.
--wj~.i .•
: ::::: ::: :::::::.
. behinC DiSneylontl
: BoCk•Of-HOUSe ~ b
::i m ~7 ~.. . .r
~ ~\'~
°.;,~~~.
i ' 1 : ' 'Existing
Fence SehlnC :
e
' b~ ne lo d H 1 I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :I~ o `o \ • ~'
L
~ o
:~
, ~ :::.~..Y.~...~~ ':::::::: ::~ m . .`;4 ' ~
..... ......
• ...... ......
...... ..... _ _
~ ' ' ' ' Hot01 : ; ' '' , • • • T116m0 POIk. ' • . . I'~ $ r.- EOSt : • •~ \~ • E
~ ° I . . . . DtS711C1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •
~) I:.PCikmO:::..::\ ~' .c
I°~' .. ............. : ~`. ~.. Aieo;.......~ .. ic
. ~ ~ : : : . : . .~. ; : :Wall.reQUired.d GR : --,F„reeo.ma~ Woy~ : ~__ j '•~, ;~ a
i :::::: • •Overlavnot : ::::Y; .r'_ . .'•\
{~: : : : : : ~ oo~ I o p ; • •OBVBIOP@tl O5 ; v-+• ~ :DCtiict. . . . : : :~ -m° ,
o ~ o o . : :ThGmE POtk i : : : : : q ' y+ ~
~ I , ~ POfBnt101 ~ m ; . . : .I m ' ..
.., . ~ oPeninq to • o S ' ~ ~ : : . : : . . . - - _ ~ ~ ~ . : : :I c .
S ~ ~4 accomocote: 30 ::: : : : : : : : : : ._} ~ . .. .~;. . ' • : :~ E • .
o; ~ occeu . .................. ::...~ ~ ~Parkmp
.
3 ~ ............ .^................ ::::::::' Dnuiel •~ U
~~------- ------ i ~: .
. . ----- ~.......:.I
_.. . . . . . ..... . . _. . . _. •
Koreua Avenuo Futwe ~
I a.~ ~ . . E.oans~on .K,~v,
a
:-..J..-..l Anonem ~::.::: Dctiict ...~~Fenco
Note: If hofels o~ " Convem~on ~1 SOUt~ Patkinp AieO ~.'.'. Pe~mi~@tl
POrking i Ceniei y~i4ss' ~"' {J as shown In
! C~Ou
suuctures, no ~ ' Soct~on22
wau reouueo at • i Poe1M1CO i-
comer oi Kafeuo I a Convennon wov A~enue „
Avenue Ontl . ~ ~ ' ' ~
west : ~
Sfreet/Drsney ~ m
IonC Drive ~ ' I _
L.._..~.._..~.._..I ~..-..._.._.._: a
N
~
orcnpewoooave~~ue ~ I o
The Disneyland Res~H Specitic Plan
Anahalm, Calilomfa Legend
Wall/Fencii~y Plan ~ _~
L~~J
Anone~m Reson Bounaory
DisneyionC Resori SpecAic Pian Bounaory
DcdgnafeC toi Fu~we E:~ens~on in Exu~~np
G(•nerpt plon Cuculonon Element
Fencelwoll petmitted wHh moximum
ne~gnt o~ 16 taet sub~ecf fo Anoneim
MuniClpOl COOB rhppl2r 1 B.7B
won reouned: mm~mum ne~qrn ot 8
teet
Souna or~enuotion wall permitteo of surloce
pOfklr^~ <;~eOS wCl1 mmiTUT h@i(~ht Of 121@21
an~ r~c,,~~mum he~gnf ol 16 teat, sub~ect fo
Anon~~m Municipol CoCe ChOp~or 1 BJ6
Fence/woll peimitiBC: minimum
ne~pn~ ot B ieet ben~na sefbock
ono alOnO infenot pioperty IineS
Sub~0C1 f0 Af10~Bi~Y1 MUf1~C1001
Coae Cnopter 1B.7B
~~~
0 10~0 Z00~ Feot Norfh
Note: Fer.ces onc; or wous moy be ioca+ed e~sewnere
wrtn~n ~ne Specn~c P~on oiea sub~ect fo me regwonons
OI inE AnOhBim MuNClpO~ COtlO CnOplpflB 78
Fen~es anC/o~ ~+'olls moy be locoteo ot o O l001
52tbOCk 10 t~E i~12~i0f piODBtty li~@S: hOwEV@~.
od~ocem to pubi~c sneeu. tnev snou ee ~ocored ot tne
m~nimum cero~c~ i~ne u~iess otnerwue permmea ny me
Anaho~m r,~un~aooi Coae Cnooiei 16.78
~s
r~r~~
~H~
~ ~ :r7~+
~~° ~ For the Polnie~AnaM1eim Overlay, with the eicep[!on ol a
requlred B•loof hlgh wall adfocent fo the Inferlor properTy linr
Exhibit 5.8.3g Wall/Fencing Plan abuaingtl~eAnaheimResortSpecKcPl:nNO.-7•fe»tem
• endtb~.f+,..~a:...:..u .... .~~».--_~..._~,- -° ---_,_'
Pointe*Anaheim Overlay for the Pointe+Anaheim Lifestyl;• 'Rataif
and Entertainment Complex shall be exempt from the requirements
of the Final Site plan review. Building plans for these areas shall be
submitted to the Building Division of the Planning Department and
shall be reviewed for conformance with all applicable provisions of the
Specific Plan prior to issuance of building permits. Pointe•Anaheim
Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex signage shall be
revie,nred by the Pfanning Department for conformance with The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan pointe*Anaheim Overiay
requirements prior to issuance of sign permits.
Revise the first paragraph of Section 18.78.050 as follows (page 7-9):
"18.78.050 LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS-GENERAL
Set forth below are the standards for the development of The Disneyland Resort
Specific Plan Districts excepting that Subsections 18.78.050.010 entitled "GENERAL"
through 18.78,050.050 entitled "PROHIBITED USES" a
en~+~~e~, "~~a- of this Chapter, shall not apply to p;ojec-s in District A ar
developed under the C-R and Pointe*Anaheim Overlay raquirements. Section
18.78.050.0705 entitled "LOT TIES" shall not apply to projects in Dlstrict A or
developed under the C-R l~verlay requirements. The C_R Overlay standards for
those uses are set forth in Section 18.78.100 entitled "C=R OVERLAY" of this Chapter.
The District A standards for those uses are set forth in S~ciion 18.78.095 entitled
"DISTRICT A" of this Chapter. The Pointe*Anaheim Overlay standards for those
uses are set forth in Section 18.78.105 entitlad "POINTE•ANAHEIM OVERLAY" of
this Chapter. The Districts and corresponding Development Areas herein are those
identified on the Development Plan Map (Exhibit 3.3b entitled "Development Plan" of the
Specific Plan document)."
Add Section 18.78.105 POINTE*ANAHEIM Ove~lay (page 7-25):
"18.78.105 POINTE*ANAHEIM OVERLAY
.010 Purpose. The Pointe~Anaheim Overiay has been established to pra-+Ide for the
development of the Pointe*Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Enterta:n~ nent Cu~nplex
pursuant to the uses set forth in subsection 1~.78.105.020 entt.tled.,
"CONDITIONAL USES" of the Anaheir*i Municipal Code and sua~ect to the density
limitations set forth in subsection 18.78.105.030 entitled, "POINTE~ANAHEIM
DENSITY" of the Anaheim Municipal Code, if t'he propertles are not developed in
accordance with The Oisneyland Resort Sp~citic Plan Parktng Clistrict (East
Parking Area) requirements or the District A or C-R Overlay roqu!rements.
.020 Conditional Use and Structures. The follovying buildings, structure;;. ~±~oj usts
shali be permitted as part of the Pointe+Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and
Entertainment Complex provided that:
(a) Conditlonal Use Permit No. 4078 ts approved therefore pursuant to, and
subject to, the conditions and required showings of Sectfon 18.03.030
entitled, "CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (C.U.P's) - GENERAL" of ~his Code;
(b) The uses and structures ara developecl in one si~gle continuous phase, as
one comprehensioe project;
(c) Ril uses and structures set forth in subsection 18.48.0T0.030 entitlad,
"PERMITTED ACCESSaRY USES AND STRUCTIJRES" and in subsection
18.48.070.04Q entitled "PERMITTED TEMPORARY USES AND
STRUCTURES" of the Anaheim Municipal Code shall be permitte~ in the
Pointe*Anaheim OvPrlay;
(d) With the exception of subsection 18.48.07U.060.0619 entitled,
"PROHIBITEO SIGNS", all uses set forth in subsection 18,48.070.060
entitled, "PROHIBITED USES" of the Anaheim Municipal Code shall be
prohibited in the Pointe+Anaheim Overlay;
(e) All development is subject to the limitations prescrlbed in Section
18.78.050 entitled, "LAND USE AND SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -
GENERAL" of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and,
(fl The Pointe+Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex shall be
destgned in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plans shown in Exhibits
5.8.3f.1, 5.8.3f.2, 5.8.3f.3, 5.8.3f.4, and 5.8.3f.5 of•The Disneyland Resort
Specific Plan document. '
.0201 Hotets, including suite-type hotels, as described in aubsection 18.78.105.060
entitied, "POINTE•ANAHEIM DENSITY" of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
.0202 All conditional uses and structures listed ln subsection 18.48.070.040 entitled,
"CONDITIONAL ~SES AND STRUCTURES" of the Anaheim Municipal Code which
implements the list of uses described in subsection 18.78.105.060 entitled
"POINTE+ANAHEIM DENSITY" of the Anal~eim Municipal Code as further
described below:
{a) Specialty Reta-IlEntertainment Center with integrated management and a
festive theme orientation and plazalpedestrlan-oriented amenities with the
following types of uses:
(1) Banking facilities.
(2) Children's, mon's, and women's apparel, shoes, Jewelry and
accessories.
(3) Ente~tafnment facilit(es (amusement arcades, skat(ng rink5, outdoor
recreatfonal playground areas).
(4) Shoppfng services.
(5) Specialty merchandise, gifts and toys.
(6) Transportation/trevel services including an automobile rental
agency office (with no on-site vehicular storage).
f7j Radio and television studio to enable live and/or taped broadcast
'iacilities at the site.
~E) Babysitting services.
(5) Fast-foodlfood court-type and walk-up/specialty restaurants.
(10) Enclosed and semi-enclosed full-service and theme-type
restaurants/nightclubs with or wfthout on-site sale and consumption
of beer, wfne, and alcoholic beverages and assoc(ated
entertal~ment uses (billiards, dancing, Ilve and recorded
performances).
(11) Art galieries/museums.
(b) Outdoor events/uses held within fhe conFnes of Pointe*Anaheim, out of
viaw of the public right-of-way and not directed towards the puLlic right-of-
way inc0uding open-air festival events ~riented totvards tourists and
guests (for pubiic gatherings, speeches, concerts, presentations, or
shows); outdoor booths, kiosks and stands; and, outdoor special lightirsg
effects.
(c) 'Pheaters, including dinner, legitimate ~r motion picture theaters,
performance theaters or night clubs, arrd indoor amphitheaters (the square
foatag~ of the indoor ana~hithsater use would be cieducted fi•om the
maximum the2ter square footage).
(d) Parlcing/transportation facilities for automobiles, buses, shuttles, and taxis.
.060 Painte*Anaheim Density. The r*~aximum density for the Pointe~~,naheim
Overlay shall be as follows: 565,OOa gross square feet of retail/diningl
entertainment uses; two to three hotels comprising a maximum of 1,050 hotel
roomsfsuites with approximately 86,985 gross square feet of relatec! accessory
uses (the hotel rooms/accessory uses would encompass a maximum of 923,800
gross square feet) and an apgroximate '~41,200 gross square foot area on the top
f'loor of the parking structure to be use~1 to provide parking and/or hotel amenities
serving guests and patrons ~F the Poin4e*Anaheim hotels only; up to three
theaters with a total of 4,600 seats for live performances or, alternatively= a 24-
screen movie theater with 4,757 seats; and, a 1,600,000 gross square foot par6cing
structure with 4,800 striped parking spaces and 25 bus parking spaces with
provisEOn to park an additional 400 vehicles which would bring tfie total rsumber
of vehicies that can be aacommodated in the garage to 5,200 cars, and including a
21,600 gross square foot bus terminal/facility for airport transport ~nd to/from
sightseeing venues. The Pointe*Anaheim Overlay densi4~; is set forkh in more
detai! in Exhibit 3.3.6b of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan document entitled
"Poir~Ye+Anaheim Overlay Development Program."
.U70 flAaximum permitted Heights. The maximum permitted height of structures
shall be as indicated on Exhibit 1 af the Specific Plan document entitled
"Maximum Permitted Structural ;-leight."
.080 Interior Structura9 Setback and Yard Requirements from Adjacent Interior
Lots. A ten-foot min9mum setback adjacent to interior lat lirses abutting the
Anaheim Resort Spacific Plan No. 92-1 ~one boundary is required for structures
developed under the provisions of Section 1E.78.105 entitled "Pointe*Anaheim
^': E°L~,'t" of this Chapter.
.090 Setbacks from Abutting Public Rights-of-Way. The minimum setback
requirements for structures developed under the provisEons of this Section shall
be as descri~ied for the base District the structure is located in with the followin,r,
exceptions:
.0901 Clementine Street (formerly Freedman Way). Twenty (20) feet
minimum, if the structure is seventy-five feet or [ess irs height or thifij (30)
16
feet minimum, if the structu~e is greater than seventy-five (73) feet in
height with lanslscaping can~istent with Design Plan Cross Section
number 27.
.Q9Q2 Disney VJay (formerly Freedman Wa~r). Twenty (20) feet
minimum, if the structure is seventy-five feet or less in height or thirty (30)
fe~t minimum, if the structure is greater than seventy-five (75) feet in
height with landscaping consistent with Design Plan Cross Section
number 17b.
.09Q3 Kateila Avenue. Eleven (11) feet minimum, with landscaping
consistent wittr Design Plan Cross Section numbers 3a and 3b.
.0904 Harbor Boulevard. Twenty-six (26) feet, minimum, ~ith
landscaping consistent witf~ Design Plan Cross Section number'i7a:'
Add Section 18.78.106 Central Core (page 7-25)
"18.78.106 Central Core.
.010 Purpose. The purpose of the Central Core is to create a consistent, high
quality pedestrian environment that reinforces tne character established by the
landscape and other streetscape elements identified in the Anaheim Resort
Identity Program. The Centrai Core boundaries encompass lots or parcels with
frontage on Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue. Subsections .020 and .040
below appiy to the minimum required setback areas adjacent to the ultimate
public right-of-way. Subsection .030 below applies ta the area between the
uitimate pubiic rlght-uf-way and the actual (constructed) building se4back.
.020 Setbacks Adjacent to Harbor Boulevard. The required landscape setback
area adjacent t~ the Harbor Boulevard ultimate public right-of-way may be paved
provided:
.0201 The paved area will serve pedestrian-related activi4ies
;restaurant outdoor dining, and limited pedestrizn wa{kways frorrt the
public r8ght-of-way to the Pointe*Anaheim Complex as approved by the
Planning Director and the City Engineer);
.0202 Landscape shal! be designed and ins4alled in conformance
with the tree derosity requirements iden4ified in the Design Plan and
depicted in Exhibit 5.6.6.3a entitled, "Yree Density Factor Plan;" and,
.0203 A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the required setback area
immediately adjacent to the restaurant outdoor dining area, excluding
driveways perpendicufar to the street, shall contain live landscape
materials.
.030 Location of Parking Areas. No parking areas sha„ be located bet~veen the
ultimate public right-of-way and the act~al (constructed) build.'sng setback
pruvided, however, that vehicular drop-off areas may be located adjacent to the
front of a building, ~ut not in the required minimum setback area.
.040 Lighting. Fluorescent, low pressure sodium; high pressure sodium, and
mercury vapor are prohibited in the front setback areas.
17
Amend subsection .0104 of Section 18.78.110.OiJ (Off-Street Parking and Loading
Requirements) as follows {page 7-27):
".0104 District A and C-R and Polnte*Anaheim Overfay Parking Requirements. The
m~nimum number, type and design of off-street parking spaces for uses developed in
District A or under the pro~isions of the C-R or Poin4e*Anaheim Overiays shaii comply
with the requirements of Section 18.06 entitled "VEHICLE PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIR[MENTS" of the Anaheim Municipal Code."
Amend subsection .120 of Section 18.78.110 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements)
as follows (page 7-28):
".120 Parking Space and Access Design. Layout and design of parking areas and
vehicls accessways in the Hotel District (except for parking for theme park and retaii
entertainment uses), District A and the C-R and Pointe*A7aheim Overlays only shall
comply with the requirements of Section 18.06.040 entitled "PARKING SPACE aND
,4CCESS DESIGN" of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and Engineering Standard Detail
No. 602-E entitled "Minimum Off-Street Parking Dimensions," and Engineering Standard
Detail No. 604 entitled "Parking Dimensions for Structures," except as follows:"
Amend subsection .0201 of Section 18.78.130.020 (Signs) as follows (page 7-35):
".0201 Application.
(a) Sign standards and regulations contained within this Section shall apply to ali
Districts and the C-R Overlay within the Specific Plan area, except that for theme park
or retail entertainment center uses developed in the Theme Park and Hotel Districts, the
sign standards contained in this Section and other sign regulations contained within the
Anaheim Municipal Code shall only apply to signs within the required setback adjacent
to perimeter streets, excluding V`Jest Street/Disneyland Drive. In the Theme Park and
Hotel Districts, wall signs for theme parks and retail entertainment center uses adjacent
to the required sefback along perimeter streets, excluding 1Nest Street/Disneyland Drive,
shall be internally oriented:'
(b) Sig~ standards and regulafions contained within this section shall apply to
development in the P'ointe*Anaheim Qveriay with the exception that signs in the
interior areas of the Pointe*Anaheim Lifestyle Re4ail and Entertainment Complex
shall he ex,empt from the requirements set fo~th in this section. "Interior areas"
are define~.i below.
Objects, structures ur signs located in the Pointe*Anaheim Ove~ lay are
considered to be "interior" for Yhe purposes of Sections 18.78.020.0201 and
18.78.105.100 if they are:
(a) Not visible to pedestrian or vehicular traffic from the adjacent pubtic
right-of-way at an equal elevation as the PoinYe*Anaheim property line (as
measured from 5 feet above any point on the public right-of-way); or,
(b) At least 160 feet from the acljacent pubiic right-of-way or correspond
with the setback ofi the last buiiding bordering tha view corridor whichever
is further, as shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5, entitlad Pointe*Anaheim Interlor
Signage a~d IconlThemed Signage Flernent, and only visibie to pedestrian
18
ard/or ve~iicular traffic Ynraugh limited view corridors at the entrances to
fhe Pointe+Anaheim Lifest~rle Retail and Entertainment Complex (as shown
on Exh~bit 5.8.3f.5. The final dimensions ~f the view ~orridor wil! be shown
on the fnal site plan. .
Amend subsection .0506 of Section 18.78.130.050 (Future Establishment Signs) as follows
(page 7-39):
".0506 7ime Limit. For development in conformance with the i heme Park, Hotel,
Parking and Future Expansion Districts, five (5) years from date of construction or
erection, and for development in conformance with District A or the C-R or
Pointe*Anaheim Overlays, one (1) year from date of construction or erectior unless
prior to expiration, approved by the Planning Director for an additional period not to
exceed one (1) year."
Conditional Use Permit provisions for signage need to be added to Section
18.78.130.060.062(e) as foilows:
"(e) In the Pointe+Anaheim Overlay, up to two icon/themed signage elements
(defined as "a structure, scuipture, or having the nature of, an icon, which is a
nationally-recognized lmage or object, including, but not limited to, trademarked
objects, logos, or other images and figures associated with nationalfy-recognized
corporate identities") shall be permitted subject to the approvai ofi a conditional
use permit provided that the signage shall be associated with a use ap;aroved for
the Pointe~Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Comp{ex pursuant to
Section 18.78.105 (Pointe+Anaheim); the location shall be in compliance with
Exhibit 5.8.3f.5 and further provided that the size, loca~•ion, height (not to exceed
30 feet in height), and deslgn of the signage shall be determined by the
conditional use permit".
SECTION 8.0 ZONING EXPLANATION
Amend Section 8.0 Zoning Expianation by adding the following (page 19):
8.7.4 Amendment No. 4
Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 adds the
Pointe*Anaheim Overlay to a 10.2 acre portion of the Parking DistricYlEast Parking
Area and the 18.9 acre District A. This new overlay provides for the develo;~ment
of the F~ointe*Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex as an
integr~vted development to be constructed in one singfe continuous phase subject
to the a~nroval of Conditional Llse Permit No. 4078. The~ Speci~c Plan
Arrzendment includes text and exhibit changes throughout the document to reflact
the new Pointe*Anaheim Overiay inciuding, but not limited to, the following:
Modification of Section 10 (General Pian Amendment ) of the Specific Plan
document to add a description of General Plan Amendment Plo. 359
language pertinent to Pointe*Anaheim.
Amendments to the Public Facilities Plan to reflect improvements to
Freedman Way (future Disney Way) and Clementine Street (future
Freedman Way) including dual lefk-turn lanes on northbound Clementine
Street at Fresdman Way; a through right-turn lane on eastbound Freedr:~an
Way at Clementine Street; right-turn tanes along southbound Clementine
Street south of Freedman Way; and a mid-block break in the Clementine
19
Street landscaped median to permit turns into and out of the
Pointe*Anaheim project area.
Amendment 4o the Development Pian to show the location of the
Pointe*Anaheim Overlay boundaries;
Amendments to the Design Plan to add Conceptual Site Plans depEcting
the layout af the Painte*Anaheim prcaject and amendments to the design
guidelines and street cross-sections to reflect the Pointe*Anaheim proj~ct
components;
Amendments to the Zoning and Development Standards to establish the
zani~~g standards far the Pointe¢Ana~heim Overlay including the proposed
list of uses, project density, driveway locations and new provisions for nn-
sEte commercial signage.
Section 10.0: General Plan Amendment
Amend Section 10.1 Introouction (Page 1) by adding the following paragraph as the second io
last paragraph of the section, as fopows:
General Plan Amendment No. 359, which was adopted by City Council on
prior to the adoption of The Disneyland Resort
SpECific Plan Atv~endment No. 4, amended the Genera! Pian Land Use Element
text to refiect the creation of the Pointe~Anaheim Overlay which allows the
development of fhe Pointe*Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Ente~tainment Gomplex.
Amend Section 10.2 Land Use Element, Comrr~~rcial Recreation (page 7) by adding a new
paragraph to describe the Pointe"Anaheim Overlay:
Commercial Recreation
Commercial Recreation--The C~rnmercial-Recreation category was adopted by
the City in the 1960's to encourage commercial-recreation land uses primarily in
the Anaheim Conven4ion t;enter/Disneyland area currently referred to as the
approximate 1,046-acre Anaheim Resort, and in the area around tYie Anaheim
Stadium. For the Anaheim Resort, the Commercial-r~ecreation category is
implemented by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, The Disneyland Resort
Specific Plan and the Hotel Cir~le Specific Plan. For the area around the
anaheim Stadium, this category is implemented by the PR (Public Recreation)
~one.
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of
approximately 549.5 acres within two land use Districts and a Mobilehome Park
Overlay: the C-R (Commercial Recreation) District which allows for hotef, motels,
convention and conference facilities as well as restaurants, retail shops and
entertainment facilities; the PR (Public Recreation) District which encompasses
the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities and provides
for the orderly use of City-owned property as weli as the existing Anaheim Hiiton
Hotel; and, the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay which encompasses existing
mobilehome parks wi'thin the C-R Di~trict and provides deveiopment standa~ds
for mobilehome parks and regulations and procedures to mitigate relocation
concerns and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a
park is converted to another land use. The Anaheim Reson Specific Plan also
identifies maximum development denssty designations in the C-R Districi. These
designations are based upon hotel/motel develapment and aliow up to 20% of
20
each hotei/motel praject gross square footage, excluding parking facilities, to be
developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel/motel complex)
accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum
permitted hotel/motei density at the rate of one hotei/rnotel room per six hundred
(600) gro~s square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be
developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses Qther than
hotels/motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said
uses shall not exceed those associated v:ith the othervvise permitted hotel/motel
(including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval. The
densiry designations are as follows: "Low Density," whi~h has a maximum
density of up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 35 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever
is greater; "Low-Medium Density," up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms
per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; "Medium Densiry," up to 100 rooms per
gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; and, "Convention
Center (CC) Medium Density," up to 125 rooms per gross acre with trip
generation cha~acteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross
acre, or 75 rooms per lot or parcel whichever is greater. For those parcels that
are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceed the maximum densiry
designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their
existing density.
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an
approximate 489.7-acre international multi-day ~!acation destinatic~n resort
including ongoing modifications to the Disneyland theme park, the ~levelopment
of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment areas, administrative
o~ce facilities, new public and private parking facilities, and an internai
transportation system. This development is within five planning Districts (Theme
Park, Hotel, Parking, Future Expansion and District A) and a C-R Overlay which
allows development withiri the Overlay ta either be consistent with the underlying
Resort District or subject to the same land uses as in the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone. 7he Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies
maximum development densiry designations for hotel/motel development in the
Hctel District (up to 5,600 hotei rooms for the entire District with up to 1,000 hotel
rooms transferable to the Theme Park District), in District A(the maximum
number of units permitted would be 75 hotel/rriotel rooms per gross acre or 75
hotellmo!el rooms per parcel existing on „une 29, 1993, whichever is greater)
and the C-R Overlay (the maximum number of units permitted on a parcel would
be the following: 1) for parcels designated Low Density - up to 50 hotel rooms
per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; and 2) for parcels designated
Medium Density -~~~ to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is
greater; provided tha; for those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel
ruoms which exceed the maximum density designation, the number of rooms
existing on the date of adoption of 7he Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing densiry.) It should be
noted that accessory uses may be developed as well as other visitor-serving
commercial/retail and restaurant uses along with these hotel/motel uses."
The Disneytand Resort Speci#ic Pian also provides for the development df
the Pointe+Anaheim LEfestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex pursuant
to the Poii3te+Aaahei~n Overlay at the fotlowing density an~ subject to tfie
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078: up io 565,000 gross square
21
feet of retail/dining/er~tertainment uses; two tcr thrse hRtels cor~prising a
maximam of 1,U50 ~ote1 roorrss/suite~ with approximately Q6,985 gross
sGuare feet o~f retated accessory uses (4he hotei rooms/accessory uses
wuuld encorr:~;ass a maximum af 923,800 gross square feet) and an
approximate 14'~,200 gross square foot arRa o? the top floor of tl~e parking
structure to be used to provide parking and/or ho4et amenities sErvinr~
guests and patrons r,~ ~~e Poin4e*Anaheim hot~ls only; up to thrse th~aters
with a total of 4,600 seaf~ fur live peffnrmances or, a~4ernatively, a 24-
screen movie theater wii~-~ 4~.757 .seats; and, ~ 1,60I1,000 gross square foot
parking struct~re with 4,~OJ stt.ipea ~~rkl:~g spaces and 25 bus parking
spaces, with provision to pa~~ ~~t acfc~Etlonai 4u~ vehicles, which wrauld
t~ring the totat number ofi vehic?es Yha~ c~n b~ accommodated in the garage
40 5,20p cars, and inciuding a 2R,6C0 ~~~s~ s5~aee foo~ bus terminal/facility
for airport transpr,rt a~;d to/from s(;~h~5eeir,g ~,~~nues. The Pointe+Anahelm
Overlay R~~,o.3a;~asses aIstrict A and tine N~r~iun of the Parking Distrtct
(East Parking kr12)!'~ n Overlay soutF: •~f D(s~ney iNay. ,
AP6069DH.D OGRevisod•052799
22
AT3AGHt1AENT D
AMENDED AND NEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. AMENDMENTS TO DISNEYLAND RESORT CONDITIONS
OF APPR~OVAL SET FORTH IN ORDINANCE NO. 55~0
(New words in bold, deletions are indicated by s#~r+~ee~)
INTRODUGTION
"The conditions of approval for development in the Theme Park, Hotel, Parking and
Future Expansion Districts, District A and the C-R Overlay include all mitigation
measures and project design features included as part of Modified Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 0067 (as modified on October 8, 1996}~e~his~fejss~ (as required by Section
21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). The conditions of approval for development in
the Pointe•Anaheim Overlay fnclude all mitigation measures including projecS design
features inciuded as part of Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004 (as required by
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). For purposes of these conditions of
approval, the following terms are used:
Applicant: The VValt Disney Company, its successors and assigns.
Property Owner/Deveioper: Any owner or developer of reai property within The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area, including the C-R and Pointe`Anaheim
Overiay Areas and District A.
Disneyland Resort: The Disneyland Resort, including a second gated theme
park, modifications to the Disneyland Hotel, a new Disneyland Administration
Building, new heteis, Entertainment areas, internal transportation systems, and
pubiic parking facilities in the Parking, Theme Park and Hotei Districts, and the
Sout!i Parking Area in the Future Expansion District. None of the conditions of
approval contained herein shall be required to be implemented prior to
issuance of any permits ror or construction of new structures, improvements, ar
other m~cifications within the exfsting Disneyland Theme Park.
Second Theme Park: A gated theme park pianned south of the existing
Disneyland Theme Park.
27. That no development shall accur unless such development is substantially ir.
accordance with the amended Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 document
on file with the Planning Department and marked Exhibit A, Amendment No. S 4
34. That the location and configuration of ai~ lighting fixtures including ground-mounted
lighting fixtures utilized to acceni buildings, landscape elements, or to flluminate
pedestrian areas in the Hotel Disstrict, Parking District and development in the C-R
and Pointe•Anaheim Overlay Areas and in District A, shall be shown on all Final
Site Plans. All proposed surtace parking area lighting fixtures shall be down-Iighted
with a maximum height of tweive (12) feet adjacent to any residential properties. All
lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighling toward the area to be illum(nated
and away from adjacent residential property lines. All lighting flxtures, types and
locations shall be identified on the plans submt'ted for building perr.~its.
50. That prior to Final Site Plan approval for parking struc4ures in the Hotel District and
in the P~in4e'Anaheim Overlay, signage plans shall be desfgnod to enhance
smooth traffic flaws on each level of the parking structure and shall be submitted to
the City Tra~c and Transportation Manager for revfew and approvai.
63. That in conjunction with the construction of the East and West Public Parking
FacilitEes, the Hotel parking structures,aad the South Parking Area Structure and tho
parking structure in the Pointe'Anahelm Overlay, no impact driven piles shall be
ellowed.
67a. That for all development in the Theme Park, Hotel, Park?ng and Future
Expansion Districts, District A and the C-R Overlay, the appiicant and/or property
owneddeveioper, as specified in the individual mitigation measures, shall be held
responsible for compliance with the mitigation measures and that the applicant shall
be responsible for implementation of the project des(gn features identified in Final
EIR No. 311 and Addendum and for complying with the Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 0067, in compliance with Section 21081.6 of the Public
Resources Code. Furthermore, the appiicant and/or property owner/developer, as
specified in the individual mitigation measures, and the applicant for project design
features, shall be responsible for any direct costs associated with the monitoring and
reporting required to ensure implementation of those mitigation measures and proJect
design features identified in Finai EIR No. 311 and Addendum that have been
incorporated into the Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067 (modified on
Oclober 8, 1996). The Modified PAitigation Monitqring !'rogram No. 0067, which
includes mitigation measures and proJect design features, is attached and made a
part of these conditions of approval.
67b. That for development in the Pointe•Anaheim Overlay, the property
ownerldeveloner shail be held responsible for compliance with the mitigation
measures and for tmplementatfon of the project design features identified in
Mitigakion Monitoring Plan No. 004 i~ compliance with Section 21081.6 of the
Public Resources Code. Furthermore, the Pointe•Anaheim property
owner/developer shall be responsible for any direct costs associated with the
monitoring and reporting required to ensure Implementatfon of those
mitigation measures and project design features tdentiflad in Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 004. Mitfgation Monftoring Plan No. 004, which tncludes
mltigation measures and project design features, is attached and made a part
oi these conditions of approval.
B. NEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE
POINTE*AN/~HEIM OVERLAY
76. That the Final Site Plan submittal requirements required pursuant to Condition of
Approval No. 29 shall be supplemented with the followinp plans/materials/information
which shall be submitted as part of the Final Site Plan application (all plans shall be
fully-dfinensioned and drawn to scale):
A. A site oian showing all proposed project components throughout the 29.1-acre
~i+~ including, but not limited to, all buildings, landscape areas, hardscape areas,
fountains/water features, works of art, and the adJacent street improvements.
B. Preliminary Mass Grading Plan for the entire 29.1-acre Pointe'Maheim Overlay
area.
C. Elev~vtion plans showing all views of each proposed building.
D. Floor plans for each building and each level of the parking garage (all parking
spaces shall be dimensioned and the total number of spaces on each level shall
be shown on the plan).
E. Roof-top plans for each bc:ilding showing all roof-top equipment (roof-top
equipment is required to be fully-screened by the architecturQ of the building and
painted in a color to match the color of the roo~. The roof-top plan of the parking
structure shall show City stan.iard dimensioned parking spaces and/or the hotel
amenities which shall serve guests and patrons of the Pointe'Anaheim hotels
only. The size, design and type of any hotel amenity must be shown on the Final
Site Plan. Building addresses shall also be shown on the roof pian (the location
and dimensions cf the address numbers shall be to the satisfaction of the Police
Department).
F. Landscaping plans showing all proposed planting materials and Landscape
PIanUTree Palette (90 copies) including color photographs to show the proposed
trees, shrubs and groundcover.
G. Above- and beiow-ground utility equipment shall be s;iown on each site plan and
landscape plan. Plans must indicate how any above-ground er,uipment is fully
screened by landscape from any public view.
H. Colored renderinqs (one full-scale set and 10 reduced color copies) of the site
improvements io show the building elevations from Harbor Boulevard, Katella
Avenue, Clementine Street (Future Freedman Way) and Freedman Way (future
Disney Way) and views ef khe interior portions of the site.
I. Material and color bcards for each building which show that ali building colors,
textures, and materials shall be compatible between on-site uses.
J. Material and color boards to show lho proposed decorative paving materials for
the interior courtyard areas of thA site and pedestrian gathering areas. The plan
shall show the location and dimensions of any proposed pedestrian walhways
from the pubiic sidewalk to the on-site uses. The design and location of thc~
walkways shall not impact the piacement of trees in the public right-of-way
parkways. In addition, the walkways shali not preclude the planting of the number
of trees required for the setback area by the Tha Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Design Plan.
K. Letter from the property owneddeveloper indicating how the Final Site Plan is in
compliance with The Disneyl~nd Resort Specific Plan Pointe'Anaheim Overlay
requirements and Conditional Use Permit No. 4078.
L, That the lighting fixture plan shall include the style of the fixture which shall be
compatfble with the project theme.
77. That the pr~perty owner/developer shall subm(t a coordinated signage program
for the entire Pointe'Anaheim development for Planning Commission's review
and approval as part of the Finsl Site Plan. The program shall, at a minimum,
include the following:
A. A sign theme/concept for the P~lnle`Anaheim project which demonstrates an
overall appearance, quality and type of sign, banner or other display device
similar to those utflized at Universal Ciry Walk, Fashion Isiand or Irvine
Spectrum.
B. Sign criteria for interior corporate sponsorship displa~~s (~aid displays could
include jumbotrons, banners or placards) which are i~~~ nded to be
visible/oriented primarily for patrons oi the Pointe'A~ °: eim proJect.
C. Sign criteria limiting interior wall signs from projectinc~ more than 50% of the
vertical height of the sign above the roof parap~t or 50% of the horizontai
length of the sign beyond the side of a building. Such signs shall not be
visible f~am the adjacent public right-of-way (measured at five (5) feet above
the grade of the sidewaik on the opposite side of the street from the
Pointe'Anaheim project) except through the limited view corridors set forth in
the Pointe'Anaheim Overlay.
D. Sign Criteria consistent with the adopted sign regulations for the
Pointe'Anaheim Overlay.
E. Standards for maintenance and replacement of damaged/broken signs and
banners and installation and maintenance af cha~geable sign copy, neon
signage or electronic readerboards.
F. Nrohibited signs include billboards, off-premises or off-site ciirectional signs,
on-site directional guidar~,:e and on-site directory s(gns which are not part of a
coordinated architectural, ,nformation, directional and regulatcary sign system,
paper signs, perrnanent'come-on" signs (e.g. "Sale Today", "Stop", "Look",
"Going out of Business", etc.), roof signs, vehicle signs (signs mounted or
displayed on a vehicle for adva:tfsing purposes) or ihe parking or storage of
advertising vehicles on pubiic or private property), or replfcas of official trafnc
control signs or signs so similar as to be confusing or hazardous to traffic
attached to or within the parking structure within the project.
78. That a maximum of Ane "non-interio~' wall sign shall be permitted for each major
commercial tenant over 10,000 square feet and that the location of these wal°
signs shall be identified on the building eievations submitted as part of the Finai
Site Plan application and shall be subject to the review and approval ~of the
Planning Commission as part of the Final Site Plan.
79. That prior to issuance of each sign permit, the property owneddeveloper/tenant
shall submit a letter and plans demonstrating that the sign plans conform with the
coordfnated signage program and major commercial tenant wali sign locations
adopted in connectfon with the approval af the Final Site Plan.
80. That prior to the submiltal of the Final Site Plan appl(cation, the site plan shall
show that the Pointe'Anaheim and Super 8 driveways has been redesigned to
combine the driveways or to meet the distance requirement set forth in The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (minfmum 40-foot wide distance belween
driveways seroing adjacent parcels). If redesigned to combine the driveways,
proof of agreement with the H•ith the adjacent property owner shall also be
provided to the satisfaction of the City Altorney's Office.
81. That prior to the submittal of the Finai Sfte Plan applfcation, the property
owner/developer shall su6mit a street improvement plan to the Public Works
Director for the installation of the ultimate public right-of-way fmprovements on the
north side of Katella Avenue from Clementine Street to the first Painte'Anahefm
proje~t driveway west of Clementine Street to improve vehicular access to the
project. The property owneddeveloper shall be responsible for all costs
associated with the preparation and processing of the street improvement plan
and all costs associated with the construction of the improvements to the
satisfaction of the Pubiic 1rVorks Director. These imFrovements shall be
completed prior to the issuance of the first final buildinc~ and zoning inspection,
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or commencement of activities/uses
pursuant to Section 13.02.d26.020 of the Anaheim Municipai Code, whichever
occurs first.
82a. That prior to the submittal of the Final Site Plan application, the property
uwneddeveloper shail submit a street improvement plan to the Public Works
Director for the construction of z free right-turn lane on the south side of
Freedman Way from the parking garage driveway exit to Clernentine Street (13-
foot lane width) in order to irnprove autbound parking structure operations. The
property owner/developer shall be responsible for ail costs associated with the
preparation and processing ef the street improvement plan and all costs
associated with the construction of the improvements to the satisfaction of the
Public Works Director. These improvements shall be completed prior to the
issuance of the first final buiiding and zoning inspectian, issuance of a certificate
of occupancy or commencement of activities/uses pursuant to Section
18.02.026.020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, whichever occurs first.
82b. Prior to the submittai of the Final Site Plan application, the property
owneddeveloper shail redesign the site plan adjacent to the Freedman Way
improvements addressed in Condition No. 82a to maintain the minimum building
setbaci<s adjacent to Freedman Way.
83. That prior to the submittal of the Final Site Plan application, plans shall show the
detailed development plans for the entire 29.1-acre site.
84. That prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property
owner/developer shall provide evidence of ownership or control (e.g., by long-
te~ m lease) of the entire 29.1-acre site and that the parcels are combined as one
property (e.g., by parcei map, lot line adjustment or lot ties). Said evidence shall
be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office.
85. That prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property
owner/developer shall submit a detailed construction schedule which addresses
each of the project components. An updated schedule shall be submitted to the
Planning Department every six months until the project is compieted.
86. The Pointe•Araheim project will result in the reconslruction (including relocation
and rea(ignment) of street improvements (including, but not limited to, driveway
approaches, streetscape, landscape and bus stop improvements) along Katella
Avenue, Harbor Boulevard, Freedman Way and Clementine Street. The property
owneddeveloper shall be responsible for all costs associated with ths preparation
and processing of plans for these street improvements and all costs associated
with the construction of the improvements to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Director.
A. Prior to the appraval of 2he Finai Site Plan application, the property
owner/developer shall submit a preliminary public right-of-way improvement plan
that addrasses the proposed improvements. This plan shall be consistent with
the Anaheim Resort Identity Program, the Anaheim Resort Public Realm
Landscape Program and the criteria and construction details that are shown on
the approyed Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard improvement plans. The
preliminary plan shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director
and be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director pdor to the approval
of the Final Site Plan.
B, Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the final plan shall be prepared to
the satisfaction of the Fublic Works Director and be reviewed and approved by
the Public Works Director.
C. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, issuance of a certificate of
occupancy or commencement of activities/uses pursuant to Section
18.02.026.020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, whichever occurs first, the street
improvements shown on the approved plan shall be completed to the satisfaction
of the Pubiic Works Director.
87. That the property owner/developer shall be responsible for all costs assaciated with
the review of the Final Site Plan by an architect, licensed by the State uf California
and selected by the City, to review the Final Site Plan for conformance with The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The property owner/developer
shall pay all costs associated with this review prior to the Final Site Plan being
scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting.
88. That prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, plans shall show that no less than 20°io of
the interior courtyards of the Pointe*Anaheim project shall be landscaped with a
variety of shrubs, groundcover, mature trees and potted plants to create a lush
garden environment for the pedestrian (this landscaping is in addition to the required
landscaped setback areas). Seating areas and decorative features inciuding, but not
Iimited to, interactive and decorative water fountains and works of art, may also be
included in this percentage. Adjace~~t to solid portions of building walls (i.e., where
there are no store-front windows), small grouping of trees or shrubs, raised planters
and site furnishings shali be located to minimize views of blank walls.
89. That prior to the approval of the Final Site Plan, a line-of-sight study shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department which shows that the
ligh± poles on the roof-top areas of the parking structure shall not be visibie from the
adjacent public right-of-way, as measured from a 5-foot high view point from adjacent
off-site areas.
90. That no exterior-mounted air conditioning facilities shall be permitted (n the
Pointe'Anaheim Overlay.
91. That prior to the approval of the Final Site Plan, elevation plans shali show that all
plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of a building or
structure shall be fully screened by the architecture of the building; that all exterior
appurtenances such as conduits, shall be minimized and integrated into the
structure; and, that any rain gutters and downspouts and vents shall be finished to
match the building materials and/or colors.
92. That prior to the approval of the Final Site Plan, plans shall show how all on-site
service and loading area operations shall be fully-screened from the public right-of-
way.
93. That prior to the approval of the Final Site Plan, plans shall sho~+r that major project
entries shall be enhanced with ~ more densely planted shrub palette utilizing annual
color, perenniai color and accent trees.
94. That in the event that the building shown in the middle of the Harbor Boulevard view
corridor on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5 is destroyed or proposed to be removed for any reason,
it shall be replaced with the construction ~f an equivalent structure (same size and
dimensions shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5 and Elevation Exhibit No. 7) in order to
provide for the same limited views of the interior signage in this view corridor. Prior
to the approval of a demolition permit for said buildinc~, a Finai Site Plan showing the
design of the replacement structure shall have been reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission and a building permit shall have been issued for the new
building. Construction of the new building shall commence immedi2tely following
demolition of said building. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for said
building, an unsubordinated covenant providing for the reconstruction, approved by
the Planning Department and (n a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be
recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded
covenant shail be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning Department.
95. That prior to advertising for any special event which will draw visitors to the
Painte*Anaheim project, the details of said event shall be submitted tu and approved
by the Ciry Traffic and Transportatfon Manager.
96. That the approval of Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No.
92-1 is contingent upon the approvai and adoption of General Plan Amendment No.
359.
cr3634ch.doc
MTTIGATION 1170NTTURING PLAN NO. 004
Project : Pointe~Anaheim
Project Actions: General Plan Amendment No. 359
Amendment No. 4 to The Disneyland Resort Specific PIan No. 92-1
Conditional Use Pernut No. 4078
Amendment to the Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program
Development P.greement No. 99-01
Location: East of Harbor Boulevard, South of Freedman Way (future Disney Way), West of Clementine Street (future Freedman Way) and North of
Kat~lla Avenue within District A and Portion of Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay of the Disneyland Resart Specific Plan
This Mitigation Monitoring Pl~n includes those mitigution mensures applicuble to this project from Modi6ed Mitigution Monitoring Program No. 0067 for the
Disneyland Rcsort Specific Plan (EIR No. 311) and additionul mitigution measures as identified in thc M9tiguted Ncgative Declaration approved in conjuuction with the
Pointe~Anaheim Project.
Terms and Definitions:
1. Propcrty Osvner/Deve[oper - Pointe~Mnheim, LLC
2. ProJect Design Featurcs (PDF's) - Mensures incocpornted into the Yointe~Aneheim Project by lhe properiy owner/developer with the intent of minimizin6 Potentinl environmentnt impncts• 'Ihe project
dcsign fentures includcd in this mitigation monitoring pimi will be implcmcnted as mitigntion measures.
3. Environmental EqutvalenUTiming - Any Project Design Peature or Mitigation Measure end tinting thereoC, subject lo Qie npproval of the City, which will hnve the same or superior result and will have
the same or saperior etCect on the environment. The Planning Deparimant, in wnlunction wilh any epproprinte agencics or City depnrtmants, shall detemune the adequacy of any proposed
"environmental equivalenUtiming" nnd, if detertnined necessary, mny rcCer snid dete~mination to the Plsnning Commission. My costs associated with informntion required in order to make a
determinetion oC environmentnl equivalency/timing shnll be bome by the property owneddeveloper. Stalt'time for reviews will be chnrged on a time and materials bnsis nt the mte in the City's adopled
Fee Schedule.
4. Tlming -'1'his is t}ic point where u mitigution mcnsurc/project dusign fi:nture snust be monilorcd for complinnca In qic casc wlicre multiple nction items nre indicnted, it is the first point wherc
wmpliance associnted with lhe miligation mensurelproject design feature must be monitored. Once the initiel uction item hns been wmplied wiQi, no additional monitoririg pursunnt to lhe Nlitigntion
Moni.oring Plan will occur, as routine City prnctices nnd procedures will ensure that the inlent of the measure/project design fenture hes beett wmplied with. For exnmple, if the timing is, "to be shown
on approved building plans" subsequent to issunnce oC the building pennit consistent with !hc approved plans will be final building nnd zoning inspections pursuent to the building peimit to ensure
compliunce.
5. Responslbillty for Monitoriug - Shnll mean that compliance with U~e subject mitignlion me~svre(s) shnll be reviewed and deternuned adeqimte by nll depxriments listed far each mitigntion meosure.
Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plnn which have permit uuthority in conjunction with ihe mitigation measure.
G. Ongofng Mittgation Mcasures - The mitigntion measures thnt are designated lo occur on nn ongoing basis as pnrl of this Mitigntion Monitoring Plun wil, be monitored in lhe fotnt of an annuul lettcr
from the property owner/developer in Jnnuary of ench year demonstrating how complinnce with the subject mcasure(s) hes becn nohieved. Whcn ~mplinnce with a miGgation measurrlprojcct design
fcature has becn demonstrnted for u period of one yenr, monitoring of the mitigalion meesureJproject dcsign feahve will be dcemed to be sulisfled end no further monitoring will occur. For miligntion
measures/project design fcatwes thnt are to bc monitorcd "Ongoing During Construction", the ennual letter will review those miligution mensures~Project design features only while wnsttuction is
occucring; monitoring will be dixontinued atter construction is complete. A final nnnual letter will be provided nt the close oCconsliuction.
7. Butld(ng Permit - For pwposes of Uus Mitigation Monilaring Plan, a building pemtit shell be defined as any pcrmit issued for consWction of a new building or structural expnnsion or modification of
nny existing building, but shnll not include any pem~its requ'ved for interior tennnt improvemnits or minor ndditions to an exisling structure or building.
PAM~4PLA1v.DOC S/6/~I9
Mitigation Monitoring Pian PJo. 004
Project: ~uinte~Anaheim
Page 2
T+ming Measure::;: Respons~ble;for
_ _ ..
s'Moni4orin `':
LAND USE-RELATED PLANS AND POLICIES
Prior to approval oE the Final Site Pians (inciuding, but not limited io, a site plan, elevations, landscape plans and signage plans) Planning Department,
Plan shall be submitted by the property owner/developer and will be reviewed for consistency with Ptanning Division
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan.
Prior to approval of the Final Site The property owneNdeveioper wili not seek to change the entitlements for the 1,050 hotel Planning Department,
Plan; and, on-going during Project rooms into any other use. These hotels rooms will be developed as an integrai part of 4he Planning Division;
construction and operations ProJect, which will be developed in a continuous single phase. The design of the Project wili
incorporate the hotels as integral components of the sito pfan, and the ProjecCs construction
will be consistent with said plan. It is noted, however, that as a general rule, hotels can take
longerto design, constn~ct, fumish, equip and train operating personnel than other uses
proposed in the Project. Notwithstanding, the properly owneNdeveloper anticipates and wili use
alt reasonabie commercial efforts to open a majoriiy (51 °/a or more) of the hotel rooms
concurcentiy with the grand opening date for the retail, dining and entertalnment components of
the Project.
Prior to 4he first finat building and The property owner/developer shall have been issued building permits and construction shall Planning Department,
zoning inspection, certificate of have commenced on the remaining hotel rooms. Planning Division;
occupancy, or commencement of
any activitiesluses authorized by
Condiiional Use Permit No. 4078,
and,
As soon as practical following the The prope~ty owneNdeveloper will open the balance of the hotel rooms. Planning Department,
grand open(ng date for the rest of Planning :'~'~;ision;
the Project, but in no event any later
than 1 S months after
commencement of any
activities/uses authorized by
Conditional Use Permit No. 4078
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
Prior to approv~l of the Finai Site The properly owner/developer shali submit plans detailing the setbacks for the parking Planning Department,
P{an structures and landscapiny plans which minimize compatibility impacls of the parking facilities Planning Division
on surroundin areas, consistent with Section 5.8 of The Disne land Resort S ecific Plan.
P7or to issuance of the first building A pre-project study of radio transmission from the AM 1500 Highway Advisory Radio Planning Depariment,
peRnit Transmission Tower located on the Fire Station No. 3 site shall be conducted by the property Planning Division
owner/developer to determine baseline conditions. Six months after topping out or any eariier
time as determined necessary by the City of Anaheim, a follow-up study of radio tower
transmissions shall be undertaken immediatel b the ro er', owneddevelo er. if the Cit of
~~~i~.a~
3-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan -vo. OG4
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 3
` ;' Timing ~~ . _: Measure ; ' Responsible for
,.:,
_ _ -, -
_. ,.
sMonitonn :::
Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a significant impact :,-~ radio
trar.smissien, a signal booster relay system, tower relocation, or other solution as approved by
the City of Anaheim shall be imptemented by the property owneddevelaper as soon as
racticable.
TF2ANSPORTATION AiVD CIRCULAT ION
Priar to issuance of each buildin~ Appropriate traffic signal assessment fees shail be paid by the praperty ovrneddeveloper to ihe Planning Department,
permit City of Anaheim in amounts determin~d by the City Gouncil Resolution in effect at the time of Building Division; Public
issuance of the buiiding permit or credit given for City-authorized improvemants. Works Depa~tment, Traffic
and Transportation
Division
Prior ta approvat of the first final The propeny awneddeveloper shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination ~f Planning ~epartment,
subdivision map or issuance of the easernents), inctuding nec.P,ssary construction easernents, the ultimate rights-of-way (as Planning Division; Public
fcrst building permit, whichever indicated in the General P~an Circulatlon Element) for the foilowing a~terial highway/street half Works Department,
occurs first sectfons on or adjacent to parcels under its ownership to the City of Anaheim: D~velopment Services
Division
a. Katella Avenue (to uttimate 8-lane facility)
b. Harbor Boulevard
c. Disney Way (currently Freedman Way)
d. Freedman Way (currently Clementine Street)
Within 120 ~ays of acquiring if, after the in~tial dedications, any additional parcels are acquired by the properiy Planning Department,
properties adjacent ta arterial owner/developer adjacent to the arterial highway/street intersection half-sections included in Flanning Division; I'ublic
highways/street inte~section half MM 3.3-3A of Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067, the applicant shall notify the Workr Department,
sections City in writing of said acquisition and the uitimate rights-of-way for said properties shall be Development Services
irrevocabiy offered for dedication to the City of Anaheim. Division
Rrior to app~ oval of the first grading A phasing plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the City Engineer demonstra!ing Public Works Department,
p~an how the following improvements, as approved by the City Engineer, will be constructed by the Traffic and Transponation
property owneddeveloper. Division
- Freedman Way/Pointe~kAnaheim driveway intersectian and signal;
- Freedman Way between Disney Way and Katelia Avenue (including the median); and
-D~al westbound and no;thbo~nd left tum lanes at the intersection of Disney Way and
Freedman Way
Prior to issuance of each building Appropriate tra(fc impact and improvement fees shatl be paid by the properiy owneNdeveloper Pianning Department,
pei~nit to the City of Anaheim in amounts deieRnined by the City Council Resolution in e(fect at the Building Division; Public
time of issuance of the building permlt with credit given for City-authorized (mprovements Works DepaRment, Traffic
providad by the praperly owner/d~veloper, and, participate in atl applfcable reimbursement or and Transportation
benefit ~istricts which have been established. Division
pammplnn.Joc
3•7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anafieim
Page 4
'; ' Timing ;', .
,; :
; ;; ; , Measure. .
;:i ;:, Responsiblefor
`Monit~rin ':
To be shown on street improvement Access roads leading up to the parking faciliiies shal! be sized to accommodate traffic at peak Public Works Dep2rtment,
plans; to be implemented prior to haurs, thereby substantially reducing the likelihood of backups, onto City streets and freeway Design Division
final building and zoning inspection ramps.
for the arkin structure.
Prior to issuance of the first building The property awneddevelopEr shai! fully fund the implementaiion of the SCOOT Sy~tem at the Public Works Department,
peRnit Haster Street/Katella Avenue intersection and along the Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Traffic aad Transportation
Disney Way, and Freedman Way corridors in the Anaheim Resort area. The specific Division
improvements to be implemented are identified in 7able 4.3-8. Property owneddeveloper shall
also fund the installation of SCOOT loo~ detector~ at ali 16 Iocations as well as the installation
of new traffic signai controllers and cabinets at ihe eight locations iden:ified in Table 4.3-8,
which will also include s3gnal preemption f~r fire response vehic!es. IrrSplementation will be fo
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pavement repair, if needed to provide additionai conduit,
will be ~rovided by the property owneddevelaper to the satisfaction of th;: CPiy Engineer.
TABLE 4.3-8
LOCRTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATIOM OF
SCOOT SIGNAL SYSTEM UPGRADE MITIGATIUN MEASURE
Intersectlon Install SCOOT Install 2070 Traffic
Loop Detectors Signal Controller
Ball & Harbor X
Harbor & I-5 NB Ramps X
Harbor & I-5 SB Ramps X
Harbor & Manchester X
Harbor & Esplanade X
Harbor & Disney Way X
Harbor 8 Kaielia X
Katella & Freedman X
Kotelia & Haster X X
Katelia & I-5 SB Ramps X X
Katella & I-5 NB Ramps X X •
Katella & Lewis X X
Freedman & Disney Way X X
D(sney Way & I-5 SB Ramps X X
Disney Way & Haster X X
Freedman & Pointe Anaheim Access X X
pammplen.doc
3•7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 5
Timin
9
,
,
, r Measure, :
:;
Responsible;Tor
_
> ; „ , ;,
<. ` ;:; : ? ;: ,
' "
> Moriito~n :
Prior to the first final building and The Property owner/developer shall provide proof of participation in the Anaheim Public IlUorks Department,
zoning inspection; and, Transportation Network (ATN) Traffic and Transportation
I Division
On-going dvring Project operations Every owner andlor lessee shall be a voting member of the Anaheim Transportation Network
(ATN), subject to the terms and provisions of the by-laws and association rules of the ATN.
Every owner and/or lessee shatl participate in ATN coordinated transportation demand
management efforts designed to decrease traffic congestion and increase ridesharing.
Ev~ry owner andlor lessee shall financially parlicipate in the operation of a ciean fuei shuttle
system, if established.
Every owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact who will be responsible for
coorcfinatin wiih the ATN and im lementin ~II tri mit~-ai~~~~ ~~,~s~~;ss.
~riorio approvai of the Finai Site A Parking Structure Layout and Signing Pian demonstrating a tayout of req~ired parking spaces Public Wo~ics Department,
Pian and signage shall be provided to the ~ubtfc Works DepaRment, Traffic and Tra~:sportation Traffic and TranspoRation
Manager, for review and approval. Division
Prior to finai building and zoning The property owneddeveloper wiil implemenl and administer a comprehensive Transportation Public Works Department,
inspection; and, cn-going during Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. Objectives of the TDM proq~am shall Trafflc and Transportation
Project operetions be to increa~e ridesharing and use of altematile transportation modes by guests and provide a Divisior.
menu of commute altematives for employees to reduce proJecl-generated trips.
A menu of TDM program strategies and elements for future employee commute options
include, but are not limited to, the following:
. Onsite Service. Onsite services, such as food, retail, and other services be provided.
• Ridesharing. A computer listing of all employee members be developed for ti~e purpose of
providfng a'matching" of employees with other employees who live in the same
geographic areas and who could rideshare.
• Vanpooling. A computer listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of
employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool.
+ Transit Pass. Southem Califom~s ^apid Transit District and Orange County
Transportation Authority (inc;uding commuter rail) passes bo promoted through financial
assistance and onsite sale~ to encourage empioyees to use the various transit and bus
services from throughout the region.
. Commuter Bus. As commuter "express" bus service expands throughout the regian,
passes for use on these lines may be provided for employees who choose to use this
service. Financial incentfves be rovided.
P,m~,,t.~.aa
3-7•99
Mitigation Monitoring P!an No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
o Shurile Service. A computer listing of all ernployees living in proximity to the proje~t be
generaied, and a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work
by means other than the auiomobile.
• Bicycling. A Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicyciing altemative to emptoyees.
Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers be provided as part of this program. Maps of
bicycle routes throuahout the area be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these
options.
a Rentai Car Fieet. A"fleet vehicle' program be developed to provide employees who travel
to work by means other than an automobile with access to automobiles in case of
emergency, medical appointments, etc. This service would help employees use
altemative modes of transportation by ensuring that they woutd be able to have personat
transportation in the event of speciat circumstances.
. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. A program to provide employees who rideshare, or use
transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental
car, shuttle, ur other vehicle, in 4he event of emergencies during the work shift.
e Ta~get Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. An incentives program for ridesharing and
other altemative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of iongest
employee commute trips.
. Stagger shifts.
• Develop a"compressed work week° program, which provides for fewer work days but
longer daily shiks as an option for employees.
• Explore ihe possibilitjr of a`telecommuting' program that would link some employees via
electronic means (e.g., computer with modem).
• Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare
or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work.
• Access. Preferential access to high accupancy vehicles and shuttles may be provided.
. Finar~ciai Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transi4. (Currently, Federal law provides
tax-free status for up to $60 per month per employee contributions to employees who
vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools).
• Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Employees offered financiai incentives for bicycling to
work.
. Special "Premium" for the Participatfon and Promotion of Trip Reduction. TickeUpasses to
special events, vacations, etc, be offered to employees who recruit other empioyees for
vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs.
• Actively recruit prospective employe~es residing rvithin a 30-minute commute shed.
. Design incentive p,-;,~,-ams 4or rarpo~linc~ and other altemative transportation modes so as
to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips.
Page 6
pnnunplandoc
3•7-99
Mitigation Moniloring Pian No. 004
Project: Pointe~kAnsheim
Page 7
` Timin9 '; !
s : < < ' <. Measure:
: : '
?
:
Respons~ble.!for
:
<.
. ,,,
Pnor to the first final building and . ; >
:
, . , , ; .., < .. . ..>< : ,
The property owner/developer will provide a Parkmg Maintenance and Operation Plan to the
.
' iMonitodn<:
. ,..,'
Public VVorks Department
zoning inspection; and
Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Manager, for review and approval; and, ,
Traffic and Transportation
implamentation on-going during said Plan shali be implemented on an on-going basis during Project operation. Division
Project operations
TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
Parkin
Prior to approval of the Final Site The Pointe Anaheim parking structure ~ill be designed to provide striped parking spaces for Public Works Department
Plan; and
4,800 cars and 25 bus spaces, with the ability to accommodate 400 more vehicles. The size of ,
Traffic and Transportation
the parking garage will increase to approximately 1,600,Q00 square feet, and wiil add up to two Division
levels to the garage structure. The height of the structure will be within the established height
limitations set forth in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan.
Priorto the first building and zoning Further, the property ownerJdeveioperwill submit a plan to the City's Traffic and Transportation
inspection Manager for review and approval demonstrating how the ~roperty owneNdeveloper wili either
provide or cause to be provided on the days and at the times needed to accommodate guest
demand, tandem emptoyee parkinc~, valet parking (for hotel, retaii, dining and entertainment
uses), or other means to increase the number of City standarcl dimensioned parking spaces
available for visitors to Pointe Anaheim, bringing the total number of vehicles that can be
accommodated in the garage to 5,200 cars.
Pedesfrian Safe
Upon commencement of any If reasonably nesded in order io regulate the flow of pedestrian traffic, as determined by the
' Public WorYs Department
activity/uses authorized by
City
s Traffic and Transportation Manager, the property owneddeveloper shall pay all costs ,
Traffic and Transportation
Conditional Use Permit No. 4078; associated with providing one or more pedestrian crossing officers at tiarbor Boulevarcl and Division
and, on-going during Project Disney Way, in order to facilitate the tlow of pedestrians during 4he "Peak Period
" vrhich is
operat~ons ,
defined as the time period from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. during the following seasonal peaks: the
Memoriai Day weekend through the Labor Day weekend; the week prior to, du~ing and following
Christmas week; Easter weeks (one week before and one week after); an~, at any other time
determined to be necessary by the City's Traffic and Transportation Manager. The continued
need for this officer(s) will be reviewed by the Gity's Traffic and Transportation Manager at least
once annually, and the day~ and/or hours of pedestrian crossing officer staffing shall be
adjusted, when determined necessary by the City's Traffic and Transportation Manager.
pammplandoc
3•7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 8
Timiny >Measure;; Responsibte;for
:iMonitorin'
Prior to the first final building and The property owner/developer shall submit to the City's Tra~c and Transportation Manager for Public Works Department,
zoning inspection; and, review and approval, a program for coorclinating traffic signal timing in the area (within the Tra~c and Transportation
limits of the Scoot signal upgrades) which shall thereafter be implemented by the prope~ty Division
owneNdeveloper. In addition, the properiy owneddevetoper shall submit to the City's Tra~c
and Transportation Manager for review and approval, a study assessing the benefits of
restricting, during certain peak exiting times, pedestrian crossings on the crosswaik located on
the north side of the inte[section of Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way to improve the
circulation of vehicular traffic by causing all east-west crossing pedestrian traffic to occur on the
south side of such intersection where pedestrian crossings will not slow the east to north tuming
movement of cars exiting Disneyland.
On-going during Project operations If such restricted pedestrian movement is determined to be ne::essary by the City's Traffic and
Transportation Manager, the property owneNdeveloper shali pay all costs associated with the
design and implementation of such restrict?~ ~~~~waiK far this intersection to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer, within the timefrro;ne established by the City Engineer.
AIR f~UALiTY
Prior to issuance of each building The property ownerideveloper shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and Snuth Coast Air Quality
permit impi~mentation ot Best Available Control Technology (BACT} fn~ all permitted rnaw and Management District;
modified st~;~~nary sources. Copies of permits shall be given to the Pisnning Derartment. Planning Department,
Planning Division
On-going during Project operations The property owner/developer shali schedule goods movements for off-paak traffic hours to Public Works Department,
reduce emissions to the extent practicable. Traffic and Transportation
Division
i~rior to issuance of each bui!ding The property owneddeveiaper shall submit evidence that low emissiort paints and coatings are South Coast Air Quality
permit utilized in the design and construction of buildings in compliance ~vith AQMD regulations. This Management District;
information shall be denoted on the proJect plans and specifications. Planning Department,
Building Division
Prior to issuance of each building The project design will incorporate the following energy-saving features which will also Pubiic Utilities
permit contribute to reduced emissions: Department, Electric
Services Administration,
• Improved thermal integrity of stNCtures and reduced thermal load through use of automated Resource Efficiency
time clocks or occupant sensors.
• Efficient heating and other appliances.
• Incorporation of appropriate passive solar design.
• Proper sealing of buildfngs.
P~,,,~t~.aa
S•7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 9
i : Timing . `;. ; ';: : ?; Measure;;
!
:
; Responsibie;for
,
'
;
:
,,; ,
; ;
> .. : ;
.. .::
' .~
Monitorln
On-going during Project operations The Qroperty ov~ner/developer shall participate in marketing programs v~hich promote the Public Works Department,
Anaheim ResoR area as a mini-vacation site to encourage use of facilitiPS withir~ the area Traffic and Transportation
rather than takin cars to destinations off-site. Division
NOISE
Prior to approval of the Final Site The design and orientation of any use, such as those which could involve amplified live music Planning Department,
Pian and open-air festival events and the family entertainment center, shall be reviewed by a Building Division and
certified acoustical engineer. The property owneNdeveloper shall submit a report, for review Code Enforc:ement
and approval by the City, to ensure that noise from areas which involve live amplified music, Division
open-air festival events, do not exceed the noise levels established by the City of Anaheim
Sound Pressure ~evel Ordinance.
Prior to final building and zoning A Noise Monitoring Program prepared by a certified acouslical engineer shall be submitted to Planning Depa~tment,
inspections the Pianning Department for review and approval for any component of Pointe Anaheim that Plsnning Division and
has the potential to involve amplified music or n~ise from open-air festfval events and, within Buitding DivEsion
nine mnnths of commencement of said activity, the properly owneddevetoper shail submit the
results of the Noise Monitoring Program conducted by a certified acoustical engineer to ensure
that there are no violations of the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance from the Pointe Anaheim
activity outside the Project. If noise in excess of the Sound Rressure Level Ordinance is
detected, the property owneddeveloper shall moc~(fy operations within three days to bring the
ncise-generating activity into confortnance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.
EARTH RESOURCES - GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY
Prior to approval of each grading The prope~ty owneNdeveloper shail submit a thorough soils and geological report for the area Public Works Department,
plan to be graded, based on proposed grading and prepared by an engineering geologist and Development Services
geotechnical engineer. The report shall comply with Title 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Divisfon
Prior to issuance of each building The property owner/developer shall submit for review and approvat detailed foundation design Planning Department,
permit information for the subject buildings, prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations Buiid(ng Division
by a geotechnical engineer.
Prior to issuance of each foundation The property owneddeveloper shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer for Planning Department,
permit review and approval which shall investigate the subject fourdation excavations to deterrnine if Building D(vision
soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility
does not underlie the footing.
Prior to issuance of each building The property owner,'developer shall submit plans showing that the proposed stNCture has been Planning Department,
permit analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recant s~ismfc standarcls Building Division
in the Uniform Buiiding Code adopted by the City of Anaheim.
pommplnn.doc
3•7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Pr~ject: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 10
Timing ; ;;
) ;:. , ;
_ . ,. . .. > . : ,:.;' ;' ;Measure ;;:
,
;;
, ,!! ``
. ,., Responsible'for
Mcmrtorin;..
, . .. ...
GROUNDWATER AfdD SUKFACE HYDROLQGY
Prior to approval of a grading pian; The property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan Public Wo~cs Department,
and, implemented during PcoJect (MDRMP} for reviev~ and approvat and pay the required Suuth Central Area Master Plan of Development Services
construction and operation Drainage (SCAMPD) storm drain fees. The Master Plan shatl include, but not be limited to, the Division; Regional Water
following items: Quality Control Board;
' Orange Count}r Flood
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic Control 9(strict
calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm.
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control o~ project-generated
drainage and runoff.
c. Detailed assessment of existing water quality, potential water quality impacts, and a
description of proposed measures to maintain water quality to the extent requi~ed by the
Nationai Pollutant Discharc~e Elimination System (NPDES) and its regulations, including
the following:
(1) Incorporation of structural and nonstructural City-controlled Besl Management
Practices (BMPs). BMIPs shall, to the extent permitted by law, include, but are not
limited to, containment of masonry and paint wastes on the construction site; proper
disposal of vehicle fuel and maintenance wastes; disposal of trash and debris;
prohibiEing water wash dawn of paved areas (both during and after construction
unless allowed by the NPDES permit); and education/training far constructio~
workers on these practices. Engfneering details, maintenance procedures, and
funding responsibilities of these BMPs shall also be described.
(2) Incorporation of ineasures to compty ~vith applicable actions to be identified by the~
RWQGB in conformance with the State Water Resources Control Boarcl (SWRCB)
statewide water quality conirol plan for intand surtace waters, adopted April 11,
1991.
(3) Description of a water quality monitoring progrgm to moniior water quaiity di;ring
and subsequent to construction and to evaluate the effectiveness of BM(=s. The
water quality monitoring program shali identify: (1) the personlagency responsible
for implementing the program, (2) sources of pollutants fn runoff (e.g., nuisance
flows from development areas, irrigation (lows), (3) specific types of pollutants
expected in runoff that will be mon(tored (e.g., total suspended solfds, phosphorous,
lead), (4) water auality sampling slations that are representative of runoff from the
sources identified above 5 sam Iin ro ram methodolo includin devices to
r,.,nmp~.n.ao~
5-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 11
Timing Measure:, .. , Responsible;~or
"-Monitorin `
be used and frequency and duration of sampling, (6) method tor evaluating data
collected fram a sampling program, including threshold standards for determining
effectiveness of BMPs, and (~ additional measures, if necessary, to increase the
effectiveness of the BMPs to the threshold standards identified in C 1 above.
Prior to issuance of each building The property owneNdeveloper shail submit landscaping and irrigation plans and an Irrigation Public Utilities
permit Management Program. This landscape plan shall inctude a maintenance program to control Depa~tment, Electric
the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and an irrigation system designed to minimize surface Services Administration,
runoff and overvvatering. Additionally: Resouroe Efficiency;
Community Services
a. The landscape plans shall be prepared and cerlified by a licensed landscape architect. Department, Parks
The landscape arch~tect shall submit plans in accordance with Anaheim's Landscape Division; Planning
Water Efficiency Ordinance and Guidelines. Department, Planning
Division
b. The Irrigation Management Prog~am shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation
system and shall be designed by an irrigation engineer (p~ans to be submitted in
accorclance with the Specific Ptan}. The sys!em shall ensure that irtigation rates do not
exceed the infiltration of local so(Is and that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do
not exceed appropriate Ievels of frequencies.
c. The landscape and imgation ptans shatl be developed to be consistent with the provisions
of the Specific Plan, which require that the maximum annual water allowance for the
project not exceed 80 percent of the mean annual evapotranspiration, or that the
landscape irrigation system include water-conserving features such ss low-flow irrigation
heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, ilow sensing controls, rain sensor~, soil
moislure sensors, and otherwater-conserving equipment. In addit(on, ail irrigation
sys'cems shall be designed so that t;iey will function prope~ly with reclaimed wster, if it
should become avaitable.
On-going during ProJect operations The property owneNdeveloper shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not Pubiic Works Department,
maintained by the City of Anaheim including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots Streets and Sanitation
on not less than a monthly basis. Using water to clean streets, parking lots, and other areas Division
shall be allowed on a periodic basfs if allowed in the appiicant's NPDES permit. Nightly
washdown shall be allowed in the family entertainment center and, where advisable to maintain
safe and sanitary working conditions, if ellowed in the property owneddevelopers and City's
NPDFS pertnit. Flushing debris, residue, and sediment down the storm drains shall conform to
the property owneNdeveloper's NPDES requirements. Properly owneddeveloper agrees that
mate~ial deposited in City storm drains shall nat be in v(olation of the City's NPDES permit.
pammplen.doc
S•7•99
Mit3gation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page i2
Timi~~g
': s
: `Measure;
; '; ~
; •Responsible for
s
- .
: < . `::Momtorin:
Pnor to each final buiiding and The property owneddeveloper shall submit a Certificate of Substantial Completion, as Planning Department,
zoning inspection described in the Specific Plan, which establishes that the landscape irrigation systems hava Planning Division
been installed as s ecified in the a roved landsca in and irri ation lars,
To be instailed with Project water To reduce the projecYs demand on potable water, the property owner/developer shail instali Public Utilities
mains; and, to be connected if water lines on-site so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation and other Department, Water
reclaimed water becomes availabie u oses. Services Administration
CONSTRUCTION
Demolition And Earfhwork ~
Prior to issuance of each grading The property owneddeveloper shall submit Demoiition and Imnort/Export Pians. The pians Public Works Department,
permit (for Import/ Export Plan) and shall include identification of offsite locations for materiai export from the project and options Traffi~ an~ Transportation
prior to issuance of demolition for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale Division
permit (for Demolition Plan) to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transFort to an environmenfally
cleared landfili, with ariempts made to move it within Orange County. The property
owner/developer shali offer recyciable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale
or removai by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all
can be reused on the project site. •
T~ans,vortation and Clrculafion
Pi~or ;o issuance of the first building The property ownedde~eloper shall submit a Traffic Mitigation and Construciion Phasing and Public Wor4cs Department,
permit; and, Control Plan. The Traffic Mitigation, Construction Phasing and Controi Plan shall identify the TraKc and Transportation
following: Division; Planning
Department, Planning
a. A Construction Staging Area Pian showing the location and size of the construction staging Division
area. The Plan shall atso show how the staging area will be scr~eened from view in
compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Prior to approval of a grading plan or b. A Construction Barcier Plan shawing the location and types of barriers that will be in place
issuance af demoliSion or building during grading and construction. Said plan shall provide for all construction areas to be
permits, whichever occ~rs first; and, screened from view, in compiiance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code and shall
include provision for the type and height of the barriers to be plaaed along ali construciion
perimeters prior to the commencement of demo(ition, site preparation, or grading,
whichever occurs first.
Prior to approval of a grading plan or c. A Truck Route Plan identifying truck routes along arteriais, avoiding residential areas to
issuance of demolition or building the extent feasible and in compliance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. The Plan
permit, whichever occurs fi~st; and, shall show conformance with the extemal noise limiis for construction between 7 p.m. and
7 a.m. The Plan shail also prahihit construction t~a~c on residentiai streets where
improvements are not planned and shall provide measures to ensure that truck drivers are
directed awa from residenrial streets and travel on a roved routes oni .
P~~i~.a~
sa•~a
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Poin4e~C•Anaheim Page 13
Measures to assist in guiding truck movement on the arteria! roadway systern include, b~t P~blic Works Department,
are not limi4ed to, pr~vision of truck route maps to truck drivers and plscement of Traffic and Transportation
flagpersons and constNCtion signage at appropdate locations. The Truck Route Plan shall Division; Planning
provide for monitoring of street wnditions an~ potential repairing a~d/or repaving by Department, Code
property owneNdeveloper after completion of constNCtion as reyuired by the City Eniorcement Division
Engineer. This plan shall be adhe~red to throughout the project constNCtion period.
Prior to approval of a grading plan or d. A Construciion Traffic Managernent Pian which inciudes mechanisms to reduce
issuance of demalition or building construction-related tra~c congestion which shall be implemented during grading and
permit, whichever occurs first; and, construction, including, but not l;mited to, the foliowing:
(1) Configure construction parking to minimize onsite and offsite traffic interterence.
(2) Minimize obstruction of through-tra~c lanes.
(3) Provide flagpersons to guide tra~c, as determined in the plan.
Prior to approval of the first grading e. A Trip Reduction Plan for construction crew vehicles shall be prepared to reduce potential
plan; and, vehicle trips on the road and identify parking locations for conslruction employees and
equipment.
Prior to issuance of the first building I f. A 7raffic Management Plan for phasing of raadwaN imc~rc~vements, specifying the
peRnit; and, sequencing of conslRaction to do the following:
(1) Coortiiinate sr,hedulisig with other infrastructure improvements to allow them to be
facilitated efficiently during roadway improvements, such as sewer, storm drain, and
water line improvements.
(2) Outline procedures for any required traffic de4ours durinp conslruction, including
provision of tour bus stops.
(3) Phase each roadway improvement to aliow access to all existing businesses. In
some instances this wili require lane-by-lane renovation, temporary bypass roads, or
tratfic reroutes.
(4) Employ vertical shoring as often as possible. This wili minimize the amount of road
surface that will be disturbed at a given location.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Jivision; Plar,ning
Depa~tmer~i, ^rianning
Division
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transpo~tation
Division
P~,~t~.aa
S-7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 14
,' ,: T~mmg <: ,
:,
;; >:
"
; ;
Measure ;
` `
: < r
:
l ~
es ons~ble';far
~
,
.
,
,:: , ,:: ....
;.>: ,..:: .. ,
,. .. ;:;: ;:•y _p , .:> ,;,: :. p
(5) Sequence the construction of each roadwa im rovement to minimize disru tion to ,
`Mnnito~ln ...:.
residents and businesses.
(6) Estahlish offsite parking and staging areas, where practical and possible, to
minimize the impact to existing level of service on adjacent roadways. These offsite
parking and staging areas will allow a dispersion of t~a~c flow to noncritical areas
and will encourage bussing of ~onstruction wo~kers from the offsite areas 4o the
construction sites.
(~ Identify how the project improvements construction schedules and haul routes wiil
be coordinated with other areawide improvements. The property owneNdeveloper
shall coorclinate with the Convention Center and area hotels to erisure continued
operations of these facilities, as well as the contir~ued op~~ation of the existing
Disneyland theme park and Disneyland Hotel.
Prior to issuance of the first buiidinc~
permit g. An Infrastructure Coorciination I'lan showing how the project improvement construction Public Works Department,
schedules and haul routes will be coordinated with other area~iide irrtprovements. Th.e Traffic and Transportatian
property owner/developer shall coordinate with adjacer~t uses to ensure continued Division
operations of these facilities, as well as the continued opera4ion of the existing Disneyland
theme park and Disneyland Hotel.
On-going during wnstruction The property owneddeveloper shall submit a quarte~iy update report showing constniclion Public Works Deparlment
activities forthe upcoming quarterwhich shall include traffic mitigation and control planning ,
Traffic and Transportation
an~ construclion scheduling. Division
Prior to approval of each grading
plan The prope~ty owneNdeveioper shall show how the proJect will be in compliance with the TraEfic
Miti
ii Public Works Department,
ga
on and Construction Phasing and Control Plan. Traffic and Transportation
Division and Development
Services Division
On-going during construction If Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim TMC personnel are required tn provide temporary Poiice Department; Pubiic
iraffic control senrices, the praperty owneNdeveloper shall reimburse the City, on a fair share Works Department
Traftic
basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. ,
and TransportaHon •
Divisian
pammplen.doc
3•7-97
Mitigation ~111onitoring Plan No. OU4
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 15
Timin9 ;'
,; „
, ,;. ;; Measure:
> <
;
;
? ;. y= ;
es
ponsibie for
`
:::,. .:<
;:
AIr Quali ; ;;
,„ ,
~
, . : ~
:
onitarin .. ...:.;
On-going during constrvction The following measures will be followed by 4he property owneNdeveloper to reduce air quality Planning Department,
impacts: Building Division; Pubiic
a. Nortnal wetting procedures or other dust palliative measures shall be foliowed during Works Department,
Deveiopment Servtces
eaKh-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City Division
of Anaheim Municipal Code.
b. Roadways adJacent to the pmject shall be swept and cleared of any spilled expoR materiai .
at least twice a day to assist ir~ minimiz(ng fugitive dust; haul routes shail be cleared as
needed if spills of material expo; ~~ .';om the project site occur.
c. Where practiceble, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in
operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repeti4iously entering
and exiting the projeat site.
d. Trucks importfng or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered prior to entering
public streets.
e. Manualiy irrigate or activate imgation systems necessary to water and maintain the
vegetation as soon as planting is compieted.
f. Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surtaces to 15 miles per hour or less.
g. Suspe~d all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25
miles per hour and during second stage smog alerts.
h. The proJect will comply with the SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts
offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricls
visible emissions irom construction.
i. Use low emission mobile construclion equipment (e.fl., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.)
where practicable.
j. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than
temporary power generators, where practicable.
k. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
I. Use low sutfur fuel for equfpment, to tfie extent practicable.
pnnm,~ten.aa
5-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 16
; Timing ; , ;; ;Measure; ;
.
;;
' ,:. ~> ,
,.
>
'
:
sponsible. for ;
_
,:.. ,,_:
On-going during construction ,
,
;: , ,:
,
i
,:.;, ,: ;: >; ' <,;:<
The property owneNdeveioper shall implement the following to limit emissions from
11Monitorln` ..,
Air Quality Management
architectural coatings and asphalt usage: District; Planning
a. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate. Depadment, Building
Division
b. Use soivent-based coatings, where they are necessary, in ways that minimize solvent
emissi~ns.
c. Encourage use of high-solid or water-based coatings.
On-going during constn~~: ~~ Ali construction contraclors shall comply with SCAQMD regutations, including Rule 4U2 which Air Quality Management
spec?.fies t~at no there be no dust impacts offsite su~cient to cause a nuisance, and SCAQMD District; Planning
Ru~e 4C3, which resi~icts visibie emessions from construction. Rule 403 was amended by the Department, Building
SCAC2Mln after preparation of The Disneyland P.esort EIR No. 311. Specific measures Division
contained in tne rule to reduce fugitive dust include the foIlQwEng
a. Apply chemical stabilizers to disturbad surtace areas (completed gra;l;y art~as) within five
days of completing grading or apply dust suppressants or vegetation sufficient t~ ~~?ntaln a
stabilized surface.
b. For open storage piies, apply water hourly or cover with temporary coverings.
c. Water exposed surfaces at teast twice a day under calm conditions and as often as needed
on windy days when winds are less than 25 miles per day or during very dry weather in
order to maintain a surface crust and prevent the release of visible emissfons from the
construction site.
d. Wash mud-covered tires and under-carriages of trucks leaving wnstNCtion sites.
e. Provide for street sweeping, as needed, on adjacent roadways to remove dirt dropped by
construction vehicles or mud which would atherwise be carried off by tn~cks dep~rting
project sites.
Nolse
On-gofng during demolition and Construction noise shall be limited by the property owner/developer to 60 dBA along the Planning Department
,
conslruction property boundaries before 7:00 a.m. and after 7:00 p.m. as govemEd by Chapter 6.7, Sound Build(ng Division and
Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Code Enforcement
Division
~n~~t~.aa
S•7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan Plo. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 17
Timing Measure : Responsibie for
.
;
r< :
' '
,
:
,
:.Monitortn
On-going during conslruction The property owneNdeveloper shall ensure that all intemal combustion engines on cor.struction Planning Department
,
e ui ment are fitted with ro erl + maintained mufflers. Buildin Division
H drolo and ErosFon
On-going during grading operations Tho property owner/developer shall implement standard practices from all applicable codes and Public Works Department
,
orciinances to pre~~ent erosion. Development ServicEs
Division
Frior to issuance of each grading The property owner/developer shall obtain required NPDES construction storm permits from Regional Water Quality
permit the State Water Resources Controi Board, if applicable. Copies of the Notice of Intent or Conlrol Board; Public
peRnits, as applicabie, shali be submitted to the City Engineer. Works Department,
Development Services
Divlsion
Hazardous Materlals
On-going during demolition and In the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or Air Quality Management
construction construction, the properiy owner/developer shail ensure thAt the identified hazardous waste Distrid; Orange County
andlor hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of Health Department;
Califomia Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter Planning Department
6.5), according to the requirements of !he Catifomia Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22, ,
Building Division; Fire
and the Uniform Fire Code, Articie 87. Department,
Envfronmental Protection
EMPLOYMENT, POPULATION, AND HO~SING
A en
On-going during Project operations The property owneddeveloper will aggressively recruit workers who are already part of the Planning Department
resident work force in the region. Implementation of The Disneytand Resort Speciftc Ptan will ,
Planning Dlvision
further efforts in offerin em lo ment o oitunities ai various socioeconomic levels
.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
Fire Protection
Prior to commencemeni of struclural
framing on each parcel or lot On-sile fire hyorants shall be installed and charged, as required, by the property
ownerldeveloper. Fire Department
Prior io approval of each grading The property owneddeveloper shall submit an emergency fire access plan to ensure that Fire Department
lan service to the site is in accordance with Fire De artment service re uirements
Prior to issuance of each building .
The property owner/developer shall submit a Const~uclion Fire Protection Plan whfch shail
Fire Department
permit include detafled desfgn plans for accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant
location, and any other constructfon features required by the Fire Marshal. The property
owneNdeveloE~er shall be responsible tor securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department
and h drants :~hall be o eraUonal with re uired fire tlow.
pnmmplan.doc
5-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. OOd
Project: Pointe:x;+~aheim
Timing
_ ». . ,_;`
::: . :...
Prior to issuance of each bui(ding Plans shall in~
permit; to be implemented pricrto installed by p~
each final buifding and zoning
ins ection
Prior to Issuance of each buildinp Plans shall bE
permit Fire Deparim
a. Overhe
b. Bridges
designt
c. All undi
entranc
Fire De
d. Adequa
private
numbai
review.
e. A minin
rates fo
Prior to issuance of the first building The property
permit Services Imp
16, 1995).
Prior to approval of stree4 The water sul
improvement plans sufficient fire
acoordance v
Prior to Qach final building and The property owneNdeveloper shali place Pmergency telephone service numbers in prominent Fire Department
zoning inspection locations as appraved by the Fire Department.
On-going during Project operations The proppriy c;wner/developer shali caordinate earlhquake train(ng with the Fire Department for Fire Department
hotei slaff tstd other employees.
purtunpim.doc
5-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 19
;; Timing , , , ; , Nfeasure.:
: Re§ponsibie;for
;
;: : ; , ,
.. : ; <
>;. ,.
<. : . < ~ . .: <, <::
:.; . .Monitorin..;:
Prior to issuance of each building The property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review Fire Departmen4
permit for hotels and approval. That plan shali require posted notices in ail hotel rooms on earthquake safety
procedures.
Police Servlces
Prior to issuance of the ftrst building Plans shall be submitied showing the location of a police/security office identifiable and easily Police Department
permit; and, accessible by the public (i.e., "store-fronY type of space) along with dedicated parking spaces
for Police Department empioyees working in the space within the project site to the satisfaclian
of the Police Department.
Prior to the first firial building and Said space shali be made available to the Police Department for permanent occupancy at no
zoning inspection cost to the City.
On-going during Project operations Property owner/developer shall staff the Project with the needed level of uniformed private Police Department
security officers working in pairs for patrol and surveillance of the facilities to the satisfaction of
the Pofice Departmeni, including possibiy 24-hour coverage.
Prior to issuance of each building The Police DepaAment shall review and approve the safety measures incorporated into the Police Department
permit pr~ject including the parking strvctures. The security measures shall include, but not be limited
to, closed circuit television surveillance/ cameras and recording equipment or other substitute
security measures as may be approved by the Roiice Department for the paricing
structures/facilities, lighting, and other defensibie space measures throughout the project, as
determined necessa b the Police De artment.
Solid Wasie
Prior to the tirst final zoning and The property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Director of Maintenance for Public Works Deparlment,
building inspection review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AS 93~, the Solid Waste Reduclion Streets and Sanitation
Act of 1989, as implemenied by the City of Anaheim, the County o( Orange fntegrated Waste Division
Management Plan, and the City o~ Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plan.
Prior to the first final zoning and A Solid Waste Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the property Public Works Department,
building inspection; and, owner/developer to ensure that the project plans comply with AB 939, as administered by City Streets and Sanitation
implemented during Project of Anaheim, and the Cnunty's and City's Integrated Waste Management Plans. Waste Division
operations management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation shall
include:
a. Detafiing the locations and design of solid waste and recyclables storage and collection
facilities.
pammplan.doc
5-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 20
Timing
< :Measure:
. . . , . .. ,
,: . . Responsibt~;for
Monitorin~`
,<
b. Compiying with all Federai, State, and City regulations for hazardous material disposal.
c. Participating in the City of Anaheim's voluntary "Recycle Anaheim" program or other
substitute program as may be developed by the City.
In orclerto meet the requirements of tha Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the
property owneddeveloper shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs including,
but not limited to, the following:
• Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and
recycling bins.
o Facilitating cardboard recycling (especiaily from retail areas) by providing adequate space
and centralized locations for collection and baling.
• Facilitating glass recyciing (especiaily from restaurants) by providing adequate space for
sorting and storing.
e Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials, ~vhenever feasibie, to reduce the
total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection.
• Prohibition of curbside pick-up within the Pointe Anaheim project.
e Rec clin of landsca e reen waste.
Schools
Prior to issuance of each building The properly ownedde~~eloper shall provide proof that schooi impact lees have been paid Planning Department,
permit consistent with State statute. Building Division
Prior to commencement of The property owneN developer shail coordinate with the Anaheim Union High School District to Pianning Depariment,
uses/activities authorized by incorporate a retail training program into the Project for interested high school seniors. Planning Division
Conditional Use Permit No. 4078;
and, on-going during Project
o erations
Prior to commencement of The propeRy owneN developer shall coorclinate with the school districts in Anaheim to Planning Department,
uses/activities authorized by incorporate a school program into the onsite theaters for the benefit of local school children. Planning Division
Conditional Use Permit No. 4078;
and, on-going during Project
operations
pammplen.doc
S-7•99
Mitigation Monitoring F`lan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anahelm
Page 21
Timing '; ';; '> ;;; < <Measure'
;;
; Res onstbie for
P ;
'> ;; ;; -;` ;; !:
: i
..,
_ , _... ;,
. , , ,,. ,;: . ;;;; : Manitorln ':
Water Service
Prior to issuance of each buiiding Among the water conservation measures to be shown cn plans and implemented by the Public Utilities
permit; to be implemented prior to property owneNdeveloper shall include the following: Depa~tment
Electric
final builtiing and zoning inspections ,
Services Administration,
Use of low-flaw sprinkler heads in irri~ation system Resource Efficiency;
Use of waterway re-circutation systems Community Services
Department, Parks
Low-flow fittings, fiMures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals Division
Use of self-closing vaives on drinking fountains
Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when t becomes available
Continuation of the existing cooling tower re-circulation system
Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use
moisture sensors
Low-flow shower heads in hotels
Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and otherwater-using
appliances
Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when ~v.~poration rates are lowest
Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarcling water conservation
Use of wa4er-conserving ;andscape plant materials wherever feasible
Use of vacuum and other equipment to reduce the use of water for washdown of exterior
areas
Prior to each final zoning and The property owneddeveloper shall submit a certified water audit for landscape irtigation Public Utilities
building inspection systems. Depar~ment, Electric
Serv(ces Administration,
Resource E~ciency
pammplan.doc
3-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 22
- Timin9
` . !. Measure:
,, , ;: ;,
_ ,: < ,
Res nnsibte:fo
; , P
Prior to issuance of the first building _: , <
The property owner/developer shall comply with the adopted Anaheim Resort Water Facilities Monitorin
Pubiic Utilities
permit Fee Program {Rule 15E of the Water Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations per Resolution No. Department, Water
95R-140, effective Se tember 1, 1995 . Services Division
Prior to approval of the Final Site The water backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shail be sh~wn on Public Utilities
Plan; and, prior to final building and plans to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Oepartment, Wafer Utilit~r Division, in either Department, Water
zoning inspections underground vauits or behind the Setback Realm area (n a manner i'ully screened from all Services Division
ubiic streets and aile s; and, the facilities wiil be installed in accorclance with lhe lans.
Prior to approval of the first Property owneNdeveloper shall enter into an ~greement recorded against the property with the Public Utilities
subdivision map or issuance of the City of Anaheim, to the satisfaction af 4he Utilities Department and City of Anaheim Attomey's DepaRment, Water
first grading permit or building Office, to guarantee the properiy owneddeveloper's participation In water system Services Division
permit, whichever occurs first improvements necessitated by the project. The agreement shall contain provisions requiring
the property owneddeveloper to pay or cause to be paid iis fair share funding for said
improvements and/or constrvct said improvements, if determined to be necessary by the
Utilities Department, with reimbursement by other beneficiaries in accordance with the Utility
Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Costs shall include the payment for consultanUcontractor
services forthe preliminary engineering, soils analysis, right-of-way acquisition, demolition,
construction and inspection, and any other related expenses. Further, the property
owneddeveloper shall submit an engineering report and phasing pian for review and approval
by the Utilities Department setting forth the extent and timing of the water system
improvements necessitat~d by the project for use in implementing the agreement. The
property owneddeveloper shall at all times pertorm its obligations as set forth in said
a reement.
Was4ewater/Sewer Servlce
Prior to the first final building and The property owneNdeveloper shalt comply with the Sewer Impact and Improvement Fee Public Worlcs Department,
zoning inspectian Program for the South Central City Area fper Ordfna~ce No. 5490 and Resolution No. 95R-60 Design Division
dated April 18, 1995). This SCASOS Fee Program applies to the sewer discharge generated
above the rate from the existing bu(Iding footprints (prior to demoliUon) and up to the maximum
of 639,000 peak gpd. This Fee Program does not apply and mitigate the need of the reverse
sewer line in Katella Avenue.
Prior to the first final building and A reverse-flow public sewer line shall be constructed in Katella Avenue from a point east of the Public Works Department,
zoning inspeciion I-5/Anaheim Boulevarci to State College Boulevard to accommodate the sewage ilow in excess Design Division
of that proJected from the land uses permitted by The Disneyiand Resort Speciiic Plan within
the boundaries of Pointe Anaheim, which cannot be accommodated by ccrrent capacity.
Line sizing and implementatfon of this measure will be as follows:
• Anatyze the Point~ Ah2heim sewer flows with the City's ~adated Basin S model to
determine local sewer impacts and downstream impacts to the Kateila sewe~ system.
~e,M,~~~.aa
5-7-99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Projecl: Pointe~kAnaheim
'fiming
• De:ermine the size and Iim
intercept and redirect flow:
• Coordinate 2-+.I anal sis, firn
Storm Drafns
Prior to issuance of the first building The property owner/developer s
permit Program for ihe South Central c
dated April 18, 1995); or, the ~i
ro ert owneNdeveloperprior~
Electricf
Prior to issuance of each buiiding T{~e property awner/developer s
permit will comply with the State ~ner~
PJanresidential Buildings (Tille 2
Prior to issuance of each building In order to conserve energy, the
peRnit; to be implemented prior to saving practices in compliance ~
each finai building and zoning
inspection • Consult~tion with tFie ~'s'.y en
conservation design feab~re:
• Use of high-efficiency air coi
sysiem fncluding fea!urA~; ~•u
economize; cycle, sequ:n2la
buEldfng demands, !soia4ion i
• Use of electric mc~tors desigi
~ Use of special ligh3i*~g fixtun
fluorescent fixtures !n place
• Use of T8 lamps and elP~i~o
li hting and parking tots,
Prior to issuance of the first building The property owner/deveioper:
permit substructures within the develo~
various uses within the develo
Prior to issuance of the first building The pmperty owneNdeveloper:
permit Rufes & Regulations for installation of backbone cabies, switches and related facilities to DepaRment, Eleclric
rovide alecl~ical distribution to the develo ment site. Services Administration
~~~t~,.a«
sa•~v
Mit~gation Monitoring Plan tvo. 004
P~oject: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 24
>: ' Timing ;
: ;, ':Measure
, ,, ;
r ReSpons~blefor
;;
;
_ , : .
. . <: : .. ,
'
> ;:
` Monitoiin
Prior to issuance of each building The property owner/developer shali pay fees in accordance with Anaheim's Electric Rates, Public Utilities
permit Rules and Regulatfons for electrical commercialfindustrial services for specific uses within the Department, Electric
development site. Services ,4dministration
Prior to the issuance of the first Anaiysis and validation of avaiiable electricity capacity will be conducted to the satisfaction of Public Utilities
building permit the Public Utilities Depa~tment and, if deemed necessary, additiona.l mitiga4ion will be provided Department, Electric
by the property owner/developer to the safisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, if the Services Administration
property owner/deveioper praposes to build the movie theater complex.
Nafural Gas
Frior to issuance of each building The property owneNdevelopar shall submit plans which shali ensure that buiidings are in Public Utilities
permit conforrnance with the State Energy Conservation Standarcis for nonresidentia! '~"ding (Title Department, Electric
24, Part 6, Article 2, Califomia Adminisirative Code). Services Administration,
Resource Efficienc
Prior to each final building and The property owneddeveloper shall implement a program (The Southem Califomia Gas Planning Department,
zoning inspection Company has developed several ~rograms which are intendeci to assist in the selection of the BuiS~ing Division
mosl energy-efficient water hea:ers and fumaces.), as required, to reduce the demand on
natural gas supplies.
TelevJsfon S~rvice!Rece tion
Prior to issuance of the first building A pre-project study of area television reception shall be undertaken by the property Planning Department,
permit owner/developer ia determine baseline conditions; and, six months after topping out, a follow- Planning Division
up study of area telerrision reception shall be undertaken immediately bN the property
owneddeveloper. if the City of Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a
significant impact on broadcast television reception at local residences, a signal booster or
relay system shali be installed on the roof of the tailest project buildinp to restore broadcast
television rece tion to its ori inaf ~ondition as soon as racticable.
HAZARDOUS PAATERIALS
Pric~ to approval ~f the first grading Investigation for the presence of cryptic tanks using geophysical methods shall be conducted in Fire pepartment,
plan or issuance of the first the subject area forthe property owner/developer by a qualified environmental professional ir~ Environmental Protection
demolition permit, whichever occws the areas of former service stations and those areas known or thought to have been forn~erly Section
first occupisd by USTs and where tank removaf has not been verified prior to excavation or grading
in these areas.
Soii sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soi! sampiing resuits are nct
available or indicate contamination is present above regu~atory guidelines. If warranted,
subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these areas, and appropriate
remediation measures developed, if necessary, before demol~tion, excavation, or grading takes
lace in these areas.
panmplan.doc
5-7-99
Niitigation ~llonitoring Pian No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 25
i' Timin9 ; !
'
, ;: ,.
! ' Measure~:
;
:
'
esponsible<for
:
<
Prior to removal of underground ir ! ,
, <
A permit shail be obtained from the Environmental Protection Sectian of the Fire Department ' Monitorin:
Fire Department
tanks
for removat of underground tanks by the property owner/developer. During removal of the ,
Environmental Protection
underground storage tank, a representative from the Fire Department, Environmental Section
Protection Section, shall be onsite ta direct soil sam lin .
On-going during remediation Remediation activities conducted on behalf of the prope~ty owneddeveloper of surtace or Orange County Health
subsurface contaminaiion not related to USTs shali be overseen by the Orange County i-ieaith Depa~tment; Public
Department. Information on subsurface contamination from an underground storage tank shall Utilities Depa~tment,
be provided to the Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Water Services
Services. Administratior„
Environmental Services
Prior to approval of the first grading 7he property owneddeveloper shall submit a plan for review and approval of the Fire Fire Department
plan or issuance of the first
Department, which details procedures that will be taken if a previously unknown lJST or ~ther ,
Environmental Protection
demolition permit, whichever occurs unknown hazardous materials or waste is discovered onsite. Section; Orange County
f ~ Health Department
Prior to relocation of any The transformers s4iall be tested by the property owner/daveloper for PCBs. Public Utilities
transformers within the ProJect DepaRment
Etectric
boundaries that may contain PCBs
which are being moved or relocated ,
Seriices Administration
as art of ro'ect develo ment
Prior to approval of a grading plan A subsurtace investigation and sampling, if needed, shail be undertaken by a qualified Public Utilities
environmental professional for the property owneNdeveloper to the satisfaction of the Public DepaRment, Water
Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmentai Services, to determine if
the former Chevron station's USTs and/or business practices have environmeniali
im
acted Services AdminiMrafion,
E
i
t
l S
y
p
the subject property. nv
ronmen
a
ervices
Prior to approval of a grading plan A physical inspection of the interiors of 1731-1741 and 1751-1755 South Ciementine Street (to Orange County Health
be renamed "Freedman 1,Nay'~, as well as the surcour~ding grounds, shall be conducted by a Department; Fire
qualifiEd environmental professional for the property owneddeveloper to the satisfaction ot the Department,
Orange County Health Department/Anaheim Fire Department to accurately assess any Environmental Protection
potential presence of hazarclous waste materials at said properties. Where possible, interviews Section
with property owners and/or company representatives shall be conducted to obtain information
on the hazardous material usage histories and handling praclices of 4he sites and, if available,
copies of contaminant investigation repoRs shall be reviewed to evaluate the presence and
level of hazardous substances in the so(I at each propeRy. The results of this investigation
shall be submitted to the Orange County Heaith Department and the Anaheim Fire Department
for review and approval.
~artunp~an.ao~
5-7-99
Mitigafion Monitoring Pian No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 26
Timin9 . ;
; .
'
,
,; < ;'Measure:
;; , , °i
;
_ ;;
spons~ e or
;
, :. < <; ;.::
,:: , ,
, .. . . _ ,, ; ; ,.
;; ,
~: Mqnitorin
,.,.
If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified
environmental professional in coordination with the Orange County Health Department.
Appropriate remediation measures shall be developed, if necessary, before demolition,
excavation, or grading take place in these areas.
On-going during abatement of LBP All aspecls of Title 8, Califomia Cod2 of Regulation, § 1523.1 shall apply. These inciude Fire Department,
manuai demolition, manual scraping, manual sanding, heat gun applications, general cleanup, Environmentai Protection
~ower tool cleaning with dust collection systems, and spray painting. At a minimum, haif-mask Section
air purafying respirators shall be utilized during these fypes of tasks. In addiiion, all other
aspects of Title 8, Califomia Code of Regulations, § 1523.1 shall apply. These include
employee exposure assessment respiratory protection program, prater,tive clothing,
housekeeping, hygiene facilities and practices, medical surveilfance program, proper employee
training in the hazards of working with lead-containing materials, posting of waming signs,
engineering controis, employer record keeping observation monitoring, and observation
procedures.
On-going during demolition Appropriate disposai of lead and other hazarclous materials to landfill shall be required, Fire Department,
depending on waste characterization. The State of Caiifomia requires that ali waste streams be Environmental Protection
characterized based on Waste Extra~tion Tests (WE'n, such as total Soluble Threshold Limit Section
Concentrations STLC , to determine a ro riate dis osal facilit and rocedures.
VISUAL RESOfJRCES AND AESTHE TICS
Prior to approval of the Final Site The property owneNdeveioper shall submit plans which illustrate that atl mechanical equipment Planning Department
Plan; to be implemented prior to
and trash areas for the subject buildings wiil be screened from adjacent public streets. ,
Planning Division
final buildina and zonin ins ections
Prior to epproval of the Finai Site The property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation pian. This plan shall be Planning Department
Pian
prepared by a Iicensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall include a phasing plan ,
Planning ~ivision
for the installation and mainienance of landscaping associated with the Final Site Pian.
Prior to the final building and zoning The property owneddeveloper shall participate in a landscape a,ssessment and maintenance City AHcmey's Otfice
inspection district, as adopted for the Anaheim ResoR.
Prior to submittal of the Final Site If the height of any building onsite is higher than shown on the conceptual plans/exhibits Planning Department
Plan
submitted in connection with Condilional Use Permit No. 4078, the property owneNdevetoper ,
Planning D:vision
shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning Department for review and 2pproval
demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would not create significant shade and shadow
impacts on adjacent land uses. A significant ~hade and shadow impacl woutd occur when
outdoor active areas (e.g., eating ar.~as along Harbor Boulevarci, hotel/motel swimming pool
areas etc. o~ structures that inciude sensitive uses e. „ residences have windows thac
punmplen.doc
S-7•99
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 27
normaily receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight
hours. '.f !h~ a~alysis identifies shade and/or shadow impacts would occur and the building
setback, architectural mas.sing and landscape requirements provisions set forih in Section 5.0,
Desigr~ F'lan of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, do not function as feasible mitigation
measures, additional technical review of the stNCture(s) will be required. The height of all
structures shall not exceed the maximum height permitted by The Disneyland Resort Specific
Pian.
Prior to approval of the Final Site The property owner/developer shall submit plans which detail th•a lighting system for the Plannin~ Department,
Plan proposed project. The systems shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to Planning Division
conceal light sources to the extent feasible to minimize light spiilage and glare to the adjacent
uses. The plans shali be prepared and signed by a licensed electricai engineer, with a letter
from the en ineer statin that, in the o inion of the en ineer, this re uirement has been met.
CUL7URAL RESOURCES
Prior to approval of each grading The property owner/developer shall submit a letter identif~ing the certified archaeologist that Public Works Department,
plan has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: Development Services
Division
a. The archaeologist must be present at the pregradinp conference in order to establish
procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacls are uncovered.
If artifacts are uncAVered and determined to b2 significant, the archaeological observer
shali determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for
( exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process wiil be donated to an
appropriate educational or research institution.
c. Any ar~haeologicai work at the site shall be conducted under the direction uf the certified
archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the
archaeological monitor is not present, grading shali be diverted around the area until the
monitor can survey the area.
d. A final report detaiUng the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submltted to
the City Engfneer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City
as to when the final report will be submifted.
punmplnndoc
S-7•99
Mitigation htonitoring Plan No. 004
Project: Pointe~Anaheim
Page 28
i; Timin9 ; ;;;
;:
::
,:
! ; Measure;
, ; ':~ ; ':
:
esponsible;for
,
;
,,:
, :;_ ; . .:.::,..
Prior to approvai of each grading , ,..
, ,;- ; :
-
. ,:;: . ;. _
' `
The property owner/developer shali submit a letter identifying the certffied paleontologist that
Monitorin' ,
Public Works Department
plan
has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: ,
Development Services
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pregrading conference in orcler to establish Division
procedures to temporarily hait or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and
evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If
artifacts are uncovered and found to be si~nificant, the paleontological observer shall
determine appropriate aclions in cooperation with the propeRy owneddeveloper for
exploration and/ar salvage.
• b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an
appropriate educational researot~ inslitution.
c. Any paleentological work at the site shall be conducted under ihe direction of the certified
paleontologist. If any fossils are discover~d during grading operations when the
paleontelogical monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the
monitor can survey the area.
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted.
Upon completion of the grading, the patsontologist shall notiry the City as to when the
final report will be submitted.
ENERGY
Prior to issuance of each building 7he property owner;Je~~ploper shail demonstrate on plans that fuel-efficient models of gas- Pianning Department,
ermit
r
d b
ld
p
po~n
ere
ui
ing equipmant have been incorporated into the proposed project to the extent 9uilding Division
feasibte.
pemmpls~.doc
5-7-97