RA2005/06/07
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
JUNE 7, 2005
The Anaheim Redevelopment Agency met in regular session in the Chambers of the
Anaheim City Hall located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard.
Present: Chairman Curt Pringle, Agency Members: Richard Chavez, Lorri Galloway, Bob
Hernandez, and Harry Sidhu
Staff Present: City Manager David Morgan, City Attorney Jack White, and Secretary
Sheryll Schroeder
A copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency was posted
on June 3, 2005 at the City Hall outside bulletin board.
At 5: 16 P.M., Chairman Pringle called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency to order for a joint session with Anaheim Council and Anaheim Housing Authority.
ADDITIONSIDELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
No remarks offered during the joint Agency/Council/Housing Authority public comment
session related to the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency. The Housing Authority and
Council meeting were recessed to consider the Agency Consent Calendar.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1 - 4.1:
Chairman Pringle requested continuation of Item 4.1, along with a companion measure
added to the Council agenda and with no objection from the Agency members, the item
was continued to June 14, 2005.
Agency Member Chavez removed Item 1 for separate discussion.
Agency Member Hernandez moved to approve the balance of the consent calendar,
seconded by Agency Member Sidhu. Roll Call vote: Ayes - 5; Chairman Pringle, Agency
Members: Chavez, Galloway, Hernandez, and Sidhu. Noes - O. Motion carried.
2. Approve and authorize the Executive Director to execute a Cooperation
3516 Agreement with the City to facilitate the development of public utilities facilities and
implement redevelopment of the Downtown area (related to Agency Item #24).
3. Approve and authorize the Executive Director to execute a Cooperation
3517 Agreement with the City and the Anaheim Housing Authority for the purpose of
acquiring land for future housing projects (OCT A Crescent and Wilshire remnant
housing parcels) (related to Agency Item #6 and Agency Item #23).
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
June 7, 2005
Page 2
4. Approve minutes of the Agency meeting held May 24, 2005.
4.1 Approve and authorize the Executive Director to execute the Cooperation
Agreement dated June 1,2005 between the City of Anaheim, City of Yorba Linda
and the Redevelopment Agency for the Savi Ranch/Weir Canyon Traffic
Improvements (related to Agency Item #36.1).
Item 4.1 continued to June 14, 2005.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Approve and authorize the Executive Director to execute a Purchase and Sale and
3515 Loan Agreement with Orange County Transportation Agency, in the amount of
$14,441,000, for the purchase of 19 freeway remnant parcels.
Chairman Pringle indicated this item was a purchase and sale and loan agreement with
Orange County Transportation Authority for 19 parcels that aCTA owned adjacent or near
the 1-5 Freeway. These parcels were part of the widening project which aCTA or Caltrans
had purchased and now were in the possession of aCTA and were before the Agency for
consideration in one single purchase agreement with OCT A.
Agency Member Chavez asked for clarification as Item 1 listed 19 parcels for purchase
while Item 3 referred to an additional purchase of another parcel and yet the additional
purchase was listed as one of the 19 parcels in Item 1. Elisa Stipkovich, Director of
Community Development, explained Item 1 was actually the agreement between the
Agency and OCTA while Item 3 was an inter-City agreement between the City of Anaheim
and the Redevelopment Agency and the Housing Authority. She commented the
Redevelopment Agency purchased the property in Item 1, and in Item 3 there was a
transfer of affordable housing funds for the purchase.
Chairman Pringle pointed out this was the first time aCTA had bundled properties and
sold them under such an agreement and that City staff worked to get them grouped to
insure all the remnant properties were purchased by the City. He also remarked in most
cases the parcels would be available for private use and in some cases, a specific City
use with three, if not more sites, available for housing. Responding to Chairman Pringle,
Ms. Stipkovich confirmed parcels two and three would be put out for a Request for
Proposal to ask developers to propose ideas for affordable housing as was mentioned
earlier in the affordable housing workshop. The RFP would go out specifically to non-
profit developers and specifically for multi-family rental for low income families. Chairman
Pringle inquired why these would be restricted to non-profit groups and Ms. Stipkovich
responded that previous RFP's were limited to for-profit developers and the decision was
made to submit to non-profit for these proposals and was staff's recommendation at this
point, however, Council had the ability to change that decision. Chairman Pringle felt the
Agency should get as big a list of potential developers as possible but would not be
averse to giving preference to a non-profit provider if a similar proposal was offered.
Agency Member Sidhu concurred in not restricting the RFP to one group of developers
and opening it up the largest number of offers.
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
June 7,2005
Page 3
Chairman Pringle inquired if each parcel was going to be offered individually through the
RFP process. Ms. Stipkovich indicated she was proposing to put three parcels together in
one RFP for multi-family rental units, included two of the 19 parcels listed and one other
the City owned. She indicated developers would have the option to submit on all three or
on only one parcel. This combining was done as staff had found when the Agency
combined a larger site with a smaller site, better cost efficiencies were received although
the RFP would clearly state it would not be an obligation for a developer to submit
proposals on all three parcels.
Agency Member Chavez moved to approve Item 1, seconded by Agency Member
Hernandez. Roll Call vote: Ayes - 5; Chairman Pringle, Agency Members Chavez,
Galloway, Hernandez and Sidhu; Noes - O. Motion Carried
At 5:56 P.M., Chairman Pringle recessed the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to
reconvene the Anaheim Housing Authority. At 6:00 P.M. Chairman Pringle reconvened
the Redevelopment Agency in a joint session with the Council and Housing Authority for a
public hearing.
PUBLIC HEARING:
8. A joint public hearing to consider an Amended and Restated Cooperation
2809 Agreement between the Anaheim Housing Authority, Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency, and Anaheim City Council for affordable housing on South Vine Street
between East Broadway and East Santa Ana Street.
Approve and authorize the Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency to
execute a Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority and the City to
acquire properties for future affordable housing on South Vine Street between East
Broadway and East Santa Ana Street.
Elisa Stipkovich, Director of Community Development, reported Item 8 was an
amendment to a cooperative agreement between three entities, the Housing Authority, the
Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. She explained the Redevelopment Agency
had been acquiring properties on the site on South Vine Street between East Broadway
and East Santa Ana Street over the last couple of years finalizing the acquisition process
in October 2004. The Housing Authority was the entity to ultimately own the property
acquired for the purpose of constructing very low income multi-family rental housing. She
remarked the City had an exclusive right to negotiate with Mercy Housing and had been
working with them for some time and that the amendment was to allow additional funding,
if needed, to go into the project. She explained if extraordinary costs were incurred in the
development of this project, $700,000 of HOME funds and $1.4 million of Redevelopment
set aside monies would be added.
In addition, the property was to be conveyed to the Housing Authority and approval was
requested of a Disposition and Development Agreement between the Housing Authority
and Mercy Housing. The Agreement would authorize a long-term ground lease to Mercy
Housing to develop 60 units of very low income housing for families contingent upon their
receipt of tax credits being allocated in July 2005.
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
June 7,2005
Page 4
Ms. Stipkovich further stated if extraordinary costs were incurred and additional funding
needed, the agreement authorized the first $350,000 to be taken from the developer fee to
be repaid out of cash flow, and authorized the additional funding up to $2.1 million, if
necessary, to be put in the form of a loan to be paid back over the 55-year period.
Ms. Stipkovich indicated the total cost for the Redevelopment Agency both for land,
demolition and relocation was approximately $3.4 million which included some interest
costs on the source of funding for the acquisition and if the $2.1 million was needed, the
total would reflect $5.5 million for the project.
The Community Development Director recommended approval of the amendment to the
Cooperative Agreement and also approval of the Housing Authority Disposition and
Development Agreement with the precaution included in the agreement that the Housing
Authority would have the right to modify plans and specifications to insure cost
containment.
Agency Member Sidhu asked why the cost increased from the $700,000 originally
estimated to $1.4 million for the project. Ms. Stipkovich did not feel the costs had
increased but that the request for additional funding related to the developer's level of
confidence in the cost estimate used by Keyser Marston, the City's real estate economist
who prepared the estimate. Mercy Housing was concerned that the estimate was too low
and costs were difficult to project due to the fluctuation in commodities and labor. In
exchange for agreeing to additional funding if needed, Ms. Stipkovich requested the City
have the ability to bring the project in as reasonable as possible to which the developer
agreed. Agency Member Sidhu questioned whether other bids were received and if not,
why the exclusive contract with Mercy Housing. Ms. Stipkovich indicated the City had
been working with Mercy Housing for a multi-family project in West Anaheim but due to
changes that had occurred, the site was no longer able to accommodate multi-family
units. Rather than try to change the overlay zoning for that site, the City indicated they
would work with Mercy Housing to locate another suitable site in the City. Agency
Member Sidhu asked how the City would know if reasonable costs were received for the
60 units. Ms. Stipkovich indicated this would be an open book project, the City would be
reviewing every subcontractor, would work with Mercy Housing on the design
development drawings to go out to bid and get on-going cost estimates during the
process. Agency Member Sidhu asked what the developer would receive to build the
project and Ms. Stipkovich replied Mercy Housing would receive $1.4 million. She
indicated she had discussed reducing the developer fee when the costs increased from
$700,000 to $1.4 million and Mercy Housing had preferred not to do so at the time.
Agency Member Sidhu stated he did not object to Mercy Housing as the developer but
preferred a competitive bid process to get the best cost for the City. Ms. Stipkovich
indicated she was recommending approval of the agreement due to the time frame for the
State tax credit allocation in July as there would not be adequate time to seek other
proposals at this point.
Chairman Pringle opened the public hearing.
Ben Phillips, Regional Associate Director for Mercy Housing, stated their mission was to
provide quality, affordable, program-enriched housing specifically for families who had
very low incomes. As to the reason for additional funding for this project, Mr. Phillips
pointed to the impact booming economy in China had on construction materials and the
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
June 7,2005
Page 5
impacts of the war in Iraq, as well as increased workers compensation insurance.
Because of those increased costs and Mercy Housing's conservative cost estimating
practices, the firm had come to an agreement with the City which put control over the cost
of the project as much in the City's hand as in Mercy Housing with the total amount being
capped and any dollars beyond that amount would be at the risk of Mercy Housing.
Scott Darrell, Director of Kennedy Commission, reported that many members of the
community were present during the earlier workshop on affordable housing and asked
that he express their support for this project.
With no other comments offered, Chairman Pringle closed the hearing.
Agency Member Hernandez indicated he was pleased with the Mercy Housing work
product and felt the final negotiations were inventive and showed the commitment on both
parties to come to agreement toward providing affordable housing without imposing
constraints on building contractors.
Agency Member Chavez thanked staff and Mercy Housing for coming to agreement and
moved to approve the Amended and Restated Cooperation Agreement and to authorize
the Executive Director to execute the Cooperative Agreement with the Housing Authority
and the City.
Chairman Pringle remarked that he might not have been supportive of this project if it was
not for the innovative elements drafted by Ms. Stipkovich which allowed the City greater
oversight as to cost containment. He pointed out over $5 million of property tax dollars
would be invested in this single project for 60 units and was necessary for the very low
income families but that Council should ensure opportunities were available for people all
across the housing spectrum.
Agency Member Sidhu confirmed that if the tax credit allocation was not received on this
go-around, the entire project would then go out to bid.
Roll Call vote: Ayes - 5; Chairman Pringle, Agency Members Chavez, Galloway,
Hernandez and Sidhu; Noes - o. Motion Carried
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, Chairman Pringle adjourned the Anaheim
Redevelopment Agency meeting at 6:25 P.M.
~~~~
Sheryll Schroeder, MMC
Secretary, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency